Congenital diaphragmatic hernia as a prominent feature of a SPECC1L-related syndrome

Update on Management and Outcomes of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia

Infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) benefit from comprehensive multidisciplinary teams that have experience in caring for the unique and complex issues associated with CDH. Despite prenatal referral to specialized high-volume centers, advanced ventilation strategies and pulmonary hypertension management, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mortality and morbidity remain high. These infants have unique and complex issues that begin in fetal and infant life, but persist through adulthood. Here we will review the literature and share our clinical care pathway for neonatal care and follow up. While many advances have occurred in the past few decades, our work is just beginning to continue to improve the mortality, but also importantly the morbidity of CDH.

Development of mortality prediction models for infants with isolated, left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia before and after birth

BACKGROUND

Mortality prediction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is essential for developing treatment strategies, including fetal therapy. Several researchers have reported prognostic factors for this rare but life-threatening condition; however, the optimal combination of prognostic factors remains to be elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop the most discriminative prenatal and postnatal models to predict the mortality of infants with an isolated left-sided CDH.

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study included infants with CDH born at 15 tertiary hospitals of the Japanese CDH Study Group between 2011 and 2016. We developed multivariable logistic models with every possible combination of predictors and identified models with the highest cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for prenatal and postnatal predictions.

RESULTS

Among 302 eligible infants, 44 died before discharge. The prenatal mortality prediction model was based on the observed/expected lung area to head circumference ratio (O/E LHR), liver herniation, and stomach herniation (AUC, 0.830). The postnatal mortality prediction model was based on O/E LHR, liver herniation, and the lowest oxygenation index (AUC, 0.944).

CONCLUSION

Our models can facilitate the prenatal and postnatal mortality prediction of infants with isolated left-sided CDH.

The Genomics of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A 10-Year Retrospective Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate genetic testing use in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) over the past decade to better inform future practices and individualize prognostication and management.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study was performed of all infants with CDH enrolled in the Pulmonary Hypoplasia Program at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, born between January 2011 and February 2021. For each infant, demographic information, prenatal and postnatal history, and genetic testing were reviewed.

RESULTS

The charts of 411 infants were analyzed. Overall, 22% (n = 89) were complex/syndromic and 78% (n = 322) were isolated/nonsyndromic. Mortality was significantly higher in complex/syndromic infants (P < .001) and in infants with diagnostic genetic testing (P < .001). Microarray was diagnostic in 9% (n = 34/399) and exome sequencing was diagnostic in 38% (n = 15/39). Genetic testing was diagnostic in 57% (n = 51/89) of complex/syndromic infants, but in only 2% of isolated/nonsyndromic infants (n = 8/322). Overall, genetic testing was diagnostic in 14% (n = 56).

CONCLUSIONS

The high diagnostic rate in this cohort highlights the utility of comprehensive genetic testing in infants with CDH. However, 43% of complex/syndromic and 98% of isolated/nonsyndromic infants do not have a genetic etiology identified. This finding underscores the need for additional genetic and genomic studies (eg, whole genome, RNA sequencing) to identify novel genes and mutational mechanisms (single genes, regulatory elements, complex traits) that will allow for improved diagnostic rates and ultimately individualized management of infants with CDH.

Underlying genetic etiologies of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is often detectable prenatally. Advances in genetic testing have made it possible to obtain a molecular diagnosis in many fetuses with CDH. Here, we review the aneuploidies, copy number variants (CNVs), and single genes that have been clearly associated with CDH. We suggest that array-based CNV analysis, with or without a chromosome analysis, is the optimal test for identifying chromosomal abnormalities and CNVs in fetuses with CDH. To identify causative sequence variants, whole exome sequencing (WES) is the most comprehensive strategy currently available. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) with CNV analysis has the potential to become the most efficient and effective means of identifying an underlying diagnosis but is not yet routinely available for prenatal diagnosis. We describe how to overcome and address the diagnostic and clinical uncertainty that may remain after genetic testing, and review how a molecular diagnosis may impact recurrence risk estimations, mortality rates, and the availability and outcomes of fetal therapy. We conclude that after the prenatal detection of CDH, patients should be counseled about the possible genetic causes of the CDH, and the genetic testing modalities available to them, in accordance with generally accepted guidelines for pretest counseling in the prenatal setting.

SPECC1L Mutations Are Not Common in Sporadic Cases of Opitz G/BBB Syndrome

Opitz G/BBB syndrome (OS) is a rare genetic developmental condition characterized by congenital defects along the midline of the body. The main clinical signs are represented by hypertelorism, laryngo–tracheo–esophageal defects and hypospadias. The X-linked form of the disease is associated with mutations in the MID1 gene located in Xp22 whereas mutations in the SPECC1L gene in 22q11 have been linked to few cases of the autosomal dominant form of this disorder, as well as to other genetic syndromes. In this study, we have undertaken a mutation screening of the SPECC1L gene in samples of sporadic OS cases in which mutations in the MID1 gene were excluded. The heterozygous missense variants identified are already reported in variant databases raising the issue of their pathogenetic meaning. Recently, it was reported that some clinical manifestations peculiar to OS signs are not observed in patients carrying mutations in the SPECC1L gene, leading to the proposal of the designation of ‘SPECC1L syndrome’ to refer to this disorder. Our study confirms that patients with diagnosis of OS, mainly characterized by the presence of hypospadias and laryngo–tracheo–esophageal defects, do not carry pathogenic SPECC1L mutations. In addition, SPECC1L syndrome-associated mutations are clustered in two specific domains of the protein, whereas the missense variants detected in our work lies elsewhere and the impact of these variants in the function of this protein is difficult to ascertain with the current knowledge and will require further investigations. Nonetheless, our study provides further insight into the SPECC1L syndrome classification.