A novel report of a fertile female with partial Y chromosome gain completing a healthy pregnancy

We present a female patient with a complex sex chromosomal rearrangement [GRCh38] Xp22.33(10701_981101)x1,Yq11.221q11.23(13948013_26483746)x1 who conceived spontaneously and carried a healthy pregnancy to term. The patient presented with extreme short stature (more than 4SD below expected) and a bilateral Madelung deformity suggesting a possible SHOX deletion. The patient was otherwise medically well. This patient's short stature was found to be a result of a complex chromosome rearrangement involving a partial X chromosome deletion, which included the SHOX gene and a gain of Y chromosomal material. The Y chromosome material did not contain the SRY gene locus. This is the first recorded case to date of this rearrangement in a female who spontaneously conceived which resulted in a live birth. This patient had normal external and internal anatomy and normal endocrine evaluation with normal puberty. X-inactivation studies revealed no evidence of skewed inactivation.

A Rare Chromosome Rearrangement Leading to de la Chapelle Syndrome with a Mosaic 45,X Cell Line: (46,X,psu dic(X;Y)(p22.13;q11.221)/45,X/45,psu dic(X;Y)(p22.13;q11.221)

Infertility affects about 15% of couples of childbearing age. About half of these cases can be attributed predominantly to a male factor, such as a quantitative or qualitative impairment in spermatogenesis. The first-line genetic screening for non-obstructive azoospermia is limited to karyotyping (to identify chromosome abnormalities) and Y chromosome microdeletions screening, with a view to explaining the spermatogenetic failure and evaluating the likelihood of sperm retrieval in a testicular biopsy. For patients with de la Chapelle syndrome (a 46,XX karyotype with the presence of SRY (Sex determining region Y) gene) and/or Y chromosome microdeletions, or sex chromosome mosaicism, sperm retrieval is usually unsuccessful. Here, we report a patient with de la Chapelle syndrome and a short stature caused by mosaicism and a very rare chromosome rearrangement: mos 46,X,psu dic(X;Y)/45,X/45,psu dic(X;Y). This case indicates that in de la Chapelle syndrome, X- and Y-chromosome breakpoint variability is high.

Characterization of the first adult de novo case of 46,X,der(Y)t(X;Y)(p22.3;q11.2)

Herein, we describe a case of an infertile man detected in postnatal diagnosis with FISH characterization and array-CGH used for genome-wide screening which allowed the identification of a complex rearrangement involving sex chromosomes, apparently without severe phenotypic consequences. The deletion detected in our patient has been compared with previously reported cases leading us to propose a hypothetical diagnostic algorithm that would be useful in similar clinical situations, with imperative multi disciplinary approach integrated with genetic counseling. Our patient, uniquely of reproductive age, is one of six reported cases of duplication of Xp22.3 (~8.4Mb) segment and contemporary deletion of Yq (~42.9Mb) with final karyotype as follows: 46,X,der(Y),t(X;Y)(Ypter→Yq11.221::Xp22.33→Xpter).ish der(Y) (Yptel+,Ycen+,RP11-529I21+,RP11-506M9-Yqtel−,Xptel+). arrXp22.33p22.31(702–8,395,963, 8,408,289x1), Yq11.221q12 (14,569,317x1, 14,587,321–57,440,839x0).

Array-CGH characterization of a prenatally detected de novo 46,X,der(Y)t(X;Y)(p22.3;q11.2) in a male fetus

We report on an apparently normal 5-month-old boy with a X;Y complex rearrangement identified first on prenatal diagnosis and found on array-CGH to have a 7.6 Mb duplication of Xp22.3 chromosome and a deletion of Yq chromosome, distal to the AZFa locus. Karyotype analysis on amniotic fluid cell cultures revealed a de novo homogenous chromosome marker that we interpreted as an isochromosome Yp. FISH analysis using SRY probe revealed only one signal on the derivative Y chromosome. The final karyotype was interpreted as 46,X,der(Y)t(X;Y)(p22.31;q11.22). Translocation Xp22;Yq11 in male are very rare event and only 4 cases have been published, all showing mental retardation and malformations. Herein we discussed some possible explanation for this apparent phenotypic variability.