A rare description of pure partial trisomy of 16q12.2q24.3 and review of the literature

A novel case of 16q22.3 duplication syndrome in a child with overgrowth: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Distal chromosome 16 duplication syndrome (also known as 16q partial trisomy) is a very rare genetic disorder recently described in few clinical reports. 16q trisomy is generally associated with a multisystemic phenotype including intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), brain and cardiac defects, intellectual disability (ID) and an increased risk of both prenatal and postnatal lethality. Smaller copy number variants (CNV) within the 16q region create partial trisomies, which occur less frequently than full trisomy 16q.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the clinical case of a 12-years-old male with a 16q22.3q24.1 de novo heterozygous duplication whose phenotype was characterized by ID, facial dysmorphisms, stature and weight overgrowth. To date, only five other cases of this syndrome have been reported in scientific literature, and none of them comprised overgrowth.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case report highlights the great heterogeneity in clinical manifestations and provides new evidence for better defining the phenotypic picture for smaller 16q distal CNVs, suggesting unusual features.

The predictive value of prenatal cell-free DNA testing for rare autosomal trisomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The diagnostic accuracy of cell-free fetal DNA in screening for rare autosomal trisomies is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming to determine the predictive value of cell-free DNA in screening for rare autosomal trisomies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to January 2022.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All studies that reported on the diagnostic accuracy of cell-free DNA in the detection of rare autosomal trisomies were included. Case series were included if they contained at least 10 cases with diagnostic test results or postnatal genetic testing.

METHODS

Study appraisal was completed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Statistical analysis was performed using random-effects meta-analysis of double-arcsine transformed proportions of confirmed results in the fetus out of the positive tests to obtain a pooled estimate of the positive predictive value.

RESULTS

The search identified 7553 studies, of which 1852 were duplicates. After screening 5701 titles and abstracts, 380 studies proceeded to the full-text screen; 206 articles were retrieved for data extraction, of which another 175 articles were excluded. A total of 31 studies, with a total of 1703 women were included for analysis. The pooled positive predictive value of cell-free DNA for the diagnosis of rare autosomal trisomies was 11.46% (95% confidence interval, 7.80-15.65). Statistical heterogeneity was high (I²=82%). Sensitivity analysis restricted to 5 studies at low risk of bias demonstrated a pooled positive predictive value of 9.13% (95% confidence interval, 2.49-18.76). There were insufficient data to provide accurate ascertainment of sensitivity and specificity because most studies only offered confirmatory tests to women with high-risk results.

CONCLUSION

The positive predictive value of cell-free DNA in diagnosing rare autosomal trisomies is approximately 11%. Clinicians should provide this information when offering cell-free DNA for screening of conditions outside of common autosomal trisomies.