A series of supernumerary small ring marker autosomes identified by FISH with chromosome probe arrays and literature review excluding chromosome 15

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from human chromosome 11

Introduction: With only 39 reported cases in the literature, carriers of a small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) derived from chromosome 11 represent an extremely rare cytogenomic condition. Methods: Herein, we present a review of reported sSMC(11), add 18 previously unpublished cases, and closely review eight cases classified as 'centromere-near partial trisomy 11' and a further four suited cases from DECIPHER. Results and discussion: Based on these data, we deduced the borders of the pericentric regions associated with clinical symptoms into a range of 2.63 and 0.96 Mb for chromosome 11 short (p) and long (q) arms, respectively. In addition, the minimal pericentric region of chromosome 11 without triplo-sensitive genes was narrowed to positions 47.68 and 60.52 Mb (GRCh37). Furthermore, there are apparent differences in the presentation of signs and symptoms in carriers of larger sSMCs derived from chromosome 11 when the partial trisomy is derived from different chromosome arms. However, the number of informative sSMC(11) cases remains low, with overlapping presentation between p- and q-arm-imbalances. In addition, uniparental disomy (UPD) of 'normal' chromosome 11 needs to be considered in the evaluation of sSMC(11) carriers, as imprinting may be an influencing factor, although no such cases have been reported. Comprehensively, prenatal sSMC(11) cases remain a diagnostic and prognostic challenge.

Multiple Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes Resulting from Maternal Meiosis I or II Errors

We present 2 cases with multiple de novo supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs), each derived from a different chromosome. In a prenatal case, we found mosaicism for an sSMC(4), sSMC(6), sSMC(9), sSMC(14) and sSMC(22), while a postnatal case had an sSMC(4), sSMC(8) and an sSMC(11). SNP-marker segregation indicated that the sSMC(4) resulted from a maternal meiosis II error in the prenatal case. Segregation of short tandem repeat markers on the sSMC(8) was consistent with a maternal meiosis I error in the postnatal case. In the latter, a boy with developmental/psychomotor delay, autism, hyperactivity, speech delay, and hypotonia, the sSMC(8) was present at the highest frequency in blood. By comparison to other patients with a corresponding duplication, a minimal region of overlap for the phenotype was identified, with CHRNB3 and CHRNA6 as dosage-sensitive candidate genes. These genes encode subunits of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). We propose that overproduction of these subunits leads to perturbed component stoichiometries with dominant negative effects on the function of nAChRs, as was shown by others in vitro. With the limitation that in each case only one sSMC could be studied, our findings demonstrate that different meiotic errors lead to multiple sSMCs. We relate our findings to age-related aneuploidy in female meiosis and propose that predivision sister-chromatid separation during meiosis I or II, or both, may generate multiple sSMCs.

Marker chromosomes

Marker chromosomes are a morphologically heterogeneous group of structurally abnormal chromosomes that pose a significant challenge in prenatal diagnosis. Phenotypes associated with marker chromosomes are highly variable and range from normal to severely abnormal. Clinical outcomes are very difficult to predict when marker chromosomes are detected prenatally. In this review, we outline the classification, etiology, cytogenetic characterization, and clinical consequences of marker chromosomes, as well as practical approaches to prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling.

Gain of FAM123B and ARHGEF9 in an Obese Man with Intellectual Disability, Congenital Heart Defects and Multiple Supernumerary Ring Chromosomes

In a 24-year-old man with mild intellectual disability, congenital heart defects and obesity, we identified up to 4 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) in blood metaphases. The ring-shaped sSMCs were derived from chromosomes 11, 12 and X as well as a fourth, unidentified chromosome. In interphase nuclei of epithelial cells from the urinary tract and buccal mucosa, the presence of the r(11), r(12) and r(X) was confirmed by FISH. Using Illumina Infinium 317K SNP-arrays, we detected 3 copies of the pericentromeric regions of chromosomes 11, 12 and X. The r(X) was present in 84-89% of cells in the various tissues examined, lacks the XIST gene, but contains FAM123B, a potential dosage-sensitive candidate gene for congenital cardiac abnormalities, and ARHGEF9, a candidate gene for intellectual disability. ARHGEF9 encodes collybistin (CB), which is required for localization of the inhibitory receptor-anchoring protein gephyrin and for formation and maintenance of postsynaptic GABAA and glycine receptors. We propose that the 2-fold increase in dosage of ARHGEF9 disturbs the stoichiometry of CB with its interacting proteins at inhibitory postsynapses. SNP alleles and short tandem repeat markers on the r(11) and r(X) were compatible with a maternal origin of both sSMCs through a meiosis II error. The sSMCs may have resulted from predivision chromatid nondisjunction, leading to anaphase lagging, followed by incomplete degradation of the supernumerary chromosomes.

Identification and characterization of a complex pure mosaic of small supernumerary marker chromosomes involving 11p11.12 → q12.1 and 19p12 → q12 regions in a child featuring multiple congenital anomalies

Unstable, gene-rich pericentric regions have been associated with various structural aberrations including small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs). We hereby report on a complex pure mosaic sSMCs derived from chromosomes 11 and 19 in a child featuring multiple congenital anomalies. As indicated by microarray analysis, the sSMCs have involved materials from 11p11.12 → q12.1 and 19p12 → q12 in complex forms (with four cell lines harboring from 1 to 4 sSMCs) in all peripheral blood lymphocytes. The patient featured facial dysmorphism, generalized hypotonia, cryptorchidism, transverse palmar creases, cerebral hemorrhage, atrial septal defect secundum, strabismus, epilepsy, immunodeficiency, and severe cognitive and motor impairment. Literature review indicated this to be a unique sSMCs case simultaneously involving chromosomes 11 and 19, with one sSMC containing materials from the both chromosomes. We propose that the involved chromosomal regions may contain dosage-sensitive genes which are important for the development, and that the sSMCs derived from multiple origins have formed by a complex mechanism.

Implications of prenatal diagnosis of the fetus with both interstitial deletion and a small marker ring originating from chromosome 5

We describe a patient with 47,XY,del(5)(p11p13), +mar observed in prenatal screening. We performed analyses including G-banding, multi-color fluorescent in situ hybridization (mFISH) for fetal chromosome detection. After birth array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-FISH was carried out to define the chromosomal changes precisely. The mFISH revealed that a ring chromosome that had originated from chromosome 5. The aCGH showed that this fetus had a terminal duplication, an interstitial deletion, and a pericentromeric duplication of the short arm of chromosome 5. This complex alteration resulted in partial trisomy 5p15.33-p15.31, partial monosomy 5p14.3-p13.2, and partial trisomy 5p12-p11. To clarify these alterations, we performed BAC-FISH using BAC clones related to deleted and duplicated regions, and found that a derivative (der) chromosome 5 showed the presence of hybridization signals from the duplicated region at 5p15.33 and the loss of hybridization signals from the deleted region at 5p14.2. In addition, FISH analysis confirmed the origin of the marker chromosome. Hybridization signals from the second intervening sequence at 5p13.1, between the deleted region and the pericentric duplicated region, were present on the marker ring chromosome.

Low grade mosaic for a complex supernumerary ring chromosome 18 in an adult patient with multiple congenital anomalies

Background

Several cases have been reported of patients with a ring chromosome 18 replacing one of the normal chromosomes 18. Less common are patients with a supernumerary ring chromosomes 18. High resolution whole genome examination in patients with multiple congenital abnormalities might reveal cytogenetic abnormalities of an unexpected complexity.

Results

We report a 24 years old male patient with lower spinal anomalies, hypospadia, bifid scrotum, cryptorchism, anal atresia, kidney stones, urethra anomalies, radial dysplasia, and a hypoplastic thumb. Some of the anomalies overlap with the VACTERL association. Chromosome analysis of cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes revealed an additional ring chromosome in 13% of the metaphases. Both parents had a normal karyotype, demonstrating the de novo origin of this ring chromosome. FISH analysis using whole chromosome paints showed that the additional chromosomal material was derived from chromosome 18. Chromosome analysis of cultured fibroblasts revealed only one cell with the supernumerary ring chromosome in the 400 analyzed. To characterize the ring chromosome in more detail peripheral blood derived DNA was analyzed using SNP-arrays. The array results indicated a 5 Mb gain of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 18q10-q11.2. FISH analysis using BAC-probes located in the region indicated the presence of 6 signals on the r(18) chromosome. In addition, microsatellite analysis demonstrated that the unique supernumerary ring chromosome was paternally derived and both normal copies showed biparental disomy.

Conclusions

We report on an adult patient with multiple congenital abnormalities who had in 13% of his cells a unique supernumerary ring chromosome 18 that was composed of 6 copies of the 5 Mb gene rich region of 18q11.

Unexpected structural complexity of supernumerary marker chromosomes characterized by microarray comparative genomic hybridization

BACKGROUND

Supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMCs) are structurally abnormal extra chromosomes that cannot be unambiguously identified by conventional banding techniques. In the past, SMCs have been characterized using a variety of different molecular cytogenetic techniques. Although these techniques can sometimes identify the chromosome of origin of SMCs, they are cumbersome to perform and are not available in many clinical cytogenetic laboratories. Furthermore, they cannot precisely determine the region or breakpoints of the chromosome(s) involved. In this study, we describe four patients who possess one or more SMCs (a total of eight SMCs in all four patients) that were characterized by microarray comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH).

RESULTS

In at least one SMC from all four patients, array CGH uncovered unexpected complexity, in the form of complex rearrangements, that could have gone undetected using other molecular cytogenetic techniques. Although array CGH accurately defined the chromosome content of all but two minute SMCs, fluorescence in situ hybridization was necessary to determine the structure of the markers.

CONCLUSION

The increasing use of array CGH in clinical cytogenetic laboratories will provide an efficient method for more comprehensive characterization of SMCs. Improved SMC characterization, facilitated by array CGH, will allow for more accurate SMC/phenotype correlation.

Maternal heterodisomy/isodisomy and paternal supernumerary ring of chromosome 7 in a child with Silver-Russell syndrome

Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is clinically variable although most cases have several common signs. Different chromosomes and chromosomal regions have been associated with SRS. Maternal uniparental disomy (UPD) of chromosome 7 is responsible for 5-10% of cases, probably because of an imbalance between maternal and paternal imprinted genes and more recently maternal duplication or epimutations in the 11p15 imprinted region have been described. To date, only two patients with maternal UPD7 and a mosaic condition for a supernumerary ring 7 marker have been reported, and we here report a further case. Standard QFQ banding of lymphocytes as well as fluorescence in-situ hybridization analyses were performed to identify and characterize the supernumerary marker. UPD testing was performed on both the patient's and parents' DNA using chromosome 7 microsatellite markers. The patient demonstrated a ring in about 4% of the analysed cells. On the basis of cytogenetic and molecular results, break points were tentatively identified as 7p11.2 and 7q21. Maternal hetero-/iso-UPD and a paternal origin for the supernumerary ring were demonstrated. Clinical data comparison between our patient who has a SRS phenotype and cases with hetero-/iso-UPD7 mat and mosaicism for a paternally derived chromosome 7 ring and previously reported ring 7 cases suggest that the SRS phenotype is probably because of the UPD rather than to the partial trisomy.

Identification of a “cryptic mosaicism” involving at least four different small supernumerary marker chromosomes derived from chromosome 9 in a woman without reproductive success

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) present in the female member of an infertile couple who has no further clinical symptoms.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING(S)

Faculty of medicine and institute of human genetics and anthropology.

PATIENT(S)

A young, healthy, nonconsanguineous couple asked for genetic evaluation for infertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, conventional and molecular cytogenetic analyses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

We characterized the sSMCs present in a woman, who was a member of an infertile couple, by molecular cytogenetic techniques.

RESULT(S)

The G-banding technique showed that a marker chromosome was present in some of the examined cells describing the 47,XX,+mar[30]/46,XX[70] karyotype. Subsequently, using new fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, four distinguishable sSMCs (cryptic mosaicism), all derived from chromosome 9, were observed, including minute and ring chromosomes. This heterogeneity was impossible to detect by the conventional G-banding technique or conventional FISH technique that were used before the new FISH techniques (subcentromere-specific multicolor-FISH [subcenM-FISH]) and specific probe for the 9q12 band. In each metaphase with sSMCs, only one or two markers were observed. On the basis of the FISH analyses, the patient's karyotype was defined as 47,XX,+min(9)(:p12-->q12:)/47,XX,+min(9)(:p12-->q12::q12-->p12:)/47,XX,+r(9)(::p12-->q12::)/47,XX,+r(9)(::p12-->q12::p12-->q12::)x2/46,XX.

CONCLUSION(S)

The presence of sSMCs derived from chromosome 9 could influence the couple's infertility. The new subcenM-FISH techniques are very useful in the characterization of cryptic mosaicisms of marker chromosomes. Additionally, the hypothesis that the 9p12 chromosomal band is an euchromatic variant region without any phenotypic impact other than possible infertility is supported by this case study since the woman shows a normal phenotype.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of eight small supernumerary marker chromosomes originating from chromosomes 2, 4, 8,18, and 21 in three patients

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) are a morphologically heterogeneous group of additional structurally abnormal chromosomes that cannot be identified unambiguously by conventional banding techniques alone. Molecular cytogenetic methods enable detailed characterization of sSMCs; however, in many cases interpretation of their clinical significance is problematic. The aim of our study was to characterize precisely sSMCs identified in three patients with dysmorphic features, psychomotor retardation and multiple congenital anomalies. We also attempted to correlate the patients' genotypes with phenotypes by inclusion of data from the literature. The sSMCs were initially detected by G-banding analysis in peripheral blood lymphocytes in these patients and were subsequently characterized using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH), (sub)centromere-specific multicolor FISH (cenM-FISH, subcenM-FISH), and multicolor banding (MCB) techniques. Additionally, the sSMCs in two patients were also studied by hybridization to whole-genome bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays (array-CGH) to map the breakpoints on a single BAC clone level. In all three patients, the chromosome origin, structure, and euchromatin content of the sSMCs were determined. In patient RS, only a neocentric r(2)(q35q36) was identified. It is a second neocentric sSMC(2) in the literature and the first marker chromosome derived from the terminal part of 2q. In the other two patients, two sSMCs were found, as M-FISH detected additional sSMCs that could not be characterized in G-banding analysis. In patient MK, each of four cell lines contained der(4)(:p11.1-->q12:) accompanied by a sSMC(18): r(18)(:p11.2-->q11.1::p11.2-->q11.1:), inv dup(18)(:p11.1-->q11.1::q11.1-->p11.1:), or der(18) (:p11.2-->q11.1::q11.1-->p11.1:). In patient NP, with clinical features of trisomy 8p, three sSMCs were characterized: r(8)(:p12-->q11.1::q11.1-->p21:) der(8) (:p11.22-->q11.1::q11.1-->p21::p21-->p11.22:) and der(21)(:p11.1-->q21.3:). The BAC array results confirmed the molecular cytogenetic results and refined the breakpoints to the single BAC clone resolution. However, the complex mosaic structure of the marker chromosomes derived from chromosomes 8 and 18 could only be identified by molecular cytogenetic methods. This study confirms the usefulness of multicolor FISH combined with whole-genome arrays for comprehensive analyses of marker chromosomes.

Five cases of supernumerary small ring chromosomes 1: Heterogeneity and genotype–phenotype correlation

Genetic counselling of patients with small supernumerary ring chromosomes (sSRCs) can be difficult, especially in prenatal testing, due to the complexity in establishing a karyotype-phenotype correlation. In fact, it has been estimated that about 10% of extra ring(1) chromosomes are associated with an unremarkable phenotype. We report on five new cases of extra ring chromosomes(1) manifesting different clinical outcome. One case was familial, segregating from a mother with mosaic karyotype, while the others were de novo. Ring chromosomes were characterised by FISH. In three subjects the involvement of the same euchromatic 1p region was demonstrated. Present observations corroborate previous results and provide some insight into the identification of the harmless ring(1) structures.

Supernumerary minute ring chromosome 14 in a man with primary infertility and left varicocele

OBJECTIVE

To describe a case of supernumerary minute ring chromosome (SMRC) in an infertile man, with the concurrent finding of a left varicocele.

DESIGN

Case report.

SETTING

Urologic infertility clinic in a university hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Male patient presenting with primary infertility.

INTERVENTION(S)

Karyotyping, genetic counseling, and microsurgical left varicocelectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Sperm concentration and motility, chromosomal number and structure.

RESULT(S)

Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealing SMRC 14. Sperm concentration and motility improved after left varicocele repair.

CONCLUSION(S)

A karyotype should be included in the evaluation of severe oligospermia. Although SMRC 14 may be associated with fertility problems, repair of a coexisting varicocele should be considered in these patients.

Telomeres, interstitial telomeric repeat sequences, and chromosomal aberrations

Telomeres are specialized nucleoproteic complexes localized at the physical ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes that maintain their stability and integrity. The DNA component of telomeres is characterized by being a G-rich double stranded DNA composed by short fragments tandemly repeated with different sequences depending on the species considered. At the chromosome level, telomeres or, more properly, telomeric repeats--the DNA component of telomeres--can be detected either by using the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique with a DNA or a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) (pan)telomeric probe, i.e., which identifies simultaneously all of the telomeres in a metaphase cell, or by the primed in situ labeling (PRINS) reaction using an oligonucleotide primer complementary to the telomeric DNA repeated sequence. Using these techniques, incomplete chromosome elements, acentric fragments, amplification and translocation of telomeric repeat sequences, telomeric associations and telomeric fusions can be identified. In addition, chromosome orientation (CO)-FISH allows to discriminate between the different types of telomeric fusions, namely telomere-telomere and telomere-DNA double strand break fusions and to detect recombination events at the telomere, i.e., telomeric sister-chromatid exchanges (T-SCE). In this review, we summarize our current knowledge of chromosomal aberrations involving telomeres and interstitial telomeric repeat sequences and their induction by physical and chemical mutagens. Since all of the studies on the induction of these types of aberrations were conducted in mammalian cells, the review will be focused on the chromosomal aberrations involving the TTAGGG sequence, i.e., the telomeric repeat sequence that "caps" the chromosomes of all vertebrate species.

Cytogenetic and molecular evaluation of 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes: Cooperative study of 19 Italian laboratories

PURPOSE

We evaluated the experiences of 19 Italian laboratories concerning 241 small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) with the aim of answering questions arising from their origin from any chromosome, their variable size and genetic content, and their impact on the carrier's phenotype.

METHODS

Conventional protocols were used to set up the cultures and chromosome preparations. Both commercial and homemade probes were used for the fluorescent in situ hybridization analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 113 of the 241 sSMCs were detected antenatally, and 128 were detected postnatally. There were 52 inherited and 172 de novo cases. Abnormal phenotype was present in 137 cases (57%), 38 of which were antenatally diagnosed. A mosaic condition was observed in 87 cases (36%). In terms of morphology, monocentric and dicentric bisatellited marker chromosomes were the most common, followed by monocentric rings and short-arm isochromosomes. The chromosomes generating the sSMCs were acrocentric in 132 cases (69%) and non-acrocentric chromosomes in 60 cases (31%); a neocentromere was hypothesized in three cases involving chromosomes 6, 8, and 15.

CONCLUSION

The presented and published data still do not allow any definite conclusions to be drawn concerning karyotype-phenotype correlations. Only concerted efforts to characterize molecularly the sSMCs associated or not with a clinical phenotype can yield results suitable for addressing karyotype-phenotype correlations in support of genetic counseling.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes – progress towards a genotype-phenotype correlation

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) are still a major problem in clinical cytogenetics as they are too small to be characterized for their chromosomal origin by traditional banding techniques, but require molecular cytogenetic techniques for their identification. Apart from the correlation of about one third of the sSMC cases with a specific clinical picture, i.e. the i(18p), der(22), i(12p) (Pallister Killian syndrome) and inv dup(22) (cat-eye) syndromes, most of the remaining sSMC have not yet been correlated with clinical syndromes. Recently, we reviewed the available >1600 sSMC cases (Liehr T, sSMC homepage: http://mti-n.mti.uni-jena.de/~huwww/MOL_ZYTO/sSMC.htm). A total of 387 cases (including the 45 new cases reported here) have been molecularly cytogenetically characterized with regard to their chromosomal origin, the presence of euchromatin, heterochromatin and satellite material. Based on analysis of these cases we present the first draft of a basic genotype-phenotype correlation for sSMC for all human chromosomes apart from the chromosomes Y, 10, 11 and 13.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a de novo supernumerary ring chromosome 7 resulting in partial trisomy, tetrasomy, and hexasomy in a child with dysmorphic signs, congenital heart defect, and developmental delay

We report on a girl with mosaicism (65%) of a de novo supernumerary ring chromosome 7. The main clinical features were delayed psychomotor development, congenital heart defect, facial dysmorphisms, and long hands, fingers, feet and toes. Molecular cytogenetic analysis revealed that the ring chromosome was duplicated in 20% of the analyzed metaphases with marker chromosome and quadruplicated in 5% thereof. Uniparental disomy (UPD) of the two normal sister chromosomes 7 was excluded. This is, to our knowledge, the first report of a partial tetrasomy to hexasomy due to a ring chromosome 7. Additionally, the ring evolution could be reconstructed according to the FISH-results.

Characterization of six marker chromosomes by comparative genomic hybridization

We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in six patients with de novo prenatal or postnatal extra marker chromosomes (MC). In four cases, MCs were mosaic and in one of them, the MC was detected in less than 50% of the cells. In three cases, CGH identified the origin of the extra MCs. In the other three, two prenatal cases and one child with an abnormal phenotype, CGH showed normal profiles. Among these cases, a normal profile and entirely C-band positive was identified suggesting that MC did not contain euchromatin. Genetic imbalances detected by CGH were as follow: a gain of 8p10-p12 in a boy with facial dysmorphism, hyperactivity and speech delay, a gain of 8q10-q12 in a healthy man with a history of spontaneous abortions, and a gain of 15q11-q13 in a girl with speech delay, and motor skill and object manipulation difficulties. Clinical data of these patients were compared with those reported in the literature. We conclude that CGH is a very useful and powerful tool for characterizing prenatal or postnatal MCs, even when the mosaicism is present and the MCs are present in less than 50% of the cells.

Prenatal diagnosis of minute supernumerary marker chromosomes

The identification of supernumerary marker chromosomes (SMC) at prenatal diagnosis is problematic, particularly for the prediction of phenotype. The assessment of phenotypic risk is based on the size, morphology and origin of the SMC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) characterization and family studies are also employed to aid in determining the significance of a prenatally ascertained SMC. Generally, SMC containing euchromatin are more likely to be associated with abnormal phenotypes and SMC without euchromatin are more likely to result in normal phenotypes. The smallest of SMC, minute SMC (minSMC) appear as dot-like or centric fragments and are particularly difficult to identify and characterize. Previous empirical observations suggested that the risk of phenotypic abnormality in prenatally ascertained minSMC was < or = 5%. We identified minSMC in chorionic villus samples (CVS) or amniocytes from 11 unrelated pregnancies. The chromosomal origin of each minSMC was identified by sequential FISH analysis with chromosome-specific centromere probes. Further FISH analysis with whole chromosome paint probes was undertaken to assess each minSMC for the presence or absence of euchromatin, since the presence of euchromatin may be associated with a higher risk of abnormality. Two minSMC were shown to have euchromatin. The first, a minSMC(12) was found in CVS but not confirmed in amniocytes, indicating confined placental mosaicism. The second, a minSMC derived from chromosome 19, was associated with ultrasound abnormalities. Apart from a case with mild speech delay, the remaining minSMC cases without detectable euchromatin had a normal outcome at birth and/or on longer term follow-up. Additional FISH analyses with a telomeric repeat probe showed no signal on any of the minSMC tested, suggesting that they were ring chromosomes in structure. These data further support the concept that minSMC containing euchromatin are more likely to be associated with an abnormal phenotype, although as more data are collected, this may vary by chromosome of origin. The absence of detectable euchromatin, while not guaranteeing a normal result, is most likely to have a normal outcome. The present report and previous studies do not yet allow any significant adjustment of the empirical < or = 5% risk estimate for minSMC identified at prenatal diagnosis. However, reporting of additional cases with characterization of the minSMC and particularly with long-term follow-up will, in time, allow for more accurate risk estimates and provide prognostic information.

Characterization of a small supernumerary marker chromosome as r(8) at prenatal diagnosis by MFISH

OBJECTIVE

To identify the mosaic marker chromosome detected in amniotic fluid cells of a 26-year-old woman, with raised triple test values and an ultrasound scan, which showed a fetus with echogenic bowels.

METHODS

Routine karyotyping with G- and C-banding was carried out for both, amniotic fluid at 18 weeks of gestation as well as fetal blood at 22(+6) weeks. Peripheral blood of both parents was karytoyped. MFISH and the all centromeric human probe were used on fetal lymphocytes to identify the marker chromosome.

RESULTS

Both parents had a normal karyotype. Amniotic fluid culture showed a de novo supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC) in 14 of the 30 colonies from four different cover slip cultures. The marker was confirmed in 50% of the fetal lymphocytes. G- and C-banding provided little information except that the marker had some heterochromatic material. The all centromeric human probe also showed the presence of a centromere along with a rim of euchromatic material. MFISH identified this ring marker to be belonging to chromosome 8.

CONCLUSIONS

SMCs with chromosome 8 have been shown to be variable phenotypes. Presence of only heterochromatic material seems to have no discernable phenotypic effects, but, with the presence of euchromatic material, mental and physical developmental delay has been reported. The parents opted to go ahead with the pregnancy and an apparently normal female baby was born at 40 weeks with no complications.

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of two small chromosome 8 derived supernumerary mosaic markers

Two small supernumerary mosaic marker chromosomes (SMC) were identified by conventional cytogenetics, one prenatally, the other postnatally. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques, including 24-color FISH, were applied to identify both SMCs and better characterize their constitution. Patient 1: a 29 year-old man, whose wife had a spontaneous abortion, was found to have a small ring of the pericentromeric region of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+r(8)(p11q11)/46,XY). Patient 2: a 37 year-old woman had amniocentesis. The fetus was found to have a SMC; its presence was confirmed postnatally. Several FISH techniques (24-color, whole chromosome paints, centromeres, telomeres, band 8p22) led to the identification of a small analphoid marker. The marker was an inversion-duplication for part of the short arm of chromosome 8 (47,XY,+inv dup (8)(p23pter)/46,XY). The 24-color FISH allowed us to conclude that both markers originated exclusively from chromosome 8. However, the structure and content of the markers were elucidated using other molecular cytogenetic techniques, showing their complementarity.

Clinical findings and cytogenetic analysis of small supernumerary ring chromosomes 7: report of two new cases

Two new patients, mosaic for a small supernumerary ring chromosome 7 are described. There are only seven published reported concerning supernumerary ring chromosome 7 and we reviewed the previously reported cases in an attempt to establish genotype-phenotype correlations, which are particularly important for genetic counselling and clinical genetics. Our first case was a 20 months old girl who was referred for a mild motor developmental delay, an asymmetric facial appearance, a plagiocephaly and a short nose with anteverted nostrils. Our second case was a 9 years old boy who was referred for a IQ at the lower end of the normal range (? 80), obesity, hyperactivity and some dysmorphic features including hypertelorism and down slanting palpebral fissures. In both cases, chromosome analysis after G and R banding and FISH showed a small ring chromosome 7 in respectively 76% and 50% of consecutively scored metaphases. Both ring chromosomes were labelled by FISH using the Williams Syndrome locus probe (Elastin Gene D7S486). Comparison between these two cases and previously published cases allowed to delineate frequent clinical findings. A mild mental retardation was found in the majority of patients. which is an important data for genetic counselling.

Retained heterodisomy for chromosome 12 in atypical lipomatous tumors: implications for ring chromosome formation

Atypical lipomatous tumor (ALT) is an intermediate malignant mesenchymal tumor that is characterized by supernumerary ring chromosomes and/or giant rod-shaped marker chromosomes (RGMC). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and molecular genetic analyses have disclosed that the RGMCs always contain amplified sequences from the long arm of chromosome 12. Typically, RGMCs are the sole clonal changes and so far no deletions or other morphologic aberrations of the two normal-appearing chromosomes 12 that invariably are present have been detected. The mechanisms behind the formation of the RGMCs are unknown, but it could be hypothesized that RGMC formation is preceded by trisomy 12 or, alternatively, that ring formation of one chromosome 12 is followed by duplication of the remaining homolog. The latter scenario would always result in isodisomy for the two normal-appearing chromosomes 12, whereas the former would yield isodisomy in one-third of the cases. In order to investigate these possible mechanisms behind ring formation, we studied polymorphic loci on chromosome 12 in 14 cases of ALT showing one or more supernumerary ring chromosomes and few or no other clonal aberrations at cytogenetic analysis. The molecular genetic analyses showed that the tumor cells always retained both parental copies of chromosome 12, thus refuting the trisomy 12 and duplication hypotheses.

Chromosome rearrangements resulting from telomere dysfunction and their role in cancer

Telomeres play a vital role in protecting the ends of chromosomes and preventing chromosome fusion. The failure of cancer cells to properly maintain telomeres can be an important source of the chromosome instability involved in cancer cell progression. Telomere loss results in sister chromatid fusion and prolonged breakage/fusion/bridge (B/F/B) cycles, leading to extensive DNA amplification and large deletions. These B/F/B cycles end primarily when the unstable chromosome acquires a new telomere by translocation of the ends of other chromosomes. Many of these translocations are nonreciprocal, resulting in the loss of the telomere from the donor chromosome, providing a mechanism for transfer of instability from one chromosome to another until a chromosome acquires a telomere by a mechanism other than nonreciprocal translocation. B/F/B cycles can also result in other forms of chromosome rearrangements, including double-minute chromosomes and large duplications. Thus, the loss of a single telomere can result in instability in multiple chromosomes, and generate many of the types of rearrangements commonly associated with human cancer.