The CACNA1A and ATP1A2 genes are not involved in dominantly inherited migraine with aura

Migraine attacks are of peripheral origin: the debate goes on

BACKGROUND

Despite the pervasiveness of migraine, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms initiating migraine attacks are far from well understood and are matter of scientific debate.

OBJECTIVE

In this narrative review, we discuss key evidence for that suggest a peripheral origin or central origin and provide directions for future studies that may provide further clarification.

DISCUSSION

Migraine pathogenesis is considered to involve the trigeminovascular system, a term that encompasses the trigeminal nerve and its axonal projections to the intracranial blood vessels. Beyond any doubt both peripheral and central mechanisms are involved in migraine pathogenesis, but an unresolved question is the how the initial activation occurs in a migraine attack. Evidence favoring a peripheral origin of migraine attacks, i.e., initial events occur outside of the blood-brain barrier, include the importance of sensitization of perivascular sensory afferents early on in a migraine attack. Evidence favoring a central origin include the occurrence of prodromal symptoms, migraine aura, and activation of structures within the central nervous system early in and during a migraine attack.

CONCLUSIONS

Both peripheral and central mechanisms are likely involved in a migraine attack, e.g., peripheral nociceptive input is necessary for pain transmission and cortical activity is necessary for pain perception. Yet, the debate of whether migraine attacks are initiated a peripheral or central site remains unresolved. The increased focus on prodromal symptoms and on the development of a human model of migraine aura will possibly provide key arguments needed to answer this question in the near future. Until then, we cannot draw firm conclusions and the debate goes on.

VIDEO LINK

Video recording of the debate held at the 1st International Conference on Advances in Migraine Sciences (ICAMS 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark) is available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC0nlcKohz0 .

Bifenazate exposure induces cardiotoxicity in zebrafish embryos

Bifenazate is a novel acaricide for selective foliar spraying and is widely used to control mites in agricultural production. However, its toxicity to aquatic organisms is unknown. Here, a zebrafish model was used to study bifenazate toxicity to aquatic organisms. Exposure to bifenazate was found to cause severe cardiotoxicity in zebrafish embryos, along with disorders in the gene expression related to heart development. Bifenazate also caused oxidative stress. Cardiotoxicity caused by bifenazate was partially rescued by astaxanthin (an antioxidant), accompanied by cardiac genes and oxidative stress-related indicators becoming normalized. Our results showed that exposure to bifenazate can significantly change the ATPase activity and gene expression levels of the calcium signaling pathway. These led to heart failure, in which the blood accumulated outside the heart without entering it, eventually leading to death. The results indicated that bifenazate exposure caused cardiotoxicity in zebrafish embryos through the induction of oxidative stress and inhibition of the calcium signaling pathway.

Introduction to Neurogenetics

Genetic variation can directly cause or increase susceptibility to neurologic diseases. An explosion of new genetic technologies has enabled the characterization of specific genes responsible for many neurologic diseases and has provided fundamentally new insight into their pathophysiology. These advancements, along with recent breakthroughs in gene therapy, are beginning to result in the translation of an individual's genetic sequence into targeted treatment strategies. This review aims to introduce key genetic concepts and to illustrate how these principles apply in cases of rare, single-gene neurologic diseases as well as more common, polygenic diseases that are encountered frequently in clinical practice.

Migraine and cluster headache - the common link

Although clinically distinguishable, migraine and cluster headache share prominent features such as unilateral pain, common pharmacological triggers such glyceryl trinitrate, histamine, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and response to triptans and neuromodulation. Recent data also suggest efficacy of anti CGRP monoclonal antibodies in both migraine and cluster headache. While exact mechanisms behind both disorders remain to be fully understood, the trigeminovascular system represents one possible common pathophysiological pathway and network of both disorders. Here, we review past and current literature shedding light on similarities and differences in phenotype, heritability, pathophysiology, imaging findings and treatment options of migraine and cluster headache. A continued focus on their shared pathophysiological pathways may be important in paving future treatment avenues that could benefit both migraine and cluster headache patients.

Family studies to find rare high risk variants in migraine

INTRODUCTION

Migraine has long been known as a common complex disease caused by genetic and environmental factors. The pathophysiology and the specific genetic susceptibility are poorly understood. Common variants only explain a small part of the heritability of migraine. It is thought that rare genetic variants with bigger effect size may be involved in the disease. Since migraine has a tendency to cluster in families, a family approach might be the way to find these variants. This is also indicated by identification of migraine-associated loci in classical linkage-analyses in migraine families. A single migraine study using a candidate-gene approach was performed in 2010 identifying a rare mutation in the TRESK potassium channel segregating in a large family with migraine with aura, but this finding has later become questioned. The technologies of next-generation sequencing (NGS) now provides an affordable tool to investigate the genetic variation in the entire exome or genome. The family-based study design using NGS is described in this paper. We also review family studies using NGS that have been successful in finding rare variants in other common complex diseases in order to argue the promising application of a family approach to migraine.

METHOD

PubMed was searched to find studies that looked for rare genetic variants in common complex diseases through a family-based design using NGS, excluding studies looking for de-novo mutations, or using a candidate-gene approach and studies on cancer. All issues from Nature Genetics and PLOS genetics 2014, 2015 and 2016 (UTAI June) were screened for relevant papers. Reference lists from included and other relevant papers were also searched. For the description of the family-based study design using NGS an in-house protocol was used.

RESULTS

Thirty-two successful studies, which covered 16 different common complex diseases, were included in this paper. We also found a single migraine study. Twenty-three studies found one or a few family specific variants (less than five), while other studies found several possible variants. Not all of them were genome wide significant. Four studies performed follow-up analyses in unrelated cases and controls and calculated odds ratios that supported an association between detected variants and risk of disease. Studies of 11 diseases identified rare variants that segregated fully or to a large degree with the disease in the pedigrees.

CONCLUSION

It is possible to find rare high risk variants for common complex diseases through a family-based approach. One study using a family approach and NGS to find rare variants in migraine has already been published but with strong limitations. More studies are under way.

The Influence of Na(+), K(+)-ATPase on Glutamate Signaling in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Senescence

Decreased Na(+), K(+)-ATPase (NKA) activity causes energy deficiency, which is commonly observed in neurodegenerative diseases. The NKA is constituted of three subunits: α, β, and γ, with four distinct isoforms of the catalytic α subunit (α1-4). Genetic mutations in the ATP1A2 gene and ATP1A3 gene, encoding the α2 and α3 subunit isoforms, respectively can cause distinct neurological disorders, concurrent to impaired NKA activity. Within the central nervous system (CNS), the α2 isoform is expressed mostly in glial cells and the α3 isoform is neuron-specific. Mutations in ATP1A2 gene can result in familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM2), while mutations in the ATP1A3 gene can cause Rapid-onset dystonia-Parkinsonism (RDP) and alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC), as well as the cerebellar ataxia, areflexia, pescavus, optic atrophy and sensorineural hearing loss (CAPOS) syndrome. Data indicates that the central glutamatergic system is affected by mutations in the α2 isoform, however further investigations are required to establish a connection to mutations in the α3 isoform, especially given the diagnostic confusion and overlap with glutamate transporter disease. The age-related decline in brain α2∕3 activity may arise from changes in the cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) and cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG) pathway. Glutamate, through nitric oxide synthase (NOS), cGMP and PKG, stimulates brain α2∕3 activity, with the glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor cascade able to drive an adaptive, neuroprotective response to inflammatory and challenging stimuli, including amyloid-β. Here we review the NKA, both as an ion pump as well as a receptor that interacts with NMDA, including the role of NKA subunits mutations. Failure of the NKA-associated adaptive response mechanisms may render neurons more susceptible to degeneration over the course of aging.

Dissecting the association between migraine and stroke

Migraine is a common disabling neurological disorder resulting from excessive cortical excitation and trigeminovascular afferent sensitization. In addition to aberrant neuronal processing, migraineurs are also at significant risk of vascular disease. Consequently, the impact of migraine extends well beyond the ictal headache and includes a well-documented association with acute ischemic stroke, particularly in young women with a history of migraine with aura. The association between migraine and stroke has been acknowledged for 40 years or more. However, examining the pathobiology of this association has become a more recent and critically important undertaking. The diversity of mechanisms underlying the association between migraine and stroke likely reflects the heterogenous nature of this disorder. Vasospasm, endothelial injury, platelet aggregation and prothrombotic states, cortical spreading depression, carotid dissection, genetic variants, and traditional vascular risk factors have been offered as putative mechanisms involved in migraine-related stroke risk. Assimilating these seemingly divergent pathomechanisms into a cogent understanding of migraine-related stroke will inform future studies and the development of new strategies for the prevention and treatment of migraine and stroke.

Genetics of migraine: an update

An important genetic component of migraine was systematically established by epidemiological studies in the 1990s. Over the past 15 years, significant progress has been made in unraveling the genetic basis and pathophysiological mechanisms of familial hemiplegic migraine, a rare and severe autosomal-dominant subtype of migraine with aura. Three different causative genes (CACNA1A, ATP1A2 and SCN1A), all of which are involved in cerebral ion translocation, have been identified. Functional studies and mouse models have shown that mutations in these genes, by different mechanisms, cause a disturbed cerebral glutamate homeostasis and, thus, increase susceptibility to cortical spreading depression, the likely correlate of migraine aura. More recently, genome-wide association studies have, for the first time, detected robust risk variants associated with the more common, genetically complex types of migraine, which has generated new perspectives for genetic research in migraine. This review summarizes the current knowledge about migraine genetics, with a focus on both familial hemiplegic migraine and recent results of genome-wide association studies.

Polymorphisms of the SCN1A gene in children and adolescents with primary headache and idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy: is there a linkage?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distribution of the polymorphisms of the SCN1A gene in a series of children and adolescents with primary headache and idiopathic or cryptogenic epilepsy compared to controls. Five non-synonymous exonic polymorphisms (1748A > T, 2656T > C, 3199A > G, 5771G > A, 5864T > C) of the SCN1A gene were selected and their genotyping was performed, by high resolution melting (HRM), in 49 cases and 100 controls. We found that among the five polymorphisms, only 3199A > G was a true polymorphism. We did not find a statistically significant difference between distribution of 3199A > G genotypes between cases and controls. We excluded the role of the SCN1A gene in the pathogenesis of comorbidity between headache (especially migraine) and epilepsy. The SCN1A gene is a major gene in different epilepsies and epilepsy syndromes; the HRM could be the new methodology, more rapid and efficacious, for molecular analysis of the SCN1A gene.

Migraine genetics

Migraine with aura (MA) and migraine without aura (MO) are primary headaches prevalent in the general population that carry a substantial familial liability. Based on the model of migraine as a complex disease, a multifactorial type of inheritance has been suggested, but familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), classified as a subtype of MA, shows an autosomal dominant transmission pattern and is due to mutations in three genes encoding for neural channel subunits. These FHM mutations, however, account for a minority of the FHM families and are not usually found in sporadic HM or in the typical migraines MA/MO. This implies that the genetic predisposition to the typical migraines may be different and that FHM could be better classified as a type of syndromic migraine rather than a MA subtype. Linkage and genome-wide scans have disclosed several chromosomal liability loci in selected families with MA/MO. It is likely that typical migraine genes will be discovered in the future. Epigenetic mechanisms, especially those acting in the early stages of neural development, are here proposed to be involved in the genetics of the typical migraines, especially if the typical migraines are modeled as evolutionarily conserved behaviors (sickness behavior) enacted out of a genetic repertoire.

Migraine: a genetic disease?

Migraines carry a substantial genetic liability, and in families affected with the typical migraines (migraine with, MA, and without aura, MO) linkage to some chromosomal loci has been reported. As yet however, no genes are known for MA/MO, while the three genes discovered as responsible for familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) are not involved in the typical migraines. Accordingly, we propose to consider FHM as a syndromic migraine and not as a variety of MA. Moreover, we suggest that epigenetic mechanisms play a role in the determination of the typical migraines, and that the primary headaches represent behavioural responses (sickness behaviour, fight-or-flight responses), having adaptive advantage and having been evolutionary conserved, in which pain represents a signal of homeostatic imbalance. Epigenetic mechanisms and this proposed genetic behavioural model could be usefully incorporated into headache genetic research.

Migraine and ischemic stroke: a debated question

Numerous epidemiologic observations reporting high prevalence of migraine among young individuals with stroke as well as dysfunction of cerebral arteries during migraine attacks prompt speculation on the existence of a comorbidity between the two disorders. The recent finding of silent infarct-like brain lesions in migraineurs reinforced this hypothesis and raised questions on whether migraine may be a progressive disorder rather than simply an episodic disorder. Stroke can occur during the course of migraine attacks with aura, supporting the assumption of a causal relation between the two diseases. Migraine may accentuate other existing risk factors for stroke, and both jointly increase the risk of cerebral ischemia outside of migraine attacks. In this regard, the role of migraine might be that of predisposing condition for cerebral ischemia. Migraine and ischemic stroke may be the end phenotype of common pathogenic mechanisms. Evidence of a migraine-stroke relation in cases of specific disorders, such as CADASIL (cerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy) and MELAS (mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes), strongly supports this concept. Finally, acute focal cerebral ischemia can trigger migraine attacks, and, thus, migraine may be the consequence of stroke. In this paper, we will review contemporary epidemiologic studies, discuss potential mechanisms of migraine-induced stroke and comorbid ischemic stroke, and pose new research questions.

The primary headaches: genetics, epigenetics and a behavioural genetic model

The primary headaches, migraine with (MA) and without aura (MO) and cluster headache, all carry a substantial genetic liability. Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM), an autosomal dominant mendelian disorder classified as a subtype of MA, is due to mutations in genes encoding neural channel subunits. MA/MO are considered multifactorial genetic disorders, and FHM has been proposed as a model for migraine aetiology. However, a review of the genetic studies suggests that the FHM genes are not involved in the typical migraines and that FHM should be considered as a syndromic migraine rather than a subtype of MA. Adopting the concept of syndromic migraine could be useful in understanding migraine pathogenesis. We hypothesise that epigenetic mechanisms play an important role in headache pathogenesis. A behavioural model is proposed, whereby the primary headaches are construed as behaviours, not symptoms, evolutionarily conserved for their adaptive value and engendered out of a genetic repertoire by a network of pattern generators present in the brain and signalling homeostatic imbalance. This behavioural model could be incorporated into migraine genetic research.

Familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 shows no hypersensitivity to nitric oxide

Familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 (FHM-1) is a dominantly inherited subtype of migraine with aura and transient hemiplegia associated with mutations in the CACNA1A gene. FHM-1 shares many phenotypical similarities with common types of migraine, indicating common neurobiological pathways. Experimental studies have established that activation of the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (NO-cGMP) pathway plays a crucial role in migraine pathophysiology. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that CACNA1A mutations in patients with FHM-1 are associated with hypersensitivity to NO-cGMP pathway. We included eight FHM-1 patients with R583Q and C1369Y mutations and nine healthy controls, who received intravenous infusions of 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1) glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) over 20 min. We recorded: headache intensity on a verbal rating scale; mean flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (V(meanMCA)) by transcranial Doppler; diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) by Dermascan. One patient reported migraine without aura 5 h after start of the GTN infusion. No aura was reported. The AUC(headache) in the immediate phase was more pronounced in patients than in controls (P = 0.01). In the 14 h following GTN infusion, there was no difference in the AUC(headache) between patients and controls (P = 0.17). We found no difference in the AUC(VmeanMCA) (P = 0.12) or AUC(STA) (P = 0.71) between FHM-1 patients and controls. None of the control persons reported migraine-like headache. FHM-1 patients do not show hypersensitivity of the NO-cGMP pathway, as characteristically seen in migraine patients with and without aura. This indicates that the pathophysiological pathways underlying migraine headache in FHM-1 may be different from the common types of migraine.

Familial hemiplegic migraine type 2 does not share hypersensitivity to nitric oxide with common types of migraine

Familial hemiplegic migraine type 2 (FHM-2) and common types of migraine show phenotypic similarities which may indicate a common neurobiological background. The nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (NO-cGMP) pathway plays a crucial role in migraine pathophysiology. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that ATP1A2 mutations in patients with FHM-2 are associated with hypersensitivity to NO-cGMP pathway. Eight FHM-2 patients with R202Q, R763C, V138A and L764P mutations and nine healthy controls received intravenous infusions of 0.5 mug kg(-1) min(-1) glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) over 20 min. We recorded the following variables: headache intensity on a verbal rating scale; mean flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (V(meanMCA)) by transcranial Doppler; diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) by ultrasound. The primary end-points were differences in incidence of migraine headache and area under the curve (AUC) for headache score during an immediate phase (0-120 min) and a delayed phase (2-14 h) after start of infusion. We found no difference in the incidence of reported migraine between FHM-2 patients, 25% (two out of eight), and controls, 0% (0 out of nine) (95% confidence interval -0.06, 0.56) (P = 0.21). The AUC(headache) in the immediate (P = 0.37) and delayed (P = 0.09) phase was not different between patients and controls. The GTN infusion resulted in a biphasic response in patients. During the immediate phase, the median peak headache occurred at 30 min and tended to be higher in patients, 1 (0, 3.8), than in controls, 0 (0, 1) (P = 0.056). During the delayed phase, the median peak headache occurred 4 h after the start of the infusion and was significantly higher in patients, 2.5 (0, 3), than in controls, 0 (0, 0) (P = 0.046). We found no difference in the AUC(VmeanMCA) (P = 0.77) or AUC(STA) (P = 0.53) between FHM-2 patients and controls. GTN infusion failed to induce more migraine in FHM-2 patients than in controls. The pathophysiological pathways underlying migraine headache in FHM-2 may be different from the common types of migraine.

Migraine: a complex genetic disorder

Although family and twin studies show that there is a genetic component to migraine, no genes predisposing to common forms of the disorder have been identified. The most encouraging findings have emerged from the identification of genes causing rare mendelian traits that phenotypically resemble migraine. These studies have pointed migraine research towards ion-transport genes; however, there is no direct evidence of the involvement of these genes in common forms of migraine. Family-based linkage studies have identified several chromosomal regions linked to common forms of migraine, but there is little consistency between studies. The modest success in the identification of contributing gene variants has stimulated research into more effective strategies. These include new phenotyping methods for genetic studies and new study designs-such as case-control and whole-genome association studies-to identify common variants contributing to the trait.

Migraine: gene mutations and functional consequences

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Genetic and functional studies of mutations in familial hemiplegic migraine reveal a major role for disturbed ion transport. Gene identification in common, multifactorial migraine remains challenging.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several new mutations have been identified in FHM1, FHM2 and FHM3 genes. Functional consequences of familial hemiplegic migraine mutations point to an important role for cortical spreading depression in migraine pathophysiology. New genetic approaches have been tested in common migraine - novel chromosomal loci - but no gene variants have been identified.

SUMMARY

Identification and analysis of gene mutations in familial hemiplegic migraine revealed a major role for disturbed ion transport in this disorder. Cellular and transgenic mouse models of familial hemiplegic migraine genes suggest that increased potassium and glutamate play a role in the pathophysiology of the disorder. Despite progress, no genes have been discovered for common migraine.

Familial hemiplegic migraine

Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) is a rare and genetically heterogeneous autosomal dominant subtype of migraine with aura. Mutations in the genes CACNA1A and SCNA1A, encoding the pore-forming alpha(1) subunits of the neuronal voltage-gated Ca2+ channels Ca(V)2.1 and Na+ channels Na(V)1.1, are responsible for FHM1 and FHM3, respectively, whereas mutations in ATP1A2, encoding the alpha2 subunit of the Na+, K+ adenosinetriphosphatase (ATPase), are responsible for FHM2. This review discusses the functional studies of two FHM1 knockin mice and of several FHM mutants in heterologous expression systems (12 FHM1, 8 FHM2, and 1 FHM3). These studies show the following: (1) FHM1 mutations produce gain-of-function of the Ca(V)2.1 channel and, as a consequence, increased Ca(V)2.1-dependent neurotransmitter release from cortical neurons and facilitation of in vivo induction and propagation of cortical spreading depression (CSD: the phenomenon underlying migraine aura); (2) FHM2 mutations produce loss-of-function of the alpha2 Na+,K+-ATPase; and (3) the FHM3 mutation accelerates recovery from fast inactivation of Na(V)1.5 (and presumably Na(V)1.1) channels. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that FHM mutations share the ability of rendering the brain more susceptible to CSD by causing either excessive synaptic glutamate release (FHM1) or decreased removal of K+ and glutamate from the synaptic cleft (FHM2) or excessive extracellular K+ (FHM3). The FHM data support a key role of CSD in migraine pathogenesis and point to cortical hyperexcitability as the basis for vulnerability to CSD and to migraine attacks. Hence, they support novel therapeutic strategies that consider CSD and cortical hyperexcitability as key targets for preventive migraine treatment.

Migraine in Multiple Sclerosis

Headache and migraine are common features in multiple sclerosis (MS) and can influence the diagnosis, radiological evaluation, treatment, and quality of life of these patients. Similarities in symptoms between patients with migraine and MS presenting with headache can lead to misdiagnosis. Likewise, MRI lesions which may be found in migraine patients without other neurological symptoms or signs may cause diagnostic confusion and patient anxiety. Studies addressing the pathophysiology of these comorbid conditions have not found a clear link, but brainstem lesions and inflammatory processes have been proposed. Management of de novo or treatment-induced headache in the MS patient is fairly straightforward if the physician is aware of the problem.

Genetik der Migräne

Twin and family studies provide evidence of a genetic component in migraine, in particular migraine with aura (MA). Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) is a rare monogenic subtype of MA for which three causative genes have been identified: CACNA1A (FHM1), ATP1A2 (FHM2), and SCN1A (FHM3). Mutations in these genes are also found in some patients with sporadic hemiplegic migraine. Linkage studies have identified several gene loci for the more common forms of migraine; however, identification of the respective causative genes is still pending. This review summarizes recent developments in the genetics of migraine and their implications for molecular genetic testing. We further discuss the roles of CACNA1A, ATP1A2, and SCN1A in the pathophysiology of cortical spreading depression, which is the likely correlate of migraine aura.