"Bleeding in the jungle"

Laboratory hemostasis: from biology to the bench

Physiological hemostasis is an intricate biological system, where procoagulant and anticoagulant forces interplay and preserves blood fluidity when blood vessels are intact, or trigger clot formation to prevent excessive bleeding when blood vessels are injured. The modern model of hemostasis is divided into two principal phases. The first, defined as primary hemostasis, involves the platelet-vessel interplay, whilst the second, defined as secondary hemostasis, mainly involves coagulation factors, damaged cells and platelet surfaces, where the so-called coagulation cascade rapidly develops. The activation and amplification of the coagulation cascade is finely modulated by the activity of several physiological inhibitors. Once bleeding has been efficiently stopped by blood clot formation, dissolution of the thrombus is essential to restore vessel permeability. This process, known as fibrinolysis, also develops through coordinate action of a vast array of proteins and enzymes. An accurate diagnosis of hemostasis disturbance entails a multifaceted approach, encompassing family and personal history of hemostatic disorders, accurate collection of clinical signs and symptoms, integrated with laboratory hemostasis testing. Regarding laboratory testing, a reasonable approach entails classifying hemostasis testing according to cost, complexity and available clinical information. Laboratory workout may hence initiate with some rapid and inexpensive "screening" tests, characterized by high negative predictive value, then followed by second- or third-line analyses, specifically aimed to clarify the nature and severity of bleeding or thrombotic phenotype. This article aims to provide a general overview of the hemostatic process, and to provide some general suggestions to optimally facilitate laboratory hemostasis testing.

Comparison of von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity levels determined by HemosIL AcuStar assay and HemosIL LIA assay with ristocetin cofactor assay by aggregometry

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of von Willebrand disease (VWD) requires quantitative as well as qualitative determination of von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels. For functional assessment of VWF, ristocetin cofactor assay by aggregometry is considered to be the gold standard. However, need for technical expertise, labour intensiveness, difficult standardization and high intra- and inter- assay variabilities are some of the limitations of this methodology. Various assays for determination of VWF adhesive function using different methodologies have been developed in recent years.

AIM

To evaluate the HemosIL AcuStar chemiluminescence assay (VWF:RCo[Acu]) and the HemosIL latex immunoassay (VWF:act) as diagnostic tests for VWD and identification of type 2 VWD in comparison with the ristocetin cofactor assay performed by aggregometry (VWF:RCo[Agg]).

METHODS

Results from 96 samples analysed by VWF:RCo[Acu] and 128 samples by VWF:act were compared with VWF:RCo[Agg]. Sixty of these samples (25 normal, 17 type 1 and 18 type 2) were analysed by all three assays.

RESULTS

VWF:RCo[Acu] showed excellent agreement with VWF:RCo[Agg], and readily identified all type 2 VWD samples tested. VWF:act showed reasonable agreement with VWF:RCo[Agg] for most patients, but had a slightly lower sensitivity for detection of type 2 VWD.

CONCLUSION

VWF:RCo[Acu] assay has the potential to replace VWF:RCo[Agg] for the diagnosis of VWD.