Further characterization of 19 cases of rea(21q21q) and delineation as isochromosomes or Robertsonian translocations in Down syndrome

Two cases of placental trisomy 21 mosaicism causing false-negative NIPT results

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA has been widely used for prenatal screening to detect the common fetal aneuploidies (such as trisomy 21, 18, and 13). NIPT has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in previous studies, but false positives (FPs) and false negatives (FNs) occur. Although the prevalence of FN NIPT results for Down syndrome is rare, the impact on families and society is significant.

CASE PRESENTATION

This article described two cases of foetuses that tested "negative" for trisomy 21 by NIPT technology using the semiconductor sequencing platform. However, the fetal karyotypes of amniotic fluid were 46,XY, + 21 der(21;21)(q10;q10) and 47,XY, + 21 karyotypes, respectively. Placental biopsies confirmed that, in the first case, the chromosome 21 placenta chimerism ratio ranged from 13 to 88% with the 46,XX, + 21,der(21;21)(q10;q10)[86]/46,XX[14] karyotype of placental chorionic cells (middle of fetal-side placental tissue). However, in the second case, of all the placental biopsies, percentage of total chimerism was less than 30%; and placental biopsies taken at the middle of maternal side and middle of fetal side, also had variable trisomy 2 mosaicism levels of 10% and 8%, respectively. Ultimately, the pregnancies were interrupted at 30 gestational age (GA) and 27GA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we present two cases of FN NIPT results that might have been caused by biological mechanisms, as opposed to poor quality, technical errors, or negligence. Clinical geneticists and their patients must understand that NIPT is a screening procedure.

The Second Case of Non-Mosaic Trisomy of Chromosome 26 with Homologous Fusion 26q;26q in the Horse

Simple Summary

We present chromosome and DNA analysis of a normal Thoroughbred mare and her abnormal foal born with neurologic defects. We show that the foal has an abnormal karyotype with three copies of chromosome 26 (trisomy chr26), instead of the normal two. However, two of the three chr26 have fused, forming an unusual derivative chromosome. Chromosomes of the dam are normal, suggesting that the chromosome abnormality found in the foal happened during egg or sperm formation or after fertilization. Analysis of the foal and the dam with chr26 DNA markers indicates that the extra chr26 in the foal is likely of maternal origin and that the unusual derivative chromosome resulted from the fusion of two parental chr26. We demonstrate that although conventional karyotype analysis can accurately identify chromosome abnormalities, determining the mechanism and parental origin of these abnormalities requires DNA analysis. Most curiously, this is the second case of trisomy chr26 with unusual derivative chromosome in the horse, whereas all other equine trisomies have three separate copies of the chromosome involved. Because horse chr26 shares genetic similarity with human chr21, which trisomy causes Down syndrome, common features between trisomies of horse chr26 and human chr21 are discussed.

Abstract

We present cytogenetic and genotyping analysis of a Thoroughbred foal with congenital neurologic disorders and its phenotypically normal dam. We show that the foal has non-mosaic trisomy for chromosome 26 (ECA26) but normal 2n = 64 diploid number because two copies of ECA26 form a metacentric derivative chromosome der(26q;26q). The dam has normal 64,XX karyotype indicating that der(26q;26q) in the foal originates from errors in parental meiosis or post-fertilization events. Genotyping ECA26 microsatellites in the foal and its dam suggests that trisomy ECA26 is likely of maternal origin and that der(26q;26q) resulted from Robertsonian fusion. We demonstrate that conventional and molecular cytogenetic approaches can accurately identify aneuploidy with a derivative chromosome but determining the mechanism and parental origin of the rearrangement requires genotyping with chromosome-specific polymorphic markers. Most curiously, this is the second case of trisomy ECA26 with der(26q;26q) in the horse, whereas all other equine autosomal trisomies are ‘traditional’ with three separate chromosomes. We discuss possible ECA26 instability as a contributing factor for the aberration and likely ECA26-specific genetic effects on the clinical phenotype. Finally, because ECA26 shares evolutionary homology with human chromosome 21, which trisomy causes Down syndrome, cytogenetic, molecular, and phenotypic similarities between trisomies ECA26 and HSA21 are discussed.

Discordant structural chromosomal aberrations in chorionic villi and amniotic fluid leading to a formation of an isochromosome 21: a case report

Background

Fetoplacental discrepancies occur in approximately 1–2% of analyzed prenatal cases. They are typically due to confined placental mosaicism, where an aberration is observed in the placental cells but not found in the fetal cells. Confined placental mosaicism usually involves aneuploidies and more sparsely structural chromosomal aberrations. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a discrepancy in the analyses of chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis involving two different structural chromosomal aberrations of chromosome 21.

Case presentation

We report a 33-year-old woman who was referred for a non-invasive prenatal testing due to an increased risk of trisomy 21 gleaned from a combined ultrasound and blood test. The non-invasive prenatal testing showed an increased risk of trisomy 21 with a normalized coverage signal that did not match the fetal cell-free DNA fraction. Rapid aneuploidy detection performed on uncultured chorionic villi indicated mosaicism for trisomy 21. The follow-up analyses revealed discordant chromosomal aberrations: 46,XY,der(21)t(10;21)(p11.21;q10) in the analysis of the chorionic villus sampling and 46,XY, + 21,der(21;21)(q10;q10) in the analysis of the amniocentesis. Thus, the analyses indicated mosaicism for a cell line containing trisomy 21 and a cell line containing a partially duplicated short arm of chromosome 10 in the chorionic villi and complete trisomy 21 resulting from an isochromosome 21 in the amniotic fluid. The analyses of the lymphocytes and the fibroblasts of the woman were normal.

Conclusions

We propose a multiple-step mechanism as a possible theoretical explanation for the formation of these discordant structural chromosomal aberrations in the chorionic villi and amniotic fluid. With this case report, we want to highlight the importance of understanding the possible underlying embryological mechanisms when interpreting results from different prenatal analyses.

A rare Down syndrome foetus with de novo 21q;21q rearrangements causing false negative results in non-invasive prenatal testing: a case report

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been established as a routine prenatal screening to assess the risk of common foetal aneuploidy disorder (trisomy 21, 18, and 13). NIPT has high sensitivity and high specificity, but false positive and false negative results still exist. False negative NIPT results involving Down syndrome are rare, but have a high clinical impact on families and society.

CASE PRESENTATION

We described a case of a foetus that tested "negative" for trisomy 21 (Z-score was 0.664) by NIPT based on the semiconductor sequencing platform (SSP). The foetal fraction of cell-free DNA was 16.9%; this percentage was much larger than the threshold of 4% for obtaining accurate NIPT results. However, postnatally, the newborn was diagnosed with Down syndrome with the 46,XY,der(21;21)(q10;q10),+ 21 karyotype.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented a case of false negative NIPT results, which may occur through biological mechanisms rather than poor quality, technical errors or negligence. It is imperative for clinical geneticists and their patients to understand that NIPT is still a screening test.

Isochromosome 21q is overrepresented among false-negative cell-free DNA prenatal screening results involving Down syndrome

False-negative cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results involving Down syndrome are rare, but have high clinical impact on patients and their healthcare providers. Understanding the biology behind these results may allow for improved diagnostic follow-up and counseling. In 5 different centers offering cfDNA prenatal screening, 9 false-negative results were documented in 646 confirmed cases of trisomy 21; a false-negative rate of 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7-2.6). False-negative results included 4 cases of classical trisomy 21 and 5 cases with a de novo 21q;21q rearrangement. Two out of five rearrangements had molecular studies and were confirmed as isochromosomes. When combined with reports from the cfDNA screening literature, 8 out of 29 (28%) Down syndrome cases with a false-negative "non-invasive prenatal test" (NIPT) were associated with a 21q;21q rearrangement, compared with 2% reported in live born children with Down syndrome. In our laboratory series, evidence for placental or fetal mosaicism was present in 3 out of 3 true-positive cases involving a 21q;21q rearrangement and was confirmed in one false-negative case where placental material was available for study. Isochromosome 21q rearrangements are thus overrepresented among false-negative cfDNA screening results involving Down syndrome. Postzygotic isochromosome formation leading to placental mosaicism provides a biological cause for the increased prevalence of these rearrangements among false-negative cases. For clinical practice, a low trisomic fraction (z-score or equivalent measure) relative to the fetal fraction suggests placental mosaicism. Care should be taken as these cases may not reflect confined placental mosaicism, but rather full trisomy in the presence of a placenta containing normal cells.

Are de novo rea(21;21) chromosomes really de novo?

We report a rare case of recurrent trisomy 21 caused by an isochromosome 21q and what is very likely to be maternal germ-line cell mosaicism. Over 90% of cases of rob(21;21) reported in the literature are due to an isochromosome 21q, with a risk of recurrence of more than 10%.

Cytogenetic and epidemiological findings in Down syndrome: England and Wales 1989-2009

This study describes the characteristics of karyotypes leading to phenotypic Down syndrome (trisomy 21) in 29,256 cases diagnosed between 1989 and 2009 in England and Wales included in the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register (NDSCR). The frequency of occurrence of the different karyotypes, proportions diagnosed prenatally, sex ratios, mean maternal age, and proportions of mothers with recurrences were analyzed. Nearly 97% of all cases were free trisomy 21; 2.9% contributory trisomy 21, 0.3% double or triple aneuploidies; 1% of all were mosaics. Mean maternal age of free trisomy 21 cases was 35 years, 54% were male, and 1% of mothers had recurrences. Free trisomy 21 mosaics had a lower mean maternal age (33 years), a lower proportion of males (39.5%), and 2.5% of mothers had recurrences. The majority of contributory translocations were Robertsonian or rea (21;21). Their mothers were younger, particularly those of Robertsonian translocations (28 years). Of the Robertsonian der (14;21) translocations of known parental origin, 54% were de novo, 41% maternal and 5% paternal and 15.8% of mothers of those of maternal origin had recurrences. Multiple aneuploidies have the highest proportion of males (67%), highest proportion of mosaics (40%), a mean maternal age of 37 years, and no mothers had a recurrence. The size of this national register allowed the frequency of occurrence of the rarer karyotypes of Down syndrome to be estimated and their epidemiology described.

Down syndrome due to unbalanced homologous acrocentric rearrangements and its recurrence in subsequent pregnancies: prenatal diagnosis by amniocentesis

OBJECTIVE

To present our experience of amniocentesis for the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome due to unbalanced homologous acrocentric rearrangements and its recurrence in subsequent pregnancies.

CASE REPORT

From January 1987 to September 2009, six cases with rea(21q21q) Down syndrome were diagnosed among 31,194 patients who underwent amniocentesis at Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Cytogenetic analysis of parental blood lymphocytes was performed in each case, and polymorphic DNA markers were used to investigate the nature of the aberrant chromosome. Three of the six cases were associated with recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. The rea(21q21q) Down syndrome was associated with advanced maternal age in three cases, a previous child with rea(21q21q) Down syndrome in three cases, an abnormal maternal serum screening result in one case, and an abnormal ultrasound finding in one case. All six cases arose de novo. Among the six cases with molecular analysis results, all had isochromosome 21, five of which were determined to be of maternal origin.

CONCLUSION

We found a frequency of 0.019% for rea(21q21q) Down syndrome in patients undergoing amniocentesis. Down syndrome caused by the homologous rearrangement rea(21q21q) can be associated with recurrence. Prenatal diagnosis of rea(21q21q) Down syndrome should include extensive cytogenetic and molecular analyses of the parents and probands.

Prenatal detection of isochromosome 21 by QF-PCR. A comparison between FISH and traditional karyotyping

OBJECTIVE

To compare rapid aneuploidy diagnostic tests with traditional karyotyping in the prenatal detection of Down syndrome due to isochromosome 21.

METHODS

Quantitative fluorescence PCR (QF-PCR) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were performed on uncultured amniotic fluid, followed by routine karyotyping. chromosomal and microsatellite analysis of peripheral blood from parents was also carried out.

RESULTS

The QF-PCR screening showed a trisomic diallelic pattern for 5 of 6 markers spanning the long arm of chromosome 21. FISH showed 3 signals in the interphase cells for the region 21q22.13-q22 during LSI 21 probe mapping. Cultured amniotic fluid revealed an isochromosome 21 resulting in a 46,XX,i(21)(q10),+21 karyotype. Parental microsatellite analysis proved that the isochromosome was paternal in origin.

CONCLUSION

The most informative analytical tool in this case appears to be QF-PCR, although a combination of QF-PCR and karyotyping provided the most evidence.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Translocation 13;13 Patau Syndrome: Clinical Features of Two Cases

Patau syndrome is associated with extra chromosome 13 material, either free as in the 47,++13 or in a Robertsonian translocation or another rearrangement. We report on two fetuses with trisomy 13 who were diagnosed prenatally via cord blood and amniocentesis, respectively. They showedde novoRobertsonian translocation between chromosome 13 and 13, and had normal parents. One was detected cytogeneticaly at 24 weeks of gestation with a karyotype of 46, XX, rob(13;13) and lived only 1 month after birth. Holoprosencephaly, proboscis, microphthalmia and heart septal defects were present. The other fetus was examined at 14 weeks gestation because of cystic hygroma, hydrothorax and hyperechogenic kidneys and had the karyotpe 46, XY, rob(13;13). After abortion the fetus was found to have a cleft lip and palate, postaxial polydactyly of the feet, micrognathia, omphalocele, low-set ears with abnormal helix and to be small for the gestational age. Due to the difference in chromosomal makeup seen in non disjunction, there may be differences in expression of several of the features often seen with trisomy 13, either classical type (as in the 47,++13) orde novoRobertsonian translocation type (as in the 46).

Nonmosaic balanced homologous translocations of major clinical significance: some may be mosaic

The main mechanism proposed for formation of homologous translocations/isochromosomes is mitotic and if this occurs in a chromosomally normal conceptus, mosaicism would be expected to be seen. The lack of mosaicism in published cases of rearrangement (REA) of mitotic origin might be explained by under-detection due to the low level mosaicism for a normal line. Recently it was reported that sex-specific centromere instability in early embryogenesis leads to a female prevalence among individuals with mosaicism for pericentromeric rearrangements. To determine whether carriers of apparent non-mosaic homologous REA could be mosaics for a normal cell line, the sex ratio (male to female ratio) among carriers of balanced and unbalanced homologous translocations/isochromosomes was studied. This ratio was determined to establish if there is a female predominance similar to that seen in carriers of REA with mosaicism. In reviewing the literature, a female prevalence among fetuses with balanced homologous REA and among carriers of unbalanced homologous REA detected prenatally, postnatally and in miscarriages was found. Overall, there were 48 males and 72 females in the collected sample, and this ratio differed significantly from the expected sex ratio of 1.06 (P = 0.0075). There is not a male prevalence among miscarried fetuses, there is no evidence of selection against males in the collected material of this study. The analysis of sex ratios in different variants of trisomy 13 with respect to ascertainment (prenatal diagnosis, miscarriages, liveborn) also does not support an intrauterine selection against males as a cause of a female prevalence among carriers of homologous REA. Thus the data presented in this paper suggests that a proportion of the carriers of balanced homologous REA may have mosaicism for a normal line. Since low level mosaicism for a normal line in a translocation carrier would alter his/her reproductive options, it can be recommended that molecular polymorphic analysis be applied to these cases. This would allow those resulting from meiotic formation to be distinguished from those resulting from postzygotic formation. This latter mechanism may indicate the presence of a mosaicism for a normal line, making further intensive karyotypic analysis advisable. However, additional studies of healthy carriers of homologous REA of chromosome 14 or 15 should not be done. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome-associated chromosome changes are not mediated by olfactory receptor gene clusters nor by inversion polymorphism on 4p16

The basic genomic defect in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS), including isolated 4p deletions and various unbalanced de novo 4p;autosomal translocations and above all t(4p;8p), is heterogeneous. Olfactory receptor gene clusters (ORs) on 4p were demonstrated to mediate a group of WHS-associated t(4p;8p)dn translocations. The breakpoint of a 4-Mb isolated deletion was also recently reported to fall within the most distal OR. However, it is still unknown whether ORs mediate all 4p-autosomal translocations, or whether they are involved in the origin of isolated 4p deletions. Another unanswered question is whether a parental inversion polymorphism on 4p16 can act as predisposing factor in the origin of WHS-associated rearrangements. We investigated the involvement of the ORs in the origin of 73 WHS-associated rearrangements. No hotspots for rearrangements were detected. Breakpoints on 4p occurred within the proximal or the distal olfactory receptor gene cluster in 8 of 73 rearrangements (11%). These were five t(4p;8p) translocations, one t(4p;7p) translocation and two isolated terminal deletions. ORs were not involved in one additional t(4p;8p) translocation, in a total of nine different 4p;autosomal translocations and in the majority of isolated deletions. The presence of a parental inversion polymorphism on 4p was investigated in 30 families in which the 4p rearrangements, all de novo, were tested for parental origin (7 were maternal and 23 paternal). It was detected only in the mothers of 3 t(4p;8p) cases. We conclude that WHS-associated chromosome changes are not usually mediated by low copy repeats. The 4p16.3 inversion polymorphism is not a risk factor for their origin.

Concurrence of ring 21 and trisomy 21 in children of normal parents

We present a case of two siblings with different chromosome 21 abnormalities that are both de novo [r(21)/i(21p13) mosaicism and rob(14;21)]. Molecular studies using polymorphic markers have shown that these two aberrations had a common maternal origin. However, the parents were cytogenetically and phenotypically normal. This unusual association has not been reported and is considered to be a unique case that should be addressed.

Trisomy 13 due to rea(13q;13q) is caused by i(13) and not rob(13;13)(q10;q10) in the majority of cases

We have used 20 PCR-based DNA polymorphisms to determine whether trisomy 13 due to de novo rea(13q;13q) in six cases is caused by translocation (13q;13q) or isochromosome (13q;13q); to determine the parental origin of the rearrangements and the mechanisms of formation. The six probands were three liveborn children with clinical features characteristic of Patau's syndrome and three fetuses diagnosed prenatally by amniocentesis or CVS. Five cases were isochromosomes with two identical q arms, one of maternal and four of paternal origin. Only one case was a Robertsonian translocation of maternal origin.

Epidemiology of leukemia in children with Down syndrome

Studies suggest nearly a 20-fold increased risk of leukemia in individuals with Down syndrome. Most of this increased risk appears in the first few decades of life, with the highest incidence in children less than 5 years of age. It is unknown why children with Down syndrome are at such an increased risk of leukemia. With respect to environmental exposures, it will be important to investigate risk factors associated with childhood leukemia in general (including diagnostic x-rays, pesticides, and other occupational exposures) as well as experiences common to children with Down syndrome (including routine medical screening tests, increased susceptibility to infections, and increased vitamin deficiencies).

Acquired Robertsonian translocations are not rare events in acute leukemia and lymphoma

Robertsonian translocations are the most common constitutional structural abnormalities but are rarely reported as acquired aberrations in hematologic malignancies. The nonhomologous acrocentric rearrangements are designated as Robertsonian translocations, whereas the homologous acrocentric rearrangements are referred to as isochromosomes. Robertsonian rearrangements have the highest mutation rates of structural chromosome rearrangements based on surveys of newborns and spontaneous abortions. It would be expected that Robertsonian recombinations would be more common than suggested by the literature. A survey of the cytogenetics database from a single institution found 17 patients with acquired Robertsonian rearrangement and hematologic malignancies. This is combined with data from the literature for a total of 237 patients. All of the possible types of Robertsonian rearrangements have been reported in hematologic malignancies, with the i(13q), i(14q), and i(21q) accounting for nearly 60%. Complex karyotypic changes are seen in the majority of cases, corresponding with disease evolution. These karyotypes consistently show loss of chromosomes 5 and/or 7 in the myelocytic disorders, nonacrocentric isochromosomes, and centromeric breakage and reunion. However, nearly 25% of the acquired rearrangements were found as the sole abnormality or in addition to an established cytogenetic aberration. Most of these were the i(14q) with the myelodysplasia subtypes refractory anemia and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Under-ascertainment of mosaic carriers of balanced homologous acrocentric translocations and isochromosomes

Acrocentric rearrangements are the most common chromosome abnormalities in humans. Carriers of homologous acrocentric rearrangements (Robertsonian translocations (ROBs) between homologous chromosomes and isochromosomes) are at very high risk of having multiple spontaneous abortions and chromosomally abnormal offspring. Parents of fetuses and children with unbalanced homologous acrocentric rearrangements are rarely found to be carriers or mosaic for the same rearrangement. Even though recurrent miscarriages may indicate a carrier parent, carriers are rarely identified. Comparison of non-chromosome 21 homologous rearrangements to rea(21q21q) culled from the literature revealed a 7-fold decrease in the number of mosaic cases among the parents of non-rea(21q21q) offspring. This under-ascertainment in parents may be due to low level mosaicism confined to the gonads, a true biological difference between chromosome 21 rearrangements and other homologous acrocentric rearrangements, or simply to the lack of rigorous clinical investigation of the parental karyotypes to uncover mosaicism. We recommend that polymorphic marker analysis be applied to apparently de novo acrocentric rearrangements to distinguish those resulting from biparental postzygotic formation from those resulting from meiotic formation; the latter of which may indicate a potential carrier parent. Parental chromosomal constitutions could then be screened in a large number of cells and in more than one tissue type to identify mosaicism. Identification of mosaicism allows for accurate genetic counseling and discussion of reproductive options. However, given that mosaicism may be restricted to the gonads, prenatal testing is likely to be desired by the family whether or not mosaicism is found.

Discordant prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21 due to mosaic structural rearrangements of chromosome 21

OBJECTIVES

Trisomy 21 mosaicism associated with a structural rearrangement of chromosome 21 is uncommon. We report on two prenatal diagnoses in which karyotypes showed mosaicism with an aberrant cell line, including a structural rearrangement of chromosome 21.

METHODS

Both these cases were associated with increased nuchal translucency. Conventional and molecular cytogenetic analyses were performed on uncultured and cultured trophoblast and amniotic fluid cells.

RESULTS

In Case 1, analysis of trophoblast cells revealed an abnormal karyotype of 47,XX,+mar.ish der(13/21)(D13Z1/D21Z1+)/46,XX. The amniocentesis showed a free non-mosaic trisomy 21. In Case 2, the trophoblast direct analysis showed a normal male karyotype whereas the long-term culture revealed a mosaicism for a dicentric long-arm isochromosome 21: 46,XY,idic(21)(p11)/45,XY,-21/46,XY. Amniocentesis showed an unbalanced non-mosaic karyotype 46,XY,idic(21)(p11) resulting therefore in trisomy for the long arm of chromosome 21.

CONCLUSION

Our cases underline the importance of combining the direct analysis and long-term culture of trophoblast and emphasise the need for confirmatory studies in other tissues when mosaicism of structural rearrangement is encountered in chorionic villi. The meiotic and mitotic mechanisms of formation of these structural rearrangements of chromosome 21 are discussed.

Mosaicism in a patient with Down syndrome reveals post-fertilization formation of a Robertsonian translocation and isochromosome

It has been estimated that a few hundred children are born each year in the United States with translocation Down syndrome. About 5% of the cases with Down syndrome carry a Robertsonian translocation involving chromosome 21. The case described here is a patient with Down syndrome who showed mosaicism for two cell lines. Each cell line contains a different, de novo acrocentric rearrangement. We constructed somatic cell hybrids from the patient's cells and determined the parental origins of the rearrangements by molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. The analysis showed that the rob(14q21q) formed between a paternally inherited chromosome 21 and a maternally inherited chromosome 14, indicating that this rearrangement formed post-zygotically. Further molecular analysis also determined that the rea(21q21q) is an isochromosome of paternal origin. The cell line containing the isochromosome is unbalanced, resulting in trisomy 21. Because the same paternal chromosome 21 was involved in both the isochromosome and the Robertsonian translocation, we speculate that an unstable chromosome 21 was stabilized either through formation of a rob(14q21q) or through formation of an isochromosome. The mechanism proposed for the formation of the rob(14q21q) in this case is different from that for most de novo rob(14q21q), but similar to a previously reported mosaic case of Down syndrome.

Identification of uniparental disomy in phenotypically abnormal carriers of isochromosomes or Robertsonian translocations

Carriers of either homologous or non-homologous acrocentric rearrangements are at an increased risk for aneuploidy, and, thus, for uniparental disomy (UPD). Abnormal phenotypes due to genomic imprinting are associated with UPD for the acrocentric chromosomes 14 and 15. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of UPD in a population with acrocentric rearrangements (either an isochromosome or a Robertsonian translocation) and abnormal phenotypes. Fifty individuals were studied. Of the 50 rearrangements, two were homologous rearrangements and both showed UPD. Forty-eight were non-homologous Robertsonian translocations, of which two showed UPD. This study demonstrates that UPD explains the abnormal phenotypes in some balanced carriers of acrocentric rearrangements. Our results and the large number of case reports in the literature suggest that patients with abnormal phenotypes and acrocentric rearrangements of chromosomes 14 or 15 should be tested for UPD.

Molecular mechanisms for constitutional chromosomal rearrangements in humans

Cytogenetic imbalance in the newborn is a frequent cause of mental retardation and birth defects. Although aneuploidy accounts for the majority of imbalance, structural aberrations contribute to a significant fraction of recognized chromosomal anomalies. This review describes the major classes of constitutional, structural cytogenetic abnormalities and recent studies that explore the molecular mechanisms that bring about their de novo occurrence. Genomic features flanking the sites of recombination may result in susceptibility to chromosomal rearrangement. One such substrate for recombination is low-copy region-specific repeats. The identification of genome architectural features conferring susceptibility to rearrangements has been accomplished using methods that enable investigation of regions of the genome that are too small to be visualized by traditional cytogenetics and too large to be resolved by conventional gel electrophoresis. These investigations resulted in the identification of previously unrecognized structural cytogenetic anomalies, which are associated with genetic syndromes and allowed for the molecular basis of some chromosomal rearrangements to be delineated.

Identification of uniparental disomy following prenatal detection of Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes

Rearrangements of the acrocentric chromosomes (Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes) are associated with an increased risk of aneuploidy. Given this, and the large number of reported cases of uniparental disomy (UPD) associated with an acrocentric rearrangement, carriers are presumed to be at risk for UPD. However, an accurate risk estimate for UPD associated with these rearrangements is lacking. A total of 174 prenatally identified acrocentric rearrangements, including both Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes, were studied prospectively to identify UPD for the chromosomes involved in the rearrangements. The overall goal of the study was to provide an estimate of the risk of UPD associated with nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations and homologous acrocentric rearrangements. Of the 168 nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations studied, one showed UPD for chromosome 13, providing a risk estimate of 0.6%. Four of the six homologous acrocentric rearrangements showed UPD, providing a risk estimate of 66%. These cases have also allowed delineation of the mechanisms involved in producing UPD unique to Robertsonian translocations. Given the relatively high risk for UPD in prenatally identified Robertsonian translocations and isochromosomes, UPD testing should be considered, especially for cases involving the acrocentric chromosomes 14 and 15, in which UPD is associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Investigation of two cases of paternal disomy 13 suggests timing of isochromosome formation and mechanisms leading to uniparental disomy

Uniparental disomy (UPD) is the abnormal inheritance of two copies of a chromosome from the same parent. Possible mechanisms for UPD include trisomy rescue, monosomy rescue, gametic complementation, and somatic recombination. Most of these mechanisms can involve rearranged chromosomes, particularly isochromosomes and Robertsonian translocations. Both maternal and paternal UPD have been reported for most of the acrocentric chromosomes. However, only UPD for chromosomes 14 and 15 show an apparent imprinting effect. Herein, we present two cases of paternal UPD 13 involving isochromosomes. Both cases were referred for UPD studies due to the formation of a de novo rea(13q13q). Case 2 was complicated by the segregation of a familial rob(13q14q) of maternal origin. Both propositi were phenotypically normal at the time of examination. Polymorphic marker analysis in Case 1 showed the distribution of alleles of markers along chromosome 13 to be complete isodisomy, consistent with an isochromosome. This rearrangement could have occurred either meiotically, without recombination, or mitotically. A likely mechanism for UPD in this case is monosomy rescue, through postzygotic formation of the isochromosome. In Case 2 the distribution of proximal alleles indicated an isochromosome, but recombination was evident. Thus, this isochromosome must have formed prior to or during meiosis I. A likely mechanism for UPD in this case is gametic complementation, since the mother carries a rob(13q14q) and is at risk of producing aneuploid gametes. However, trisomy rescue of a trisomy 13 conceptus cannot be completely excluded. Given that both cases were phenotypically normal, these data further support that paternal UPD 13 does not have an adverse phenotypic outcome and, thus, does not show an apparent imprinting effect.

Molecular analysis of mosaicism for two different de novo acrocentric rearrangements demonstrates diversity in Robertsonian translocation formation

Robertsonian translocations (ROBs) involving chromosome 21 occur in about 5% of individuals with Down syndrome. ROBs are the most common chromosomal rearrangements in humans and are formed through whole arm exchanges of any two acrocentric chromosomes. The de novo formation of ROBs occurs at exceptionally high rates. The present case concerns a child with mosaic Down syndrome who has two cell lines that contain two different de novo ROBs: 45,XX,rob(14;21)(q10;q10) and 46,XX,rea(21;21)(q10;q10),+21. To elucidate the mechanisms by which the rearrangements formed, somatic cell hybrids were constructed to allow the parental origins of the chromosomes involved in the ROBs to be distinguished. The analysis of the hybrids showed that the rob(14q21q) must have formed postzygotically because it contained a maternal chromosome 14 and a paternal chromosome 21. Furthermore, hybrid analysis of the rea(21q21q) demonstrated two copies of the same chromosome from the mother and thus, by definition, was an isochromosome [i(21q)]. All free-lying chromosomes 21 isolated in hybrids were of maternal origin. These chromosomes may have originated from either of the patient's cell lines. We present four hypotheses for the formation of the two cell lines of this child. This case is part of an ongoing project to determine the mechanism(s) of de novo ROB formation and the results differ from the other de novo rob(14q21q) studied in our laboratory (n = 7) in that all previously studied translocations were maternally derived, leading to the conclusion that most de novo rob(14q21q) occur in oogenesis. The current case illustrates that other mechanisms may contribute to ROB formation.

Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with a homologous Robertsonian translocation of chromosomes 15

We present a prenatal diagnosis of a de novo homologous Robertsonian translocation involving both chromosomes 15. Amniocentesis was performed on a 36-year-old woman at 16.5 weeks of gestation. Chromosome analysis documented a 45,XX,der(15;15) (q10;q10) chromosome pattern. No evidence of a deletion was observed by FISH using a SNRPN DNA probe associated with the Prader-Willi/Angelman syndrome critical region. Molecular studies in the family using six polymorphic markers for chromosome 15 and Southern blot analysis of DNA methylation for the CpG island near the SNRPN gene showed normal biparental inheritance of chromosome 15, excluding uniparental disomy. The patient was counseled that her child would not be able to bear off-spring without clinical assistance. Otherwise the health and intellect of her child were not expected to be affected by the translocation. We consider this to be the first prenatal case identified with a balanced der(15;15)(q10;q10) Robertsonian translocation and a phenotypically normal female outcome. Prenatally identified cases of der(15;15)(q10;q10) warrant further investigation by molecular methodology.

Down syndrome with biparental inheritance of der(14q21q) and maternally derived trisomy 21: confirmation by fluorescent in situ hybridization and microsatellite polymorphism analysis

Individuals with translocation Down syndrome (DS) often inherit the rearranged chromosome from a carrier parent. DS due to inheritance of one Robertsonian or derivative (14q21q) from one parent and a second der(14q21q) in addition to a free chromosome 21 from the other parent are rarely documented in liveborn infants. Presented here is such a propositus with DS and with a unique karyotype 45,XY,der(14;21) (p11.1;p11.1)pat,der(14;21)(p11.1;q11.1)mat, +21mat. Using conventional chromosome heteromorphisms, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), and microsatellite polymorphism analyses, we established the biparental origin of the 2 der(14q21q) and the maternal origin of the extra chromosome 21 in the patient. A combination of both cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques also enabled us to show that the 2 der(14q21q) were not identical by descent and hence the parents were nonconsanguineous. It has been a well-established fact that mothers with Robertsonian translocations have higher risk for nondisjunction than do carrier fathers. Our case, wherein the nondisjunctional event occurred in the mother, even though both parents are carriers of a 14;21 Robertsonian translocation, is yet another example of this.

Short-limb dwarfism and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a patient with paternal isodisomy 14: 45,XY,idic(14)(p11)

Uniparental disomy (UPD) has been shown to result in specific disorders either due to imprinting and/or homozygosity of mutant alleles. Here we present the findings in a child with paternal UPD14. Ultrasound evaluation was performed at 30 weeks of gestation because of abnormally large uterine size. Pertinent ultrasound findings included polyhydramnios, short limbs, abnormal position of hands, small thorax, and nonvisualization of the fetal stomach. Post-natally the infant was found to have a low birth weight, short birth length, contractures, short limbs, and a small thorax with upslanting ribs. Assisted ventilation and gastrostomy were required. At age 6 months, the infant required hospitalization for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy which responded to Atenolol. Initial cytogenetic studies demonstrated an apparently balanced de novo Robertsonian translocation involving chromosomes 14 and a karyotype designation of 45,XY,t(14q14q). No indication of mosaicism for trisomy 14 was observed in metaphase spreads prepared from peripheral blood lymphocytes or skin-derived fibroblasts. C-band and fluorescence in situ hybridization results demonstrated that the chromosome was dicentric. DNA analyses showed paternal uniparental isodisomy for chromosome 14. Based on the cytogenetic and DNA results a final karyotype designation of 45,XY,idic(14)(p11) was assigned to this infant with paternal isodisomy of chromosome 14.

Down syndrome genetics: unravelling a multifactorial disorder

Down syndrome is a common disorder affecting many tissues both during development and later on in adult life; the principle feature of all cases is a specific form of mental retardation, which is combined with a range of variable traits. Down syndrome is an aneuploidy syndrome that is caused by trisomy for human chromosome 21. While the phenotype is most likely due to a subtle increase in gene dosage of only a small minority of the estimated 500-800 genes that are present on this chromosome, the molecular genetics of Down syndrome remains speculative. However, recent advances on a number of fronts, including chromosome studies, gene identification and mouse modelling, are giving us the tools to dissect this multifactorial gene dosage disorder.

Molecular studies of translocations and trisomy involving chromosome 13

Twenty-four cases of trisomy 13 and one case with disomy 13, but a de novo dic(13,13) (p12p12) chromosome, were examined with molecular markers to determine the origin of the extra (or rearranged) chromosome. Twenty-one of 23 informative patients were consistent with a maternal origin of the extra chromosome. Lack of a third allele at any locus in both paternal origin cases indicate a somatic duplication of the paternal chromosome occurred. Five cases had translocation trisomy: one de novo rob(13q14q), one paternally derived rob(13q14q), two de novo t(13q13q), and one mosaic de novo t(13q13q)/r(13). The patient with a paternal rob(13q14q) had a maternal meiotic origin of the trisomy; thus, the paternal inheritance of the translocation chromosome was purely coincidental. Since there is not a significantly increased risk for unbalanced offspring of a t(13q14q) carrier and most trisomies are maternal in origin, this result should not be surprising; however, it illustrates that one cannot infer the origin of translocation trisomy based on parental origin of the translocation. Lack of a third allele at any locus in one of the three t(13q13q) cases indicates that it was most likely an isochromosome of postmeiotic origin, whereas the other two cases showed evidence of recombination. One balanced (nontrisomic) case with a nonmosaic 45, -13, -13, +t(13;13) karyotype was also investigated and was determined to be a somatic Robertsonian translocation between the maternal and paternal homologues, as has been found for all balanced homologous Robertsonian translocations so far investigated. Thus, it is also incorrect to assume in de novo translocation cases that the two involved chromosomes are even from the same parent. Despite a maternal origin of the trisomy, we cannot therefore infer anything about the parental origin of the chromosomes 13 and 14 involved in the translocation in the de novo t(13q14q) case nor for the two t(13;13) chromosomes showing a meiotic origin of the trisomy.

Uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 14 in two cases: an abnormal child and a normal adult

Uniparental disomy (UPD) of a number of different chromosomes has been found in associated with abnormal phenotypes. A growing body of evidence for an imprinting effect involving chromosome 14 has been accumulating. We report on a case of paternal UPD of chromosome 14 studied in late gestation due to polyhydramnios and a ventral wall hernia. A prenatal karyotype documented a balanced Robertsonian 14:14 translocation. The baby was born prematurely with hairy forehead, retrognathia, mild puckering of the lips and finger contractures. Hypotonia has persisted since birth and at age one year, a tracheostomy for laryngomalacia and gastrostomy for feeding remain necessary. Absence of maternal VNTR polymorphisms and homozygosity of paternal polymorphisms using chromosome 14 specific probes at D14S22 and D14S13 loci indicated paternal uniparental isodisomy (pUPID). Parental chromosomes were normal. We also report on a case of maternal UPD in a normal patient with a balanced Robertsonian 14:14 translocation and a history of multiple miscarriages. Five previous reports of chromosome 14 UPD suggest that an adverse developmental effect may be more severe whenever the UPD is paternal in origin. This is the second reported patient with paternal UPD and the fifth reported with maternal UPD, and only few phenotypic similarities are apparent. Examination of these chromosome 14 UPD cases of maternal and paternal origin suggests that there are syndromic imprinting effects.

Characterization of a ring chromosome 21 by FISH-technique

Ring chromosomes 21 that contain two copies of the Down syndrome critical region (DCR1), thereby contributing to trisomic dosage, have not been fully characterized by routine cytogenetic methods in the past. We therefore employed the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique, using a battery of chromosome 21 probes and conclude that the ring resulted from a centromere to centromere and long arm to long arm fusion that contains alpha-satellite DNA and two copies of the D21S65 locus, but lacks beta-satellite DNA and telomeric DNA. Consequently, we suggest that the origin of the ring may be due to the misdivision of the centromere following the duplication of the long arm, forming a monocentric isochromosome followed by breakage in a region distal to the D21S65 locus and proximal to the telomeric sequences followed by reunion of the broken ends resulting in a monocentric ring. Different ring configurations or fragments were not detected, suggesting that the ring chromosome was highly stable. Apparently, the presence of two copies of Down syndrome loci within the ring chromosome, along with one copy on the normal homologue, caused the clinical consequences of Down syndrome.

Conservation of the Down syndrome critical region in humans and great apes

A quarter century ago, a chimpanzee with trisomy 22 was reported to have the clinical manifestation of Down syndrome. The features of Down syndrome in human have been associated with chromosome 21 band q22.3. The recent availability of chromosome and loci specific probes has prompted us to utilize the human cosmid probe (D21S65) for the trisomy 21 region in the chromosomes of the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutan (Pongo pygmeus). Interestingly, the hybridization site for the Down syndrome region was found on the equivalent ape chromosome 22 in all three primates (the human equivalent of chromosome 21). Apparently, these results support the notion that the Down syndrome critical region of human chromosome 21 band q22.3 is conserved in great apes, which has displayed mongolism in a chimpanzee when present in triplicate conditions. Furthermore, other probes can be used as phylogenetic signals to enhance the understanding of human descent.

Molecular analysis to assign parental origin and distinguish de novo i(21q) from t(21q21q) in two Down syndrome fetuses

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the origin of two prenatal cases of chromosome 21 rearrangements not amenable to clarification by conventional cytogenetic methodology.

METHODS

Hypervariable repeat polymorphisms (chromosome 21) were used to determine the type of structural rearrangement and the parental origin of the rearranged chromosome. The repeats used were highly polymorphic and located very close to the centromere; thus, the likelihood of differences among the parental alleles and overall informativeness were increased.

RESULTS

The rea(21q21q) chromosomes were identified as a Robertsonian translocation in one fetus and an isochromosome in the other. The extra chromosome material was found to be maternal in origin in both cases.

CONCLUSION

The ability to clarify the origin of abnormal chromosomal rearrangements provides valuable information concerning possible mechanisms of aneuploidy, as well as clinical data that may have an impact in assessing a patient's risk for abnormal offspring.