NGS targeted screening of 100 Scandinavian patients with coronal synostosis

The value of genome-wide analysis in craniosynostosis

Background: This study assessed the diagnostic yield of high-throughput sequencing methods in a cohort of craniosynostosis (CS) patients not presenting causal variants identified through previous targeted analysis. Methods: Whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing (WGS/WES) was performed in a cohort of 59 patients (from 57 families) assessed by retrospective phenotyping as having syndromic or nonsyndromic CS. Results: A syndromic form was identified in 51% of the unrelated cases. A genetic cause was identified in 38% of syndromic cases, with novel variants detected in FGFR2 (a rare Alu insertion), TWIST1, TCF12, KIAA0586, HDAC9, FOXP1, and NSD2. Additionally, we report two patients with rare recurrent variants in KAT6A and YY1 as well as two patients with structural genomic aberrations: one with a 22q13 duplication and one with a complex rearrangement involving chromosome 2 (2p25 duplication including SOX11 and deletion of 2q22). Moreover, we identified potentially relevant variants in 87% of the remaining families with no previously detected causal variants, including novel variants in ADAMTSL4, ASH1L, ATRX, C2CD3, CHD5, ERF, H4C5, IFT122, IFT140, KDM6B, KMT2D, LTBP1, MAP3K7, NOTCH2, NSD1, SOS1, SPRY1, POLR2A, PRRX1, RECQL4, TAB2, TAOK1, TET3, TGFBR1, TCF20, and ZBTB20. Conclusion: These results confirm WGS/WES as a powerful diagnostic tool capable of either targeted in silico or broad genomic analysis depending on phenotypic presentation (e.g., classical or unusual forms of syndromic CS).

Familial monoallelic CYP26B1 truncating variant causes a syndromic craniosynostosis due to haploinsufficiency ?

Autosomal recessive CYP26B1 disorder is characterised by syndromic craniosynostosis of variable severity, and survival ranging from prenatal lethality to survival into adulthood. Here we report on two related individuals of Asian-Indian origin with syndromic craniosynostosis characterised by craniosynostosis, and dysplastic radial heads, caused by monoallelic CYP26B1 likely pathogenic variant NM_019885.4:c.86C > A:p. (Ser29Ter). We propose the possibility of autosomal dominant phenotype of CYP26B1 variant.

Review of Recurrently Mutated Genes in Craniosynostosis Supports Expansion of Diagnostic Gene Panels

Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, affects ~1 in 2000 children. Although many patients with a genetically determined cause harbor a variant in one of just seven genes or have a chromosomal abnormality, over 60 genes are known to be recurrently mutated, thus comprising a long tail of rarer diagnoses. Genome sequencing for the diagnosis of rare diseases is increasingly used in clinical settings, but analysis of the data is labor intensive and involves a trade-off between achieving high sensitivity or high precision. PanelApp, a crowd-sourced disease-focused set of gene panels, was designed to enable prioritization of variants in known disease genes for a given pathology, allowing enhanced identification of true-positives. For heterogeneous disorders like craniosynostosis, these panels must be regularly updated to ensure that diagnoses are not being missed. We provide a systematic review of genetic literature on craniosynostosis over the last 5 years, including additional results from resequencing a 42-gene panel in 617 affected individuals. We identify 16 genes (representing a 25% uplift) that should be added to the list of bona fide craniosynostosis disease genes and discuss the insights that these new genes provide into pathophysiological mechanisms of craniosynostosis.

An additional whole-exome sequencing study in 102 panel-undiagnosed patients: A retrospective study in a Chinese craniosynostosis cohort

Craniosynostosis (CRS) is a disease with prematurely fused cranial sutures. In the last decade, the whole-exome sequencing (WES) was widely used in Caucasian populations. The WES largely contributed in genetic diagnosis and exploration on new genetic mechanisms of CRS. In this study, we enrolled 264 CRS patients in China. After a 17-gene-panel sequencing designed in the previous study, 139 patients were identified with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants according to the ACMG guideline as positive genetic diagnosis. WES was then performed on 102 patients with negative genetic diagnosis by panel. Ten P/LP variants were additionally identified in ten patients, increasing the genetic diagnostic yield by 3.8% (10/264). The novel variants in ANKH, H1-4, EIF5A, SOX6, and ARID1B expanded the mutation spectra of CRS. Then we designed a compatible research pipeline (RP) for further exploration. The RP could detect all seven P/LP SNVs and InDels identified above, in addition to 15 candidate variants found in 13 patients with worthy of further study. In sum, the 17-gene panel and WES identified positive genetic diagnosis for 56.4% patients (149/264) in 16 genes. At last, in our estimation, the genetic testing strategy of “Panel-first” saves 24.3% of the cost compared with “WES only”, suggesting the “Panel-first” is an economical strategy.

Results from Genetic Studies in Patients Affected with Craniosynostosis: Clinical and Molecular Aspects

Background: Craniosynostosis (CS) represents a highly heterogeneous genetic condition whose genetic background has not been yet revealed. The abnormality occurs either in isolated form or syndromic, as an element of hundreds of different inborn syndromes. Consequently, CS may often represent a challenging diagnostic issue.

Methods: We investigated a three-tiered approach (karyotyping, Sanger sequencing, followed by custom gene panel/chromosomal microarray analysis, and exome sequencing), coupled with prioritization of variants based on dysmorphological assessment and description in terms of human phenotype ontology. In addition, we have also performed a statistical analysis of the obtained clinical data using the nonparametric test χ².

Results: We achieved a 43% diagnostic success rate and have demonstrated the complexity of mutations’ type harbored by the patients, which were either chromosomal aberrations, copy number variations, or point mutations. The majority of pathogenic variants were found in the well-known CS genes, however, variants found in genes associated with chromatinopathies or RASopathies are of particular interest.

Conclusion: We have critically summarized and then optimised a cost-effective diagnostic algorithm, which may be helpful in a daily diagnostic routine and future clinical research of various CS types. Moreover, we have pinpointed the possible underestimated co-occurrence of CS and intellectual disability, suggesting it may be overlooked when intellectual disability constitutes a primary clinical complaint. On the other hand, in any case of already detected syndromic CS and intellectual disability, the possible occurrence of clinical features suggestive for chromatinopathies or RASopathies should also be considered.

Phenotypic variability of syndromic craniosynostosis caused by c.833G > T in FGFR2: Clinical and genetic evaluation of eight patients from a five-generation family

Objective

Craniosynostosis is the result of the early fusion of cranial sutures. Syndromic craniosynostosis includes but not limited by Crouzon syndrome and Pfeiffer syndrome. Considerable phenotypic overlap exists among these syndromes and mutations in FGFR2 may cause different syndromes. This study aims to investigate the explanation of the phenotypic variability via clinical and genetic evaluation for eight patients in a large pedigree.

Methods

For each patient, comprehensive physical examination, cranial plain CT scan with three‐dimensional CT reconstruction (3D‐CT), and eye examinations were conducted. Whole exome sequencing was applied for genetic diagnosis of the proband. Variants were analyzed and interpreted following the ACMG/AMP guidelines. Sanger sequencing was performed to reveal genotypes of all the family members.

Results

A pathogenic variant in the FGFR2 gene, c.833G > T (p.C278F), was identified and proved to be co‐segregate with the disease. Some symptoms of head, hearing, vision, mouth, teeth expressed differently by affected individuals. Nonetheless, all the eight patients manifested core symptoms of Crouzon syndrome without abnormality in the limbs, which could exclude diagnosis of Pfeiffer syndrome.

Conclusion

We have established clinical and genetic diagnosis of Crouzon syndrome for eight patients in a five‐generation Chinese family. Variability of clinical features among these familial patients was slighter than that in previously reported sporadic cases.

Mechanism of Disease: Recessive ADAMTSL4 Mutations and Craniosynostosis with Ectopia Lentis

Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the calvarial bones, has numerous etiologies. Among them, several involve mutations in genes related to the TGFb signaling pathway, a critical molecular mediator of human development. These TGFb pathway-associated craniosynostosis syndromes include Loeys–Dietz syndrome (LDS) and Shprintzen–Goldberg syndrome (SGS). LDS and SGS have many similarities common to fibrillinopathies, specifically Marfan syndrome (MFS), which is caused by mutations in FBN1. Historically discriminating features of MFS from LDS and SGS are (1) the presence of ectopia lentis (the subluxation/dislocation of the ocular lens) and (2) the absence of craniosynostosis. Curiously, several instances of a seemingly novel syndrome involving only craniosynostosis and ectopia lentis have recently been reported to be caused by recessive mutations in ADAMTSL4, a poorly characterized gene as of yet. Here, we report on two new cases of craniosynostosis with ectopia lentis, each harboring recessive mutations in ADAMTSL4. We also discuss a proposed mechanism for the relationship between ADAMTSL4, FBN1, and TGFb pathway-related syndromes.

The outcome of targeted NGS screening in patients with syndromic forms of sagittal and pansynostosis - IL11RA is an emerging core-gene for pansynostosis

Here, we have studied the prevalence and spectrum of genetic alterations in syndromic forms of sagittal and pansynostosis. Eighteen patients with sagittal synostosis (isolated or combined with other synostoses, except coronal) or pansynostosis were phenotypically assessed by retrospective analysis of medical records, three-dimensional computed tomography skull reconstructions, and registered photos. Patient DNAs were analyzed using a targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel including 63 craniosynostosis (CS) related genes. Pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants were found in 72% of the cases, mainly affecting FGFR2, TWIST1, IL11RA, and SKI. Two patients that were negative at NGS screening - one with a supernumerary marker chromosome with duplication of 15q25.2q26.3 and one with a pathogenic PHEX variant - were identified using microarray and single gene analysis, respectively. The overall diagnostic rate in the cohort was thus 83%. We identified two novel likely pathogenic variants in FGFR2 (NM_022970.3: c.811_812delGGinsCC, p.Gly271Pro) and TWIST1 (NM_000474.3: c.476T  >  A, p.Leu159His), and a novel variant of unclear phenotypic significance in RUNX2 (NM_001024630.3: c.340G > A, p.Val114Ile) which could suggest a modulatory effect. Notably, we also identified three new patients with pansynostosis and a Crouzon-like phenotype with IL11RA mutation. Targeted NGS using a broad panel of CS-related genes is a simple and powerful tool for detecting pathogenic mutations in patients with syndromic forms of CS and multiple suture involvement, in particular pansynostosis. Our results provide additional evidence of an association between pansynostosis and IL11RA, an emerging core gene for autosomal recessive CS.

TCF12 haploinsufficiency causes autosomal dominant Kallmann syndrome and reveals network-level interactions between causal loci

Dysfunction of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) axis causes a range of reproductive phenotypes resulting from defects in the specification, migration and/or function of GnRH neurons. To identify additional molecular components of this system, we initiated a systematic genetic interrogation of families with isolated GnRH deficiency (IGD). Here, we report 13 families (12 autosomal dominant and one autosomal recessive) with an anosmic form of IGD (Kallmann syndrome) with loss-of-function mutations in TCF12, a locus also known to cause syndromic and non-syndromic craniosynostosis. We show that loss of tcf12 in zebrafish larvae perturbs GnRH neuronal patterning with concomitant attenuation of the orthologous expression of tcf3a/b, encoding a binding partner of TCF12, and stub1, a gene that is both mutated in other syndromic forms of IGD and maps to a TCF12 affinity network. Finally, we report that restored STUB1 mRNA rescues loss of tcf12 in vivo. Our data extend the mutational landscape of IGD, highlight the genetic links between craniofacial patterning and GnRH dysfunction and begin to assemble the functional network that regulates the development of the GnRH axis.

Benefits of clinical criteria and high-throughput sequencing for diagnosing children with syndromic craniosynostosis

An accurate diagnosis of syndromic craniosynostosis (CS) is important for personalized treatment, surveillance, and genetic counselling. We describe detailed clinical criteria for syndromic CS and the distribution of genetic diagnoses within the cohort. The prospective registry of the Norwegian National Unit for Craniofacial Surgery was used to retrieve individuals with syndromic CS born between 1 January 2002 and 30 June 2019. All individuals were assessed by a clinical geneticist and classified using defined clinical criteria. A stepwise approach consisting of single-gene analysis, comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and exome-based high-throughput sequencing, first filtering for 72 genes associated with syndromic CS, followed by an extended trio-based panel of 1570 genes were offered to all syndromic CS cases. A total of 381 individuals were registered with CS, of whom 104 (27%) were clinically classified as syndromic CS. Using the single-gene analysis, aCGH, and custom-designed panel, a genetic diagnosis was confirmed in 73% of the individuals (n = 94). The diagnostic yield increased to 84% after adding the results from the extended trio-based panel. Common causes of syndromic CS were found in 53 individuals (56%), whereas 26 (28%) had other genetic syndromes, including 17 individuals with syndromes not commonly associated with CS. Only 15 individuals (16%) had negative genetic analyses. Using the defined combination of clinical criteria, we detected among the highest numbers of syndromic CS cases reported, confirmed by a high genetic diagnostic yield of 84%. The observed genetic heterogeneity encourages a broad genetic approach in diagnosing syndromic CS.

A novel p.Pro871Leu missense mutation in SPECC1L gene causing craniosynostosis in a patient

INTRODUCTION

Craniosynostosis is one of the most common craniofacial abnormalities. It involves premature closure of one or more cranial sutures. Mutations in many genes have been and continue to be identified in patients.

SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION

Whole blood samples were collected from the patient and family members.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Whole exome sequencing was performed to identify potential mutations in the patient. The results were verified by Sanger sequencing by comparing SPECC1L gene sequence of blood samples from 100 unrelated population-matched controls.

RESULTS

The patient presented with craniosynostosis with fusion of the bicoronal and sagittal sutures. A novel missense mutation (c.2612C>T, p.Pro871Leu) in the SPECC1L gene was identified. Gene analysis showed a missense mutation in exon1 of SPECC1L that led to an amino acid substitution in the region between coiled-coil domain 3 and calponin homology domain.

CONCLUSION

Our observations expand the molecular spectrum of gene mutations in craniosynostosis and emphasize the importance of gene testing in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis. The observations also reinforce the characteristics of SPECC1L-related cranial disorders.