Milone G, Leotta S, Indelicato F, Mercurio S, Moschetti G, Di Raimondo F, Tornello A, Consoli U, Guido G, Giustolisi R. G-CSF alone vs cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in PBPC mobilization of patients with lymphoma: results depend on degree of previous pretreatment.
Bone Marrow Transplant 2003;
31:747-54. [PMID:
12732880 DOI:
10.1038/sj.bmt.1703912]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
We performed a randomized study to compare 'G-CSF alone' (administered at dose of 10 mcg/kg/day) and 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF' (cyclophosphamide at dose of 4 g/m(2) and G-CSF at dose of 10 microg/kg/day), as PBPC mobilization schedules in 52 patients with NHL or HD. Randomization was stratified according to the amount of previous chemotherapy (< or =2 and >2 lines of previous chemotherapy). Mean CD34+ cell peak in P.B., mean 'Total CD34+ cells' harvested and percentage of patients successfully mobilized, in the group mobilized with 'G-CSF alone' vs the group mobilized with 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF', were: 35.3 x 10(6) vs 45.8 x 10(6)/l (P=0.3), 5.4 x 10(6) vs 6.8 x 10(6)/kg (P>0.9) and 50 vs 61% (P=0.4). No differences were observed in the stratum of less pretreated patients. However, in the stratum of patients who had previously received more than two lines of chemotherapy, CD34+cell peak (P=0.05) and percentage of successful mobilization (P=0.01) were higher when 'cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF' was used. Using logistic regression, both age and mobilization with 'G-CSF alone' were significantly associated with a low CD34+ cell peak in P.B. However, in the stratum of less pretreated patients, only age was significantly associated with this risk.
Collapse