Complex chromosome rearrangements and congenital anomalies

Mechanisms of Origin, Phenotypic Effects and Diagnostic Implications of Complex Chromosome Rearrangements

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) are currently defined as structural genome variations that involve more than 2 chromosome breaks and result in exchanges of chromosomal segments. They are thought to be extremely rare, but their detection rate is rising because of improvements in molecular cytogenetic technology. Their population frequency is also underestimated, since many CCRs may not elicit a phenotypic effect. CCRs may be the result of fork stalling and template switching, microhomology-mediated break-induced repair, breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, or chromothripsis. Patients with chromosomal instability syndromes show elevated rates of CCRs due to impaired DNA double-strand break responses during meiosis. Therefore, the putative functions of the proteins encoded by ATM, BLM, WRN, ATR, MRE11, NBS1, and RAD51 in preventing CCRs are discussed. CCRs may exert a pathogenic effect by either (1) gene dosage-dependent mechanisms, e.g. haploinsufficiency, (2) mechanisms based on disruption of the genomic architecture, such that genes, parts of genes or regulatory elements are truncated, fused or relocated and thus their interactions disturbed - these mechanisms will predominantly affect gene expression - or (3) mixed mutation mechanisms in which a CCR on one chromosome is combined with a different type of mutation on the other chromosome. Such inferred mechanisms of pathogenicity need corroboration by mRNA sequencing. Also, future studies with in vitro models, such as inducible pluripotent stem cells from patients with CCRs, and transgenic model organisms should substantiate current inferences regarding putative pathogenic effects of CCRs. The ramifications of the growing body of information on CCRs for clinical and experimental genetics and future treatment modalities are briefly illustrated with 2 cases, one of which suggests KDM4C (JMJD2C) as a novel candidate gene for mental retardation.

Constitutional complex chromosomal rearrangements in a klinefelter patient: case report and review of literature

BACKGROUNDS

While XXY aneuploidy is the most common disorder of sex chromosomes in men, complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare in humans.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Here we describe clinical and cytogenetic findings in a male referred to our cytogenetic laboratory by an infertility clinic. The patient's age was 35 at the time of referral. Total azoospermia was confirmed on semen analysis.

RESULTS

The karyotype of peripheral blood showed 47,XXY,t(1;3;5)(p22;q29;q22). The mother had the same CCRs.

DISCUSSION

To our best of our knowledge this is the first case of 47,XXY with CCRs. We think it is important to report such a unique chromosomal occurrence.

De novo exceptional complex chromosomal rearrangement in a healthy fertile male: case report and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To report a de novo exceptional complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) with four breakpoints in the male partner of a couple with recurrent abortions.

DESIGN

Case report and review of the literature.

SETTING

Genetics laboratory in a private hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A couple referred for recurrent abortions.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cytogenetic and sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Karyotype and FISH sperm results.

RESULT(S)

The couple was phenotypically normal, with no family history of miscarriage or infertility. Female karyotype was normal. Male karyotype followed by FISH analysis showed a de novo CCR with four breakpoints: t(5,13,16)(q11.1, q14.3, q12.2), ins(16;13)(q12.2;q?q14.2). ish t(5;13;16)(wcp5+,wcp13+), ins(16;13)(wcp13+).

CONCLUSION(S)

Exceptional de novo CCR male carriers with recurrent abortions are extremely rare. Patients with CCRs have limited options to achieve a normal pregnancy. Careful consideration and assessment should be provided upon counseling of couples with CCRs.

Complex chromosome rearrangements related 15q14 microdeletion plays a relevant role in phenotype expression and delineates a novel recurrent syndrome

Complex chromosome rearrangements are constitutional structural rearrangements involving three or more chromosomes or having more than two breakpoints. These are rarely seen in the general population but their frequency should be much higher due to balanced states with no phenotypic presentation. These abnormalities preferentially occur de novo during spermatogenesis and are transmitted in families through oogenesis.Here, we report a de novo complex chromosome rearrangement that interests eight chromosomes in eighteen-year-old boy with an abnormal phenotype consisting in moderate developmental delay, cleft palate, and facial dysmorphisms.Standard G-banding revealed four apparently balanced translocations [corrected] involving the chromosomes 1;13, 3;19, 9;15 and 14;18 that appeared to be reciprocal. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed no imbalances at all the breakpoints observed except for an interstitial microdeletion on chromosome 15. This deletion is 1.6 Mb in size and is located at chromosome band 15q14, distal to the Prader-Willi/Angelman region. Comparing the features of our patient with published reports of patients with 15q14 deletion this finding corresponds to the smallest genomic region of overlap. The deleted segment at 15q14 was investigated for gene content.

A 14-year follow-up of a case detected prenatally of partial trisomy 13q21.32-qter and monosomy 18q22.3-qter as a result of a maternal complex chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 6, 13, and 18

A balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving three chromosomes is rare and may lead to different types of aneuploid germ cells. We report here a 14-year follow-up of a boy with a karyotype defined as 46,XY,der(18)t(6;13;18)(q21;q21.32;q22.3).ish der(18)(13qter+,18qter-) characterized by multiple congenital abnormalities, including distinctive minor facial anomalies, short neck, abnormalities of the extremities, anogenital abnormalities, flexion contractures, especially at extremities, and severe mental and growth retardation. Chromosome analysis in the mother showed a CCR involving chromosomes 6, 13, and 18. This CCR was the result of a three-break rearrangement, and the derivative chromosome 13 consisted of parts of chromosomes 18 and 13. The karyotype of the child was not balanced, and resulted in partial trisomy for 13q and partial monosomy for 18q detected prenatally by conventional and molecular cytogenetics. Although such a karyotype and its phenotype have not previously been reported, we have compared the clinical and cytogenetic data from our patient with previously described cases of partial trisomy 13q and monosomy 18q despite different break points. We are presenting a new CCR in a woman with normal phenotype with a history of four early abortions and a long follow-up of her malformed newborn with partial 13q trisomy and 18q monosomy.

A de novo Complex Chromosome Rearrangement Involving Chromosomes 2, 3, 5, 9 and 11 Detected Prenatally and Studied Postnatally by Conventional Cytogenetics and Molecular Cytogenetic Analyses

OBJECTIVE

To describe a de novo complex chromosome rearrangement(CCR) detected prenatally and studied afterbirth.

METHODS

Conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) were performed on amniotic fluid and peripheral blood. High-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) analysis was made postnatally.

RESULTS

Prenatal/postnatal cytogenetic, FISH and HR-CGH analyses revealed an apparently balanced de novo CCR ascertained as 46,XY,t(2; 3;9)(q21;p24;q22),der(5)inv(5)(?p11q13)t(5; 11)(?p13;q25),ins(5; 3)(?p13;?p23p24). At 9 months,the child has neither congenital anomalies nor evidence of delayed psychomotor development.

CONCLUSIONS

Our report describes a rare CCR detected prenatally and shows the usefulness of FISH and CGH in complementing conventional cytogenetics.

Complex chromosomal rearrangement and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a case report

Complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare events in human pathology and are usually considered to induce severe reproductive impairment by disturbing the meiotic process and producing unbalanced gametes responsible for high reproductive risk. One-third of all CCRs are familial and tend to implicate fewer breakpoints and fewer chromosomes than de novo cases. CCRs are rarely transmitted through spermatogenesis and are primarily ascertained by male infertility. We report a familial balanced CCR, with seven breakpoints involving three chromosomes, which was detected prenatally in a female fetus conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in a couple initially thought to be a carrier of a paternal reciprocal translocation involving two chromosomal breakpoints. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) was used to elucidate the complexity of this CCR. The karyotype of the female CCR carrier was balanced and determined as 46,XX.ish t(1;4)(q42;q32)(WCP1+, D1Z5+, WCP4+, D1S3738-, D4S2930+; WCP4+, D4Z1+, WCP1+, D4S2930-, D1S3738+), ins(1;11)(q41;q23q24)(WCP1+,WCP11+, D11S2071-, MLL+; WCP11+, D11S2071+, WCP1-, MLL-), ins(4;11)(q23;q14q23)(WCP4+,WCP11+; WCP11+,WCP4-). The same balanced CCR was confirmed in her oligozoospermic father. We report, to our knowledge, the first case of ICSI performed in an infertile male with CCR, resulting in a balanced CCR carrier female with a normal clinical follow-up at 4 years of age. This particular case stresses the point of the relevance and feasibility of ICSI procedure in cases of balanced CCRs.

Maternal complex chromosome rearrangements involving five chromosomes 1, 4, 10, 12 and 20 ascertained through a del(4)(p14p15) detected in a mother's first affected daughter

Complex chromosomal rearrangements, defined as exchanges between three or more chromosomes, are very rare aberrations in human chromosomal pathology. We present a case of a complex, apparently balanced maternal chromosome rearrangement involving five different chromosomes (1, 4, 10, 12 and 20) and six breakpoints ascertained through a deletion of the short arm of chromosome 4 [del(4)(p14p15)] detected in a mother's affected 2-year old daughter.

Characterization of a de novo complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosomes 2 and 12, associated with mental retardation and impaired speech development

We report on a currently six-year-old patient with a de novo complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosomes 2 and 12. A translocation 2;12 that appeared to be reciprocal after standard banding turned out to be a complex event with seven breaks after molecular cytogenetic analyses. Array CGH analysis showed no imbalances at the breakpoints but revealed an additional microdeletion of about 80 kb on chromosome 11. The same deletion was also present in the phenotypically normal father. The patient showed relatively mild mental retardation, defined mainly as impaired speech development (orofacial dyspraxia) and psychomotor retardation. In addition, mild dysmorphic facial features like hypertelorism, a prominent philtrum and down-turned corners of the mouth were observed. We narrowed down all breakpoint regions to about 100 kb, using a panel of mapped bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). BACs spanning or flanking all seven breakpoints were identified and no chromosomal imbalances were found consistent with the array CGH results. Our investigations resulted in the following karyotype: 46,XY,t(2;12)(2pter-->2p25.3::2p23.3-->2p25.2::2p23.3-->2p14::2q14.3-->2p14::2q14.3-->2q14.3::12q 12-->12qter;12pter-->12q12::2p25.3-->2p25.2::2q14.3-->2qter).

A highly complex rea(2;3;11) and aniridia by position effect

A two-year-old boy presenting with bilateral aniridia and psychomotor retardation had a de novo (2;3;11) highly complex rearrangement which was characterized as far as possible by means of G-banding and FISH assays with multiple probes including cosmids for the Wilms, Aniridia, Genital anomalies and Retardation (WAGR) region, alphoid repeats for chromosomes 2, 3 and 11, subtelomere probes for 2p/2q, 3p/3q and 11q and BACs for 2q32 and 3q13. We identified approximately 15 breakpoints with at least three interchromosomal and three intrachromosome anomalies involving chromosome 11. Both parents had normal karyotypes and no cryptic 11p rearrangements revealed by the chromosome 11 cosmid panel. The lack of a deletion of PAX6 pointed to the direct insertion of an approximately 300-kb segment involving the cosmids FO2121 and AO4160, and more specifically the insertion's proximal breakpoint in the approximately 150-kb segment between FO2121 and FAT5 (PAX6), as the responsible factor for the patient's aniridia via a position effect resulting in functional haploinsufficiency of the PAX6 gene. This case illustrates the importance of recognizing that de novo complex chromosomal rearrangements found in patients with diverse clinical features may contribute to the phenotype, but that multiple mechanisms and higher levels of complexity may be unmasked by high resolution molecular cytogenetic studies.

A constitutional complex chromosome rearrangement involving meiotic arrest in an azoospermic male: Case report

Complex chromosome rearrangements are rare aberrations that frequently lead to reproductive failure and that may hinder assisted reproduction. A 25-year-old azoospermic male was studied cytogenetically with synaptonemal complex analysis of spermatocytes from a testicular biopsy and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of lymphocytes. The spermatocytes showed a pentavalent plus a univalent chromosome. Cell death occurred mainly at advanced pachytene stages. The sex chromosomes were involved in the multiple, as shown by their typical axial excrescences. Two autosomal pairs, including an acrocentric chromosome (15), were also involved in the multiple. FISH allowed the definite identification of all the involved chromosomes. An inverted chromosome 12 is translocated with most of one long arm of chromosome 15, while the centromeric piece of this chromosome 15 is translocated with Yqh, forming a small marker chromosome t(15;Y). The euchromatic part of the Y chromosome is joined to the remaining piece of chromosome 12, forming a neo-Y chromosome. The patient shows azoospermia and a normal phenotype. The disruption of spermatogenesis is hypothetically due to the extent of asynaptic segments and to sex-body association during pachytene. This CCR occurred 'de novo' during paternal spermatogenesis. Meiotic analysis and FISH are valuable diagnostic tools in these cases.

De novo double translocation 3;13 and 4;8;18 in a patient with mental retardation and skeletal abnormalities

A de novo, apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving five chromosomes and six chromosome breakpoints was found in a child with Marfanoid habitus, kyphoscoliosis, axillary pterygium, camptodactyly, joint laxity, and mild mental retardation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed a simple translocation involving chromosomes 3 and 13, and a complex rearrangement involving chromosomes 4, 8, and 18 with four breakpoints.

Familial complex chromosomal rearrangement resulting in a recombinant chromosome

Familial complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs) are rare and tend to involve fewer breakpoints and fewer chromosomes than CCRs that are de novo in origin. We report on a CCR identified in a child with congenital heart disease and dysmorphic features. Initially, the child's karyotype was thought to involve a straightforward three-way translocation between chromosomes 3, 8, and 16. However, after analyzing the mother's chromosomes, the mother was found to have a more complex rearrangement that resulted in a recombinant chromosome in the child. The mother's karyotype included an inverted chromosome 2 and multiple translocations involving chromosomes 3, 5, 8, and 16. No evidence of deletion or duplication that could account for the clinical findings in the child was identified.

Prenatal diagnosis of a familial complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 5, 10, 16 and 18

We report one case of a familial complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) involving four different chromosomes 5, 10, 16 and 18. The CCR was detected prenatally at 20 weeks' gestation because of advanced maternal age and history of recurrent miscarriages. Cytogenetic analysis of cultured amniotic fluid cells with GTG banding showed a 46,XX,t(5;16;10;18)(q13;q22;q11.2;q21) karyotype. Parental cytogenetic study revealed that the mother has the same CCR. RBG banding, high resolution banding and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were used to characterize further and confirm the conventional banding data. No physical abnormalities were shown in the targeted fetal ultrasonography examination. The parents decided to continue the pregnancy. The child is now 2 years old and has neither congenital anomalies nor evidence of delayed psychomotor development. The fetal targeted ultrasound and FISH analysis helped us reassure fetal status.

Maternal complex chromosome rearrangement ascertained through a del (13)(q12.1q14.1) detected in her mildly affected daughter

A maternal complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosomes 2, 13, and 20 was ascertained in a normal female through the diagnosis of a deletion of 13q in her daughter. The child has mild clinical features and developmental delay consistent with proximal deletions of 13q that do not extend into band q32 and a del(13)(q12q14.1) that does not involve the retinoblastoma locus by FISH. Maternal studies by GTG banding and FISH showed a complex karyotype with bands 13q12.3-->13q12.1::20p13 translocated to 2p13 and bands 2pter-->2p13::13q12.3-->13q14.1 translocated into band 20p13. This would be the first report of an interstitial deletion of 13q inherited from a parental complex chromosome rearrangement.

Usefulness and limitations of FISH to characterize partially cryptic complex chromosome rearrangements

Interpretation of a complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) using only G-band analysis is difficult and potentially inaccurate. We present two patients with de novo, partially cryptic, CCRs that illustrate both the value and limitations of using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) whole chromosome paint probes to characterize these types of rearrangements. In a patient referred because of features of Townes-Brocks syndrome, G-band analysis revealed an unbalanced CCR involving 3 chromosomes (2,11 and 16) and at least 4 breakpoints. A more complex rearrangement involving two cryptic insertions and at least 6 breakpoints, however, was detected using whole chromosome paint probes specific for the 3 chromosomes involved in the rearrangement. In this case, FISH studies were essential for accurate characterization of this patient's rearrangement. In a second patient, G-band analysis revealed that a 12-year-old male with obesity, small genitalia, attention deficit disorder, learning disabilities, and behavior problems, carried a CCR involving 4 chromosomes (3, 5, 10 and 13) with 6 breakpoints. This rearrangement seemed unbalanced, with missing terminal 3p26. 2-pter material. Our G-band interpretation of this karyotype was confirmed by FISH using whole chromosome paint probes specific for the involved chromosomes. Although no evidence of the "missing" 3pter material was observed using a chromosome 3 paint, FISH analysis using a chromosome 3p unique telomere probe identified telomeric 3p material on the distal long arm of the derivative 10 chromosome. This case illustrates the limited value of painting probes to detect small rearrangements, especially those involving terminal chromosome regions.

A de novo complex chromosomal rearrangement with nine breakpoints characterized by FISH in a boy with mild mental retardation, developmental delay, short stature and microcephaly

A de novo complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosomes 1, 6, 7, 15 and Y was detected in a boy with mental retardation, short stature, and microcephaly. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with whole chromosome painting libraries, band-specific cosmids and telomeric probes was essential for the characterisation of the rearrangement. The CCR was shown to be the result of at least nine chromosomal breaks and involved the alternating insertion of two segments of the short arm of chromosome 1 and two segments of the long arm of chromosome 6 into a novel derived chromosome 7. A non-reciprocal translocation between the distal short arm of the same chromosome 7 and the distal long arm of the Y chromosome was also found, together with a paracentric inversion of the long arm of chromosome 15. The only detectable imbalance was a deletion of the heterochromatic Yq telomeric region. FISH investigations in this case have revealed an additional complexity in this CCR, which has implications for reproductive risk assessment and genetic counselling.

Severe mental retardation-distal arthrogryposis in the upper limbs and complex chromosomal rearrangements resulting from a 10q25-->qter deletion

We present the first report of chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 4, 10 and 12. The proband was a 42-year-old woman with severe mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies. The most striking physical anomalies were upper limb contractures resulting in distal arthrogryposis. As upper limb flexion contractures have been previously reported in individuals with partial distal 10q deletion, this sign should be considered as part of the clinical manifestations of 10q25-->qter monosomy.

Analysis of a familial three way translocation involving chromosomes 3q, 6q, and 15q by high resolution banding and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) shows two different unbalanced karyotypes in sibs

We report on a familial three way translocation involving chromosomes 3, 6, and 15 identified by prometaphase banding and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Two mentally retarded sibs with different phenotypic abnormalities, their phenotypically normal sister and mother, and two fetuses of the phenotypically normal sister were analysed. The terminal regions of chromosomes 3q, 6q, and 15q were involved in a reciprocal translocation, in addition to a paracentric inversion of the derivative chromosome 15. Conventional cytogenetic studies with high resolution GTG banding did not resolve this rearrangement. FISH using whole chromosome paints (WCPs) identified the chromosomal regions involved, except the aberrant region of 3q, which was undetectable with these probes. Investigation of this region with the subtelomeric FISH probe D3S1445/D3S1446 showed a balanced karyotype, 46,XX,t(3;15;6) (q29;q26.1;q26), inv der(15) (q15.1q26.1) in two adult females and one fetus. It was unbalanced in two sibs, showing two different types of unbalanced translocation resulting in partial trisomy 3q in combination with partial monosomy 6q in one patient and partial trisomy 15q with partial monosomy 6q in the other patient and one fetus. These represent apparently new chromosomal phenotypes.

Familial four breakpoint complex chromosomal rearrangement as a cause of monosomy 9p22-->pter and trisomy 10p11.2-->pter and 11q21 analysed by dual and triple colour FISH

A familial four breakpoint complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 9, 10, and 11 was ascertained through a child with dysmorphic features, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and hypotonia. A cryptic insertion, invisible in G banded chromosomes was identified by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) using chromosome specific libraries. Possible mechanisms of its formation as well as karyotype-phenotype correlation are discussed.

Prenatally diagnosed de novo apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangements: two new cases and review of the literature

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) are rare structural rearrangements. Currently six cases of prenatally diagnosed balanced de novo CCR have been described. We present two new cases of prenatally ascertained balanced de novo CCR. In the first case, an amniocentesis revealed a balanced de novo three-way CCR involving chromosomes 5, 6, and 11 with a pericentric inversion of chromosome 5 [four breaks]. In the second case, a balanced de novo rearrangement was identified by amniocentesis which involved a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 3 and 8 and a CCR involving chromosomes 6, 7, and 18 [six breaks]. The use of whole chromosome painting helped elucidate the nature of these rearrangements. A review of the postnatally ascertained cases suggests that most patients have congenital anomalies, minor anomalies, and/or developmental delay/mental retardation. In addition, there appears to be a relationship between the number of chromosome breaks and the extent of phenotypic effects. The paucity of information regarding prenatally diagnosed CCR and the bias of ascertainment of postnatal CCR cases poses a problem in counseling families.

Disclosure of five breakpoints in a complex chromosome rearrangement by microdissection and FISH

Microdissection and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) were used to elucidate the nature of a complex chromosome translocation, after GTG banding failed in the complete characterisation of the structural rearrangement between chromosomes 6 and 12. These chromosomes were painted with chromosome specific paints and one of the chromosome regions involved in the translocation was isolated by microdissection. Ten copies of the microdissected region were collected with microneedles from GTG banded metaphases, transferred to a collecting drop, and amplified by means of DOP-PCR. The PCR product was labelled with biotin-14-dATP and used as a FISH probe for hybridisation to normal metaphase chromosomes and metaphase chromosomes of the patients (microFISH). FISH with this chromosome region specific painting probe and with chromosome band specific probes enabled the characterisation of a complex chromosome rearrangement with five breakpoints in two chromosomes. This resulted in the following karyotype: 46,XY,t(6;12)(6pter--> 6q12::12q24.1-->12qter;12qter-->12q13.3:: 6q16.2-->6q26::12q13.3-->12q24.1::6q12--> 6q16.2::6q26-->6qter).

Molecular analysis of a complex chromosomal rearrangement and a review of familial cases

A complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving chromosomes 7, 8, and 13 was detected in a phenotypically normal woman ascertained through her mentally retarded son with abnormal phenotype. He had a karyotype with 47 chromosomes including an extra der(13). In initial banding studies the CCR in the mother was interpreted as a three-way translocation. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with whole chromosome libraries and a telomere-specific probe was used to better characterize the rearrangement. Combined data allowed us to reinterpret the CCR as a translocation and an insertion. A review of 35 familial CCRs involving at least three chromosomes led to the following observations: 1) familial CCRs tend to have fewer chromosomes involved and fewer break-points than do de novo CCRs; 2) familial transmission is mainly observed through female carriers although the origin of de novo cases is paternal; 3) an apparent excess of balanced female carriers among the offspring of index carriers was noted; and 4) meiotic segregation resulting in malformed liveborn infants is most frequently due to adjacent-1 segregation, followed by 4:2 segregation; no adjacent-2 segregation was observed.

Complex chromosomal rearrangements: some breakpoints may have cellular adaptive significance

Cytogenetic study of a 3-year-old girl with developmental delay and some minor abnormalities revealed a complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) involving seven chromosomes with eight breakpoints, leading to monosomy of segment 5q15-q22. According to breakpoint distribution, CCRs may be classified as those with primary intrachromosomal abnormalities (including inversions, insertions, duplications, etc.) and those without them. Only the latter group of CCRs was used in this analysis. Comparison of theoretical and observed breakpoint distributions in 33 cases demonstrated that recurrent involvement of some chromosome(s) ("re-entry") occurs more frequently than expected. One possible explanation for this observation suggests that the initial event leads to an unstable provisional rearrangement, and subsequent breaks are necessary to stabilize the karyotype.

A complex chromosomal rearrangement detected prenatally and studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization

We report of case of a complex chromosomal rearrangement detected prenatally and studied with traditional banding methods and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The combination of these techniques showed that four chromosomes were involved in the translocation. Nine breakpoints were proposed to explain these results. Some of the findings could only be detected with fluorescence in situ hybridization, demonstrating the usefulness of this technique in characterizing chromosomal abnormalities that would otherwise be difficult to interpret correctly with classical cytogenetics alone.

Kallmann syndrome associated with complex chromosome rearrangement

We report on a male with Kallmann syndrome (KS) and an apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR): 46,XY,t(3; 9)(9;12)(q13.2;q21.2p13;q15). This is the first known report of a CCR in the KS and the second reported case of a definitive autosomal chromosome abnormality with KS. Possible relationships between the cytogenetic abnormality and KS are discussed.

Complex chromosome rearrangement with ankyloblepharon filiforme adnatum

A Caucasian boy with a de novo complex chromosome rearrangement owing to six chromosome breaks was small for gestation with microcephaly, complex heart defect, hypotonia, left auricular pit, simian creases, and ankyloblepharon filiforme adnatum. The rearrangement included two translocation, t(15;21) (q22;q22) and t(3;11)(q21;q11), with the derivative 3 showing in addition pericentric inversion (p11q11) and interstitial deletion (q11q21). Based on parental satellite polymorphisms of chromosomes 15 and 21, the paternal gamete appeared to be the source of the chromosome rearrangement. There was no evidence of mitotic chromosome instability. A review of 36 reported patients with complex chromosome rearrangements secondary to more than four breaks indicates that complex chromosome rearrangements are compatible with gamete survival, zygote formation, and postnatal life. The latter is usually compromised by structural defects, growth retardation, and often mental retardation.

Cleft palate and complex chromosome rearrangements

Two of three unrelated children with de novo congenital complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) with more than four chromosome breaks had cleft lip and palate as one of several congenital anomalies. In patient 1, unilateral complete cleft of the primary and secondary palates accompanied severe ectrodactyly, bilateral posterior choanal atresia and several minor congenital anomalies. Karyotypes of peripheral lymphocytes and skin fibroblasts showed five derivative chromosomes with six break points. There were two translocations, t(2;5), t(3;11) and an interstitial deletion, del(13)(q12q14). Patient 2 had a bilateral complete cleft of the lip and palate, in addition to slow pre- and postnatal growth and minor congenital anomalies. Peripheral lymphocytes and palatal mucosa fibroblasts karyotypes showed five derivative chromosomes with six break points. A partial deletion of 10p, two translocations, t(2;3), t(7;18) and an inversion of the derivative chromosome 2 were present. In both patients, a "major catastrophe" of unknown etiology in one of the parental gametes appeared to be the event leading to the stable CCR without evidence of persistent chromosome instability. All four parents had normal karyotypes. The presence of palatal clefts in these patients indicates that dysmorphologists and pediatricians have to consider CCR whenever taking care of a patient with cleft palate, particularly if additional anomalies, no matter how subtle, are present. The detection and interpretation of the latter anomalies are essential for the diagnosis and management of these patients. Accurate cytogenetic diagnosis determines the short- and long-term prognosis and facilitates genetic counseling in regard to life-span, quality of life and reproductive plans of patients and parents.

A complex chromosome rearrangement with 10 breakpoints: tentative assignment of the locus for Williams syndrome to 4q33----q35.1

An unbalanced complex chromosome rearrangement with 10 breakpoints resulting in four derivative chromosomes (1, 2, 4, and 11) was found in a girl with severe phenotypic abnormalities, many of which are characteristic of Williams syndrome. The patient was monosomic for the region 4q33----q35.1 and thus the mapping of the syndrome could tentatively be restricted to this region.

De novo complex chromosome rearrangement in identical twins with multiple congenital anomalies

A de novo and apparently balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) was found in monozygotic (MZ) twin infants with multiple congenital anomalies. The rearrangement involved 4 chromosomes with 6 breakpoints including 2p23, 2q13, 2q21.1, 3p23, 11q13.1, and 12q24.1. This seems to be the first report of a CCR in MZ twins. The relationship between this chromosome abnormality and MZ twinning is discussed.

Ankyloblepharon filiforme adnatum

We treated 4 infants with ankyloblepharon filiforme adnatum (AFA), an uncommon anomaly in which the apposing eyelid margins are connected by abnormal tissue strands. One infant had AFA alone, one had Hay-Wells syndrome, characterized by ectodermal dysplasia, and the other 2 had chromosome abnormalities, trisomy 18, and complex chromosome rearrangement, with visceral malformations. Despite heterogeneity and phenotypic variability, these developmental abnormalities shared (1) involvement of tissues growing in apposition and (2) temporal overlap of their occurrence. This suggests a common defect in the mechanism(s) that regulate tissue fusion at multiple sites during development.

Balanced complex chromosomal rearrangements with more than four breakpoints: report of a new case

Congenital complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) compatible with life are rare in man. We report on a new case of apparently balanced CCR in a 30-month-old boy with mental retardation and minor anomalies. This CCR consists in a 3-way reciprocal translocation (2;3;16) and an insertion (6;7), as it was analyzed by different banding and high resolution techniques. It involves 6 breakpoints: 2q11, 13q12, 16p11, 6p21.3, 7q21.3 and 7q35.

A balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement (BCCR) with phenotypic effect

The authors report on a case of balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement (BCCR) with phenotypic effect, describe the dysmorphisms and malformations observed, and discuss the various pathogenetic mechanisms. On the basis of these considerations, they underline the need for careful reporting of examined cases, distinguishing the characteristic signs from dysmorphisms that are described in several other chromosomal aberrations as well. Finally, they stress the importance of a more precise description of BCCRs for the purpose, among others, of a correct formulation of reproductive risk.

Deletion of terminal portion of 6q: report of a case with unusual malformations

We present the necropsy findings of a 21-week-gestation male fetus with deletion of the terminal portion of long arm of chromosome 6 [46,XY,del(6)(q23----qter)]. Major anomalies include intrauterine growth retardation, facial anomalies, nuchal cyst, scoliosis, bilateral diaphragmatic hernias, persistent common atrioventricular canal, absent olfactory bulbs and agenesis of corpus callosum. In aberrations of chromosome 6q, patients usually have psychomotor retardation, somatic growth failure, and facial anomalies; nuchal cyst and bilateral diaphragmatic hernias have not yet been described.

Complex chromosome rearrangements involving chromosomes 1;3 and 2;3 in two abnormal children

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) involving multiple breaks in two chromosomes are rare. The detection of a four-break apparently balanced rearrangement involving chromosomes 1 and 3 in a child with developmental delay led us to reanalyse, using prometaphase banding, another complex two-chromosome rearrangement in a previously reported case (Fitzgerald 1974). The relationship between clinical abnormalities and apparently balanced rearrangements is discussed.