Balanced information about Down syndrome: what is essential?

Parent-reported genetic counselor adherence to the NSGC practice resource for communicating a potential prenatal diagnosis: Impact on the Down syndrome diagnosis experience

In 2011, the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) published practice resources about communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS). However, the impact of GC adherence to those recommendations on patient experiences has been unknown. The objective of this analysis was to investigate perceived GC adherence to professional recommendations for delivering a DS diagnosis and the impact on parental diagnosis experiences and the information and support offered. Parents of children with DS born between 2016 and 2021 completed a survey distributed by 12 local DS organizations and the national DS Diagnosis Network to assess prenatal diagnosis experiences and the provision of support and information by health professionals. Participants were queried about whether their GC followed specific recommendations from the NSGC practice resource. Respondents were also invited to describe their diagnosis experience. An overall perceived adherence score was calculated (percentage of elements GC demonstrated/total number of elements). Open-ended responses were inductively coded by a GC and GC student to identify categories and to perform a sentiment analysis where 1 was completely negative, 2 was mixed/more negative, 3 was neutral, 4 was mixed/more positive, and 5 was completely positive. The GCs were blinded to participants' perceived adherence scores while performing the sentiment analysis. Of the 242 parents who completed the survey, 161 respondents answered questions about GC's perceived practice resource adherence. The median perceived adherence score was 42.9% (IQR 21.4-71.4)%. A total of 61 people provided an open-ended response about their prenatal diagnosis experience with a GC and were assigned a sentiment score. The median sentiment score was 3 (IQR 1-5). Kendall's Tau analysis showed that higher perceived practice resource adherence was associated with more positive sentiment scores. These results suggest that NSGC practice resource adherence may improve the prenatal diagnosis experiences of parents of children with DS and have the potential to improve counseling outcomes.

The impact of implicit and explicit bias about disabilities on parent experiences and information provided during prenatal screening and testing

BACKGROUND

Prenatal screening technology has consistently raised concerns regarding the conversations and information provided about disabilities, particularly given that research shows trauma related to negative prenatal screening and diagnosis experiences among parents of children with Down syndrome.1 OBJECTIVE: To determine what information obstetric medical providers (OB/MFMs) are most and least likely to provide when delivering prenatal screening/testing results about Down syndrome (DS), the subsequent impact of bias on prenatal screening experiences, and how these issues can be addressed through training, resources, and professional guidelines.

METHODS

Online surveys were distributed to parents of children with DS born between 2016 and 2021 via local DS organizations and the national DS Diagnosis Network (April 2020-December 2021).

RESULTS

Of the 242 parents who completed the survey, a majority indicated that OB/MFMs were most likely to discuss medical issues and reproductive options while less than 40% reported that OB/MFMs discussed psychosocial outcomes, supports, and services. Respondents reported that the 61.3% of OB/MFMs who delivered the diagnosis as bad news or said "I'm sorry" were significantly less likely than their counterparts to provide information about life outcomes, supports and services, condition-specific resources, or more comprehensive prenatal care. Qualitative responses about screening/diagnosis experiences provided further context about the impact of implicit and explicit bias on the provision of accurate, up-to-date information.

CONCLUSION

To meet information needs during prenatal screening, OB/MFMs need access to accurate, balanced, and up-to-date information about disabilities and more training on disability cultural competency and how to deliver prenatal screening/testing results without implicit or explicit bias.

Down syndrome: Parental experiences of a postnatal diagnosis

Globally it is estimated that Down syndrome occurs in 1 in 800 live births (Bull 2020). It has also been estimated that the incidence of Down syndrome occurs in 1/444 live births in the Republic of Ireland. Given the prevalence of Down syndrome births in Ireland and the fact that care is provided by the majority of parents at home, this qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of Irish parents receiving a postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. A qualitative research approach was used through semi structured interviews. Eight parents of a baby diagnosed postnatally with Down syndrome participated in this study sharing their stories of their postnatal diagnosis experiences. Five overarching themes emerged using a descriptive thematic analysis; 1. prenatal screening, pregnancy and delivery; 2. how the diagnosis was delivered; 3. setting and emotional experiences; 4. moving on with the postnatal diagnosis and 5. Future recommendations from parents' perspectives. This study highlighted the importance of the need for clinicians to ensure that partners are present at the time of the disclosure, that ample time is allocated and that verbal and written communications are provided to parents using less medical jargon when delivering the postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. These reasonable adjustments could alleviate parental anxiety at this critical juncture in their lives. Online resources and support forums were also identified as an integral support for families on discharge from the maternity centres and in the early months and years.

Recommendations to Improve the Patient Experience and Avoid Bias When Prenatal Screening/Testing

While prenatal screening and testing have expanded substantially over the past decade and provide access to more genetic information, expectant parents are more likely to describe the diagnosis experience as negative than positive. In addition, the conversations that take place during these experiences sometimes reflect unconscious bias against people with disabilities. Consequently, an interdisciplinary committee of experts, including people with disabilities, family members, disability organization leaders, healthcare and genetics professionals, and bioethicists, reviewed selected published and gray literature comparing the current state of the administration of prenatal testing to the ideal state. Subsequently, the interdisciplinary team created recommendations for clinicians, public health agencies, medical organizations, federal agencies, and other stakeholders involved with administering prenatal screening and testing to create better patient experiences; conduct training for healthcare professionals; create, enforce, and fund policies and guidelines; and engage in more robust data collection and research efforts.

Family perspectives on gaps in health care for people with Down syndrome

Patients with Down syndrome (DS) have significant specialized healthcare needs. Our objective was to understand what families of patients with DS perceive to be the most pressing gaps in health care, barriers to attendance at a DS specialty clinic, and what they thought a specialty healthcare clinic for people with DS ought to include as part of the clinical package. A qualitative survey was distributed nationally through the online platform SurveyMonkey. We divided respondents into two groups: those who attended a DS specialty clinic (n = 141) and those who did not (n = 100). Data were cleaned and analyzed in RStudio 3.6.3. Results demonstrate that families value mental health services, therapies (e.g., physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy), developmental specialists, dietitians, and educational advocates. Lack of clear advertisement, especially within low-income communities, a lack of awareness of DS specialty clinics, and travel time to clinics constituted significant barriers to care. These findings are arguably of benefit to those who direct DS specialty clinics because they offer direction for resource allocation in a time of increasing healthcare costs and financial scrutiny.

Parenting a child with Down syndrome: A qualitative study of everyday practices in Danish families

Genetic counseling about Down syndrome is suggested to include information on a future family life. However, there is an insufficient knowledge on the potential impact of parenting a child with Down syndrome on parents' everyday practices. We aimed to address this gap by exploring the experienced everyday practices of parents in families where a child has Down syndrome. Taking a qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 parents of children with Down syndrome aged 4-12 years. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified two themes concerned with the parents' practice. The first, 'Supporting our child', describes how the parents perceived their child as a valuable human being and how this perception founded parents' support of the child's development and social interactions. The second, 'Managing our family life', demonstrates how the parents acted to manage a family life that had become the 'new normal' including being alert toward the child, shaping the practical and logistical framework of daily life, and balancing between being at home and away from home. Overall, the analysis presents an everyday practice aimed at a desirable future for the child with Down syndrome and at a management of everyday life on the family's own terms. In conclusion, this study provides specific knowledge on parents' everyday practice, which may inform genetic counseling about Down syndrome and be of value to service providers.

Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions

As prenatal genetic testing technologies have become both easier and more accessible, women are increasingly choosing prenatal genetic testing for a reason that is largely unexamined in the clinical literature: preparation. This reasoning, offered not only from pregnant women but frequently from testing laboratories and health care providers, reflects long-held assumptions that prenatal genetic results-properly delivered and followed with information, clinical surveillance, and/or social supports-prepare families for a child with a genetic condition, and even improve health and social outcomes for children and families. But these assumptions remain unexamined, since there are no clear definitions or recommendations for prenatal preparation. Preparation may refer to several overlapping ways in which prenatal information may change parents' approach to the rest of the pregnancy, including: (a) clinical activities, including surveillance, interventions, and delivery planning; (b) social and informational support, such as interacting with patient support groups and gathering information about quality of life; and (c) psychological "coping" or adjustments to the reality of raising a child with a genetic condition. These meanings and activities intersect and influence one another and form a foundation for postnatal family adaptation, but they are rarely parsed out in studies examining the impact of prenatal diagnosis. Based on previous work delineating conceptual models as middle terms between theory and reality, we are building a conceptual model that incorporates an empirical understanding of meanings and actions encompassed by prenatal preparation. Comparing diverse families' expectations with the resources they are offered can identify (mis)matches between priorities and approaches.

The Feedback Session of an Autism Assessment: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations

This review aimed to assess the quality and content of recommendations for delivering an autism diagnosis, published internationally within clinical practice guidelines. Seventeen relevant guidelines were identified. When methodological information was provided, recommendations for feedback were predominantly formed through consensus. Recommendations consistently included who should attend feedback, the timing and mode of delivery, the clinician's manner, and what should be discussed and/or included in an accompanying report. Specific recommendations were not consistent however, and a number of gaps were identified, such as the inclusion of educators and educational specific recommendations. Although individual variation is necessary for autism diagnosis disclosure, agreement on minimum standards of practice is warranted. Further investigation is required to establish best practice.

The Emergence and Global Spread of Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

Since its introduction in 2011, noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has spread rapidly around the world. It carries numerous benefits but also raises challenges, often related to sociocultural, legal, and economic contexts. This article describes the implementation of NIPT in nine countries, each with its own unique characteristics: Australia, Canada, China and Hong Kong, India, Israel, Lebanon, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Themes covered for each country include the structure of the healthcare system, how NIPT is offered, counseling needs and resources, and cultural and legal context regarding disability and pregnancytermination. Some common issues emerge, including cost as a barrier to equitable access, the complexity of decision-making about public funding, and a shortage of appropriate resources that promote informed choice. Conversely, sociocultural values that underlie the use of NIPT vary greatly among countries. The issues described will become even more challenging as NIPT evolves from a second-tier to a first-tier screening test with expanded use.

The Voice of Parents of Children With a Congenital Anomaly - A EUROlinkCAT Study

EUROlinkCAT aims to investigate the health and educational outcomes of children with congenital anomalies for the first 10 years of their lives. We also aim to facilitate the development of a more reciprocal relationship between families with children with congenital anomalies, health and social care professionals, and researchers by conducting focus groups. The aim of the focus groups and parent interviews was to investigate parental experiences of having a child with a heart defect requiring surgery, cleft lip, spina bifida or Down Syndrome and to identify their research priorities. In total, seven interviews with 12 parents and eight focus groups with 58 parents and two caregivers were conducted in four European countries. We found that parents request more positive information with a focus on quality of life and what the children can achieve rather than solely on the negative aspects and limitations of the congenital anomaly. Some parents also highlighted discrepancies between the family's need for support and the lack of support received from the local authority. Finally, it was challenging for the parents to address specific research priorities. Future research should therefore focus on the potential of a child with a congenital anomaly.

Counselling in tuberous sclerosis complex: A survey on content and satisfaction in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a highly variable condition and its clinical features cannot reliably be predicted from the genotype. Counselling of parents of a child with TSC is challenging because of the variability of the condition and the changing outlook due to new treatment options. This study explored current counselling strategies in TSC in the Netherlands, with the aim of developing a recommendation for counselling.

METHOD

We performed a nationwide survey using digital questionnaires. Questionnaires were sent to parents of children diagnosed with TSC, and to medical doctors involved in counselling, both no more than ten years prior to the study. Questions focused on general information about the child with TSC, medical doctors involved in counselling, type of information provided, mode of providing information, and recommendations for improvement of counselling.

RESULTS

Parents of 34 children diagnosed with TSC (7 prenatally) and 18 medical doctors from different departments responded to the questionnaires. Almost all parents were informed on the neurological and cardiac symptoms of TSC, other symptoms were mentioned less often. Satisfaction on counselling was higher when more information on the variability of TSC was provided, preferentially during a clinical visit, when emotional support was provided, and when parents were notified of the TSC patient society.

CONCLUSIONS

Information on the variability in expression and quality of life is highly demanded by (expecting) parents of a child with TSC. Furthermore, reference should be made to institutions such as the support organisation for patients and social services for questions and support.

Building trust and improving communication with parents of children with Trisomy 13 and 18: A mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Trisomy 13 and trisomy 18 are common life-limiting conditions associated with major disabilities. Many parents have described conflictual relationships with clinicians, but positive and adverse experiences of families with healthcare providers have not been well described.

AIM

(1) To investigate parental experiences with clinicians and (2) to provide practical recommendations and behaviors clinicians could emulate to avoid conflict.

DESIGN

Participants were asked to describe their best and worse experiences, as well as supportive clinicians they met. The results were analyzed using mixed methods.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Parents of children with trisomy 13 and 18 who were part of online social support networks. A total of 503 invitations were sent, and 332 parents completed the questionnaire about 272 children.

RESULTS

The majority of parents (72%) had met a supportive clinician. When describing clinicians who changed their lives, the overarching theme, present in 88% of answers, was trust. Parents trusted clinicians when they felt he or she cared and valued their child, their family, and made them feel like good parents (69%), had appropriate knowledge (66%), and supported them and gave them realistic hope (42%). Many (42%) parents did not want to make-or be part of-life-and-death decisions. Parents gave specific examples of supportive behaviors that can be adopted by clinicians. Parents also described adverse experiences, generally leading to conflicts and lack of trust.

CONCLUSION

Realistic and compassionate support of parents living with children with trisomy 13 and 18 is possible. Adversarial interactions that lead to distrust and conflicts can be avoided. Many supportive behaviors that inspire trust can be emulated.

Experiences and outcomes following diagnosis of congenital foetal anomaly and medical termination of pregnancy: A phenomenological study

AIM

To determine and describe the experiences of pregnant women who receive a diagnosis of chromosomopathy and/or foetal malformation during a prenatal check-up and who decide to legally terminate the pregnancy.

BACKGROUND

When a pregnancy is terminated, the woman must cope with frustrated motherhood. The psychological consequences of this will largely depend on the care and support provided by health professionals. When a congenital anomaly is diagnosed, a patient-centred communication helps understanding, influences adaptation to the new situation and ensures the person concerned has sufficient (autonomy or independence or ability) to make appropriate decisions.

METHODS

A qualitative study, based on a phenomenological approach, was carried out through nonparticipant observation and semi-structured interviews with 27 obstetric patients. NVivo 11 software was used, and content analysis was performed. The manuscript was developed using the COREQ guidelines to inform qualitative studies.

RESULTS

The clinical relationship may be affected by communication problems such as patients' perceptions of scarce emotional involvement by obstetricians, by poor psychosocial support during the termination of the pregnancy and by insufficient follow-up after discharge.

CONCLUSION

Nurses are in a privileged position to promote the empowerment of affected women. It is necessary to improve aspects related to the privacy of patients and the awareness and training of the interdisciplinary team in interpersonal communication. Post-loss follow-up is recommended to assess individual needs, thus facilitating an optimal approach to ease the grieving process.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

During the prenatal diagnosis, the existence of a fetal anomaly is emphasized, but support and follow up of the mother may be neglected; therefore, exhaustive knowledge about the obstetric history, the state of health and the expectations of patients is as important as a multidisciplinary team trained in counseling strategies and with a comprehensive care plan that covers all areas, especially those that control maternal emotions.

"We don't know what we don't know": Providing information about communication to families of children with Down syndrome

PURPOSE

Children with Down syndrome often present with a communication disability, and families require information to support their child's communication. Effective provision of information by professionals is an important part of family-centred practice. However, we currently do not know the specific communication information needs of families of children with Down syndrome. This study aimed to (1) explore families' experiences of communication information provision and (2) identify families' preferences regarding when, what and how they would like to receive information about communication.

METHOD

A qualitative descriptive approach was used to explore the experiences and information needs of nine family members of children with Down syndrome aged 0-15 years. Data from semistructured, in-depth interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three core themes were identified: (1) We want more information about communication to be provided by professionals now and into the future so we can be "self-help people." (2) We want general information resources that help us support our child's communication. (3) We want to have a two-way partnership with professionals so we can share and receive specific information about our child's communication.

CONCLUSION

Ineffective information provision restricts families' capacity to be self-help people in supporting communication development. Ongoing provision of both general and specific information about communication is needed in different formats. This study informs the development of resources to better meet families' information needs.

Building and Connecting: Family Strategies for Developing Social Support Networks for Adults With Down Syndrome

Being embedded in social networks is crucial for well-being and health. While this is particularly the case for people with Down syndrome (DS), our knowledge of how their support networks are developed is limited. This article investigates the role of family members in developing and maintaining the social support networks of their adult children with DS. Based on 29 interviews with family members, a grounded theory study was conducted. The Family Building and Connecting (BAC) framework was developed, which distinguishes a "building" and a "connecting" approach. The building approach includes strategies that rely on family members and close friends for building a support network for the person with DS. The connecting approach includes strategies that connect the person with DS to external and often professional resources and services. Distinguishing these approaches is important for future research and for strengthening the support networks of people with DS and their families.

Parental Perspectives Regarding Outcomes of Very Preterm Infants: Toward a Balanced Approach

OBJECTIVES

To explore parental perspectives regarding their preterm child at 18 months corrected age and to investigate whether reported answers correlate with level of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) as defined by clinicians. We hypothesized that parents would report more negative concerns with increasing level of NDI.

STUDY DESIGN

This study included 190 infants born <29 weeks of gestational age in 2009-2012 at 1 tertiary university health center. Infants underwent detailed developmental assessment at 18 months corrected age, and were classified into either absence or presence of mild to moderate or severe NDI. Parents were asked 2 open-ended questions: "What concerns you most about your child?" and "Please describe the best things about your child." Open-ended questions were analyzed using qualitative methodology.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 49%, 43%, and 8% of participants had no, mild to moderate, and severe NDI. The majority of parents (72.8%) had both positive and negative aspects to report; 26.8% only had positive ones. The main positive themes invoked by parents included their child's personality (61%), happiness (40%), developmental outcome/progress (40%), and physical health (11%). The main themes regarding parental concerns included neurodevelopment (56%), notably language and behavior, and physical health (24%), particularly growth/nutrition and physical fragility. There was no association between positive themes and categories of NDI, but parents of children with mild to moderate NDI reported more concerns about development.

CONCLUSIONS

Neonatal outcome research would benefit from incorporating parental perspectives regarding their child, including negative and positive aspects, enabling physicians to provide complete and balanced information to parents of all preterm infants.

An assessment of health, social, communication, and daily living skills of adults with Down syndrome

Adults with Down syndrome (DS) are surviving longer, yet data delineating life skills are lacking. As providers are encouraged to provide a "balanced" description of DS to family members/caregivers, more quantitative data are required to accurately describe the abilities and potential of adults with DS. This study assessed health, social, communication, and daily living skills of adults with DS to describe the range of abilities and to show how increasing age contributes to functional abilities. Caregivers of an adult with DS 20 years of age or older participated in an online questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and scores from scales assessed relationships between the number of health issues reported and functional abilities, and how the abilities changed as age increased. Of 188 participants, 157 completed the survey with partial results included. Communication, independence, and social activity scores were compared to the number of congenital and non-congenital health issues reported. Linear regression results showed those with more health issues were significantly less likely to be independent and social. However, only current health issues affected communication skills. No significant correlation occurred between the number of congenital abnormalities and scores for independence/life skills as an adult. T-test by age group found decreasing abilities after 40 years of age. In conclusion, quantitative data and information from this study is beneficial for providers in order to describe the potential for an individual with DS and to assist caregivers to plan accordingly for the future of their adult with DS.

Changing Needs for Information and Support in an Online System for Parents of Children With Kidney Disease

Background:

Pediatric chronic kidney disease is psychologically, financially, and physically demanding on parents providing care. Parents often feel isolated because of the rarity of the condition, and geographic isolation often compounds this perception in Canada. Many parents seek assistance online for both information and social support.

Objective:

This study examines an online portal, titled “Ability Online,” which was designed to provide support and information to a diverse group of parents using chat facilities, bulletin boards, and e-mail. Specifically, we sought to identify how the technologies offered in this system related to the support and information seeking needs for parents. Secondary aims of determining possible reasons for attrition over time were explored as well.

Design:

Mixed methodology sequential exploratory design using the qualitative methodology of descriptive interpretation.

Setting:

Telephone interviews.

Patients:

Twenty parents of pediatric patients with chronic kidney disease from four Canadian centers who engaged in an online social support system “Ability Online.”

Measurements:

Interview transcripts generated from 20 taped phone conversations were reviewed from parents who engaged in the online system, and the themes derived from these transcripts served to generate semistructured interview questions that focused on their use of, and perceived benefit from, this technology for social support. Follow-up telephone interviews were then conducted with a 6-person subset of the original group in an effort to further define the impact of technology on their experience. This same smaller cohort provided data on social supports, caregiver satisfaction, and caregiver stress.

Results:

Many parents experience a progression through which their needs for knowledge and support change over time. Specifically, parents describe a transition from pure information seeking, to seeking parental interaction, mutual support and collaboration, and ultimately to advocacy. Parents described how technology could be used to address those needs.

Limitations:

Our cohort was slightly more educated and representative of more urban populations than published data reflecting the population of North American pediatric patients living with kidney disease.

Conclusions:

Our data suggest themes of technology use influencing the goals of online support seeking. While our findings are preliminary, further study may inform Web designers to identify the changing needs of participants in designing such online support networks, and minimize the reasons that participants fail to adopt, or terminate their online experiences.

Measuring and communicating meaningful outcomes in neonatology: A family perspective

Medium- and long-term outcomes have been collected and described among survivors of neonatal intensive care units for decades, for a number of purposes: (1) quality control within units, (2) comparisons of outcomes between NICUs, (3) clinical trials (whether an intervention improves outcomes), (4) end-of-life decision-making, (5) to better understand the effects of neonatal conditions and/or interventions on organs and/or long-term health, and finally (6) to better prepare parents for the future. However, the outcomes evaluated have been selected by investigators, based on feasibility, availability, cost, stability, and on what investigators consider to be important. Many of the routinely measured outcomes have major limitations: they may not correlate well with long-term difficulties, they may artificially divide continuous outcomes into dichotomous ones, and may have no clear relationship with quality of life and functioning of children and their families. Several investigations, such as routine term cerebral resonance imaging for preterm infants, have also not yet been shown to improve the outcome of children nor their families. In this article, the most common variables used in neonatology as well as some variables which are rarely measured but may be of equal importance for families are presented. The manner in which these outcomes are communicated to families will be examined, as well as recommendations to optimize communication with parents.

Informed decision-making about prenatal cfDNA screening: An assessment of written materials

OBJECTIVES

The introduction of prenatal cfDNA screening for fetal aneuploidy and other genetic conditions has exacerbated concerns about informed decision-making in clinical prenatal testing. To assess the information provided to patients to facilitate decisions about cfDNA screening, we collected written patient education and consent documents created by laboratories and clinics.

METHODS

Informed consent documents (IC) were coded by two independent coders. Each IC was assessed for readability, attention to elements of informed consent, and completeness of information about the test and the screened conditions.

RESULTS

We found variance between IC produced by commercial laboratories versus those provided by local clinics or health care systems, and considerable variance among materials from all sources. "Commercial" IC were longer and written at a more difficult reading level than "non-commercial" IC, and were less likely to state explicitly that cfDNA only screens for certain conditions. About one-third of IC were combined with laboratory order forms. Though most IC recommended confirmatory testing for positive results, only about half clearly stated that results could be incorrect-including mentions of false positives or false negatives. About one-third of IC explicitly stated that cfDNA screening was optional. While nearly all IC from any source listed the conditions screened by the test, only about half of the IC included any phenotypic descriptions of these conditions. Few IC mentioned psychosocial considerations, and only one IC mentioned the availability of support groups for families of children with genetic conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our findings, we recommend that written and well-informed consent be sought before performing cfDNA screening, and we offer minimal and recommended standards for patient education and consent materials.

Impact of the increased adoption of prenatal cfDNA screening on non-profit patient advocacy organizations in the United States

The 'Stakeholder Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Screening' Symposium was held in conjunction with the 2015 annual meeting of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis. During the day-long meeting, a panel of patient advocacy group (PAG) representatives discussed concerns and challenges raised by prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening, which has resulted in larger demands upon PAGs from concerned patients receiving prenatal cfDNA screening results. Prominent concerns included confusion about the accuracy of cfDNA screening and a lack of patient education resources about genetic conditions included in cfDNA screens. Some of the challenges faced by PAGs included funding limitations, lack of consistently implemented standards of care and oversight, diverse perspectives among PAGs and questions about neutrality, and lack of access to training and genetic counselors. PAG representatives also put forward suggestions for addressing these challenges, including improving educational and PAG funding and increasing collaboration between PAGs and the medical community. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Beyond the Genetic Diagnosis: Providing Parents What They Want to Know

Clinicians need to provide accurate, up-to-date, and balanced information to parents following a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome and other genetic conditions. Families want information about the genomic outcomes and medical issues, but they also want information about life outcomes and social supports. Because the anticipated outcomes of a condition can change significantly based on available social support, health care, and services, it is important for clinicians to stay up-to-date about new developments and credible, medically reviewed information about Down syndrome and other genetic conditions to access resources for clinical care.

Presenting life with cystic fibrosis: a Q-methodological approach to developing balanced, experience-based prenatal screening information

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of the most common life-threatening genetically inherited conditions and prenatal screening for CF is available in many countries. Genetic counsellors and other health professionals are expected to provide information about the condition in a way that facilitates personal decision making. Knowing what information to deliver about complex genetic conditions to support informed screening decisions can be challenging for health professionals.

OBJECTIVE

To solicit views from those with personal experience with CF on which aspects of the condition they consider most important to include in prenatal screening materials.

METHODS

Q-methodology; an approach to systematically explore variations in viewpoint that combines factor analytic techniques with qualitative approaches to pattern interpretation.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Twelve adults with CF and 18 parents of affected children were recruited from a regional centre in the UK.

RESULTS

Five distinct viewpoints on the items most and least important to include in screening information were identified: Factor 1 the normality of life with CF and increasing life expectancy; Factor 2 the hardships and reduced lifespan. Factor 3 medical interventions and the importance of societal support. Factor 4 longer-term consequences of CF. Factor 5 the ability to adjust to the condition.

DISCUSSION

The identification of five different views on what represented the most and least important information to include about CF highlights the challenge of portraying a complex genetic condition in a balanced and accurate manner. Novel ways in which Q-methodology findings can be used to meet this challenge are presented.

Neonatal diagnosis of Down syndrome in The Netherlands: suspicion and communication with parents

OBJECTIVES

To analyse which dysmorphic features are most recognised in newborns with Down syndrome (DS). Furthermore to evaluate the communication techniques used by clinicians to inform parents about the postnatal diagnosis and compare these to current best practice guidelines.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study of a birth cohort of newborns with DS born between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006 registered by the Dutch Paediatric Surveillance Unit (DPSU).

RESULTS

A total of 586 children with trisomy 21 were analysed. Most recognised dysmorphic features in DS newborns were 'upslanted palpebral fissures' (74.1%; n = 426), 'hypotonia' (73.7%; n = 424) and 'epicanthic folds' (68.5%; n = 394). The majority of parents were informed about the suspected diagnosis on the day of birth (76.5%; n = 390). Hospital deliveries had a significantly earlier suspected diagnosis (mean age 3-4 days) compared with home deliveries (mean age 7 days) (P < 0.05). In 10% (n = 44), paediatricians described dissatisfaction with the first conversation with parents. In 88.9% (n = 499) parents were both present when the diagnosis was told, however the child was not present during the conversation in 51.3% (n = 288). In 10.8% (n = 61) parents were not informed about local parent support groups or community resources.

CONCLUSION

DS is still often diagnosed after birth, usually on the first day of postnatal life. Most identified clinical features were upslanted palpebral fissures, epicanthic folds and hypotonia. Special attention for recognition of all present clinical features is needed for early diagnosis. Appropriate communication with the parents of the message that their child has DS can be difficult. Guidelines can help to make counselling easier and more effective, which in turn may increase parental satisfaction. Not all recommendations for the first conversation with parents were fully implemented in Dutch clinical practice.

End-of-life decisions for extremely low-gestational-age infants: why simple rules for complicated decisions should be avoided

Interventions for extremely preterm infants bring up many ethical questions. Guidelines for intervention in the "periviable" period generally divide infants using predefined categories, such as "futile," "beneficial," and "gray zone" based on completed 7-day periods of gestation; however, such definitions often differ among countries. The ethical justification for using gestational age as the determination of the category boundaries is rarely discussed. Rational criteria used to make decisions regarding life-sustaining interventions must incorporate other important prognostic information. Precise guidelines based on imprecise data are not rational. Gestational age-based guidelines include an implicit judgment of what is deemed to be an unacceptably poor chance of "intact" survival but fail to explore the determination of acceptability. Furthermore, unclear definitions of severe disability, the difficulty, or impossibility, of accurately predicting outcome in the prenatal or immediate postnatal period make such simplistic formulae inappropriate. Similarly, if guidelines for intervention for the newborn are based on the "qualitative futility" of survival, it should be explicitly stated and justified according to established ethical guidelines. They should discuss whether newborn infants are morally different to older individuals or explain why thresholds recommended for intervention are different to recommendations for those in older persons. The aim should be to establish individualized goals of care with families while recognizing uncertainty, rather than acting on labels derived from gestational age categories alone.

Effects of a genetic counseling model on mothers of children with down syndrome: a Brazilian pilot study

Down syndrome occurs in approximately 1:600 live births. Genetic counseling is indicated for these families and may be beneficial for adaptation to the challenges that accompany by this diagnosis. Although the basic counseling goals are similar, there are many models of genetic counseling practiced around the world. The aim of this article is to report the results of a pilot study that evaluated the level of satisfaction with a model of service delivery of genetic counseling practiced in Brazil, the knowledge assimilated about Down syndrome and whether this process resulted in a feeling of well-being and psychological support. Thirty mothers of under 6-month-old children with Down syndrome were interviewed after having two sessions of genetic counseling in a public healthcare service within a period of 30 days. A semi-structured questionnaire was developed by the researchers to collect identification, socioeconomic and demographic data and to assess the client's satisfaction with the model of genetic counseling. Data were collected using both open and closed questions. The reported level of satisfaction was high. The knowledge assimilated about Down syndrome after only two sessions was considered technically vague by raters in 44 % of cases. Most mothers (96.7 %) reported that genetic counseling was beneficial and provided psychological support. The model was considered satisfactory, but further research is needed to identify ways to improve knowledge retention by this population. These results highlight the utility of referring families for genetic counseling when there is a suspicion of a diagnosis of Down syndrome.

Prenatal testing for intellectual disability: misperceptions and reality with lessons from Down syndrome

Down syndrome is the most common cause of intellectual disability. In the United States, it is recommended that prenatal testing for Down syndrome be offered to all women. Because of this policy and consequent public perception, having Down syndrome has become a disadvantage in the prenatal period. However, in the postnatal period, there may be some advantage in having Down syndrome. To help parents make informed decisions about screening and testing, it is crucial to reconcile divergent prenatal and postnatal perspectives. Advancements in genetic technologies will also impact the informed consent process and need to be considered.

Women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about Down syndrome: a qualitative research study

Women who are or may become pregnant need up-to-date information about Down syndrome (DS). Asking women about their knowledge, opinions, resources, and information needs on the topic of DS is an important precursor to develop effective strategies for education. We conducted 24 focus groups (N = 111) in two US cities with women who were recently pregnant (who had a child ≤ 3 years old without DS) and women who planned to have a child in the next year. Groups were further segmented by age and race-ethnicity. Questions explored women's knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about DS; resources used to obtain information about health and DS; and information needs on the topic of DS. All participants reported having some knowledge of DS: facial features, chromosomal condition, and maternal age as a risk factor. Many participants had misconceptions, including the life expectancy for persons with DS, other maternal and paternal risk factors, and the idea that having a child with DS would disrupt their lives. Participants requested stories to help illustrate what life is like for families with DS. Many Hispanic and African American participants said they only saw or knew of Caucasian persons with DS and requested culturally diverse educational materials about DS. Participants said they would seek information on DS from the Internet and from their health care providers. Results suggest that women need tailored materials that contain clinical information about DS as well as information about living with a child with DS. Published 2012. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

What is a "balanced" description? Insight from parents of individuals with down syndrome

Genetic counselors and parents of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) agree that descriptions of DS in prenatal settings should be "balanced." However, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes a balanced description of DS. A survey was designed in collaboration with, and sent to the membership of, the British Columbia based Lower Mainland Down Syndrome Society (N = 260). Respondents were asked how they would describe DS to a couple who have just received a prenatal diagnosis of the condition. We rated the descriptions provided for positivity/negativity. Completed surveys were returned by 101 members, the majority of whom were Caucasian (87%) and female (79%). Participants' descriptions of DS ranged from entirely positive (n = 5; 10%) to entirely negative (n = 4; 7%) in nature. Deriving a description of DS that would broadly be perceived as "balanced" may be impossible. Instead, it may be more important to explore the range of possibilities regarding the family experience of raising a child with DS using nonjudgmental terminology, and to help families evaluate these possibilities in the context of their own values, coping strategies, and support networks.

Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors

Down syndrome is one of the most common conditions encountered in the genetics clinic. Due to improvements in healthcare, educational opportunities, and community inclusion over the past 30 years, the life expectancy and quality of life for individuals with Down syndrome have significantly improved. As prenatal screening and diagnostic techniques have become more enhanced and widely available, genetic counselors can expect to frequently provide information and support following a new diagnosis of Down syndrome. This guideline was written for genetic counselors and other healthcare providers regarding the communication of a diagnosis of Down syndrome to ensure that families are consistently given up-to-date and balanced information about the condition, delivered in a supportive and respectful manner.