Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for complex chromosome rearrangements

Global Practice Patterns in the Evaluation of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia: Results of a World-Wide Survey and Expert Recommendations

PURPOSE

Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the persistent absence of sperm in ejaculate without obstruction, stemming from diverse disease processes. This survey explores global practices in NOA diagnosis, comparing them with guidelines and offering expert recommendations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 56-item questionnaire survey on NOA diagnosis and management was conducted globally from July to September 2022. This paper focuses on part 1, evaluating NOA diagnosis. Data from 367 participants across 49 countries were analyzed descriptively, with a Delphi process used for expert recommendations.

RESULTS

Of 336 eligible responses, most participants were experienced attending physicians (70.93%). To diagnose azoospermia definitively, 81.7% requested two semen samples. Commonly ordered hormone tests included serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (97.0%), total testosterone (92.9%), and luteinizing hormone (86.9%). Genetic testing was requested by 66.6%, with karyotype analysis (86.2%) and Y chromosome microdeletions (88.3%) prevalent. Diagnostic testicular biopsy, distinguishing obstructive azoospermia (OA) from NOA, was not performed by 45.1%, while 34.6% did it selectively. Differentiation relied on physical examination (76.1%), serum hormone profiles (69.6%), and semen tests (68.1%). Expectations of finding sperm surgically were higher in men with normal FSH, larger testes, and a history of sperm in ejaculate.

CONCLUSIONS

This expert survey, encompassing 367 participants from 49 countries, unveils congruence with recommended guidelines in NOA diagnosis. However, noteworthy disparities in practices suggest a need for evidence-based, international consensus guidelines to standardize NOA evaluation, addressing existing gaps in professional recommendations.

Preimplantation genetic testing for complex chromosomal rearrangements: clinical outcomes and potential risk factors

Objective

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR) are rare structural abnormalities involving at least three breakpoints, categorized into three types based on their structure: type A (three-way rearrangements), type B (double two-way translocations), and type C (exceptional CCR). However, thus far, limited data exists on preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in CCR carriers. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and influencing factors of PGT-SR in couples with CCR.

Methods

Fifteen couples with unique CCR recruited from 793 couples following PGT-SR between January 2017 and May 2023. In addition, a total of 54 CCR cases, 39 previously reported as well as 15 newly added, were included in the analysis of factors associate with normal/balanced embryos.

Results

A total of 100 blastocysts were biopsied and analyzed in 15 CCR couples after 17 PGT-SR cycles, with 16.0% being euploid, 78.0% aneuploid and 6.0% mosaic. 11 normal/balanced embryos and one mosaic embryo were transferred, resulting in eight live births. Furthermore, based on the combined data from 54 CCR carriers, the proportion of normal/balanced embryos was 10.8%, with a significant decrease observed among female carriers compared to male heterozygotes (6.5% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.002). Type B exhibited the lowest rate of euploid embryos at only 6.7%, followed by type A at 11.6% and type C at 14.0%, although the differences were not significant (p = 0.182). After completing the multivariate generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis, type B (p = 0.014) and female carrier (p = 0.002) were identified as independent risk factors for fewer euploid embryos.

Conclusion

The occurrence of balanced CCR in patients with reproductive abnormalities may be more frequent than we expected. Despite the proportion of normal/balanced embryos being significantly low, which can be influenced by CCR type and carrier's sex, PGT-SR may improve the reproductive outcomes among CCR cases. These findings can optimize the clinical management and genetic counseling of CCR carriers seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Insight into the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome: Case report of a young women with infertility

Objective

To report the case of a young woman with repeated conception failure, whose karyotype showed an unbalanced complex chromosomal rearrangement involving a large duplication harboring >115 genes and overlapping the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome region. The 8p23.1 duplication syndrome results from a tandem duplication on the short arm of chromosome 8 containing the 4 genes (GATA4, TNKS, SOX7, XKR6) responsible for the most common phenotypic features: developmental delay/learning disabilities, congenital heart disease and dysmorphism.

Design

Case report and review of the literature.

Setting

American University of Beirut Medical Center, department of Pathology and Laboratory medicine.Patient(s): Young woman referred to the genetic clinics for the workup of secondary idiopathic infertility with multiple unsuccessful inseminations and in vitro fertilizations.

Interventions

Peripheral blood karyotype analysis from the patient and her parents. Elucidation of the CCR required whole chromosome painting Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization and Chromosomal Microarray.

Main outcome measures

The few published reports on 8p23.1 duplication syndrome (<50 cases) describing carriers reveal a wide range of phenotypic consequences with heterogeneous severity. The main outcome is to further understand this syndrome.

Results

Chromosomal microarray analysis detected a large (12Mb) pathogenic Copy Number Variant (CNV) at 8p23.3p23.1, overlapping the 8p23.1 duplication syndrome region. This CNV, classified as pathogenic, was shown to carry little significance in our patient.

Conclusions

8p23.1 duplication syndrome display a variable expressivity, ranging from overt syndromic features to minimal effect on the phenotype as shown in this case. Interpretation of prenatal detection of 8p23.1 duplication especially in preimplantation diagnosis is thus challenging. Nevertheless, this case emphasizes the importance of genetic testing in infertile patients displaying a normal phenotype.

Case report: Optical genome mapping revealed double rearrangements in a male undergoing preimplantation genetic testing

Chromosome rearrangement is one of the main causes of abortion. In individuals with double chromosomal rearrangements, the abortion rate and the risk of producing abnormal chromosomal embryos are increased. In our study, preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangement (PGT-SR) was performed for a couple because of recurrent abortion and the karyotype of the male was 45, XY der (14; 15)(q10; q10). The PGT-SR result of the embryo in this in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle showed microduplication and microdeletion at the terminals of chromosomes 3 and 11, respectively. Therefore, we speculated whether the couple might have a cryptic reciprocal translocation which was not detected by karyotyping. Then, optical genome mapping (OGM) was performed for this couple, and cryptic balanced chromosomal rearrangements were detected in the male. The OGM data were consistent with our hypothesis according to previous PGT results. Subsequently, this result was verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in metaphase. In conclusion, the male’s karyotype was 45, XY, t(3; 11)(q28; p15.4), der(14; 15)(q10; q10). Compared with traditional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray, CNV-seq and FISH, OGM has significant advantages in detecting cryptic and balanced chromosomal rearrangements.

Genetics in human reproduction

Approximately 50% of the causes of infertility are of genetic origin. The objective of this study was to analyze the role of genetics in human reproduction by reviewing the main genetic causes of infertility and the use of preimplantation genetic testing in Brazil. This literature review comprised articles in English and Portuguese published on databases PubMed, Scielo, and Bireme from 1990 to 2019. Randomized clinical trials and specialized guidelines were given preference whenever possible. Genetic cause can be traced back to up to 20% of the cases of severe azoospermia or oligozoospermia. Subjects with these conditions are good candidates for genetic screening. In women, genetic causes of infertility (fragile X syndrome, X-trisomy, and Turner's syndrome, some of which diagnosed with karyotyping) culminate with premature ovarian failure. Genetic screening helps advise couples of the risk of experiencing early reproductive capacity loss and of the chances of their offspring carrying genetic disorders. In addition to enhancing the prevention of serious diseases in the offspring of couples at increased risk of genetic diseases, preimplantation genetic screening improves the success rates of assisted reproduction procedures by allowing the selection of euploid embryos for transfer. The interface between genetics and human reproduction has gained significant relevance, but discussions are still needed on which procedures are clinically and ethically acceptable and how they should be regulated.

Successful pregnancy after prenatal diagnosis by NGS for a carrier of complex chromosome rearrangements

BACKGROUND

The study is aimed to provide prediction for fertility risk in the setting of assisted reproduction for a woman with complex chromosomal rearrangements (CCRs).

METHODS

We implemented a robust approach, which combined whole-genome low-coverage mate-pair sequencing (WGL-MPS), junction-spanning PCR and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) method to provide accurate chromosome breakpoint junctional sequences in the embryo selection process in the setting of assisted reproduction for a couple with recurrent abortions due to CCRs.

RESULT

WGL-MPS was applied to a female carrying CCRs which consisted of 9 breakpoints and 1 cryptic deletion related to fertility risks. Sequencing data provided crucial information for designing junction-spanning PCR and PGT-A process, which was performed on the 11 embryos cultivated. One embryo was considered qualified for transplanting, which carried the exact same CCRs as the female carrier, whose phenotype was normal. The amniotic fluid was also investigated by WGL-MPS and karyotyping at 19 weeks' gestation, which verified the results that the baby carried the same CCRs. A healthy baby was born at 39 weeks' gestation by vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION(S)

Our study illustrates the WGL-MPS approach combining with junction-spanning PCR and PGT-A is a powerful and practical method in the setting of assisted reproduction for couples with recurrent miscarriage due to chromosomal abnormalities, especially CCRs carriers.

DNA Damage and Repair in Human Reproductive Cells

The fundamental underlying paradigm of sexual reproduction is the production of male and female gametes of sufficient genetic difference and quality that, following syngamy, they result in embryos with genomic potential to allow for future adaptive change and the ability to respond to selective pressure. The fusion of dissimilar gametes resulting in the formation of a normal and viable embryo is known as anisogamy, and is concomitant with precise structural, physiological, and molecular control of gamete function for species survival. However, along the reproductive life cycle of all organisms, both male and female gametes can be exposed to an array of “stressors” that may adversely affect the composition and biological integrity of their proteins, lipids and nucleic acids, that may consequently compromise their capacity to produce normal embryos. The aim of this review is to highlight gamete genome organization, differences in the chronology of gamete production between the male and female, the inherent DNA protective mechanisms in these reproductive cells, the aetiology of DNA damage in germ cells, and the remarkable DNA repair mechanisms, pre- and post-syngamy, that function to maintain genome integrity.

Preimplantation genetic testing for complex chromosomal rearrangement carriers by next-generation sequencing

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) with next-generation sequencing (NGS) increase the chance of achieving a balanced euploid pregnancy in complex chromosome rearrangement (CCR) carriers?

DESIGN

Six couples underwent PGT at the Clinical Centre of Reproductive Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University. The CCR carriers in the six couples were: Case A: 46,XY,t(1;4;11)(p31;p16;q22); Case B: 46,XY,t(3;13;5)(p14;q21;p14); Case C: 46,XX,t(6;11;21)(q21;q21;q13); Case D: 46,XX,inv(9)(p12; q13),t(13;15)(q14;q24); Case E: 46,XX,inv(9)(p12;q13),t(7;9)(q22;p22); and Case F: 46,XX,t(2;7)(q21;q36),t(2;4)(p10;q10),t(2;4)(q15;q10). After ovarian stimulation followed by oocyte retrieval and embryo culture, PGT was performed on day 5 or 6 blastocyst biopsies using NGS to identify normal/balanced euploid embryos. Vitrified-warmed single embryo transfers were performed using normal/balanced euploid embryos.

RESULTS

After seven cycles, 84 oocytes were retrieved. Whole genome sequencing by NGS was performed on 25 trophectoderm biosies. Six (24%) embryos were identified as normal/balanced euploid, four were transferred resulting in four live births. Case A, C, D and E each gave birth to a healthy baby after their first cycle. There was no transferable embryo after two cycles for Case B and one cycle for Case F. The implantation rate per transfer was 4/4 and the live birth rate was 4/4.

CONCLUSION

These results strongly support the use of NGS for CCR carriers.

Complex chromosomal rearrangement-a lesson learned from PGS

PURPOSE

The aim of the study is to report a case of non-diagnosed complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) identified by preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) followed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) which resulted in a pregnancy and delivery of healthy offspring.

METHODS

A 29-year-old woman and her spouse, both diagnosed previously with normal karyotypes, approached our IVF-PGD center following eight early spontaneous miscarriages. PGS using chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on biopsied trophectoderm. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as re-karyotype, were performed on metaphase derived from peripheral blood of the couple. Subsequently, in the following PGD cycle, a total of seven blastocysts underwent CMA.

RESULTS

A gain or loss at three chromosomes (3, 7, 9) was identified in six out of seven embryos in the first PGS-CMA cycle. FISH analysis of parental peripheral blood samples demonstrated that the male is a carrier of a CCR involving those chromosomes; this was in spite of a former diagnosis of normal karyotypes for both parents. Re-karyotype verified the complex translocation of 46,XY,t (3;7;9)(q23;q22;q22). Subsequently, in the following cycle, a total of seven blastocysts underwent PGD-CMA for the identified complex translocation. Two embryos were diagnosed with balanced chromosomal constitution. A single balanced embryo was transferred and pregnancy was achieved, resulting in the birth of a healthy female baby.

CONCLUSIONS

PGS employing CMA is an efficient method to detect unrevealed chromosomal abnormalities, including complicated cases of CCR. The combined application of array CGH and FISH technologies enables the identification of an increased number of CCR carriers for which PGD is particularly beneficial.

A family study of complex chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 1, 8, and 11 and its reproductive consequences

Complex chromosome translocations are structural chromosomal rearrangements involving three or more chromosomes and more than two breakpoints. A complex chromosome rearrangement was detected in a phenotypically normal female patient that was referred to the hospital for genetic counseling due to reproductive failure. A cytogenetic evaluation was performed, according to standard method of chromosomal analysis, using G-banding technique. The patient's karyotype showed a balanced complex chromosome rearrangement (BCCR) involving chromosomes 1, 8, and 11 with three breakpoints 1p31, 8q13, and 11q23. The karyotype designed according to ISCN (2013), is 46,XX,t(1;8;11)(p31;q13;q23) (8qter→8q13::1p31→1qter;8pter→8q13::11q23→11qter;11pter→11q23::1p31→1pter). Additionally, the proband's mother and brother were tested, resulting in the same exact translocation. In this study, we describe all possible meiotic segregations regarding this translocation, as well as the clinical phenotypes which could arise, if unbalanced products of conception survive. This is a rare case of familial complex chromosome rearrangement, giving a view for its reproductive consequences.

Chromothripsis: potential origin in gametogenesis and preimplantation cell divisions. A review

OBJECTIVE

To review the discovery of chromothripsis and analyze its impact on human reproduction.

DESIGN

Database and literature analysis.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENT(S)

Carriers of massive and complex chromosomal rearrangements.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cytogenetic analysis and molecular testing (fluorescence in situ hybridization, microarray, whole-genome sequencing).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Chromothripsis occurrence in human gametes and preimplantation embryos, with regard to the potential causative mechanisms described in literature.

RESULT(S)

Databases were searched for the literature published up to March 2014. Chromothripsis is characterized by the shattering of one (or a few) chromosome segments followed by a haphazard reassembly of the fragments generated, arising through a single initial catastrophic event. Several mechanisms involving abortive apoptosis, telomere erosion, mitotic errors, micronuclei formation, and p53 inactivation might cause chromothripsis. The remarkable point is that all these plausible mechanisms have been identified in the field of human reproduction as causal factors for reproductive failures and the genesis of chromosomal abnormalities. Specific features of gametogenesis and early embryonic development such as the weakness of cell cycle and mitosis checkpoints and the rapid kinetics of division in germ cells and early cleavage embryos may contribute to the emergence of chromothripsis.

CONCLUSION(S)

The discovery of this new class of massive chromosomal rearrangement has deeply modified our understanding on the genesis of complex genomic rearrangements. Data presented in this review support the assumption that chromothripsis could operate in human germlines and during early embryonic development. Chromothripsis might arise more frequently than previously thought in both gametogenesis and early human embryogenesis.

Identification of a balanced complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 3, 18 and 21 with recurrent abortion: case report

BACKGROUND

Complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) are constitutional structural rearrangements involve more than two breakpoints on two or more chromosomes. Balanced CCR carriers are often phenotypically normal but associated with high risk of spontaneous abortion and having abnormal offspring with unbalanced karyotype. Here, we report a new familial case of complex chromosome structural aberrations involving chromosomes 3, 18 and 21 and four breakpoints.

RESULTS

Cytogenetic investigations showed a complex chromosomal chromosome rearrangement involving chromosomes 3, 18 and 21 with four breakpoints. 2 of 4 breakpoints were within the long arm of chromosome 18. Three-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed the complexity of the rearrangement and showed the derivative 21 to be composed of 3 distinct segments derived from chromosomes 21, 18, and 3. The karyotype of CCR carrier was determined as 46,XX,t(3;21;18)(3pter → 3q12::18q23 → 18qter;21pter → 21q22.1::18q21.1 → 18q23::3q12 → 3qter; 18pter → 18q21.1::21q22.1 → 21qter).

DISCUSSION

A new complex balanced CCR was characterized using conventional high resolution banding and molecular cytogenetic analysis. The results provided an explanation of recurrent abortion and abnormal child for balanced CCR carriers. Genetic counselling and prenatal diagnosis for couples with a balanced CCR is necessary since they have a high risk of having a child with unbalanced karyotype. Additional studies to reveal the molecular mechanism of CCRs would help reveal the rule of inherited CCRs in offspring.

Two different microarray technologies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening, due to reciprocal translocation imbalances, demonstrate equivalent euploidy and clinical pregnancy rates

PURPOSE

To compare single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) microarray platforms to evaluate embryos for parental translocation imbalances and aneuploidy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening (PGD/PGS) results of 498 embryos from 63 couples undergoing 75 in vitro fertilization cycles due to parental carriers of a reciprocal translocation.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between SNP and aCGH microarrays when comparing the prevalence of embryos that were euploid with no translocation imbalance, euploidy with a parental translocation imbalance or aneuploid with or without the parental chromosome imbalance. The clinical pregnancy rates were also equivalent for SNP (60 %) versus aCGH (65 %) microarrays. Of 498 diagnosed embryos, 45 % (226/498) were chromosomally normal without translocation errors or aneuploidy, 22 % (112/498) were euploid but had a parentally derived unbalanced chromosomal segregant, 8 % (42/498) harbored both a translocation imbalance and aneuploidy and 24 % (118/498) of embryos were genetically balanced for the parental reciprocal translocation but were aneuploid for other chromosomes. The overall clinical pregnancy rate per IVF cycle following SNP or aCGH microarray analysis was 61 % and was higher if the biopsy was done on blastocysts (65 %) versus cleavage stage embryos (59 %), although not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

SNP or aCGH microarray technologies demonstrate equivalent clinical findings that maximize the pregnancy potential in patients with known parental reciprocal chromosomal translocations.

Meiotic outcomes of three-way translocations ascertained in cleavage-stage embryos: refinement of reproductive risks and implications for PGD

Our study provides an analysis of the outcome of meiotic segregation of three-way translocations in cleavage-stage embryos and the accuracy and limitations of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique. We propose a general model for estimating reproductive risks for carriers of this class of complex chromosome rearrangement. The data presented describe six cycles for four couples where one partner has a three-way translocation. For male heterozygotes, 27.6% of embryos were consistent with 3:3 alternate segregation resulting in a normal or balanced translocation chromosome complement; 41.4% were consistent with 3:3 adjacent segregation of the translocations, comprising 6.9% reflecting adjacent-1 and 34.5% adjacent-2 segregation; 24.1% were consistent with 4:2 nondisjunction; none showed 5:1 or 6:0 segregation; the probable mode could not be ascertained for 6.9% of embryos due to complex mosaicism or nucleus fragmentation. The test accuracy for male heterozygotes was estimated to be 93.1% with 100% sensitivity and 75% specificity. With 72.4% prevalence, the predictive value was estimated to be 91.3% for an abnormal test result and 100% for a normal test result. Two of four couples had a healthy baby following PGD. The proportion of normal/balanced embryo could be significantly less for female heterozygotes, and our model indicates that this could be detrimental to the effectiveness of PGD. A 20% risk of live-born offspring with an unbalanced translocation is generally accepted, largely based on the obstetric history of female heterozygotes; we suggest that a 3% risk may be more appropriate for male carriers.

Sequential FISH allows the determination of the segregation outcome and the presence of numerical anomalies in spermatozoa from a t(1;8;2)(q42;p21;p15) carrier

PURPOSE

To find out the meiotic segregation behaviour of the t(1;8;2)(q42;p21;p15), to evaluate the occurrence of interchromosomal effects, and to determine whether there is an accumulation of unbalanced products in aneuploid/diploid gametes.

METHODS

A sequential FISH protocol based on two successive hybridization rounds over the same spermatozoa was performed to determine the segregation outcome of the rearranged chromosomes. The presence of numerical abnormalities for 13, 18, 21, X and Y was also evaluated by sperm FISH. Those aneuploid/diploid gametes were subsequently relocalized and analyzed for their segregation content through additional hybridization rounds.

RESULTS

The segregation pattern observed reported a very low production of normal/balanced gametes (11.7 %). Significant increased frequencies of diploidies and disomies for chromosomes X/Y and 18 were detected (p < 0.001). Aneuploid and diploid spermatozoa displayed significant increases of 5:1, 6:0 and other unexpected disjunction modes (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy developed in this study is a reliable new approach to establish the full segregation pattern of complex chromosome rearrangements (CCR). Results corroborate the low number of normal/balanced spermatozoa produced by CCR carriers and support previous findings regarding an altered segregation pattern in gametes with numerical abnormalities. Altogether this confirms the importance of PGD as a tool to prevent the transmission of chromosomal abnormalities to the offspring in CCR patients.

De novo exceptional complex chromosomal rearrangement in a healthy fertile male: case report and review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

To report a de novo exceptional complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) with four breakpoints in the male partner of a couple with recurrent abortions.

DESIGN

Case report and review of the literature.

SETTING

Genetics laboratory in a private hospital.

PATIENT(S)

A couple referred for recurrent abortions.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cytogenetic and sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Karyotype and FISH sperm results.

RESULT(S)

The couple was phenotypically normal, with no family history of miscarriage or infertility. Female karyotype was normal. Male karyotype followed by FISH analysis showed a de novo CCR with four breakpoints: t(5,13,16)(q11.1, q14.3, q12.2), ins(16;13)(q12.2;q?q14.2). ish t(5;13;16)(wcp5+,wcp13+), ins(16;13)(wcp13+).

CONCLUSION(S)

Exceptional de novo CCR male carriers with recurrent abortions are extremely rare. Patients with CCRs have limited options to achieve a normal pregnancy. Careful consideration and assessment should be provided upon counseling of couples with CCRs.

PGD for a complex chromosomal rearrangement by array comparative genomic hybridization

Patients carrying a chromosomal rearrangement (CR) have an increased risk for chromosomally unbalanced conceptions. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) may avoid the transfer of embryos carrying unbalanced rearrangements, therefore increasing the chance of pregnancy. Only 7-12 loci can be screened by fluorescence in situ hybridization whereas microarray technology can detect genome-wide imbalances at the single cell level. We performed PGD for a CR carrier with karyotype 46,XY,ins(3;2)(p23;q23q14.2),t(6;14)(p12.2;q13) using array comparative genomic hybridization. Selection of embryos for transfer was only based on copy number status of the chromosomes involved in both rearrangements. In two ICSI-PGD cycles, nine and seven embryos were analysed by array, leaving three and one embryo(s) suitable for transfer, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of single cell arrays was 100 and 88.8%, respectively. In both cycles a single embryo was transferred, resulting in pregnancy following the second cycle. The embryo giving rise to the pregnancy was normal/balanced for the insertion and translocation but carried a trisomy 8 and nullisomy 9 in one of the two biopsied blastomeres. After 7 weeks of pregnancy the couple miscarried. Genetic analysis following hystero-embryoscopy showed a diploid (90%)/tetraploid (10%) mosaic chorion, while the gestational sac was empty. No chromosome 8 aneuploidy was detected in the chorion, while 8% of the cells carried a monosomy for chromosome 9. In summary, we demonstrate the feasibility and determine the accuracy of single cell array technology to test against transmission of the unbalanced meiotic products that can derive from CRs. Our findings also demonstrate that the genomic constitution of extra-embryonic tissue cannot necessarily be predicted from the copy number status of a single blastomere.

Complex chromosomal rearrangement involving chromosomes 1, 4 and 22 in an infertile male: case report and literature review

Here we describe a rare case of an apparently balanced karyotype of 46, XY, t(1;22;4)(p22.3;q11.1;q31.1) in a infertile male with oligoastenoteratozoospermia (OAT). He was the second patient with complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) referred to our center because of infertility. We also review reports on 24 males carrying CCRs with spermatogenesis failure or a malformed child, to provide information on the reproductive outcome of male CCR carriers.