Natural history, predictors of development of extramedullary disease, and treatment outcomes for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma

BCMA-BBZ-OX40 CAR-T Therapy Using an Instant Manufacturing Platform in Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell has revolutionary efficacy against relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). However, current CAR-T cell therapy has several limitations including long vein-to-vein time and limited viability.

METHODS

A 4-1BB-costimulated B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR-T integrating an independently-expressed OX40 (BCMA-BBZ-OX40) was designed and generated by a traditional manufacturing process (TraditionCART) or instant manufacturing platform (named InstanCART). The tumor-killing efficiency, differentiation, exhaustion, and expansion level were investigated in vitro and in tumor-bearing mice. An investigator-initiated clinical trial was performed in patients with R/R MM to evaluate the outcomes of both TraditionCART and InstanCART. The primary objective was safety within 1 month after CAR-T cell infusion. The secondary objective was the best overall response rate.

RESULTS

Preclinical studies revealed that integrated OX40 conferred BCMA CAR-T cells with superior cytotoxicity and reduced exhaustion levels. InstanCART process further enhanced the proliferation and T-cell stemness of BCMA-BBZ-OX40 CAR-T cells. BCMA-BBZ-OX40 CAR-T cells were successfully administered in 22 patients with R/R MM, including 15 patients with TraditionCART and 7 patients with InstanCART. Up to 50% (11/22) patients had a high-risk cytogenetic profile and 36% (8/22) had extramedullary disease. CAR-T therapy caused grade 1-2 cytokine release syndrome in 19/22 (80%) patients, grade 1 neurotoxicity in 2/22 (9%) patients and led to ≥grade 3 adverse events including neutropenia (20/22, 91%), thrombocytopenia (15/22, 68%), anemia (12/22, 55%), creatinine increased (1/22, 5%), hepatic enzymes increased (5/22, 23%), and sepsis (1/22, 5%). The best overall response rate was 100%, and 64% (14/22) of the patients had a complete response or better. The median manufacturing time was shorter for InstanCART therapy (3 days) than for TraditionCART therapy (10 days). Expansion and duration were dramatically higher for InstanCART cells than for TraditionCART cells.

CONCLUSIONS

BCMA-BBZ-OX40 CAR-T cells were well tolerated and exhibited potent responses in patients with R/R MM. InstanCART shortened the manufacturing period compared to TraditionCART, and improved the cellular kinetics. Our results demonstrated the potency and feasibility of OX40-modified BCMA CAR-T cells using InstanCART technology for R/R MM therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This trial was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov as #NCT04537442.

A 5-Year Follow-up Clinical Study of the B-cell Maturation Antigen Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy HDS269B in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to report the 5-year clinical outcomes of anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (HDS269B) therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), including those with poor performance status [Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores 3 to 4], and to identify factors influencing long-term outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients with RRMM enrolled from 2016 to 2020 received HDS269B (9 × 106 cells/kg) after receiving a conditioning chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. The overall response, long-term outcomes, and safety were assessed, as were their associations with clinical and disease characteristics.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 59.0 months, the overall response rate was 77.55%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.01-13.99] and 20.0 months (95% CI, 11.26-28.74), respectively. The 5-year PFS and OS rates were 21.3% (95% CI, 12.3%-36.7%) and 34.1% (95% CI, 22.7%-51.3%), respectively. Patients with ECOG 0 to 2 had marked longer survival, with a median PFS of 11.0 months and a median OS of 41.8 months. Early minimal residual disease negativity, higher and persistent CAR T-cell expansion, and the absence of extramedullary disease were associated with better survival outcomes. No new CAR T-cell therapy-associated toxicities were observed. Importantly, ECOG scores 0 to 2, prior therapy lines <4, and CAR T-cell persistence at ≥6 months were independently associated with longer OS.

CONCLUSIONS

HDS269B is effective and safe, especially for patients with ECOG scores 0 to 2. Early CAR T-cell intervention may improve prognosis in patients with RRMM.

High-risk multiple myeloma: Redefining genetic, clinical, and functional high-risk disease in the era of molecular medicine and immunotherapy

Multiple myeloma (MM) exhibits significant heterogeneity in its presentation, genetics, and treatment response. Despite therapeutic advances, some patients continue to relapse early (ER, <18-months) and rapidly cycle through therapies. Myriad prognostic factors have been identified and incorporated into risk stratification models; however, these produce discordant, often three-tiered outputs that fail to identify many patients destined for ER. Treatment strategies are increasingly focused on disease biology and trials enriched for high-risk (HR)MM, but consensus on the minimum required testing and a succinct, specific, and clinically meaningful definition for HRMM remains elusive. We review the risk-factors, definitions, and future directions for HRMM.

Clinical features associated with poor response and early relapse following BCMA-directed therapies in multiple myeloma

Three classes of BCMA-directed therapy (BDT) exist: antibody drug-conjugates (ADCs), CAR-T, and T-cell engagers (TCEs), each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. To aid clinicians in selecting between BDTs, we reviewed myeloma patients treated at Mayo Clinic with commercial or investigational BDT between 2018-2023. We identified 339 individuals (1-exposure = 297, 2-exposures = 38, 3-exposures = 4) who received 385 BDTs (ADC = 59, TCE = 134, CAR-T = 192), with median follow-up of 21-months. ADC recipients were older, with more lines of therapy (LOT), and penta-refractory disease. Compared to ADCs, CAR-T (aHR = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.20-0.43) and TCEs (aHR = 0.62, 95%CI = 0.43-0.91) had better progression-free survival (PFS) on analysis adjusted for age, the presence of extramedullary (EMD), penta-refractory disease, multi-hit high-risk cytogenetics, prior BDT, and the number of LOT in the preceding 1-year. Likewise, compared to ADCs, CAR-T (aHR = 0.28, 95%CI = 0.18-0.44) and TCEs (aHR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39-0.93) had superior overall survival. Prior BDT exposure negatively impacted all classes but was most striking in CAR-T, ORR 86% vs. 50% and median PFS 13-months vs. 3-months. Of relapses, 54% were extramedullary in nature, and a quarter of these cases had no history of EMD. CAR-T demonstrates superior efficacy and where feasible, should be the initial BDT. However, for patients with prior BDT or rapidly progressive disease, an alternative approach may be preferable.

Impact of extramedullary multiple myeloma on outcomes with idecabtagene vicleucel

Idecabtagene vicleucel (Ide-cel) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and durable responses in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, the outcomes with ide-cel in patients with extramedullary disease (EMD) remain incompletely characterized. We included patients with RRMM treated with ide-cel between May 2021 and April 2023 across 11 US academic institutions. Visceral or soft tissue lesions non-contiguous from bone was classified as EMD. Time-to-event analyses were performed from date of ide-cel infusion. Among 351 patients, 84 (24%) had EMD prior to infusion. The median follow-up from ide-cel infusion was 18.2 months (95% CI: 17-19.3). The day 90 overall response rates (ORR) were 52% vs. 82% for the EMD and non-EMD cohorts, respectively (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-6.9) for the EMD cohort vs. 11.1 months (95% CI: 9.2-12.6; p < 0.0001) for the non-EMD cohort. In a multivariable analysis, EMD was an independent predictor of inferior PFS [hazard ratio 1.5 (1.1-2.2), p = 0.02]. The median overall survival was 14.8 months [95% CI: 9-Not reached (NR)] vs. 26.9 months (26.3 vs. NR, p = 0.006) for the EMD and non-EMD cohorts, respectively. Extramedullary disease represents an independent predictor of inferior day 90 ORR and PFS among patients treated with ide-cel.

Beyond the marrow: insights from comprehensive next-generation sequencing of extramedullary multiple myeloma tumors

Extramedullary multiple myeloma (EMM) is an aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM). This study represents the most comprehensive next-generation sequencing analysis of EMM tumors (N = 14) to date, uncovering key molecular features and describing the tumor microenvironment. We observed the co-occurrence of 1q21 gain/amplification and MAPK pathway mutations in 79% of EMM samples, suggesting that these are crucial mutational events in EMM development. We also demonstrated that patients with mutated KRAS and 1q21 gain/amplification at the time of diagnosis have a significantly higher risk of EMM development (HR = 2.4, p = 0.011) using data from a large CoMMpass dataset. We identified downregulation of CXCR4 and enhanced cell proliferation, along with reduced expression of therapeutic targets (CD38, SLAMF7, GPRC5D, FCRH5), potentially explaining diminished efficacy of immunotherapy. Conversely, we identified significantly upregulated EZH2 and CD70 as potential future therapeutic options. For the first time, we report on the tumor microenvironment of EMM, revealing CD8+ T cells and NK cells as predominant immune effector cells using single-cell sequencing. Finally, this is the first longitudinal study in EMM revealing the molecular changes from the time of diagnosis to EMM relapse.

Navigating High-Risk and Ultrahigh-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Challenges and Emerging Strategies

Despite significant improvement in the outcomes of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with novel therapies, there is still an underserved high-risk (HR) population that experiences early disease progression and death. With the median survival crossing 10 years, we defined ultrahigh-risk (uHR)MM as MM leading to death within 24-36 months of diagnosis and HRMM as MM leading to death within 36-60 months. Several features have emerged as markers of uHRMM: the co-occurrence of two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary disease, plasma cell leukemia and a high-risk gene expression profiling signature. The heterogeneous risk definition across trials, the few trials available designed for HR patients, and the small HR subgroups in all-comers trials make it difficult to generate recommendations with high levels of evidence. Nevertheless, regardless of treatment administered, several studies consistently showed that achieving and maintaining measurable residual disease negativity is now considered the main factor able to mitigate the adverse prognosis related to baseline features. For fit patients with HR transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM, quadruplet induction/consolidation treatment with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors and dexamethasone, and autologous stem-cell transplant and maintenance with, if available, at least a doublet combination could be considered the option of choice. For non-TE NDMM, considering the recent data generated and carefully reviewing those upcoming, quadruplet treatment consisting of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulatory agents, proteasome inhibitors, and dexamethasone should also be considered. Future trials integrating BCMA-directed novel generation immunotherapies hold great potential for further advancing the treatment landscape in all NDMM patients with HR disease.

Real-world analysis of teclistamab in 123 RRMM patients from Germany

Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) × CD3 directed bispecific antibody, has shown high response rates and durable remissions in the MAJESTEC-1 trial in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We retrospectively assessed efficacy and tolerability in 123 patients treated at 18 different German centers to determine whether outcome is comparable in the real-world setting. Most patients had triple-class (93%) or penta-drug (60%) refractory disease, 37% of patients had received BCMA-directed pretreatment including idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) CAR-T cell therapy (21/123, 17.1%). With a follow-up of 5.5 months, we observed an overall response rate (ORR) of 59.3% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.7 months. In subgroup analyses, we found significantly lower ORR and median PFS in patients with extramedullary disease (37%/2.1 months), and/or an ISS of 3 (37%/1.3 months), and ide-cel pretreated patients (33%/1.8 months). Nonetheless, the duration of response in ide-cel pretreated patients was comparable to that of anti-BCMA naive patients. Infections and grade ≥3 cytopenias were the most frequent adverse events. In summary, we found that teclistamab exhibited a comparable efficacy and safety profile in the real-world setting as in the pivotal trial.

A matching-adjusted indirect comparison of the efficacy of elranatamab versus physician's choice of treatment in patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

For patients with triple-class exposed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE/R MM), prognosis is poor and effective treatment options are limited. Elranatamab is a novel B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)- and CD3-directed bispecific antibody which was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in August 2023 and demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with TCE/R MM in the phase 2, single-arm MagnetisMM-3 trial (NCT04649359). To compare the effectiveness of elranatamab vs physician's choice of treatment (PCT) in the absence of head-to-head comparative data, a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted.

METHODS

Individual patient data from MagnetisMM-3 (Cohort A [BCMA-naïve] N = 123, 14.7 months of follow-up) were reweighted to match published summary data from two real-world studies of PCT in patients with TCE/R MM (LocoMMotion and MAMMOTH) using a propensity score-type logistic regression. Unanchored MAIC analyses were conducted according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Decision Support Unit (DSU) 18 guidance.

RESULTS

Compared with PCT in LocoMMotion, elranatamab was associated with a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR rate difference: 37.52; 95% CI 26.20-48.83; odds ratio: 4.85; 95% CI 2.85-8.23) and complete or stringent complete response rate (≥CR rate difference: 42.29; 95% CI 31.84-52.74; odds ratio: 184.01; 95% CI 24.66-1372.86), longer progression-free survival (PFS HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.20-0.49), and overall survival (OS HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.40-0.94). Compared with PCT in MAMMOTH, elranatamab was associated with significantly higher ORR (rate difference: 28.14; 95% CI 16.77-39.52; odds ratio: 3.24; 95% CI 1.98-5.32) and ≥ CR (rate difference: 26.22; 95% CI 16.40-36.05; odds ratio: 5.48; 95% CI 2.88-10.44), as well as longer PFS (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.17-0.37) and OS (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.33-0.71). Sensitivity analysis results were consistent with the base case.

CONCLUSION

In the MAIC, elranatamab was consistently associated with improved rates and depth of response and significantly longer PFS and OS versus PCT in LocoMMotion and MAMMOTH.

Isolated Non-Secretory Extramedullary Relapse of Multiple Myeloma Responded Completely to Localized Radiotherapy

Introduction

Non-secretory multiple myeloma (NSMM) is a rare form of multiple myeloma (MM) that is often difficult to detect and has not yet been well characterized. This is due to the lack of production or the presence of monoclonal protein (MP) levels below levels detectable by testing such as serum/urine electrophoresis and immunofixation.

Case Presentation

Two patients of ours were being treated for MM with typical courses of systemic therapy. By the third-line therapy, both developed an extramedullary mass, one in the pelvis and the other in the neck. In both cases, blood work showed no measurable MP, normal free light chain levels, and unremarkable skeletal surveys. Secondary malignancies were suspected due to the clinical presentation in each case, and biopsies confirmed the presence of non-secretory plasmacytomas. Both patients were only treated with localized radiotherapy with a total dose of 2,000 cGy in 5 fractions over 1 week. Ultimately, this resolved the original masses with no residual tumors. No changes had to be made to their systemic therapies, and both patients remained stable.

Conclusion

NSMM relapse is not unusual and should be suspected in patients with relapsed refractory disease. Relapse should be confirmed by a tissue biopsy, and secondary malignancies should be ruled out. Radiotherapy is an excellent option to treat localized relapse and preserve the current line of systemic anti-myeloma therapy.