X chromosome inactivation in fibroblasts of mentally retarded female carriers of the fragile site Xq27.3: application of the probe M27 beta to evaluate X inactivation status

Mechanisms of Choice in X-Chromosome Inactivation

Early in development, placental and marsupial mammals harbouring at least two X chromosomes per nucleus are faced with a choice that affects the rest of their lives: which of those X chromosomes to transcriptionally inactivate. This choice underlies phenotypical diversity in the composition of tissues and organs and in their response to the environment, and can determine whether an individual will be healthy or affected by an X-linked disease. Here, we review our current understanding of the process of choice during X-chromosome inactivation and its implications, focusing on the strategies evolved by different mammalian lineages and on the known and unknown molecular mechanisms and players involved.

Skewed X-Chromosome Inactivation and Compensatory Upregulation of Escape Genes Precludes Major Clinical Symptoms in a Female With a Large Xq Deletion

In mammalian females, X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) acts as a dosage compensation mechanism that equalizes X-linked genes expression between homo- and heterogametic sexes. However, approximately 12–23% of X-linked genes escape from XCI, being bi-allelic expressed. Herein, we report on genetic and functional data from an asymptomatic female of a Fragile X syndrome family, who harbors a large deletion on the X-chromosome. Array-CGH uncovered that the de novo, terminal, paternally originated 32 Mb deletion on Xq25-q28 spans 598 RefSeq genes, including escape and variable escape genes. Androgen receptor (AR) and retinitis pigmentosa 2 (RP2) methylation assays showed extreme skewed XCI ratios from both peripheral blood and buccal mucosa, silencing the abnormal X-chromosome. Surprisingly, transcriptome-wide analysis revealed that escape and variable escape genes spanning the deletion are mostly upregulated on the active X-chromosome, precluding major clinical/cognitive phenotypes in the female. Metaphase high count, hemizygosity concordance for microsatellite markers, and monoallelic expression of genes within the deletion suggest the absence of mosaicism in both blood and buccal mucosa. Taken together, our data suggest that an additional protective gene-by-gene mechanism occurs at the transcriptional level in the active X-chromosome to counterbalance detrimental phenotype effects of large Xq deletions.

Unbalanced 14;X Translocation and Pattern of X Inactivation in a Female Patient with Multiple Congenital Anomalies

We report on a female patient who was first evaluated at the age of 6 years with developmental delay, dysmorphic facial features, seizures, and autistic behavior. A brain CT showed complete agenesis of the corpus callosum, and EEG recorded bilateral epileptogenic foci. Karyotype analysis revealed 45,X,psu dic(14;X)(p11;p22). FISH using 14q and Xp subtelomeric probes, combined with a SHOX gene-specific probe, and centromere X and XIST gene analysis revealed ish psu dic(14;X)(D14S1420+; DXYS129-, SHOX-, DXZ1+, XIST+). Array CGH detected a 2-Mb loss at Xp22.33 and a 4.6-Mb gain at Xp22.2p22.12. The deletion contains 34 genes, of which CSF2RA and SHOX are OMIM morbid genes. The duplication also contains some OMIM morbid genes, of which CDKL5, NH5, RPS6KA3, and AP1S2 are the most important. The late replicating chromatin technique was used to detect the pattern of X inactivation in the normal X and in the translocated chromosome. The translocated X was found to be inactive in 70% of the studied blood lymphocytes with patchy extension of inactivation to chromosome 14. In conclusion, the phenotype of the patient may be partially affected by the haploinsufficiency of the genes that are known to escape X inactivation and that lie within the deleted region and by other deleted or duplicated genes on the abnormal X chromosome due to an alternative pattern of X inactivation. The phenotype of the patient was significantly aggravated and complicated by the functional monosomy of some genes on chromosome 14 due to partial spreading of inactivation and silencing of those genes. This case report indicates the importance of structural and functional studies and emphasizes the clinical importance of the follow-up of abnormal microarrays.

Copy number changes on the X chromosome in women with and without highly skewed X-chromosome inactivation

AIM

To test the hypothesis that microdeletions or microduplications below the resolution of a standard karyotype may be a significant cause of highly skewed X-inactivation (HSXI) in women without a cytogenetically detected X-chromosome anomaly.

METHODS

Cases were women with HSXI, defined as ≥85% of cells in a blood sample with the same active allele at the HUMARA locus. The skewing in controls ranged from 50 to <75%. We performed an SNP microarray analysis using the Affymetrix 6.0 platform for 45 cases and 45 controls.

RESULTS

Cases and controls did not differ in the frequency of X-chromosome copy number changes ≥100 kb or in the frequency of copy number changes that contained genes. However, one woman with HSXI >90% in blood and left and right buccal smears had a 5.5-Mb deletion in Xp22.2p22.1. This deletion could affect the viability of male conceptions and may have led to the dysmorphology found in female carriers.

CONCLUSION

HSXI in a blood sample is rarely due to X-chromosome copy number changes detectable by microarray.

Skewed X chromosome inactivation and trisomic spontaneous abortion: no association

Several studies suggest that highly skewed X chromosome inactivation (HSXI) is associated with recurrent spontaneous abortion. We hypothesized that this association reflects an increased rate of trisomic conceptions due to anomalies on the X chromosome that lead both to HSXI and to a diminished oocyte pool. We compared the distribution of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) skewing percentages (range: 50%-100%) among women with spontaneous abortions in four karyotype groups-trisomy (n = 154), chromosomally normal male (n = 43), chromosomally normal female (n = 38), nontrisomic chromosomally abnormal (n = 61)-to the distribution for age-matched controls with chromosomally normal births (n = 388). In secondary analyses, we subdivided the nontrisomic chromosomally abnormal group, divided trisomies by chromosome, and classified women by reproductive history. Our data support neither an association of HSXI with all trisomies nor an association of HSXI with chromosomally normal male spontaneous abortions. We also find no association between HSXI and recurrent abortion (n = 45).

X inactivation of the FMR1 fragile X mental retardation gene

X chromosome inactivation has been hypothesised to play a role in the aetiology and clinical expression of the fragile X syndrome. The identification of the FMR1 gene involved in fragile X syndrome allows testing of the assumption that the fragile X locus is normally subject to X inactivation. We studied the expression of the FMR1 gene from inactive X chromosomes by reverse transcription of RNA followed by PCR (RT-PCR), both in somatic cell hybrids which retain an active or inactive human X chromosome and in a female patient with a large deletion surrounding the FMR1 gene. In both analyses, the data indicate that FMR1 is not normally expressed from the inactive X chromosome and is, therefore, subject to X chromosome inactivation. This finding is consistent with the results of previous studies of DNA methylation of FMR1 on active and inactive X chromosomes, verifies previous assumptions about the fragile X locus, and supports the involvement of X inactivation in the variable phenotype of females with full mutations of the FMR1 gene.

Noninactivation of a portion of Xq28 in a balanced X-autosome translocation

We present a balanced translocation (X;9) (q28;q21) in which the normal X chromosome is preferentially active. The derivative X chromosome is inactive in 93% of fibroblasts, but the X portion translocated onto chromosome 9 is not inactivated, as apparent from DNA methylation and chromosome replication patterns. Consequently, the patient is functionally disomic for the part of Xq28 distal to the locus LICAM.