Personality profile in adult female fragile X carriers: assessed with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Profile (MMPI)

Programming social behavior by the maternal fragile X protein

The developing fetus and neonate are highly sensitive to maternal environment. Besides the well-documented effects of maternal stress, nutrition and infections, maternal mutations, by altering the fetal, perinatal and/or early postnatal environment, can impact the behavior of genetically normal offspring. Mutation/premutation in the X-linked FMR1 (encoding the translational regulator FMRP) in females, although primarily responsible for causing fragile X syndrome (FXS) in their children, may also elicit such maternal effects. We showed that a deficit in maternal FMRP in mice results in hyperactivity in the genetically normal offspring. To test if maternal FMRP has a broader intergenerational effect, we measured social behavior, a core dimension of neurodevelopmental disorders, in offspring of FMRP-deficient dams. We found that male offspring of Fmr1(+/-) mothers, independent of their own Fmr1 genotype, exhibit increased approach and reduced avoidance toward conspecific strangers, reminiscent of 'indiscriminate friendliness' or the lack of stranger anxiety, diagnosed in neglected children and in patients with Asperger's and Williams syndrome. Furthermore, social interaction failed to activate mesolimbic/amygdala regions, encoding social aversion, in these mice, providing a neurobiological basis for the behavioral abnormality. This work identifies a novel role for FMRP that extends its function beyond the well-established genetic function into intergenerational non-genetic inheritance/programming of social behavior and the corresponding neuronal circuit. As FXS premutation and some psychiatric conditions that can be associated with reduced FMRP expression are more prevalent in mothers than full FMR1 mutation, our findings potentially broaden the significance of FMRP-dependent programming of social behavior beyond the FXS population.

Toward a molecular architecture of personality

Epidemiological studies provided a large body of evidence that personality dimensions are influenced by genetic factors and that the genetic component is highly complex, polygenic, and epistatic. However, consistent findings on the genetic basis of personality have yet remained sparse. In recent years, molecular genetics has begun to identify specific genes coding in particular for components of the serotonergic and dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems representing quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for behavioral traits. The QTL concept suggests that complex traits are not attributable to single genes. According to this polygenic model, the genetic basis of personality and behavior and its pathological variations thus results from additive or nonadditive interactions of various genes. As the number of suitable candidate genes constantly increases, the QTL model provides a reasonable explanation for the genetic basis of personality and its disorders. In this review, the current knowledge on the impact of a large number of candidate gene polymorphisms (e.g. variations in serotonin and dopamine receptor and serotonin transporter genes) on personality and temperament is summarized. Additionally, investigations of gene-gene and gene-environment interactions in humans and animals, which currently intensify the identification of genes that underlie behavioral variations, are examined. The findings converge on the notion that a probabilistic rather than deterministic impact of genes on the expression of behavior will contribute to the demystification of behavioral disorders.

A distinct neurocognitive phenotype in female fragile-X premutation carriers assessed with visual attention tasks

Premature ovarian failure (POF) and underlying hormonal changes are recognized as a distinct phenotype in female fragile-X premutation carriers. Neurocognitive deficits, in particular mental retardation, are associated with the full mutation in males and females. In female full mutation carriers this neurocognitive phenotype is expressed more mildly than in males. Research on whether the fragile-X premutation is associated with a particular neurocognitive phenotype or not has been equivocal. By means of the Sonneville Visual Attentions Tasks (SVAT) computer-based battery of neurocognitive tasks, we assessed reaction time on different tasks in three groups of subjects: female premutation carriers, female full mutation carriers, and female control subjects. The results show that a fraction of the female premutation carriers perform poorly on several selective attention tasks, but not on other tasks. Their neurocognitive profile is different from that of control subjects and of the majority of female premutation carriers. It may also be different from the phenotype of female full mutation carriers, though in that respect this study remains inconclusive. These findings support earlier findings that the fragile-X premutation may affect neurocognitive functioning, in particular aspects of attention.

Cognitive and behavioral performance among FMR1 high-repeat allele carriers surveyed from special education classes

The fragile X syndrome is caused by an unstable CGG repeat sequence in the 5' untranslated region of the X-linked, FMR1 gene. When the number of repeats exceeds 200, the region is hypermethylated and the gene is silenced. The lack of the protein produced by the FMR1 gene, FMRP, causes the fragile X syndrome. Recent evidence suggests that FMR1 alleles with unmethylated long repeat tracks (40-200 repeats) may cause a specific somatic phenotype in women, premature ovarian failure, and may cause variation in the levels of FMR1 mRNA and FMRP. Because FMR1 is known to be involved in the regulation of subset of genes expressed in the brain, we investigated the variation in cognitive and/or behavioral performance among carriers of high repeat alleles. Specifically, we administered cognitive, behavioral, and adaptive performance tests to children identified with high repeat alleles who attended special education classes in Atlanta, Georgia public schools and to those with < 40 repeats drawn from the same population. Overall, we found no significant effect of repeat size and the psychometric measures in our test battery after adjustment for multiple comparisons. All scales were found to be within 1 SD standard deviation of the mean. We did find an intriguing, albeit marginally statistically significant, association in the cognitive profile among males and not females, consistent with an X-linked effect. After adjusting for the overall cognitive abilities score, Verbal Ability scores decreased and Nonverbal Reasoning scores increased with repeat number to a greater extent in males than females. Spatial Ability scores were not associated with repeat number.

Genotype-phenotype relationship in female carriers of the premutation and full mutation of FMR-1

The present French-German cooperative study focuses on the genotype-phenotype relationship of mutations of the FMR-1 gene and psychiatric conditions in mothers with a full mutation in the FMR-1 gene of fra-X children (n=13), mothers with a premutation in the FMR-1 gene of fra-X children (n=61), as well as premutated siblings of these mothers without affected children (n=17) and two non-mutated control groups: (1) siblings of these mothers with normal CGG repeat (n=18); and (2) mothers of non-fra-X autistic children (n=42). Mothers with a full mutation in the FMR-1 gene and mothers with a premutation in the FMR-1 gene did not differ in the frequency of any axis I disorder; however, both groups were diagnosed with social phobia more often than the control group of mothers of autistic children. Moreover, mothers with a premutation in the FMR-1 gene of fra-X children and their siblings with the premutation (without affected offspring) revealed a similar frequency of social phobia. Furthermore avoidant personality disorder was more common in groups of carriers of the full premutation than in siblings without mutation or than the control group of mothers with autistic children. On the basis of our data, we therefore suggest that social avoidance (expressed as social phobia or avoidant personality disorder) has been underestimated in previous studies of carriers with the FMR-1 full mutation or premutation. Comorbidity of axis I and axis II psychiatric diagnoses was mainly restricted to the group of carriers of the full mutation and carriers of the premutation of FMR-1. Correlations between size of CGG repeat and IQ as well as CGG and age of onset of axis I diagnosis were non-significant. IQ of subjects had no impact on presence or absence of axis I and/or axis II diagnoses.

New findings in the behavioral profile of young FraX females

Nine girls, with a 50% risk to be carrier of the FMR-1 gene and who attended normal school and did not have a mentally retarded fraX relative, were selected to exclude influences of external factors. These subjects were submitted to an extensive neurocognitive and psychiatric evaluation before molecular analysis of their FMR-1 status was done to obtain completely unbiased results. The findings of this study suggest that differentiation according to the FMR-1 status may be more significant at the neurocognitive level than at the behavioral level and support the hypothesis that behavioral problems are more influenced by external factors than by the FMR-1 carrier state.

Fragile-X carrier females: evidence for a distinct psychopathological phenotype?

The present study examined 35 mothers (29 premutation carriers) of children with fragile-X syndrome in measures of intelligence and psychiatric disorders by comparing them with two control groups: a) 30 mothers of children in the general population and b) 17 mothers of non-fra-X retarded children with autism. Premutation carriers had a higher frequency of affective disorders than mothers from the general population. Preliminary data indicate that normally intelligent premutation carriers of the fra-X genetic abnormality have a similar frequency of affective disorders (DSM-III-R criteria [APA, 1987]) than mothers of autistic children. Neither carriers of the premutation nor carriers of the full mutation in the fra-X group obtained a diagnosis of the schizophrenia-spectrum (schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, and schizoaffective disorder). Carriers of the fra-X full mutation had considerably lower IQ than carriers of the fra-X premutation. There was a negative correlation between length of CGG repeats and IQ which failed to reach significance in both groups of fra-X carriers. Psychiatric morbidity was not restricted to carriers of the fra-X full mutation only but was also present in normal intelligent premutation carriers. Furthermore the age of onset of psychiatric morbidity in both groups of mothers of fra-X children as well as the group of mothers with autistic children was much earlier than the age when mental retardation had been diagnosed in their children. Increased psychosocial burden of raising a developmentally retarded child and/or feelings of guilt of being a fra-X carrier can therefore not fully explain our findings (three-fold higher frequencies of affective disorders compared to mothers from the general population).