3
|
Souza-Alves JP, Chagas RRD, Santana MM, Boyle SA, Bezerra BM. Food availability, plant diversity, and vegetation structure drive behavioral and ecological variation in Endangered Coimbra-Filho's titi monkeys. Am J Primatol 2021; 83:e23237. [PMID: 33528872 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.23237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
There is wide variability in primate behavior and ecology. Understanding how frugivorous primates behave under different habitat fragmentation levels is key for effective conservation and management of species and their habitats. We evaluated the seasonality in activity budget, diet, and ranging behavior of two groups of Endangered Coimbra-Filho's titi monkeys (Callicebus coimbrai). One group inhabited a 14-ha forest fragment, whereas the other lived in a 522-ha fragment. We measured the monthly density of trees and lianas available as food sources over 8 months. We also collected behavioral and group location data every 5 min, from dawn to dusk, using the scan sampling method. The two forest fragments differed seasonally in the number of fruiting food-resource available. In the 14-ha fragment, we found that the time spent by titi monkeys feeding, foraging, resting, and traveling differed seasonally. In the 522-ha fragment, titi monkeys exhibited seasonal differences in time spent sleeping, socializing, foraging, and revisiting food sources. In both titi monkey groups, diets varied seasonally. Our findings indicate that Coimbra-Filho's titi monkeys can exhibit behavioral flexibility in their activity budgets, diets, and movement patterns. Such flexibility is important for this species to survive in fragmented habitats and may be linked to three key factors: species-specific resource availability, plant species diversity, and the vegetation structure of each forest fragment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João P Souza-Alves
- Postgraduate Program in Animal Biology, Department of Zoology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.,Postgraduate Program in Biological Science, Department of Systematics and Ecology, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil.,Department of Zoology, Laboratory of Ecology, Behavior and Conservation (LECC), Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
| | - Renata R D Chagas
- Postgraduate Program in Biological Science, Department of Systematics and Ecology, Federal University of Paraíba, João Pessoa, Brazil
| | - Marina M Santana
- Postgraduate Program in Ecology and Conservation, Federal University of Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Brazil
| | - Sarah A Boyle
- Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Bruna M Bezerra
- Postgraduate Program in Animal Biology, Department of Zoology, Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.,Department of Zoology, Laboratory of Ecology, Behavior and Conservation (LECC), Federal University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barnett AA, Boyle SA, Thompson CL. Pitheciid research comes of age: Past puzzles, current progress, and future priorities. Am J Primatol 2015; 78:487-92. [PMID: 26456235 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2015] [Revised: 10/01/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
For a long time, members of the Pitheciidae were among the least studied of all Neotropical primates. But times have changed. Here, we trace the trajectory of this change and show how the articles in this special edition illustrate new knowledge and developments in our understanding of pitheciid ecology, behavior, and conservation. We propose new directions and priorities for future research, especially to ensure the effective conservation of pitheciids, and demonstrate how studies of this family are now the focus of hypothesis-driven research that not only allows the details of this family's biology to be explored, but will allow its biology to be compared with other primate lineages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian A Barnett
- Amazon Mammal Research Group, Biodiversity Sector, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.,Department of Life Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah A Boyle
- Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Cynthia L Thompson
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boyle SA, Thompson CL, Deluycker A, Alvarez SJ, Alvim THG, Aquino R, Bezerra BM, Boubli JP, Bowler M, Caselli CB, Chagas RRD, Ferrari SF, Fontes IP, Gregory T, Haugaasen T, Heiduck S, Hores R, Lehman S, Melo FRD, Moreira LS, Moura VS, Nagy-Reis MB, Palacios E, Palminteri S, Peres CA, Pinto L, Port-Carvalho M, Rodríguez A, Santos RRD, Setz EZF, Shaffer CA, Silva FE, Silva RFSD, Souza-Alves JP, Trevelin LC, Veiga LM, Vieira TM, DuBose ME, Barnett AA. Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia. Am J Primatol 2015; 78:493-506. [PMID: 26031411 DOI: 10.1002/ajp.22422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2014] [Revised: 04/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Pitheciids are known for their frugivorous diets, but there has been no broad-scale comparison of fruit genera used by these primates that range across five geographic regions in South America. We compiled 31 fruit lists from data collected from 18 species (three Cacajao, six Callicebus, five Chiropotes, and four Pithecia) at 26 study sites in six countries. Together, these lists contained 455 plant genera from 96 families. We predicted that 1) closely related Chiropotes and Cacajao would demonstrate the greatest similarity in fruit lists; 2) pitheciids living in closer geographic proximity would have greater similarities in fruit lists; and 3) fruit genus richness would be lower in lists from forest fragments than continuous forests. Fruit genus richness was greatest for the composite Chiropotes list, even though Pithecia had the greatest overall sampling effort. We also found that the Callicebus composite fruit list had lower similarity scores in comparison with the composite food lists of the other three genera (both within and between geographic areas). Chiropotes and Pithecia showed strongest similarities in fruit lists, followed by sister taxa Chiropotes and Cacajao. Overall, pitheciids in closer proximity had more similarities in their fruit list, and this pattern was evident in the fruit lists for both Callicebus and Chiropotes. There was no difference in the number of fruit genera used by pitheciids in habitat fragments and continuous forest. Our findings demonstrate that pitheciids use a variety of fruit genera, but phylogenetic and geographic patterns in fruit use are not consistent across all pitheciid genera. This study represents the most extensive examination of pitheciid fruit consumption to date, but future research is needed to investigate the extent to which the trends in fruit genus richness noted here are attributable to habitat differences among study sites, differences in feeding ecology, or a combination of both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Boyle
- Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Cynthia L Thompson
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan
| | | | - Silvia J Alvarez
- Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
| | - Thiago H G Alvim
- Research Support Foundation, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil
| | | | - Bruna M Bezerra
- Department of Zoology, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
| | | | - Mark Bowler
- San Diego Zoo Global Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego, California
| | | | - Renata R D Chagas
- Department of Systematics and Ecology, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
| | - Stephen F Ferrari
- Department of Ecology, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
| | | | - Tremaine Gregory
- Center for Conservation Education and Sustainability, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC
| | - Torbjørn Haugaasen
- Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | | | - Rose Hores
- Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
| | - Shawn Lehman
- Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fabiano R de Melo
- Biological Sciences Program, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Jataí, Goiás, Brazil
| | - Leandro S Moreira
- Center of Ecological and Environmental Education Studies, Carangola, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Viviane S Moura
- Program in Ecology and Conservation, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brazil
| | - Mariana B Nagy-Reis
- Biology Institute, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Erwin Palacios
- Conservation International Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
| | | | - Carlos A Peres
- School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Liliam Pinto
- National Center for Amazonian Biodiversity Research and Conservation, Chico Mendes Institute for Biodiversity Conservation, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
| | | | | | - Ricardo R dos Santos
- Centre for Agrarian and Environmental Sciences, Universidade Federal de Maranhão, Chapadinha, Maranhão, Brazil.,Center for Geospatial Research, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Eleonore Z F Setz
- Biology Institute, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - João P Souza-Alves
- Department of Systematics and Ecology, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
| | | | - Liza M Veiga
- Department of Zoology, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Belém, Pará, Brazil
| | - Tatiana M Vieira
- Mamirauá Institute for Sustainable Development, Tefé, Amazonas, Brazil
| | - Mary E DuBose
- Department of Biology, Rhodes College, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Adrian A Barnett
- Biodiversity Unit, National Institute for Amazonian Research, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|