Efficacy of front-line ibrutinib versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A retrospective multicenter "Real-World" study

Overall survival of patients with CLL treated with ibrutinib in the first line compared to second-line ibrutinib after chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving either ibrutinib monotherapy as a first-line (1L) treatment or chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy-based (CT/CIT) regimens in 1L followed by ibrutinib in the second line (1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib) after disease progression by emulating a randomized trial comparing both treatment sequences.

METHODS

Patient-level data from the RESONATE-2 trial (NCT01722487) and real-world PHEDRA databases were analyzed. Three scenarios were considered using the following data sources: (1) RESONATE-2, (2) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA, (3) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA for 1L ibrutinib and PHEDRA for 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib. Propensity score-based weights and inverse probability of censoring weighting were used to adjust for baseline (Scenarios 2 and 3) and time-dependent confounding (all scenarios), and to address potential biases. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1L ibrutinib versus 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib.

RESULTS

Results from Scenario 1 showed a significantly lower risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L chlorambucil followed by 2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [95% CI 0.20-0.62]). Results from Scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrated a reduced risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [0.21-0.61] and 0.64 [0.39-1.04], respectively).

CONCLUSION

The analyses consistently showed a reduced risk of death when ibrutinib was used as a 1L treatment in CLL compared with delaying its use until 2L after CT/CIT regimens, which suggests that initiating ibrutinib in 1L is advantageous for improving survival outcomes.

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors: can they be optimized for the treatment of neuroinflammatory disorders?

INTRODUCTION

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a multifaceted player of the immune system which has been involved in the survival of hematological malignancies but also in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated diseases. Oral BTK inhibitors (BTKi) have become a cornerstone for the treatment of patients with B-cell malignancies, and are under investigation for several immune-mediated diseases.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the biology of BTK and emerging data on BTKi in patients with neuroinflammatory disorders of both the peripheral and central nervous system.

EXPERT OPINION

We support the use of BTKi in relapsed/refractory patients with multiple sclerosis and anti-MAG antibody neuropathies. However, other immune-mediated neuroinflammatory disorders are likely to benefit from BTKi. Whether BTKi will improve the response rates than conventional therapies in previously untreated patients is unknown and will be assessed within future clinical trials. Furthermore, the availability of more selective BTKi, with less adverse events, will improve patients' tolerability and expand our treatment landscape.