t(9;22) as secondary alteration in core-binding factor de novo acute myeloid leukemia

Concurrent BCR-ABL1 and core binding factor beta rearrangement in de novo acute myeloid leukemia: A case report and review of literature

A distinct subset of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is characterized by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph+), due to reciprocal translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). This chromosomal rearrangement leads to the fusion of the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) gene on chromosome 22 with the ABL1 gene on chromosome 9, generating the BCR::ABL1 fusion gene. The Ph+ AML subtype is associated with poor prognosis and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Beyond the well-established BCR::ABL1 fusion, recent studies have shed light on additional genetic abnormalities in Ph+ AML, including associations with rearrangements involving core binding factor beta (CBFB). We describe a case of de novo AML with concurrent BCR::ABL1 and CBFB::MYH11 rearrangements.

A novel subclonal rearrangement of the STRN3::PDGFRB gene in de novo acute myeloid leukemia with NPM1 mutation and its leukemogenic effects

Chromosome translocations in the 5q31-33 region are associated with a range of hematologic malignancies, some of which involve the platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRB) gene. We report a case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a mutation in the NPM1 gene (NPM1-mut AML) and a subclonal gene rearrangement involving the PDGFRB gene. We identified a novel fusion gene, STRN3::PDGFRB, resulting from t(5;14) (q32;q12) chromosomal rearrangement. Sequential FISH confirmed that ~15% of leukemic cells carried the PDGFRB gene rearrangement, which suggests that STRN3::PDGFRB is a previously unreported fusion gene in a subclone. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing confirmed that the fusion gene consisted of STRN3 exon 7 fused to PDGFRB exon 11, resulting in a chimeric protein containing the coiled-coil domain of striatin-3 and the transmembrane and intracellular tyrosine kinase domains of the PDGFRB. The new protein exhibited distinct cytoplasmic localization and had leukemogenic effects, as demonstrated by its ability to transform Ba/F3 cells to growth factor independence and cause a fatal myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN)-like disease in mice, which then transformant to T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma in secondary recipients. Ba/F3 cells expressing STRN3::PDGFRB or ETV6::PDGFRB were sensitive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and selinexor, but in vitro experiments showed that the combination of imatinib and selinexor had a marked synergistic effect, although only the imatinib alone group could prolong the survival of T-cell blast transformation recipient mice. Our findings demonstrate the leukemogenic effects of the novel fusion gene and provide insights into the clone evolution of AML, which can be influenced by therapy selection. Furthermore, our results provide insight into the potential therapeutic options for patients with this type of mutation, as well as the need for careful consideration of treatment selection to prevent undesirable side effects.

Deciphering Potential Molecular Signatures to Differentiate Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with BCR::ABL1 from Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) in Blast Crisis

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with BCR::ABL1 has recently been recognized as a distinct subtype in international classifications. Distinguishing it from myeloid blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia (BC-CML) without evidence of a chronic phase (CP), remains challenging. We aimed to better characterize this entity by integrating clonal architecture analysis, mutational landscape assessment, and gene expression profiling. We analyzed a large retrospective cohort study including CML and AML patients. Two AML patients harboring a BCR::ABL1 fusion were included in the study. We identified BCR::ABL1 fusion as a primary event in one patient and a secondary one in the other. AML-specific variants were identified in both. Real-time RT-PCR experiments demonstrated that CD25 mRNA is overexpressed in advanced-phase CML compared to AML. Unsupervised principal component analysis showed that AML harboring a BCR::ABL1 fusion was clustered within AML. An AML vs. myeloid BC-CML differential expression signature was highlighted, and while ID4 (inhibitor of DNA binding 4) mRNA appears undetectable in most myeloid BC-CML samples, low levels are detected in AML samples. Therefore, CD25 and ID4 mRNA expression might differentiate AML with BCR::ABL1 from BC-CML and assign it to the AML group. A method for identifying this new WHO entity is then proposed. Finally, the hypothesis of AML with BCR::ABL1 arising from driver mutations on a BCR::ABL1 background behaving as a clonal hematopoiesis mutation is discussed. Validation of our data in larger cohorts and basic research are needed to better understand the molecular and cellular aspects of AML with a BCR::ABL1 entity.

NPM1 Mutated, BCR-ABL1 Positive Myeloid Neoplasms: Review of the Literature

Breakpoint cluster region - Abelson (BCR-ABL1) chimeric protein and mutated Nucleophosmin (NPM1) are often present in hematological cancers, but they rarely coexist in the same disease. Both anomalies are considered founder mutations that inhibit differentiation and apoptosis, but BCR-ABL1 could act as a secondary mutation conferring a proliferative advantage to a pre-neoplastic clone. The 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification lists the provisional acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with BCR-ABL1, which must be diagnosed differentially from the rare blast phase (BP) onset of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), mainly because of the different therapeutic approach in the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Here we review the BCR/ABL1 plus NPMc+ published cases since 1975 and describe a case from our institution in order to discuss the clinical and molecular features of this rare combination, and report the latest acquisition about an occurrence that could pertain either to the rare AML BCR-ABL1 positive or the even rarer CML-BP with mutated NPM1 at the onset. Differential diagnosis is based on careful analysis of genotypic and phenotypic features and anamnestic, clinical evolution, and background data. Therapeutic decisions must consider the broader clinical aspects, the comparatively mild effects of TKI therapy versus the great benefit that might bring to most of the patients, as may be incidentally demonstrated by our case history.