UGT1A1 genotype does not affect tyrosine kinase inhibitors efficacy and safety in chronic myeloid leukemia

Preclinical safety, toxicokinetics and metabolism of BIIB131, a novel prothrombolytic agent for acute stroke

BIIB131, a small molecule, is currently in Phase 2 for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Safety and metabolism of BIIB131 were evaluated following intravenous administration to rats and monkeys. Exposure increased dose-proportionally in rats up to 60 mg/kg and more than dose-proportionally in monkeys at greater than 10 mg/kg accompanied by prolonged half-life and safety findings. The BIIB131 was poorly metabolized in microsomes with no inhibition of CYPs. BIIB131-glucuronide, formed by UGT1A1, accounted for 21.5% metabolism in human hepatocytes and 28-40% in rat bile. In rats, excretion was primarily via the bile. BIIB131 inhibited the hERG and Nav1.5 cardiac channels by 39% but showed no effect on cardiovascular parameters in monkeys. Toxicology findings were limited to reversable hematuria, changes in urinary parameters and local effects. A MTD of 30 mg/kg was established in monkeys, the most sensitive species, at total plasma Cmax and AUC of 6- and 14-fold, respectively, greater than the NOAEL. The Phase 1 study started with intravenous 0.05 mg/kg and ascended to 6.0 mg/kg which corresponded to safety margins of 147- to 0.9-fold (for Cmax) within the linear drug exposure. Thus, the preclinical profile of BIIB131 has been appropriately characterized and supports its further clinical development.

Relationship between achievement of major molecular response or deep molecular response and nilotinib plasma concentration in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving first-line nilotinib therapy

PURPOSE

We evaluated the plasma exposure and response relationships of nilotinib for patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in real-world practice.

METHODS

For the 26 patients enrolled in this study, at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after nilotinib administration, the trough plasma concentrations (C_trough) of nilotinib were analyzed. The relationships between nilotinib C_trough and the molecular response to nilotinib treatment at each point (each n = 26) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median nilotinib C_trough values were significantly higher in patients with a major molecular response (MMR) at 3 months than in patients without an MMR (809 and 420 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.046). Based on the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, the threshold value of the nilotinib C_trough at 3 months for predicting MMR achievement was 619 ng/mL at the best sensitivity (71.4%) and specificity (77.8%). Patients with a nilotinib C_trough of above 619 ng/mL had a significantly shorter time to achievement of a deep molecular response (DMR; 9.0 and 18.0 months, respectively; P = 0.020) and higher rates of DMR by 2 years in Kaplan-Meier plots (P = 0.025) compared with that in patients with a nilotinib C_trough of less than 619 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

For patients with newly diagnosed CML, the nilotinib dose may be adjusted using a C_trough of above 619 ng/mL as the minimum effective concentration, i.e., the lowest concentration required for MMR or DMR achievement within a shorter time, during early stages after beginning therapy to obtain faster and deeper clinical responses.

Is dose modification or discontinuation of nilotinib necessary in nilotinib-induced hyperbilirubinemia?

Nilotinib is a specific breakpoint cluster region-Abelson leukemia virus-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is used as an effective first- or second-line treatment in imatinib-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients. Hepatotoxicity due to nilotinib is a commonly reported side effect; however, abnormal liver function test (LFT) results have been reported in asymptomatic cases. When alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels are more than five-fold the upper limit of the normal (ULN) or when the serum total bilirubin level is more than three-fold the ULN, dose modification or discontinuation of nilotinib is recommended, resulting in decreased levels of hematological indicators in certain patients with CML. Nilotinib-induced hyperbilirubinemia typically manifests as indirect bilirubinemia without elevated ALT or AST levels. Such abnormal liver functioning is thus not attributed to the presence of a true histologic lesion of the liver. The underlying mechanism may be related to the inhibition of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase activity. Therefore, nilotinib dose adjustment is not recommended for this type of hyperbilirubinemia, and in the absence of elevated liver enzyme levels or presence of abnormal LFT findings, physicians should consider maintaining nilotinib dose intensity without modifications.

UGT1A1 Guided Cancer Therapy: Review of the Evidence and Considerations for Clinical Implementation

Simple Summary

The use of multi-gene testing platforms to individualize treatment is rapidly expanding into routine oncology practice. UGT1A1, which encodes for the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 enzyme, is commonly included on multi-gene molecular testing assays. UGT1A1 polymorphisms may influence drug-induced toxicities of numerous medications used in oncology. However, guidance for incorporating UGT1A1 results into therapeutic decision-making is sparse and can differ depending on the referenced resource. We summarize the literature describing associations between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and toxicity risk with irinotecan, belinostat, pazopanib, and nilotinib. Resources that provide recommendations for UGT1A1-guided drug prescribing are reviewed, and considerations for implementation into patient care are provided.

Abstract

Multi-gene assays often include UGT1A1 and, in certain instances, may report associated toxicity risks for irinotecan, belinostat, pazopanib, and nilotinib. However, guidance for incorporating UGT1A1 results into therapeutic decision-making is mostly lacking for these anticancer drugs. We summarized meta-analyses, genome-wide association studies, clinical trials, drug labels, and guidelines relating to the impact of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on irinotecan, belinostat, pazopanib, or nilotinib toxicities. For irinotecan, UGT1A1*28 was significantly associated with neutropenia and diarrhea, particularly with doses ≥ 180 mg/m², supporting the use of UGT1A1 to guide irinotecan prescribing. The drug label for belinostat recommends a reduced starting dose of 750 mg/m² for UGT1A1*28 homozygotes, though published studies supporting this recommendation are sparse. There was a correlation between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and pazopanib-induced hepatotoxicity, though further studies are needed to elucidate the role of UGT1A1-guided pazopanib dose adjustments. Limited studies have investigated the association between UGT1A1 polymorphisms and nilotinib-induced hepatotoxicity, with data currently insufficient for UGT1A1-guided nilotinib dose adjustments.