Phylogenetic relationships among the Lorisoidea as indicated by craniodental morphology and mitochondrial sequence data

The phylogeny of the Afro-Asian Lorisoidea is controversial. While postcranial data attest strongly to the monophyly of the Lorisidae, most molecular analyses portray them as paraphyletic and group the Galagidae alternately with the Asian or African lorisids. One of the problems that has bedevilled phylogenetic analysis of the group in the past is the limited number of taxa sampled for both ingroup families. We present the results of a series of phylogenetic analyses based on 635 base pairs (bp) from two mitochondrial genes (12S and 16S rRNA) with and without 36 craniodental characters, for 11 galagid and five lorisid taxa. The outgroup was the gray mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). Analyses of the molecular data included maximum parsimony (MP), neighbor joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and Bayesian methods. The model-based analyses and the combined "molecules+morphology" analyses supported monophyly of the Lorisidae and Galagidae. The lorisids form two geographically defined clades. We find no support for the taxonomy of Galagidae as proposed recently by Groves [Primate Taxonomy, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. 350 p, 2001]. The taxonomy of Nash et al. [International Journal of Primatology 10:57-80, 1989] is supported by the combined "molecules+morphology" analysis; however, the model-based analyses suggest that Galagoides may be an assemblage of species united by plesiomorphic craniodental characters.

Nests, tree holes, and the evolution of primate life histories

In contrast to the majority of primates, many prosimians, some New World monkeys, and the great apes rest in tree holes or self-constructed nests during their inactive periods. The goal of this comparative study was to examine possible functions of this interspecific variation. Information on resting behavior, maternal behavior, and basic life-history traits was gleaned from the literature and mapped onto a phylogenetic tree of primates for various comparative tests. Parsimony-based reconstructions revealed that only the use of nests or tree holes as shelters for young infants can be unequivocally reconstructed for various higher taxa, suggesting that it is functionally different from the use of shelters by adults (who may be accompanied by infants). Further reconstructions revealed that the ancestral primate was most likely nocturnal and solitary and produced a single infant that was initially left in a shelter and later carried orally to a parking place in the vegetation--a combination of traits exhibited by many living galagos. Evolutionary losses of the use of nests were concentrated among diurnal and nonsolitary taxa and weakly associated with evolutionary increases in body size. Thus, protective functions of nests or tree holes used by prosimians are either secondary or there are alternative ways of obtaining protection. Because the evolution of larger litters was significantly associated with the presence of shelters, the presence of relatively altricial young among prosimians best explains the use of nests and tree holes, which are in most but not all cases also used by adults. These shelters therefore play an integral part in the life-history strategies of primitive primates and their ancestors and evolved secondarily among anthropoids for other purposes.

Nests, tree holes, and the evolution of primate life histories

In contrast to the majority of primates, many prosimians, some New World monkeys, and the great apes rest in tree holes or self-constructed nests during their inactive periods. The goal of this comparative study was to examine possible functions of this interspecific variation. Information on resting behavior, maternal behavior, and basic life-history traits was gleaned from the literature and mapped onto a phylogenetic tree of primates for various comparative tests. Parsimony-based reconstructions revealed that only the use of nests or tree holes as shelters for young infants can be unequivocally reconstructed for various higher taxa, suggesting that it is functionally different from the use of shelters by adults (who may be accompanied by infants). Further reconstructions revealed that the ancestral primate was most likely nocturnal and solitary and produced a single infant that was initially left in a shelter and later carried orally to a parking place in the vegetation--a combination of traits exhibited by many living galagos. Evolutionary losses of the use of nests were concentrated among diurnal and nonsolitary taxa and weakly associated with evolutionary increases in body size. Thus, protective functions of nests or tree holes used by prosimians are either secondary or there are alternative ways of obtaining protection. Because the evolution of larger litters was significantly associated with the presence of shelters, the presence of relatively altricial young among prosimians best explains the use of nests and tree holes, which are in most but not all cases also used by adults. These shelters therefore play an integral part in the life-history strategies of primitive primates and their ancestors and evolved secondarily among anthropoids for other purposes.

The role of phylogeny and behavioral competition in the evolution of coexistence among primates

No analysis of coexistence among primates has ever considered phylogenetic distances and behavioral competition. The present model proposes that high levels of behavioral competition strongly incite divergence of the respective positions of sympatric species in niches, especially when these species are closely related. This divergence is then reflected in the morphologies of coexisting species (individuals exploit new dimensions of niches and their associated morphologies are selected for) and consequently in their phylogenetic distances. Sister species (defined here as those from the same subgenus or same species group) are phylogenetically closer than kin species (of the same genus but different subgenera or species groups). Accordingly, if a minimum phylogenetic distance is a condition of stable coexistence, then kin (and higher ranking) species, but not sister species, are expected to coexist in ecological communities. Moreover, the intensity of behavioral competition among coexisting species should be inversely proportional to phylogenetic distance. (Taxa are said to have high levels of behavioral competition if they display high rates of aggressive behaviors and simultaneous low rates of grooming behaviors.) To test these hypotheses, 41 ecological communities were reviewed. The conclusions are that (i) primate sister species do coexist, but very exceptionally compared with kin species (Wilcoxon's signed ranks test, p < 0.0001), suggesting that coexistence is possible provided a minimum phylogenetic distance is respected; (ii) there is a negative relationship between taxonomic distance and the rate of aggression among sympatric primates (p = 0.04) and a positive relationship between this distance and the rate of interspecific grooming behaviors (p = 0.028), supporting the hypothesis that stable coexistence is possible if sympatric species reduce and maintain low levels of behavioral competition.