Myelodysplastic syndrome treatment with danazol and cis-retinoic acid

Danazol as First-Line Therapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) represents the only option with a potential cure rate of 30% to 50% in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); however, < 5% of patients are optimal candidates for this management. Therapeutic options are limited in patients unsuitable for ASCT. Evidence that androgens might be beneficial in MDS is controversial. We aimed to document the clinical outcomes of patients diagnosed with MDS treated with danazol as first-line therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed in our center with MDS according to the World Health Organization 2008 criteria and treated with danazol between 2005 and 2015. Response was defined according to international working group criteria.

RESULTS

We included 42 patients treated exclusively with danazol. Median dose was 400 mg/d (range, 100-600 mg/d). Median follow-up was 12 (range, 3-76) months. Twenty-four of these patients (60%) achieved clinical response. Median overall survival was 24 months (95% confidence interval, 5.1-42). Responders were older than nonresponders (P = .025) and had higher baseline hemoglobin concentration (P = .009). No patients discontinued danazol because of toxicity. Fifteen patients died (35.7%) and 5 progressed to acute myeloid leukemia.

CONCLUSION

Danazol as first-line therapy is an acceptable treatment option with low side effects for patients with MDS who cannot receive ASCT.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: Contemporary review and how we treat

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of clonal stem cell disorders with an inherent tendency for leukemic transformation. Diagnosis is currently based on the presence of peripheral blood cytopenias, peripheral blood and bone marrow dysplasia/blasts, and clonal cytogenetic abnormalities. With the advent of next generation sequencing, recurrent somatic mutations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation (TET2, ASXL1, EZH2, DNMT3A, IDH1/2), RNA splicing (SF3B1, SRSF2, U2AF1, ZRSR2), DNA damage response (TP53), transcriptional regulation (RUNX1, BCOR, ETV6) and signal transduction (CBL, NRAS, JAK2) have been identified in MDS. Conventional prognostication is by the revised International prognostic scoring system (IPSS-R) with additional adverse prognosis conferred by presence of ASXL1, EZH2, or TP53 mutations. Currently Food and Drug administration (FDA)-approved drugs for the treatment of MDS are not curative and their effect on survival is limited; they include the hypomethylating agents (HMA) azacitidine and decitabine and lenalidomide for MDS with isolated del(5q). To date, allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only treatment option for possible cure. Given the current lack of drugs with convincing evidence of favorable effect on survival, we consider ASCT as the treatment of choice for most patients with symptomatic disease, and especially for those with high-risk disease. For nontransplant candidates, participation in clinical trials is preferred over conventional therapy. There is not one right way of treatment for patients who are not candidates for either ASCT or clinical trials and palliative drugs of choice depend on the clinical problem, such as symptomatic anemia (ESAs, danazol, HMA), thrombocytopenia (HMA), or neutropenia (myeloid growth factors). Conversely, there is no controlled evidence to support the use of iron chelating agents in MDS. Going forward, we believe it is time to incorporate mutation information in clinically derived prognostic models in MDS and encourage development of novel drugs with disease-modifying activity.

Successful treatment of primary refractory anemia with a combination regimen of all-trans retinoic acid, calcitriol, and androgen

We investigated the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen in 63 patients with primary refractory anemia (RA). The daily treatment protocol comprised all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) (30 mg/m(2)), calcitriol (0.1 microg/m(2)), and androgen (stanozolol 3mg/m(2), or danazol 300 mg/m(2)) in three separate doses for eight consecutive weeks. Hematologic improvement was observed in 43 (68.3%) patients. The treatment administered was generally well tolerated, with no severe regimen-related toxicity. The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 68.72% and 53.18%, respectively. These results indicate that this combination regimen is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with RA.

The myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis and treatment

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are common, acquired, clinically challenging hematologic conditions that are characterized by bone marrow failure and a risk of progression to acute leukemia. These disorders can arise de novo, especially in elderly patients or, less often, as a consequence of prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy for an unrelated disease. The MDS classification systems were revised recently and updated. These refined classification and prognostic schemes help stratify patients by their risk of leukemia progression and death; this knowledge can help clinicians select appropriate therapy. Although many treatments for MDS have been proposed and evaluated, at present, only hematopoietic stem cell transplantation offers any real hope for cure, and no available therapy beyond general supportive care offers benefit to more than a minority of patients. However, recent clinical trials enrolling patients with MDS have reported encouraging results with use of newer drugs, including lenalidomide, decitabine, and darbepoetin alfa. Other exciting treatment regimens are being tested. Here, we present a contemporary, practical clinical approach to the diagnosis and risk-stratified treatment of MDS. We review when to suspect MDS, detail how to evaluate patients who may have a form of the condition, explain key features of treatments that are currently available in the United States, and summarize a general, common-sense therapeutic approach to patients with MDS.

The myelodysplastic syndrome(s): a perspective and review highlighting current controversies

The myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) includes a diverse group of clonal and potentially malignant bone marrow disorders characterized by ineffective and inadequate hematopoiesis. The presumed source of MDS is a genetically injured early marrow progenitor cell or pluripotential hematopoietic stem cell. The blood dyscrasias that fall under the broad diagnostic rubric of MDS appear to be quite heterogeneous, which has made it very difficult to construct a coherent, universally applicable MDS classification scheme. A recent re-classification proposal sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO) has engendered considerable controversy. Although the precise incidence of MDS is uncertain, it has become clear that MDS is at least as common as acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). There is considerable overlap between these two conditions, and the former often segues into the latter; indeed, the distinction between AML and MDS can be murky, and some have argued that the current definitions are arbitrary. Despite the discovery of several tantalizing pathophysiological clues, the basic biology of MDS is incompletely understood. Treatment at present is generally frustrating and ineffective, and except for the small subset of patients who exhibit mild marrow dysfunction and low-risk cytogenetic lesions, the overall prognosis remains rather grim. In this narrative review, we highlight recent developments and controversies within the context of current knowledge about this mysterious and fascinating cluster of bone marrow failure states.

Treatment of unfavorable myelodysplastic syndrome with all-trans-retinoic acid and subcutaneous Ara C

Thirty patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, defined as > 5% bone marrow blasts, were treated with a combination of oral all-trans-retinoic acid (45 mg/m2 daily) and subcutaneous AraC (10 mg/m2) on days 1-14 of each 28-35 day cycle repeated for 2-6 cycles. Complete remission lasting 9, 12, and 15 months was achieved in three patients. Partial and minor response did not translate into meaningful clinical improvement, like complete responders. Overall incidence of leukemia transformation and survival of this cohort of patients was no different from the expected outcome for a group of patients with similar characteristics.

Advances in the therapy of the myelodysplastic syndromes

The study of the proliferation and differentiation of the MDS clone at the molecular level, including the details of apoptosis, may hopefully lead to more effective differentiation-induction/antiapoptotic agents. The study of the cytokines at the cellular/molecular level may lead to more effective trails of combination therapy with differentiation-induction agents, chemotherapy, and/or early-acting cytokines. Further phenotypic characterization of the MDS clone may lead to negative selection of these cells or positive selection of normal stem cells as part of an autotransplant strategy, as is presently being done in chronic-phase chronic myeologenous leukemia. The use of agents such as the topoisomerase I inhibitors (e.g., topotecan), which have mechanisms of action disparate from agents already used in MDS, may increase the efficacy of chemotherapy for MDS. The further clinical refinements in reducing treatment-related mortality and the study of T cells at the molecular level may hopefully lead to improvement in the prevention and therapy of graft-versus-host disease, in turn increasing the upper age limit of allogeneic BMT for MDS and increasing the feasibility of matched unrelated allogeneic BMT. At present, we can tailor the approach to a MDS patient based on his or her IPSS risk stratification, degree of cytopenia, and age, as outlined in Figure 2. At present, we can tailor the approach to a MDS patient based on his or her IPSS risk stratification, degree of cytopenia, and age, as outlined in Figure 2.

Standard and low-dose chemotherapy for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of disorders with an invariably fatal outcome. Other than bone marrow transplantation, no treatment has been able to alter the natural history of MDS. As a result, there has been an interest in identifying new and more effective chemotherapeutic agents. Many of the drugs that have been evaluated in an attempt to increase remissions and prolong survival were selected because of their activity in acute myeloid leukemia. Thus cytarabine has been the most widely studied drug. Although numerous studies suggested activity for low-dose cytarabine (LoDAC), a careful analysis of the data identified a complete remission (CR) rate of less than 20%, without meaningful clinical benefit. The issue of LoDAC was finally put to rest by a randomized trial in which survival was no better than with supportive care. 5-Azacytidine induces cellular differentiation by hypomethylation of DNA. Phase II trials noted CRs in fewer than 10% of patients, with response rates under 30%, although additional patients appeared to experience hematologic and clinical benefit. A randomized trial of 5-azacytidine versus supportive care failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. One of the most promising new agents is the topoisomerase inhibitor topotecan, which achieves CRs in more than 30% of patients. Combinations of this drug with other active agents are in development. Obviously, new treatment strategies are needed to improve the outcome of MDS patients. Combination approaches incorporating new, active agents should have sound scientific rationale, targeting biological differences among the various MDS subtypes.