Fragile X syndrome in a male with methylated premutation alleles and no detectable methylated full mutation alleles

Insight and Recommendations for Fragile X-Premutation-Associated Conditions from the Fifth International Conference on FMR1 Premutation

The premutation of the fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 (FMR1) gene is characterized by an expansion of the CGG trinucleotide repeats (55 to 200 CGGs) in the 5' untranslated region and increased levels of FMR1 mRNA. Molecular mechanisms leading to fragile X-premutation-associated conditions (FXPAC) include cotranscriptional R-loop formations, FMR1 mRNA toxicity through both RNA gelation into nuclear foci and sequestration of various CGG-repeat-binding proteins, and the repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN)-initiated translation of potentially toxic proteins. Such molecular mechanisms contribute to subsequent consequences, including mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal death. Clinically, premutation carriers may exhibit a wide range of symptoms and phenotypes. Any of the problems associated with the premutation can appropriately be called FXPAC. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI), and fragile X-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (FXAND) can fall under FXPAC. Understanding the molecular and clinical aspects of the premutation of the FMR1 gene is crucial for the accurate diagnosis, genetic counseling, and appropriate management of affected individuals and families. This paper summarizes all the known problems associated with the premutation and documents the presentations and discussions that occurred at the International Premutation Conference, which took place in New Zealand in 2023.

Identification of a novel epigenetic marker for typical and mosaic presentations of Fragile X syndrome

BACKGROUND

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is primarily due to CGG repeat expansions in the FMR1 gene. FMR1 alleles are classified as normal (N), intermediate (I), premutation (PM), and full mutation (FM). FXS patients often carry an FM, but size mosaicism can occur. Additionally, loss of methylation boundary upstream of repeats results in de novo methylation spreading to FMR1 promoter in FXS patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This pilot study investigated the methylation boundary and adjacent regions in 66 males with typical and atypical FXS aged 1 to 30 years (10.86 ± 6.48 years). AmplideX FMR1 mPCR kit was used to discriminate allele profiles and methylation levels. CpG sites were assessed by pyrosequencing.

RESULTS

40 out of 66 FXS patients (60.6%) showed an exclusive FM (n = 40), whereas the remaining (n = 26) exhibited size mosaicism [10 PM_FM (15.15%); 10 N_FM (15.15%); 2 N_PM_FM (3%)]. Four patients (6.1%) had deletions near repeats. Noteworthy, a CpG within FMR1 intron 2 displayed hypomethylation in FXS patients and hypermethylation in controls, demonstrating remarkable specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy when a methylation threshold of 69.5% was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

Since intragenic methylation is pivotal in gene regulation, the intronic CpG might be a novel epigenetic biomarker for FXS diagnosis.

Decreased rates of cerebral protein synthesis in conscious young adults with fragile X syndrome demonstrated by L-[1-11C]leucine PET

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited cause of intellectual disability. Fragile X mental retardation protein, a putative translation suppressor, is significantly reduced in FXS. The prevailing hypothesis is that rates of cerebral protein synthesis (rCPS) are increased by the absence of this regulatory protein. We have previously reported increased rCPS in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of FXS. To address the hypothesis in human subjects, we measured rCPS in young men with FXS with L-[1-11C]leucine PET. In previous studies we had used sedation during imaging, and we did not find increases in rCPS as had been seen in the mouse model. Since mouse measurements were conducted in awake animals, we considered the possibility that sedation may have confounded our results. In the present study we used a modified and validated PET protocol that made it easier for participants with FXS to undergo the study awake. We compared rCPS in 10 fragile X participants and 16 healthy controls all studied while awake. Contrary to the prevailing hypothesis and findings in Fmr1 knockout mice, results indicate that rCPS in awake participants with FXS are decreased in whole brain and most brain regions by 13-21% compared to healthy controls.

Mechanisms of the FMR1 Repeat Instability: How Does the CGG Sequence Expand?

A dynamic mutation in exon 1 of the FMR1 gene causes Fragile X-related Disorders (FXDs), due to the expansion of an unstable CGG repeat sequence. Based on the CGG sequence size, two types of FMR1 alleles are possible: “premutation” (PM, with 56-200 CGGs) and “full mutation” (FM, with >200 triplets). Premutated females are at risk of transmitting a FM allele that, when methylated, epigenetically silences FMR1 and causes Fragile X syndrome (FXS), a very common form of inherited intellectual disability (ID). Expansions events of the CGG sequence are predominant over contractions and are responsible for meiotic and mitotic instability. The CGG repeat usually includes one or more AGG interspersed triplets that influence allele stability and the risk of transmitting FM to children through maternal meiosis. A unique mechanism responsible for repeat instability has not been identified, but several processes are under investigations using cellular and animal models. The formation of unusual secondary DNA structures at the expanded repeats are likely to occur and contribute to the CGG expansion. This review will focus on the current knowledge about CGG repeat instability addressing the CGG sequence expands.

Mechanisms of Genome Instability in the Fragile X-Related Disorders

The Fragile X-related disorders (FXDs), which include the intellectual disability fragile X syndrome (FXS), are disorders caused by expansion of a CGG-repeat tract in the 5′ UTR of the X-linked FMR1 gene. These disorders are named for FRAXA, the folate-sensitive fragile site that localizes with the CGG-repeat in individuals with FXS. Two pathological FMR1 allele size classes are distinguished. Premutation (PM) alleles have 54–200 repeats and confer the risk of fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) and fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI). PM alleles are prone to both somatic and germline expansion, with female PM carriers being at risk of having a child with >200+ repeats. Inheritance of such full mutation (FM) alleles causes FXS. Contractions of PM and FM alleles can also occur. As a result, many carriers are mosaic for different sized alleles, with the clinical presentation depending on the proportions of these alleles in affected tissues. Furthermore, it has become apparent that the chromosomal fragility of FXS individuals reflects an underlying problem that can lead to chromosomal numerical and structural abnormalities. Thus, large numbers of CGG-repeats in the FMR1 gene predisposes individuals to multiple forms of genome instability. This review will discuss our current understanding of these processes.

Regional rates of brain protein synthesis are unaltered in dexmedetomidine sedated young men with fragile X syndrome: A L-[1-11C]leucine PET study

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common inherited cause of intellectual disability. Fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), a putative translation suppressor, is absent or significantly reduced in FXS. One prevailing hypothesis is that rates of protein synthesis are increased by the absence of this regulatory protein. In accord with this hypothesis, we have previously reported increased rates of cerebral protein synthesis (rCPS) in the Fmr1 knockout mouse model of FXS and others have reported similar effects in hippocampal slices. To address the hypothesis in human subjects, we applied the L[1-¹¹C]leucine PET method to measure rCPS in adults with FXS and healthy controls. All subjects were males between the ages of 18 and 24 years and free of psychotropic medication. As most fragile X participants were not able to undergo the PET study awake, we used dexmedetomidine for sedation during the imaging studies. We found no differences between rCPS measured during dexmedetomidine-sedation and the awake state in ten healthy controls. In the comparison of rCPS in dexmedetomidine-sedated fragile X participants (n = 9) and healthy controls (n = 14) we found no statistically significant differences. Our results from in vivo measurements in human brain do not support the hypothesis that rCPS are elevated due to the absence of FMRP. This hypothesis is based on findings in animal models and in vitro measurements in human peripheral cells. The absence of a translation suppressor may produce a more complex response in pathways regulating translation than previously thought. We may need to revise our working hypotheses regarding FXS and our thinking about potential therapeutics.