The prevalence of lung surface abnormalities in a healthy population as detected by a screening lung ultrasound protocol: Comparison between young and older volunteers

High Prevalence of the Lung Ultrasound Interstitial Syndrome in Systemic Sclerosis Patients with Normal HRCT and Lung Function-A Pilot Study

Objective: High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) may lack sensitivity for the early detection of interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD). Lung ultrasound is an emerging technique for the diagnosis of SSc-ILD. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe the prevalence of ultrasound interstitial syndrome in SSc patients with normal HRCT and pulmonary function tests (PFT). Methods: Thirty SSc patients with normal HRCT, FVC > 80% predicted and DLCO > 70% predicted were included. Echocardiography and PFT including impulse oscillometry and cardiopulmonary exercise testing were performed. Lung ultrasound was analyzed by two blinded operators. Patients were classified into two groups, according to the presence or absence of ultrasound interstitial syndrome, defined as the sum of B-lines in all thoracic areas ≥10 and/or pleural line thickness >3 mm on at least one thoracic area and/or a pleural line irregularity score >16%. Results: Ultrasound interstitial syndrome was present in 12 patients (40%). Inter-reader agreement for the diagnosis of ultrasound interstitial syndrome defined by the Kappa coefficient was 0.93 (95%CI 0.79-1.00). Patients with ultrasound interstitial syndrome were younger (37 years vs. 53 years, p = 0.009), more often had pitting scars (n = 7/12 vs. 3/18, p = 0.045) and had lower FVC (102 vs. 110% pred, p = 0.009), TLC (114 vs. 122% pred, p = 0.042) and low-frequency respiratory system reactance (Xrs5 Z-score 0.16 vs. 1.02, p = 0.018), while pulmonary gas exchange was similar. Conclusions: Ultrasound interstitial syndrome was detected in 12/30 SSc patients with normal HRCT and PFT. Patients with ultrasound interstitial syndrome had differences in lung function consistent with reduced respiratory compliance, suggesting minimal and/or early suspected SSc-ILD.

Lung Ultrasound Abnormalities in Patients Without Pulmonary Pathology Prior to Surgery

Background

The occurrence of lung ultrasound abnormalities in patients without lung disease remains uncertain, while patients with respiratory disease often exhibit such abnormalities.

Objectives

The primary aim was to identify pathological ultrasonographic pulmonary findings and their correlation with baseline diseases and static lung compliance in patients without any pre-existing respiratory conditions.

Methods

This prospective observational study enrolled a series of surgical patients with no history of pulmonary pathology (n = 104). Baseline diseases and patients' physical status classification, based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), were documented by reviewing medical records. Prior to surgery, a lung ultrasound was performed to assess pulmonary changes. During surgery with general anesthesia, static lung compliance was measured. The Spearman correlation coefficient was employed to determine the correlation between the two variables.

Results

Twenty-four patients (23.07%) exhibited 1 - 2 B-lines in certain lung fields. Seven patients (6.7%) had an ultrasound B-line score > 0 (indicating ≥ 3 B-lines). Among these patients, the average number of lung fields with ≥ 3 B-lines was 3.71 ± 2.43. Patients with systemic diseases (ASA ≥ 2) displayed a higher number of B-lines compared to ASA I patients (P-value = 0.039). Pleural irregularities were found in 10 patients (9.6%), while atelectasis and pleural effusion were observed in five (4.8%) and four (3.8%) patients, respectively. The mean lung compliance value was 56.78 ± 15.33. No correlation was observed between the total score of the B-lines and lung compliance (Spearman's correlation: rho = -0.028, P-value = 0.812).

Conclusions

Patients without pulmonary pathology may exhibit ultrasound pulmonary abnormalities, which tend to increase with higher ASA scores and do not appear to have a correlation with static lung compliance.

Lung Ultrasound to Assess Pulmonary Congestion in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Purpose

Heart failure (HF) often coexists with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is associated with worse outcomes. We aimed to assess the feasibility of detecting vertical artifacts (B-lines) on lung ultrasound (LUS) to identify concurrent HF in patients hospitalized with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). Second, we wanted to assess the association between B-lines and the risk of rehospitalization for AECOPD or death.

Patients and Methods

In a prospective cohort study, 123 patients with AECOPD underwent 8-zone bedside LUS within 24h after admission. A positive LUS was defined by ≥3 B-lines in ≥2 zones bilaterally. The ability to detect concurrent HF (adjudicated by a cardiologist committee) and association with events were evaluated by logistic- and Cox regression models.

Results

Forty-eight of 123 patients with AECOPD (age 75±9 years, 57[46%] men) had concurrent HF. Sixteen (13%) patients had positive LUS, and the prevalence of positive LUS was similar between patients with and without concurrent HF (8[17%] vs 8[11%], respectively, p=0.34). The number of B-lines was higher in concurrent HF: median 10(IQR 6-16) vs 7(IQR 5-12), p=0.03. The sensitivity and specificity for a positive LUS to detect concurrent HF were 17% and 89%, respectively. Positive LUS was not associated with rehospitalization and mortality: Adjusted HR: 0.93(0.49-1.75), p=0.81.

Conclusion

LUS did not detect concurrent HF or predict risk in patients with AECOPD.

Serial Transthoracic Ultrasonography Studies in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients: A Tool for Early Lung Pathology Detection

Early detection of pulmonary complications can improve outcomes for patients with hematological malignancy (HM). For detecting lung injuries, lung ultrasound (LUS) images have been found to be of greater sensitivity than radiographic images. Our group performed a pilot study of LUS imaging to enhance early detection of pulmonary complications in HM patients. This prospective single-center feasibility study evaluated LUS for detecting pulmonary complications in 18 HM patients enrolled while hospitalized for a hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) (concurrent-HCT group) or re-hospitalized for complications (post-HCT group). Serial LUS exams were performed and assigned a score from 0 to 5 based on pleural line, B-line, consolidation and pleural effusion features. Correlations between patients' clinical characteristics and LUS features were analyzed. Comparisons between the LUS and radiographic images were evaluated. In the concurrent-HCT patients (79 LUS exams), non-significant fluctuating findings were commonly identified, but one-third of the patients presented pathologic findings (LUS scores ≥ 3). In the post-HCT patients (29 LUS exams), LUS images revealed severe pathologic findings (LUS score = 5) in every patient and, compared with radiographic images, were more sensitive for detecting pleural effusions (p < 0.05). LUS can be routinely performed on hospitalized HM patients, allowing point-of-care early detection of pulmonary complications.

The emerging role of ultrasound in detecting interstitial lung disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential role of US in the detection of ILD in a cohort of patients with RA.

METHODS

Patients with diagnosis of RA were consecutively enrolled. All patients underwent pulmonary examination, laboratory data, DLCO measure, chest HRCT and radiographs, and US examination. A healthy group was included as control group. US was performed according the 14-intercostal space scanning protocol using the following semiquantitative scale [0=normal (≤5 B-lines); 1=slight (≥6 and ≤15 B-lines); 2=moderate, (≤16 and ≥30 B-lines); 3=severe (≥30 B-lines)].

RESULTS

A total of 74 RA patients and 74 healthy controls were included. Thirty of 74 patients (40.5%) showed US signs of ILD with respect to the healthy controls (3 subjects, 4.1%) (P<0.001); whereas HRCT showed ILD in 27 (36.4%) of 74 patients. Among the 30 patients that showed US findings of ILD, 17 (56.6%) were asymptomatic from respiratory view-point. The sensitivity and specificity of US were 92% and 89% respectively. A positive correlation between US and HRCT findings were found (P<0.001) whereas no correlation was found with chest radiographs and DLCO findings. Positive association between US findings and DAS28-ESR, anti-CCP and RF (P<0.01 for each respectively) was found. Feasibility, represented by the mean time spent to perform the pulmonary US assessment was 7.8minutes (±SD 1.2, range 6 to 10minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the potential of US in detect accurately ILD in patients with RA and provide a rationale to consider it as a friendly screening tool to be implemented in early phases of the disease.

A-lines and B-lines in patients with acute heart failure

AIMS

Lung ultrasound (LUS) relies on detecting artefacts, including A-lines and B-lines, when assessing dyspnoeic patients. A-lines are horizontal artefacts and characterize normal lung, whereas multiple vertical B-lines are associated with increased lung density. We sought to assess the prevalence of A-lines and B-lines in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) and examine their clinical correlates and their relationship with outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a prospective cohort study of adults with AHF, eight-zone LUS and echocardiography were performed early during the hospitalization and pre-discharge at an imaging depth of 18 cm. A- and B-lines were analysed separately off-line, blinded to clinical and outcome data. Of 164 patients [median age 71 years, 61% men, mean ejection fraction (EF) 40%], the sum of A-lines at baseline ranged from 0 to 19 and B-line number from 0 to 36. One hundred and fifty-six patients (95%) had co-existing A-lines and B-lines at baseline. Lower body mass index and lower chest wall thickness were associated with a higher number of A-lines (P trend < 0.001 for both). In contrast to B-lines, there was no significant change in the number of A-lines from baseline to discharge (median 6 vs. 5, P = 0.80). While B-lines were associated with 90-day HF readmission or death, A-lines were not [HR 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-2.51 vs. HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.65-1.43].

CONCLUSIONS

A-lines and B-lines on LUS co-exist in the vast majority of hospitalized patients with AHF. In contrast to B-lines, A-lines were not associated with adverse outcomes.