Low dose venetoclax as a single agent treatment of plasma cell malignancies harboring t(11;14)

Flow cytometric expression of Bcl-2, Mcl-1, and their ratios correlates with primary and secondary cytogenetic changes and their combinations in multiple myeloma

Response to BH3 mimetics in multiple myeloma (MM) correlates with CCND1-rearrangement or expression of anti-apoptotic molecules, particularly Bcl-2 and Mcl-1. Our study investigates the relationship between cytogenetic abnormalities (CGAs) and intracellular Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 expression in myeloma plasma cells (MPCs) using flow cytometry (FCM). We measured median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 in 163 bone marrow samples (143 MM, 20 controls) across various cell types. Both Bcl-2MFI and Mcl-1MFI were significantly higher in MPCs compared to other cells, with Bcl-2 MFI exceeding Mcl-1 MFI in MPCs. Bcl-2 expression peaked in CCND1-rearranged cases, while Mcl-1 expression was highest in cases with 1q21 gain/amplification. Notably, 65-74% of cases with other CGAs exhibited moderate to strong Bcl-2 or Mcl-1 expression, indicating potential utility of BH3 mimetics in this group, while 25% showed dim to absent expression of one or both markers, suggesting potential futility in these patients. Our study highlights FCM's potential for rapid Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 quantification, surpassing traditional methods. We propose that direct measurement of Bcl-2 and Mcl-1 expression in PCs by FCM, combined with cytogenetic characterization, could improve therapeutic decision-making regarding the use of BH3 mimetics in MM, potentially enhancing outcomes and overcoming resistance.

Outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in patients with t(11;14) light chain amyloidosis after failure of daratumumab-based therapy

BACKGROUND

Daratumumab's incorporation in the upfront treatment of light chain (AL) amyloidosis has led to daratumumab (dara) refractoriness early in disease course. Patients who experience relapse or have suboptimal response to dara-based-therapy, have limited options.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of venetoclax-based therapy in t(11;14) positive AL patients who previously failed dara.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with AL were included in this bi-institutional retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Dara failure was due to inadequate response in 20 (65%) patients, haematologic relapse in 7 (22%), and both haematologic plus organ relapse in 4 (13%). Overall haematologic response rate to venetoclax-based therapy was 97%, with ≥ VGPR being 91%. Of the 19 evaluable patients with cardiac involvement, 14 (74%) achieved organ response. Of the 13 evaluable patients with renal involvement, 6 (46%) achieved organ response. With a median follow-up of 22 months, median time-to-next-treatment (TTNT) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The 12- and 24-month TTNT rates were 74% and 56%, respectively. At data-cut-off, four patients had died, all from AL-related organ complications. The 12- and 24-month OS rates were 89% and 85%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26% of patients, with 6% due to infections.

CONCLUSION

These findings are encouraging for the use of venetoclax as salvage therapy post-dara failure.

Options for Rescue Treatment of Patients with AL Amyloidosis Exposed to Upfront Daratumumab

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to assess the therapeutic strategies available for relapsed/refractory patients with immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis who received upfront daratumumab-based regimens.

RECENT FINDINGS

The treatment landscape of AL amyloidosis has changed radically thanks to the introduction in the upfront setting of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (DaraCyBorD) which improved patients' outcomes increasing the rate of hematologic and organ responses. However, many patients eventually relapse or are refractory to daratumumab and the best salvage therapy is not well defined yet. In this contest, we reviewed the available therapeutic options after daratumumab failure, and we look towards the current advances in Bcl-2 inhibitors, novel immunotherapeutic agents as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) therapy and bispecific antibodies (bsAbs). Relapsed/refractory AL amyloidosis represent an unmet clinical need and novel targeted drugs require urgent prospective assessment.

Use of venetoclax in t(11;14) positive relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The plasma cell malignancy, multiple myeloma (MM), remains incurable despite advanced treatment protocols. Overexpression of Bcl-2 (an anti-apoptotic protein), in MM harboring the translocation (11;14), contributes to resistance to prior therapy. Venetoclax, a selective oral inhibitor of BCL-2 is a novel agent that shows promise as a therapeutic agent.

AIMS

The objective of this systematic review is to address how the use of venetoclax, alone or as a combination regimen, contributed to the treatment of patients with t(11:14) positive relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

DATA SOURCES

This systematic review was conducted in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was done on 5th June 2022. A literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus, 145 articles were screened and 10 studies were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

DATA SUMMARY

Across the studies reviewed, a total of 311 patients were identified with t(11;14) positive RRMM. The overall response rate achieved ranged between 33% and 95.5%. Furthermore, the use of venetoclax has exhibited a favorable adverse effect profile. Side effects included hematological side effects, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Venetoclax demonstrates promising results. When given with drugs like dexamethasone, daratumumab and carfilzomib, a synergistic effect is seen in treating translocation (11:14) positive relapsed/refractory MM. The use of venetoclax in clinical practice can potentially improve outcomes and quality of life in RRMM patients, and future research should continue to explore this promising treatment option.

Effectiveness and infectious complications of BCMA T-cell engagers in treating multiple myeloma: Real-world evidence from Sweden

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM), an incurable disease characterized by frequent relapses and a need for multiple treatments, often progresses to a relapse/refractory status resistant to all available drugs and drug classes. Bispecific antibodies, specifically BCMA T-cell engagers, have emerged as effective treatments for MM, demonstrating impressive efficacy. However, these treatments can adversely affect the immune system, increasing vulnerability to infections.

METHODS/RESULTS

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BCMA T-cell engagers in 58 Swedish patients with poor MM prognosis. The patients exhibited a 69% overall response rate, with 69% survival and 60% progression-free survival at 15 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the risk of infectious complications, the prognosis of MM patients can be significantly improved with vigilant monitoring and proactive management of infections. This real-world data highlight the potential of BCMA T-cell engagers in treating MM, emphasizing the need for careful patient monitoring to mitigate infection risks.

Venetoclax in Relapse/Refractory AL Amyloidosis—A Multicenter International Retrospective Real-World Study

Therapeutic options in relapsed refractory (R/R) light-chain (AL) amyloidosis patients are limited. Given the encouraging results in t(11;14) multiple myeloma and the high prevalence of t(11;14) in AL amyloidosis, venetoclax is an attractive treatment option in this setting. We report here the results of a multi-center retrospective study on 26 R/R AL amyloidosis patients treated off-label with venetoclax. The median lines of therapy prior to venetoclax was 3.5 (range 1–7), and 88% of our cohort had t (11;14). Twenty-two patients (85%) were previously treated with daratumumab. The overall hematologic response rate was 88%, 35% achieved a CR, and 35% achieved VGPR. The median event-free survival was 25 months (m) (95% CI 9.7 m-not reached), and the median overall survival was 33 m (95% CI 25.9–39.2 m). Most of the patients in this cohort are in ongoing deep responses and continuing venetoclax therapy. The treatment was relatively safe. One patient died due to infection, and there were two grade 3 infections in our cohort. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was not seen in any patient. Dose reductions were frequent but did not affect the efficacy. These promising results require confirmation in a randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based regimens for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) usually have dismal prognostic outcomes. Venetoclax, a selective inhibitor of antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2), demonstrates antimyeloma activity in plasma cells with t(11;14) or high BCL-2 expression.

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax-based therapy in RRMM.

DESIGN

This is a meta-analysis study.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies published up to 20 December 2021. Overall response rate (ORR), rate of very good partial response or better (≧VGPR), and complete response (CR) rate were pooled with the random-effects model. Safety was evaluated by the incidences of grade ≧3 adverse events. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to identify the causes of heterogeneities. All the analyses were conducted by STATA 15.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies with 713 patients were included for analysis. The pooled ORR, rate of ≧VGPR, and CR for all patients were 59% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 45-71%], 38% (95% CI = 26-51%), and 17% (95% CI = 10-26%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 2.0 months to not reached (NR), and the median overall survival (OS) ranged from 12.0 months to NR. Meta-regression showed that patients treated with more drugs combined or less heavily pretreated had higher response rates. Patients with t(11;14) had superior ORR [relative risk (RR) = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.05-2.07], ≧VGPR (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.12-2.60), CR (RR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.34-2.57), PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30-0.65], and OS (HR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.08-0.52) compared with patients without t(11;14). Most grade ≧3 adverse events were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and infectious related and were manageable.

CONCLUSION

Venetoclax-based therapy is an effective and safe option for RRMM patients, especially those with t(11;14).

How do we manage t(11;14) plasma cell disorders with venetoclax?

The oral BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax has demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with t(11;14) plasma cell disorders, both as a single-agent and in combination. However, there was an increased mortality signal in the randomized BELLINI trial that was primarily driven by non-t(11;14) patients. Based on current evidence, venetoclax is included as an option for relapsed/refractory t(11;14) plasma cell dyscrasias in NCCN guidelines and is being widely used in clinical practice. In this review, we aim to critically appraise the current literature and perform case-based illustration of our approach to management of t(11;14) plasma cell disorders with venetoclax.

Novel Approaches Outside the Setting of Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: The Case of Melflufen, Venetoclax, and Selinexor

Although the survival rate of patients with multiple myeloma has significantly improved in the last years thanks to the introduction of various classes of new drugs, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and monoclonal antibodies, the vast majority of these subjects relapse with a more aggressive disease due to the acquisition of further genetic alterations that may cause resistance to current salvage therapies. The treatment of these often "triple" (or even more) refractory patients remains challenging, and alternative approaches are required to overcome the onset of that resistance. Immunotherapies with novel monoclonal, drug-conjugated, or bi-specific antibodies, as well as the use of chimeric antigen receptor T cells, have been recently developed and are currently investigated. However, other non-immunologic therapeutic regimens based on melfluflen, venetoclax, or selinexor, three molecules with new mechanisms of action, have also shown promising results in the setting of relapsed/refractory myeloma. Here we report the most recent literature data regarding these three drugs, focusing on their efficacy and safety in multiple myeloma.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: The Past, Present and Future of Venetoclax-Based Therapies in AML

The use of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) has changed the paradigm for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in elderly patients and those unfit for intensive chemotherapy. A phase 3 study has shown superior response rates and improved overall survival for patients treated with venetoclax + azacitidine compared with the previous standard of care, azacitidine alone. This success has led to multiple exciting follow-up studies, including investigations related to the discovery of predictors of response, relapse, and the mechanism of action of this therapy. While venetoclax + HMA has shown significant benefit in elderly patients unfit for chemotherapy, further questions remain as to how this therapy can be expanded into other populations including relapsed or refractory patients and younger newly diagnosed patients with adverse risk features. In this article, we discuss the clinical outcomes of AML with venetoclax + HMA, established and potential predictors of response to this regimen, its mechanisms of action, and speculate on the future of venetoclax + HMA therapy in AML.