Genetic variation of FOXE1 and risk for orofacial clefts in a California population

Disruption of the foxe1 gene in zebrafish reveals conserved functions in development of the craniofacial skeleton and the thyroid

Introduction: Mutations in the FOXE1 gene are implicated in cleft palate and thyroid dysgenesis in humans.

Methods: To investigate whether zebrafish could provide meaningful insights into the etiology of developmental defects in humans related to FOXE1, we generated a zebrafish mutant that has a disruption in the nuclear localization signal in the foxe1 gene, thereby restraining nuclear access of the transcription factor. We characterized skeletal development and thyroidogenesis in these mutants, focusing on embryonic and larval stages.

Results: Mutant larvae showed aberrant skeletal phenotypes in the ceratohyal cartilage and had reduced whole body levels of Ca, Mg and P, indicating a critical role for foxe1 in early skeletal development. Markers of bone and cartilage (precursor) cells were differentially expressed in mutants in post-migratory cranial neural crest cells in the pharyngeal arch at 1 dpf, at induction of chondrogenesis at 3 dpf and at the start of endochondral bone formation at 6 dpf. Foxe1 protein was detected in differentiated thyroid follicles, suggesting a role for the transcription factor in thyroidogenesis, but thyroid follicle morphology or differentiation were unaffected in mutants.

Discussion: Taken together, our findings highlight the conserved role of Foxe1 in skeletal development and thyroidogenesis, and show differential signaling of osteogenic and chondrogenic genes related to foxe1 mutation.

Orofacial clefts embryology, classification, epidemiology, and genetics

Orofacial clefts (OFCs) rank as the second most common congenital birth defect in the United States after Down syndrome and are the most common head and neck congenital malformations. They are classified as cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and cleft palate only (CPO). OFCs have significant psychological and socio-economic impact on patients and their families and require a multidisciplinary approach for management and counseling. A complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors contributes to the incidence and clinical presentation of OFCs. In this comprehensive review, the embryology, classification, epidemiology and etiology of clefts are thoroughly discussed and a "state-of-the-art" snapshot of the recent advances in the genetics of OFCs is presented.

Non-syndromic Cleft Palate: An Overview on Human Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors

The epithelial and mesenchymal cells involved in early embryonic facial development are guided by complex regulatory mechanisms. Any factor perturbing the growth, approach and fusion of the frontonasal and maxillary processes could result in orofacial clefts that represent the most common craniofacial malformations in humans. The rarest and, probably for this reason, the least studied form of cleft involves only the secondary palate, which is posterior to the incisive foramen. The etiology of cleft palate only is multifactorial and involves both genetic and environmental risk factors. The intention of this review is to give the reader an overview of the efforts made by researchers to shed light on the underlying causes of this birth defect. Most of the scientific papers suggesting potential environmental and genetic causes of non-syndromic cleft palate are summarized in this review, including genome-wide association and gene–environment interaction studies.

Association between forkhead box E1 polymorphisms and risk of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present work was to investigate the association between forkhead box E1 (FOXE1) and the risk of non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (NSCL/P).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Relevant studies were searched in several professional databases up to 31 July 2019. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a fixed-effect model or a random-effect model to analyse the relationship between FOXE1 polymorphisms and NSCL/P.

RESULTS

A total of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), including rs3758249, rs4460498, rs1443434 and rs10217225, were analysed. The overall findings showed that FOXE1 rs4460498 was statistically associated with NSCL/P (including cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and cleft palate only (CPO)). Genotypes CC and CT of rs4460498 were significantly more closely correlated with NSCL/P (including CL/P and CPO) than genotype TT (NSCL/P: TT vs CC, OR = 0.630, P = .000; TT vs TC + CC, OR = 0.775, P = .020; CL/P: TT vs CC, OR = 0.664, P = .000; TT vs TC + CC, OR = 0.738, P = .006. CPO: TT vs CC, OR = 0.761, P = .027; TT vs TC + CC, OR = 0.792, P = .045). For rs10217225, only the TT genotype might have contributed to the elevated risk of CL/P (TT vs CC OR = 2.236, P = .000). The other FOXE1 polymorphisms were not associated with NSCLP, CL/P or CPO.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis provided confirmation that the polymorphism of FOXE1 rs10217225 was correlated with an increased risk of CL/P, and the polymorphism of FOXE1 rs4460498 was a protective factor for NSCL/P, including CLP and CPO.

Characterization of Burn Eschar Pericytes

Pericytes are cells that reside adjacent to microvasculature and regulate vascular function. Pericytes gained great interest in the field of wound healing and regenerative medicine due to their multipotential fate and ability to enhance angiogenesis. In burn wounds, scarring and scar contractures are the major pathologic feature and cause loss of mobility. The present study investigated the influence of burn wound environment on pericytes during wound healing. Pericytes isolated from normal skin and tangentially excised burn eschar tissues were analyzed for differences in gene and protein expression using RNA-seq., immunocytochemistry, and ELISA analyses. RNA-seq identified 443 differentially expressed genes between normal- and burn eschar-derived pericytes. Whereas, comparing normal skin pericytes to normal skin fibroblasts identified 1021 distinct genes and comparing burn eschar pericytes to normal skin fibroblasts identified 2449 differential genes. Altogether, forkhead box E1 (FOXE1), a transcription factor, was identified as a unique marker for skin pericytes. Interestingly, FOXE1 levels were significantly elevated in burn eschar pericytes compared to normal. Additionally, burn wound pericytes showed increased expression of profibrotic genes periostin, fibronectin, and endosialin and a gain in contractile function, suggesting a contribution to scarring and fibrosis. Our findings suggest that the burn wound environment promotes pericytes to differentiate into a myofibroblast-like phenotype promoting scar formation and fibrosis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on protective role of forkhead box E1 (FOXE1) polymorphisms in susceptibility to non-syndromic cleft lip/palate

INTRODUCTION

Several environmental and genetic factors have a role in the aetiology of non-syndromic cleft lip/palate (NSCL/P). This meta-analysis evaluated the association of rs3758249 and rs4460498 forkhead box E1 (FOXE1) polymorphisms with the NSCL/P risk.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PubMed databases were searched for articles published until March 2019. The analyses were performed by Review Manager 5.3 using the crude odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for a strong association between FOXE1 polymorphisms and the risk of NSCL/P.

RESULTS

Out of 161 articles retrieved from the databases, four case-control articles were involved in the meta-analysis. The pooled ORs of rs4460498 polymorphism based on allelic, homozygous, heterozygous, dominant, and recessive models were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.80; P<0.00001), 0.43 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.61; P<0.00001), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.55, 0.80; P<0.0001), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.73; P<0.00001), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.82; P<0.0001), respectively; whereas, the pooled OR of rs3758249 polymorphism were 0.86 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.04; P=0.12), 0.68 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.82; P<0.0001), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.09; P=0.15), 0.79 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.08; P=0.14), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.95; P=0.010) for the afore-mentioned models, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed that the T allele, TT, and CT genotypes of rs4460498 polymorphism were significantly associated with a decreased risk of NSCL/P; whereas, for rs3758249 polymorphism, only the AA genotype had a significant protective role in NSCL/P. Thus, FOXE1 is strongly associated with NSCL/P in the populations.

The multisystemic functions of FOXD1 in development and disease

Transcription factors (TFs) participate in a wide range of cellular processes due to their inherent function as essential regulatory proteins. Their dysfunction has been linked to numerous human diseases. The forkhead box (FOX) family of TFs belongs to the "winged helix" superfamily, consisting of proteins sharing a related winged helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif. FOX genes have been extensively present during vertebrates and invertebrates' evolution, participating in numerous molecular cascades and biological functions, such as embryonic development and organogenesis, cell cycle regulation, metabolism control, stem cell niche maintenance, signal transduction, and many others. FOXD1, a forkhead TF, has been related to different key biological processes such as kidney and retina development and embryo implantation. FOXD1 dysfunction has been linked to different pathologies, thereby constituting a diagnostic biomarker and a promising target for future therapies. This paper aims to present, for the first time, a comprehensive review of FOXD1's role in mouse development and human disease. Molecular, structural, and functional aspects of FOXD1 are presented in light of physiological and pathogenic conditions, including its role in human disease aetiology, such as cancer and recurrent pregnancy loss. Taken together, the information given here should enable a better understanding of FOXD1 function for basic science researchers and clinicians.

The Role of Noncoding Genetic Variation in Isolated Orofacial Clefts

In the past decade, medical genetic research has generated multiple discoveries, many of which were obtained via genome-wide association studies (GWASs). A major GWAS finding is that the majority of risk variants for complex traits map to noncoding regions. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in terms of the interpretation of human genomic sequence variation, with more attention now being paid to what was previously termed “junk DNA.” Translation of genetic findings into biologically meaningful results requires 1) large-scale and cell-specific efforts to annotate non-protein–coding regions and 2) the integration of comprehensive genomic data sets. However, this represents an enormous challenge, particularly in the case of human traits that arise during embryonic development, such as orofacial clefts (OFCs). OFC is a multifactorial trait and ranks among the most common of all human congenital malformations. These 2 attributes apply in particular to its isolated forms (nonsyndromic OFC [nsOFC]). Although genetic studies (including GWASs) have yielded novel insights into the genetic architecture of nsOFC, few data are available concerning causality and affected biological pathways. Reasons for this deficiency include the complex genetic architecture at risk loci and the limited availability of functional data sets from human tissues that represent relevant embryonic sites and time points. The present review summarizes current knowledge of the role of noncoding regions in nsOFC etiology. We describe the identification of genetic risk factors for nsOFC and several of the approaches used to identify causal variants at these loci. These strategies include the use of biological and genetic information from public databases, the assessment of the full spectrum of genetic variability within 1 locus, and comprehensive in vitro and in vivo experiments. This review also highlights the role of the emerging research field “functional genomics” and its increasing contribution to our biological understanding of nsOFC.