Family resemblance for anthropometric and blood pressure measurements in Black Caribs and Creoles from St. Vincent Island

Assortative mating for human height: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The study of assortative mating for height has a rich history in human biology. Although the positive correlation between the stature of spouses has often been noted in western populations, recent papers suggest that mating patterns for stature are not universal. The objective of this paper was to review the published evidence to examine the strength of and universality in assortative mating for height.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive literature review and meta-analysis. We started with published reviews but also searched through secondary databases. Our search led to 154 correlations of height between partners. We classified the populations as western and non-western based on geography. These correlations were then analyzed via meta-analytic techniques.

RESULTS

148 of the correlations for partner heights were positive and the overall analysis indicates moderate positive assortative mating (r = .23). Although assortative mating was slightly stronger in countries that can be described as western compared to non-western, this difference was not statistically significant. We found no evidence for a change in assortative mating for height over time. There was substantial residual heterogeneity in effect sizes and this heterogeneity was most pronounced in western countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive assortative mating for height exists in human populations, but is modest in magnitude suggesting that height is not a major factor in mate choice. Future research is necessary to understand the underlying causes of the large amount of heterogeneity observed in the degree of assortative mating across human populations, which may stem from a combination of methodological and ecological differences.

Assortative mating for relative weight: genetic implications

Most work on the genetics of relative weight has not considered the role of assortative mating, i.e., mate selection based on similarity between mates. We investigated the extent to which engaged men and women in an archival longitudinal database were similar to each other in relative body weight prior to marriage and cohabitation. After controlling for age, a small but statistically significant mate correlation was found for relative weight (r=.13, p=.023), indicating some assortative mating. Furthermore, we examined whether mate similarity in relative weight prior to marriage predicts survival of the marriage. No significant effects were found. In sum, these results are consistent with those of other studies in suggesting that there is a small but significant intermate correlation for relative weight. However, they are unique in showing that these results cannot be explained on the basis of (a) cohabitation, (b) age similarity, or (c) selective survival of marriages between couples more similar in relative weight. The implications of these findings for heritability studies, linkage studies, and the estimation of shared environmental effects are discussed.

Age-specific genetic effects for blood pressure

Correlations between relatives were determined for systolic and diastolic blood pressure. The correlations decrease as age differences between relatives increase in a Norwegian sample with 43,751 parent-offspring pairs, 19,140 pairs of siblings, and 169 pairs of twins. A simple biometric model specifying only age-specific genetic additive effects and environmental effects fitted well to correlations between cotwins, pairs of siblings, and parent-offspring dyads in subsets of relatives grouped by age differences. None of the environmental effects appeared to be due to environmental factors that are shared by family members. Models that excluded a parameter for the age-specific genetic influence did not fit the data. The results may partly explain what seems to be a discrepancy between relatively low parent-offspring correlations from previous nuclear family studies and high correlations from twin studies, especially in identical twins.

Genetic and environmental contributions to the variance of body height in a sample of first and second degree relatives

Height was measured in a health screening of the population in Nord-Trøndelag, Norway. Correlations were computed for 24,281 pairs of spouses, 43,613 pairs of parents and offspring, 19,168 pairs of siblings, 1,318 pairs of grandparents and grandchildren, 1,218 cognate avuncular pairs, 849 noncognate avuncular pairs, 175 pairs of same-sexed twins, and smaller groups of other types of relatives. Fitting of structural equation models showed proportions of additive genetic variance of approximately 0.8 for both sexes and small sex-specific effects that probably reflect genetic dominance or environmental sibling effects. The correlations between parents and offspring were significantly lower in old than young cohorts, seeming to imply some kind of interaction effect between genes and environment.

Genetic and environmental effects on blood pressure in a Norwegian sample

Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressures were measured in a health screening of the adult population in Nord-Trøndelag, Norway. Correlations were computed for 23,936 pairs of spouses, 43,586 pairs of parent and offspring, 19,151 pairs of siblings, 1,251 pairs of grandparents-grandchildren, 1,146 pairs of biological uncles/aunts-nephews/nieces (avuncular), 801 non-biological avuncular pairs, 169 pairs of same-sex twins, and smaller groups of other types of relationships. Spouse correlations of 0.08 and 0.09 were approximately constant or slightly decreasing with marital duration. The correlation values for SBP and DBP were approximately 0.16 for parents-offspring, 0.19 to 0.23 for same-sex siblings with similar values for DZ twins, 0.19 and 0.16 for opposite-sex siblings, 0.52 and 0.43 for MZ twins, and close to zero for most of the second-order relationships. Genetic additive variance was estimated at 0.29 and genetic dominance variance at 0.18 with the best model for SBP. The corresponding estimates from the best models for DBP were 0.29 or lower and 0.22 or lower, the sum not exceeding 0.35. There was evidence of a moderate effect of environmental factors shared by same-sex siblings and twins (for DBP), but no cultural transmission, and whether or not adult relatives live together does not affect familial resemblance for BP. The data did not permit a very precise resolution of the relative magnitude of genetic dominance and sibling effects. The correlation structure did not show sex-specific genetic effects.