An assessment of health, social, communication, and daily living skills of adults with Down syndrome

Developmental Profile in Children Aged 3-6 Years: Down Syndrome vs. Autism Spectrum Disorder

This research aims to compare the developmental profiles of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and children with Down Syndrome (DS) between the ages of 3 and 6 years. The study examines whether these developmental disorders share common developmental milestones or exhibit distinctive characteristics. A total of 43 children, 23 with DS and 20 with ASD, participated in the study. Cognitive and language skills were assessed using standardized tools, including the Battelle Developmental Inventory, Reynell Developmental Language Scales III, and NEPSY-II battery. The results indicated that children with ASD outperformed children with DS in the areas of fine motor skills, gross motor skills, and communication. Additionally, children with ASD demonstrated higher scores in language comprehension and expressive language, compared to children with DS. Significant correlations were found between motor skills and communication abilities. Neuropsychological evaluations revealed significant differences between the two groups in various tasks, such as the comprehension of instructions, body part naming and identification, and recognition of emotions. These findings contribute to our understanding of the similarities and differences between ASD and DS, shedding light on the dissociation between cognition and language and its impact on adaptive functioning in these populations.

Health in Down syndrome: creating a conceptual model

BACKGROUND

Down syndrome (DS) has a unique medical and psychological profile that could impact how health is defined on three dimensions: physical, social and mental well-being.

METHODS

In 2021, we presented our proposed conceptual model to three expert panels, four focus groups of parents of individuals with DS age 0-21 years and four focus groups of individuals with DS age 13-21 years through videoconferencing technology. Participants gave feedback and discussed the concept of health in DS.

RESULTS

Feedback from participants resulted in iterative refinement of our model, retaining the three dimensions of health, and modifying constructs within those dimensions. Experts and parents agreed that individuals with DS have unique health concerns that necessitate the creation and validation of a syndrome-specific health model. We present key themes that we identified and a final conceptual model of health for individuals with DS.

CONCLUSION

Health in DS is a multi-dimensional, multi-construct model focused on relevant constructs of causal and effect indicators. This conceptual model can be used in future research to develop a syndrome-specific measure of health status.

Indicators of health in Down syndrome: A virtual focus group study with patients and their parents

BACKGROUND

Down syndrome has a unique medical and psychological profile. To date, few studies have asked individuals with Down syndrome about their views of health.

METHODS

Eight focus groups of 20 parents and 8 individuals with Down syndrome, were conducted virtually via videoconferencing to obtain participants' views of health indicators. Focus group moderators employed some modifications for individuals with Down syndrome, including simplified language and use of graphics. Transcripts were coded using a hybrid inductive/deductive framework and thematically analysed using the Framework Method.

RESULTS

We describe lessons learned in conducting virtual focus groups of individuals with Down syndrome and their parents. Individuals with Down syndrome could describe their views of health indicators and identified many of the same topics as their parents. Both groups discussed physical, mental, and social health components. However, people with Down syndrome gave a more restricted range of examples, but with different nuances than parents.

CONCLUSION

Partcipants discussed physical, social, and mental well-being components of health in Down syndrome. Interviewing individuals with Down syndrome in virtual focus groups with appropriate modifications added important self-report health information.

Proxy-report in individuals with intellectual disability: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Views can be collected from individuals (self-report) or others on their behalf (proxy-report).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to review the literature on methods and statistical approaches used to evaluate observer versus self-report responses from individuals with intellectual disability or Down syndrome.

METHODS

A series of key questions related to statistical approaches and data collection methods were formulated a priori to inform the search strategy and review process. These addressed the topics of self-report in individuals with intellectual disability, including Down syndrome. Using the National Library of Medicine database, PubMed, detailed literature searches were performed. The quality of available evidence was then evaluated, the existing literature was summarised, and knowledge gaps and research needs were identified.

RESULTS

Fifty relevant original articles were identified which addressed at least one key question. Study details, including: research design, internal validity, external validity, and relevant results are presented. Review of studies of individuals with intellectual disability which used a variety of statistical approaches showed mixed agreement between self-report and proxy-report.

CONCLUSION

Few studies identified to-date have used self-report from individuals with Down syndrome, but lessons from the existing intellectual disability literature can guide researchers to incorporate self-report from individuals with Down syndrome in the future.

Impact of Assistive Technologies to Inclusive Education and Independent Life of Down Syndrome Persons: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the lifespan of people born with Down syndrome (DS) has increased. They now outlive their parents and rely on their relatives who usually sacrifice their own families to care for their disabled siblings. To reduce the pressure on families and the wider community, it is crucial to prepare DS people for independent life from early childhood. Emerging technologies can significantly support the process of acquiring the skills that are necessary for solving real-life problems at home and work. To assess their impact and estimate how much they are implemented in inclusive education, a review of 564 papers published after 2015 was done using the PRISMA review model. After gradual exclusion, 24 papers were used for the final review. Thematic analysis resulted in four themes with one common concept: variety. The results of examining the four research questions defined in the paper’s background confirm that the synergy of emerging assistive technologies and inclusive education has the potential of becoming a very effective strategy for creating an independent life for DS individuals. Many questions remain open, mainly related to a DS persons’ specific needs and capabilities. The acceptance of the proposed synergy will depend on them.

Caregivers evaluate independence in individuals with Down syndrome

Independence is both a sense of autonomy and self-reliance coupled with the skills to complete tasks without assistance. Questionnaire of caregivers of individuals with Down syndrome asked about factors related to independence on six topics: safety, communication, self-care, daily living, social/leisure, and vocational/employment. Responses from 408 caregivers to an independence questionnaire were received, and summarized using means and frequencies. Top goals by topic were safety from sexual abuse, communicating wants and needs, toileting independently, living independently/semi-independently, engaging in leisure time appropriately, and reading and writing. Independence is a complex, multifactorial phenomenon which varies among individuals with DS.

The French translation of the dementia screening questionnaire for individuals with intellectual disabilities is a sensitive tool for screening for dementia in people with Down Syndrome

BACKGROUND

People with Down Syndrome (DS) are at an increased risk of developing Alzheimer's Disease (AD) relatively early in life. The dementia screening questionnaire for individuals with intellectual disabilities (DSQIID) has been developed for people with intellectual disabilities and was shown to have high discriminative power to distinguish between people with and without dementia. The objective of this study was to verify if the French version of the DSQIID (DSQIID-F) had a good diagnostic specificity and to determine the optimal cut-off for screening people with DS for dementia.

METHOD

This was a single-centre, retrospective, medical chart review study in people with DS aged ≥40 years. Demographics, level of intellectual disability, DSQIID-F data and clinical assessment of dementia were extracted from medical records. Sensitivity and specificity for different DSQIID-F cut-offs were calculated to determine the optimal cut-off.

RESULTS

151 people with DS were included with a median age of 51 years. The optimal DSQIID-F cut-off was 19, sensitivity was 0.940 (95 % CI: 0.830; 0.985) and specificity was 0.941 (95 % CI: 0.873; 0.975). Results were comparable to those for the English DSQIID (cut-off: 20; sensitivity: 0.92; specificity: 0.97). However, the psychometric qualities of the DSQIID-F, used for clinical follow-up, have not been verified.

CONCLUSIONS

The DSQIID-F has good discriminative power and represents a useful tool to screen people with DS for dementia.

Description of Daily Living Skills and Independence: A Cohort from a Multidisciplinary Down Syndrome Clinic

Levels of independence vary in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). We began this study to describe the current life skills in our clinic population of children and adults with DS. We collected and reviewed demographics, living situation, and life skills from an electronic intake form used in clinic procedures. Descriptive statistics for this cohort study included mean, standard deviation, and frequencies. From 2014–2020, 350 pediatric and 196 adult patients (range 0–62 years) with a first visit to the Massachusetts General Hospital Down Syndrome Program are described. Pediatric patients were most often enrolled in school, and in an inclusion setting. Adult patients were most often participating in a day program, living with family, and wanted to continue living with family in the future. Most (87%) of adults with DS communicated verbally, though fewer could use written communication (17%). Life skills of greatest importance to adolescents and adults with DS included: learning about healthy foods (35%), preparing meals (34%), providing personal information when needed (35%), and describing symptoms to a doctor (35%). Life skills for patients with DS are varied; those associated with a medical appointment, such as sharing symptoms with the doctor, could improve for greater independence.

Opportunities, barriers, and recommendations in down syndrome research

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in medical care have increased life expectancy and improved the quality of life for people with Down syndrome (DS). These advances are the result of both pre-clinical and clinical research but much about DS is still poorly understood. In 2020, the NIH announced their plan to update their DS research plan and requested input from the scientific and advocacy community.

OBJECTIVE

The National Down Syndrome Society (NDSS) and the LuMind IDSC Foundation worked together with scientific and medical experts to develop recommendations for the NIH research plan.

METHODS

NDSS and LuMind IDSC assembled over 50 experts across multiple disciplines and organized them in eleven working groups focused on specific issues for people with DS.

RESULTS

This review article summarizes the research gaps and recommendations that have the potential to improve the health and quality of life for people with DS within the next decade.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights many of the scientific gaps that exist in DS research. Based on these gaps, a multidisciplinary group of DS experts has made recommendations to advance DS research. This paper may also aid policymakers and the DS community to build a comprehensive national DS research strategy.