Functional monosomy of 6q27-qter and functional disomy of Xpter-p22.11 due to X;6 translocation with an atypical X-inactivation pattern

Spread of X-chromosome inactivation into autosomal regions in patients with unbalanced X-autosome translocations and its phenotypic effects

Patients with unbalanced X-autosome translocations are rare and usually present a skewed X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) pattern, with the derivative chromosome being preferentially inactivated, and with a possible spread of XCI into the autosomal regions attached to it, which can inactivate autosomal genes and affect the patients' phenotype. We describe three patients carrying different unbalanced X-autosome translocations, confirmed by G-banding karyotype and array techniques. We analyzed their XCI pattern and inactivation spread into autosomal regions, through HUMARA, ZDHHC15 gene assay and the novel 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation assay, and identified an extremely skewed XCI pattern toward the derivative chromosomes for all the patients, and a variable pattern of late-replication on the autosomal regions of the derivative chromosomes. All patients showed phenotypical overlap with patients presenting deletions of the autosomal late-replicating regions, suggesting that the inactivation of autosomal segments may be responsible for their phenotype. Our data highlight the importance of the XCI spread into autosomal regions for establishing the clinical picture in patients carrying unbalanced X-autosome translocations, and the incorporation of EdU as a novel and precise tool to evaluate the inactivation status in such patients.

Two Abnormal Cell Lines of Trisomy 14 and t(X;14) with Skewed X-Inactivation

Trisomy 14 is incompatible with live, but there are several patients reported with mosaic trisomy 14. We aimed to study the pattern of X inactivation and its effect on a translocated autosome and to find out an explanation of the involvement of chromosome 14 in 2 different structural chromosomal abnormalities. We report on a girl with frontal bossing, hypertelorism, low-set ears, micrognathia, cleft palate, congenital heart disease, and abnormal skin pigmentations. The patient displayed iris, choroidal, and retinal coloboma and agenesis of the corpus callosum and cerebellar vermis hypoplasia. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a karyotype 45,X,der(X)t(X;14)(q24;q11)[85]/46,XX,rob(14;14)(q10;q10),+14[35]. Array-CGH for blood and buccal mucosa showed high mosaic trisomy 14 and an Xq deletion. MLPA detected trisomy 14 in blood and buccal mucosa and also showed normal methylation of the imprinting center. FISH analysis confirmed the cell line with trisomy 14 (30%) and demonstrated the mosaic deletion of the Xq subtelomere in both tissues. There was 100% skewed X inactivation for the t(X;14). SNP analysis of the patient showed no region of loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 14. Also, genotype call analysis of the patient and her parents showed heterozygous alleles of chromosome 14 with no evidence of uniparental disomy. Our patient had a severe form of mosaic trisomy 14. We suggest that this cytogenetic unique finding that involved 2 cell lines with structural abnormalities of chromosome 14 occurred in an early postzygotic division. These 2 events may have happened separately or maybe there is a kind of trisomy or monosomy rescue due to dynamic cytogenetic interaction between different cell lines to compensate for gene dosage.

Defective DNA Polymerase α-Primase Leads to X-Linked Intellectual Disability Associated with Severe Growth Retardation, Microcephaly, and Hypogonadism

Replicating the human genome efficiently and accurately is a daunting challenge involving the duplication of upward of three billion base pairs. At the core of the complex machinery that achieves this task are three members of the B family of DNA polymerases: DNA polymerases α, δ, and ε. Collectively these multimeric polymerases ensure DNA replication proceeds at optimal rates approaching 2 × 103 nucleotides/min with an error rate of less than one per million nucleotides polymerized. The majority of DNA replication of undamaged DNA is conducted by DNA polymerases δ and ε. The DNA polymerase α-primase complex performs limited synthesis to initiate the replication process, along with Okazaki-fragment synthesis on the discontinuous lagging strand. An increasing number of human disorders caused by defects in different components of the DNA-replication apparatus have been described to date. These are clinically diverse and involve a wide range of features, including variable combinations of growth delay, immunodeficiency, endocrine insufficiencies, lipodystrophy, and cancer predisposition. Here, by using various complementary approaches, including classical linkage analysis, targeted next-generation sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing, we describe distinct missense and splice-impacting mutations in POLA1 in five unrelated families presenting with an X-linked syndrome involving intellectual disability, proportionate short stature, microcephaly, and hypogonadism. POLA1 encodes the p180 catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase α-primase. A range of replicative impairments could be demonstrated in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from affected individuals. Our findings describe the presentation of pathogenic mutations in a catalytic component of a B family DNA polymerase member, DNA polymerase α.

X-chromosomale Intelligenzminderung

X-chromosomale Intelligenzminderung („X-linked intellectual disability“, XLID) ist eine heterogene Krankheitsgruppe; inzwischen sind mehr als 100 XLID-Gene identifiziert worden. Das Fragile-X-Syndrom mit CGG-Repeatexpansion in der 5’-UTR des FMR1-Gens ist die häufigste monogene Ursache für Intelligenzminderung. Weitere X‑chromosomale Gene mit vergleichsweise hohen Mutationsprävalenzen sind ATRX, RPS6KA3, GPC3, SLC16A2, SLC6A8 und ARX. Die Ursachen für XLID verteilen sich zu ca. 90 % auf molekulargenetisch nachweisbare Mutationen und zu ca. 10 % auf chromosomale Kopienzahlvarianten („copy-number variants“, CNVs). Häufige CNVs sind Duplikationen in Xq28 unter Einschluss von MECP2 sowie das Xp11.22-Duplikations-Syndrom mit Überexpression von HUWE1. Mit den aktuellen Untersuchungsmethoden kann bei ca. 10 % der männlichen Patienten mit Intelligenzminderung eine X‑chromosomale Ursache nachgewiesen werden. Neue Erkenntnisse zu XLID sind für die nächsten Jahre am ehesten in den nicht kodierenden Regionen zu erwarten, wo wahrscheinlich ein weiterer Teil der Ursachen für das bislang nicht vollständig erklärte Überwiegen männlicher Patienten zu suchen ist.