Counselling risk figures for fragile X carrier females of varying band sizes for use in predicting the likelihood of retardation in their offspring

Screening for fragile X syndrome in women of reproductive age

We conducted a prospective intervention study of screening for fragile X syndrome in the general population. Antenatal and preconceptional screening were carried out in 9459 women aged between 19 and 44 with no known family history of fragile X syndrome. 80% were tested antenatally. 134 carriers were detected (a frequency of 1 in 70); 130 had a premutation (PM) and 4 had a full mutation (FM). Prenatal diagnosis was carried out in 108 concurrent or subsequent pregnancies among carriers involving 111 fetuses. Nine had an FM, a rate of 1 in 12; two of the affected embryos received the FM directly from the mother and in seven it was the result of expansion from a PM. In all cases with an FM the pregnancy was terminated. In PM carriers there was evidence of a selection against the mutated chromosome with a segregation ratio of 0.40. Owing to the high rate of premutated chromosomes in our population we conclude that screening for fragile X syndrome among women of reproductive age should be more widely available.

The fragile X syndrome

The fragile X syndrome is characterised by mental retardation, behavioural features, and physical features, such as a long face with large protruding ears and macro-orchidism. In 1991, after identification of the fragile X mental retardation (FMR1) gene, the cytogenetic marker (a fragile site at Xq27.3) became replaced by molecular diagnosis. The fragile X syndrome was one of the first examples of a "novel" class of disorders caused by a trinucleotide repeat expansion. In the normal population, the CGG repeat varies from six to 54 units. Affected subjects have expanded CGG repeats (>200) in the first exon of the FMR1 gene (the full mutation). Phenotypically normal carriers of the fragile X syndrome have a repeat in the 43 to 200 range (the premutation). The cloning of the FMR1 gene led to the characterisation of its protein product FMRP, encouraged further clinical studies, and opened up the possibility of more accurate family studies and fragile X screening programmes.

Cost effectiveness of DNA diagnosis for four monogenic diseases

In this paper the costs and benefits associated with DNA diagnosis of subjects who are at risk of having a child with a monogenic disease and who seek genetic counselling because of their reproductive plans are predicted under various assumptions using a mathematical model. Four monogenic diseases have been considered: cystic fibrosis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, myotonic dystrophy, and fragile X syndrome. Counselling (triggered by previous information) on the basis of DNA diagnosis is compared to the situation that only risk evaluation based on pedigree analysis is possible. The results show for each disease that with DNA diagnosis, couples can be more confident in choosing (further) offspring leading to the birth of more healthy children while the number of affected children is reduced. The costs minus savings within the health care sector depend on the prior risks and on the future burden of the monogenic illness under consideration. DNA diagnosis of relative "low" prior risks of a child with CF (for example, 1:180, 1:240 and 1:480) leads to costs instead of savings. For higher prior risks of CF and for the three other diseases, DNA diagnosis produces considerable savings. This result remains valid when assumptions regarding behaviour, reproduction, and receiving DNA diagnosis under different circumstances are varied.

Recent advances in reproductive genetic technologies

New possibilities for the diagnosis and treatment of reproductive and genetic disorders are becoming available as a result of a series of recent technical advances. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) allows treatment of numerous infertile men whose sperm cannot penetrate the egg to initiate fertilization. Molecular genetic testing provides clients of reproductive age with additional information that permits prevention of genetic diseases such as fragile X syndrome, the leading cause of inherited mental retardation. Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) offers couples who carry genetic disorders the prospect of having children with a greatly decreased risk of initiating a pregnancy involving an affected individual. Flow-cytometric sperm separation offers a new, effective approach for prevention of X-linked genetic disorders. Two major causes of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) involve recurrent trisomies and immunological disorders. Of the latter, 70% of studied populations of patients can attain live births with simple treatment protocols. Maternal serum assays involving multiple markers reduce both false positives and false negatives in detection of trisomies. Despite these advances in research, many safe and effective methods of diagnosis and treatment remain under-utilized in the clinical arena.