Efficacy of transnasal endoscopic resection for malignant anterior skull-base tumors

Association of Complication Rates and Intensive Care Unit Use With Sinonasal and Skull Base Malignancies: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Background: Patients with sinonasal and skull base malignancies experience many types of complications after surgery. The intensive care unit (ICU) provides a high level of care for these patients; however, the effect of ICU care on complication rates remains unclear. Methods: Between November 2014 and November 2022, we retrospectively analyzed 151 patients with sinonasal and skull base malignancies. Fifty-six of these patients were admitted to the ICU and 95 were admitted to the non-ICU after surgery. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. The complication rates of the ICU and non-ICU groups were compared. Results: Before PSM, the complication rate was 28.5%. Patients admitted to the ICU had a higher incidence of medical complications (P = .032). Orbital injury (n = 9) and diplopia or visual changes (n = 9) were the most common surgical complications, whereas respiratory tract infections (n = 7) were the most common medical complications. After PSM, the incidences of surgical, medical, and all complications in the ICU and non-ICU groups were 23.8% and 19.0% (P = .791), 16.7% and 9.5% (P = .520), and 38.1% and 26.2% (P = .350), respectively. Conclusions: This preliminary study revealed that ICU admission did not reduce the complication rate of patients with sinonasal and skull base malignancies. Further studies are required to validate these findings and clarify the potential role of the ICU.

Skull base reconstruction using in situ bone flap in patients with pituitary adenomas treated by endoscopic endonasal approach

Objective

The objective of this study is to study the effect of in situ bone flap (ISBF) repositioning, a recently proposed rigid skull base reconstruction technique, on patients diagnosed with pituitary adenoma undergoing endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA).

Method

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 188 patients with pituitary adenomas who underwent EEA from February 2018 to September 2022. Patients were divided into the ISBF group and non-ISBF group, according to whether ISBF was used during skull base reconstruction.

Results

Of the 75 patients in the non-ISBF group, 6 had postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage (8%), while only 1 of 113 patients in the ISBF group (0.8%) had postoperative CSF leakage, indicating that the incidence of postoperative CSF leakage in the ISBF group was significantly lower than that in the non-ISBF group (P = 0.033). In addition, we also found that the postoperative hospitalization days of patients in the ISBF group (5.34 ± 1.24) were significantly less than those in the non-ISBF group (6.83 ± 1.91, P = 0.015).

Conclusion

ISBF repositioning is a safe, effective, and convenient rigid skull base reconstruction method for patients with pituitary adenoma treated by EEA, which can significantly reduce the rate of postoperative CSF leakage and shorten postoperative hospital stays.

Cirugía endoscópica transnasal de base de cráneo: Análisis de las complicaciones en los primeros 120 procedimientos

Antecedentes:

El abordaje endoscópico endonasal (AEE) presenta ventajas potenciales a los abordajes abiertos tradicionales. Sin embargo, se han descrito complicaciones como la fístula de líquido cefalorraquídeo (LCR), trastornos visuales y meningitis postquirúrgica. El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar la experiencia acumulada en 120 casos de cirugía endoscópica de base de cráneo realizadas por un mismo equipo quirúrgico, y describir y analizar las principales complicaciones postoperatorias según la complejidad de los casos.

Métodos:

Estudio retrospectivo sobre nuestra base de datos de pacientes operados de AEE de base de cráneo por diversas patologías entre julio de 2011 y marzo de 2022.

Resultados:

Se analizaron 120 cirugías con AEE de base de cráneo. El 57.14% fueron realizadas en mujeres. La mediana de edad fue de 44 años. El 26.66% fueron reintervenciones. La patología más frecuente fue el adenoma hipofisario (49.17%) seguida de la fístula de LCR (8.33%). El AEE más utilizado fue el transelar 65.83%. Se registraron 26 complicaciones, sin diferencias según la complejidad. Se constataron 13 casos de diabetes insípida (DI) y 8 de fístula de LCR. Esta fue más frecuente en pacientes con fístula intraoperatoria de LCR. La mediana de internación fue de 5.5 días.

Conclusiones:

El AEE de base de cráneo se ha vuelto una opción cada vez más utilizada para el manejo quirúrgico de la patología de la base de cráneo, con una baja frecuencia de complicaciones postoperatorias inmediatas y baja mortalidad. El perfeccionamiento de la técnica como la mejoría en los cuidados postoperatorios se asocian a una menor estancia hospitalaria.

Interdisciplinary management of skull base surgery

Skull base surgery remains one of the challenging areas in the field of cranio-maxillofacial surgery, otolaryngology and neurosurgery. Subsequent reconstruction of bone and soft tissue are an essential component to restore function and appearance after ablative surgery. Establishment of interdisciplinary tumor boards with presentation of the individual patient cases have become standard. Multiplanar reconstruction using MRI or CT imaging techniques combined with virtual 3D planning allow precise planning of the procedures. Intraoperative navigation helps for complete resection of malignant findings with safety margins; surgical approaches provide a good overview of the surgical site. Reconstruction using local flaps have a low complication rate with equally reliable results in reconstruction of small tissue defects. Free flap surgery makes reconstruction of large tissue defects possible. Alloplastic materials are alternatively used for reconstruction of bone defects. Based on selected patients, treatment algorithms and standard surgical procedures in extracerebral skull base surgery will be illustrated. Current techniques and new approaches will be discussed with emphasize on hard and soft tissue reconstruction.

Conditional and Overall Disease-Specific Survival in Patients With Paranasal Sinus and Nasal Cavity Cancer: Improved Outcomes in the Endoscopic Era

BACKGROUND

The management of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignancies has evolved significantly with the development of advanced endoscopic techniques and improvements in adjuvant therapy. We sought to characterize both disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year conditional disease-specific survival (CDSS, the change in life expectancy with increasing survivorship) for sinus malignancies diagnosed before and after the year 2000.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with sinus and nasal cavity cancer between 1973-2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) registry. Kaplan-Meier analysis for DSS was stratified by year of diagnosis before and after 2000. Cox-proportional hazards models of DSS controlling for stage, age, and year of diagnosis were generated. CDSS was calculated using Cox-regression models stratified by stage.

RESULTS

We analyzed 10,535 patients. Diagnosis after the year 2000 was independently associated with improved DSS (HR:0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.87, P < .001) after controlling for age and stage. After stratifying by stage, diagnosis after year 2000 was associated with improved DSS for localized (HR:0.71, 0.59-0.86, P < .001) malignancies, regional (HR: 0.86, 0.78-0.94, P = .001) and distant malignancies (HR 0.74, 0.63-0.87, P < .001). CDSS improved with increasing survivorship for all stages of sinus and nasal cavity cancer, and those diagnosed after 2000 had improved CDSS compared to those diagnosed before 2000. Descriptively, the association of year of diagnosis with CDSS diminished with increasing survivorship for localized cancers, but was consistent for other stages.

CONCLUSION

For paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignancies, year of diagnosis independently influences both DSS and CDSS. Improved survival is likely due to advances in both surgical and adjuvant treatments. To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine CDSS for these malignancies.

How close are we to anterior robotic skull base surgery?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The application of robotic surgery to anterior skull base disease has yet to be defined despite the potential for improved tumour resection with less morbidity in this region. Complex anatomy and restricted access have limited the development of robotic anterior skull base surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

A limited number of transoral robotic surgical anterior skull base procedures have been undertaken; however, there are significant limitations to the utilization of this technology in the anterior skull base. In this article, the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of robotic anterior skull base surgery are discussed. Currently, the major limitation is the size of the robotic endoscope and of the available instrumentation. Technological advancements that provide promise for the future development of robotic anterior skull base surgery are in development, such as single-port robots, flexible instrument systems and miniaturization and growth of minimally invasive platforms.

SUMMARY

Although transnasal access to the skull base is not possible with the currently available robotic systems, promising technology does exist and is in development. Robotic anterior skull base surgery promises to provide greater access to skull base disease, improve oncologic results, reduce morbidity and to reduce the ergonomic burden on the surgeon.

Reconstruction after extended endonasal approaches to the anterior cranial base: surgical techniques and current results

The development of extended endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to the anterior skull base has allowed successful resection of selected extradural and intradural skull base tumors through an endonasal corridor, minimizing brain and cranial nerve manipulation. However, as the complexity of the approaches has increased, so has the need for more robust and reliable reconstructive options to minimize morbidity. Reconstructive decision-making after extended EEA for anterior skull base tumors must take into consideration multiple factors including patient characteristics (Body Mass Index, previous surgeries, and radiation), location and the size of the skull base defect. A multilayered reconstruction which includes a combination of free grafts and a vascularized flap is the standard approach to anterior skull base defects after EEA and should be applied in a stepwise manner tailored to each patient. The techniques and materials used to accomplish skull base repair are discussed, the outcomes in the literature are reviewed, and our reconstructive paradigm presented.

Endoscopic approaches to skull base malignancies affecting the anterior fossa

Anterior skull base malignancies are rare and comprise distinct histological entities. Surgery encompasses the traditional craniofacial resections (CFR), and more recently, endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) or a hybrid cranioendoscopic (CEA) technique. Although the CFR is still considered the "gold-standard;" there is growing evidence supporting that EEA yield equivalent oncologic outcomes with less morbidity in well-selected cases. Therefore, this article aims to review the current state-of-art in addressing anterior cranial base malignancies using expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) with particular references to surgical anatomy and nuances of hybrid cranioendoscopic techniques. Cadaveric dissections and illustrative cases are presented to detail our current surgical technique allied with tailored adjuvant therapies, and treatment strategies are further discussed based on tumor histology.

Surgical outcomes of endoscopic versus open resection for the management of sinonasal malignancies

The purpose of this review is to assess the surgical outcomes of two different treatment modalities, endoscopic and open resection, for the management of sinonasal malignancies by comparing the effectiveness of these two methods. A wide search was carried out considering various electronic databases for English language articles from 2013 to 2018 using keywords such as sinonasal malignancies, endoscopic surgery, open resection for sinonasal malignancies, and endoscopic versus open surgery. One thousand articles were identified from the literature for screening. After a thorough systematic assessment and based on the selection criteria, 10 articles with 4,642 patients were included in this quantitative analysis. With a total of 4,642 patients, 1,730 patients were operated on using endoscopic resection and 2,912 patients were operated on using open resection. The endoscopic approach was found to have a shorter hospital stay compared to open surgical resection (P<0.05). The rate of positive margins and the recurrence rate for open surgical resection were both smaller compared to those for endoscopic resection (P>0.05), and the endoscopic approach had smaller complication rates and a higher survival rate compared to open resection (P>0.05). Though endoscopic resection and open surgical resection have comparable postoperative benefits, preoperative evaluation of cases presenting with sinonasal malignancies is necessary for determining the right treatment method to obtain the best possible results postoperatively.

Comparison of Open and Endoscopic Approaches in the Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Olfactory neuroblastoma, or esthesioneuroblastoma (ENB), is an uncommon sinonasal malignancy arising from olfactory neuroepithelium that is optimally treated with surgical resection. The objective of this study is to determine preoperative predictors of undergoing open versus endoscopic approach for ENB and to investigate significant postoperative survival outcomes between the two surgical approaches.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for cases of ENB histology that were treated surgically from 2010 to 2015. Groups were stratified into open or endoscopic approach cohorts. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment modality, and 5-year overall survival were compared between the two groups using Chi-Square analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Cases were classified as Kadish stage A, B, C, or D based on the "Collaborative Stage-Extension" codes in NCDB.

RESULTS

Of 533 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 276 (51.8%) patients underwent open, and 257 (48.2%) patients underwent endoscopic surgical approaches. Patients undergoing endoscopic surgery were more likely to be Kadish stages A and B and less likely to be stages C and D (P = .020). Those undergoing endoscopic approach overall had a shorter mean hospital stay postoperatively (3.8 vs. 7.0 days, P < .001). Endoscopic cases had a greater 5-year overall survival (81.9% vs. 75.6%, P = .030); after multivariate regression, there was a trend toward survival benefit to endoscopic surgery that did not reach clinical significance (HR 0.644, [0.392-1.058], P = .083).

CONCLUSION

Although not statistically significant, there is a trend toward increased overall survival with an endoscopic approach in patients undergoing surgery for ENB as compared to an open approach, regardless of Kadish stage. An endoscopic approach is an adequate alternative to an open approach for the surgical treatment of ENB.

Reconstruction of skull base bone defects using an in situ bone flap after endoscopic endonasal transplanum-transtuberculum approaches

PURPOSE

The creation of bone flaps which can be later repositioned and fixed in situ for repairing the bone defects during the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs)-similar to transcranial craniotomies-is still a challenge. We present an in situ bone flap (ISBF) closure for the repair of bone defects after endoscopic endonasal transplanum-transtuberculum approaches (EETAs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent the EETAs between January 2016 and February 2019 was performed. According to whether or not to use ISBF for skull base reconstruction, these patients were divided into the ISBF group or the non-ISBF group.

RESULTS

Of 47 patients in the ISBF group, only one patient (2.1%) developed postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, yielding a significantly lower leakage rate in the ISBF group than in the non-ISBF group (6 of 38, 15.8%, P = 0.042). Besides, when only comparing cases of hydrocephalus in the two groups, the CSF leakage rate in the ISBF group was 8.3% (1/12), which was still significantly lower than that in the non-ISBF group (62.5%, 6/8) (P = 0.018). Postoperative CSF leakages in both groups were successfully treated with lumbar drainage alone, and no cases of injury to the internal carotid arteries or optic nerves occurred in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

An ISBF closure similar to transcranial craniotomies with repositioning bone flap in situ-is feasible, safe, and reliable. The ISBF closure combining with a pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) provides the cranial base surgeon with an additional repair method that has demonstrated effectiveness at facilitating a more stable and durable reconstruction and reducing CSF leaks.

Surgical outcomes in patients with endoscopic versus transcranial approach for skull base malignancies: a 10-year institutional experience

Object: The authors performed an extensive comparison between patients treated with open versus an endoscopic approach for skull base malignancy with emphasis on surgical outcomes.Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of 60 patients who underwent surgery for skull base malignancy between 2009 and 2018 was performed. Disease features, surgical resection, post-operative morbidities, adjuvant treatment, recurrence, and survival rates were compared between 30 patients who received purely open surgery and 30 patients who underwent purely endoscopic resection for a skull base malignancy.Results: Of the 60 patients with skull base malignancy, 30 underwent open resection and 30 underwent endoscopic resection. The most common hisotype for endoscopic resection was squamous cell carcinoma (26.7%), olfactory neuroblastoma (16.7%), and sarcoma (10.0%), and 43.3%, 13.3%, and 10.0% for the open resection cohort, respectively. There were no statistical differences in gross total resection, surgical-associated cranial neuropathy, or ability to achieve negative margins between the groups (p > 0.1, all comparisons). Patients who underwent endoscopic resection had shorter surgeries (320.3 ± 158.5 minutes vs. 495.3 ± 187.6 minutes (p = 0.0003), less intraoperative blood loss (282.2 ± 333.6 ml vs. 696.7 ± 500.2 ml (p < 0.0001), and shorter length of stay (3.5 ± 3.7 days vs. 8.8 ± 6.0 days (p < 0.0001). Additionally, patients treated endoscopically initiated adjuvant radiation treatment more quickly (48.0 ± 20.3 days vs. 72.0 ± 20.5 days (p = 0.01).Conclusions: An endoscopic endonasal approach facilitates a clinically meaningful improvement in surgical outcomes for skull base malignancies.

Management of squamous cell carcinomas of the skull-base

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to assess the recent evidence regarding the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the skull-base and to discuss the implications of these findings on clinical practice.

METHOD

Free text Medline and MeSH term search of publications relating to Squamous Cell Carcinoma & Skull-base and Skull base, Neoplasm respectively. Multidisciplinary clinical guidelines were also reviewed.

RESULTS

The primary search yielded a total of 271 papers which following initial review was reduced to 28. Secondary search yielded 56 papers. There were no randomised controlled trials relating to squamous cell carcinoma of the skull-base and as such this review is based on cohort studies, case series and expert opinion.

CONCLUSION

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common cancer occurring in the Head and Neck. Squamous cell carcinoma is also the most common cancer arising within the nose and sinuses of which skull-base squamous cell carcinoma is a rare subgroup. Evidence relating to the management and survival of skull-base SCC is based on expert opinion and. retrospective analyses Clinical examination and biopsy, imaging and a broad multidisciplinary team are key to the management of skull-base SCC. The information gathered should be used to guide informed discussion by suitably trained experts with patients regarding surgical approach, post-operative recovery and adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatments. The standard of care is currently to perform skull base resection with or without additional craniotomy, pedicled or free flap reconstruction in multiple layers and post-operative radiation (usually photons or protons). Open approaches have traditionally been the mainstay, however in certain cases endoscopic approaches can yield equivalent results and offer many advantages. Despite advances in care survival remains poor with a nearly one in five risk of nodal recurrence within two years.

ICAR: endoscopic skull-base surgery

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic skull-base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull-base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull-base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull-Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS).

METHODS

Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence-based review or evidence-based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull-base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus.

RESULTS

The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull-base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated.

CONCLUSION

A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence-based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull-base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.

Treatment-related morbidity in patients treated for sinonasal malignancy

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal malignancies are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors that often present at an advanced stage and require multimodal therapy. The presence of high-grade toxicity and sinonasal complications after treatment can negatively impact quality of life. In this study we aim to describe posttreatment morbidity in patients with sinonasal malignancy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients treated for sinonasal malignancy was conducted from 2005 to 2018 at a tertiary referral institution. A total of 129 patients met the inclusion criteria. Primary outcomes were treatment details, pathology, posttreatment complications, and radiation toxicity. Fisher's exact test, chi-square test, and Student t test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Mean age was 58.4 (median, 61; range, 19-94) years. After diagnosis, 24 patients had surgery alone, 46 had surgery with radiation alone, 47 had surgery with chemoradiation, and 14 received definitive chemoradiation. Overall, 10.4% (n = 12) of patients had postoperative complications, and 21.0% (n = 22) had high-grade (grade 3-5) radiation toxicity. After radiation, 20% (n = 21) of patients had chronic sinusitis requiring functional endoscopic sinus surgery and 20% (n = 21) had symptomatic nasal obstruction requiring operative debridement.

CONCLUSION

Sinonasal complications, including nasal obstruction and chronic sinusitis, occur frequently after definitive treatment of sinonasal malignancy and should be addressed when considering quality of life in survivors. These complications occur more frequently in patients who undergo chemoradiation as opposed to surgery alone.

Margins in Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Predictors, Outcomes, and the Endoscopic Approach

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with positive margins following surgical management of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC), especially with regard to endoscopic treatment.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of adult patients with clinically staged tumor (T)1 to T4a SNSCC within the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2004 to 2014, factors were associated with positive margins using multivariable binary logistic regression. Cases from 2010 to 2014 had surgical approach (open vs. endoscopic) available and were analyzed in a subgroup to assess the association of surgical approach with margin status. The association of margin status with overall survival (OS) and additional therapy administration was also assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 2,968 cases, of which 807 (27.2%) had positive margins. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with positive margins included higher T stage (T4a vs. T1: odds ratio [OR] 2.768 [95% CI 2.143-3.577]), less differentiated tumors (poorly differentiated vs. well differentiated: OR 1.403 [95% CI 1.060-1.856]), and tumors in the ethmoid sinus (vs. nasal cavity; OR 1.889 [95% CI 1.305-2.734]). Cases treated at higher volume facilities (HVFs) were associated with a lower likelihood of positive margins (OR 0.716 [95% CI 0.582-0.881]). Positive margins were associated with decreased OS (hazard ratio 1.672 [95% CI 1.464-1.908]) and an increased rate of additional therapy (OR 1.966 [95% confidence interval 1.597-2.421]). An endoscopic approach was not associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining positive margins (vs. open; OR 1.151 [0.903-1.651]).

CONCLUSION

Positive margins were less likely when performed at HVFs and more likely in the ethmoid sinus than other subsites. Importantly, there was no association between positive margins and surgical approach. Endoscopic surgery may offer a safe, less invasive alternative to open surgery for select patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 130:E388-E396, 2020.

Radiofrequency Coblation-Assisted Resection of Skull Base Neoplasms Using an Endoscopic Endonasal Approach

OBJECTIVES

We describe our early experiences with resecting skull base tumors using a radiofrequency ablation-assisted endoscopic endonasal approach. Ninety-seven patients with skull base tumors who were admitted to the Otorhinolaryngology department at Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital between January 2014 and December 2016 were operated on using a radiofrequency ablation-assisted endoscopic endonasal approach. Complete resection was achieved in all patients. This paper describes the operative technique and presents the degree of resection, complications, and early clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We investigated the safety and feasibility of the technique and assessed preliminary treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

No patients experienced a new neurological deficit, cerebrospinal fluid leak, or meningitis after surgery. No deaths related to skull base tumors were observed during the follow-up period (14-50 months). The volume of intraoperative blood loss was 100-1,200 mL (median 350 mL), the duration of operation was 40-510 min (median 180 min), and the hospital stay was 6-65 days (median 18).

CONCLUSIONS

Our limited experience indicates that this technique is feasible and safe for complete resection of some skull base tumors in selected cases and in the future will have an increasing role to play in endoscopic sinonasal and skull base tumor dissection.

Prognostic Factors in Paranasal Sinus Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma: A SEER Database Analysis

Background  Outcome studies on sinonasal malignancy are limited to retrospective case series, often with inclusion of diverse histology and short follow-up. The objective of this study was to identify key predictive variables that independently impact survival for paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) and to compare these variables in the context of these two distinct clinicopathologic entities. Methods:  Analysis was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1973 to 2012 to identify key variables that impact survival for SCC and AC. Results  A total of 3,714 cases were included. There were 2,895 SCC cases and 819 AC cases. The mean age at diagnosis was 64.1 years. The male to female ratio for SCC and AC was 1.85 and 1.04, respectively. Patients with SCC and AC were most often diagnosed with stage IV disease in 61.8 and 63.4% of cases, respectively. The majority of patients received combined surgery and radiation (52% for SCC and 43.1% for AC). For SCC, increased age ( p  < 0.001) and stage ( p  < 0.001) were negative predictors, and surgery improved survival ( p  < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. For AC, prognostic factors associated with worse survival include increased age ( p  < 0.001) and grade ( p  < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. Overall survival was significantly higher in AC compared with SCC at 5 years ( p  = 0.001). Conclusion  SCC and AC of the paranasal sinuses are both aggressive malignancies with poor survival. For both histological subtypes, increased age predicts worse survival and grade also closely links to survival in AC. These data have important potential implications for treatment planning and pretreatment counseling.

Avoiding complications in endoscopic skull base surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic skull base surgery has become an established approach for the removal of tumors and cerebrospinal fluid fistulae repair. Compared with external approaches, it provides better aesthetic results and quality of life postoperatively. However, as it becomes popular and expands its indications possible complications should be reassessed in terms of incidence and variability in order to confirm its efficacy and safety. This article reviews the recent literature describing the main categories of possible complications suggesting strategies to minimize their incidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Detailed preoperative planning based on imaging and histology can prevent major complications. Intraoperative use of image guidance and meticulous hemostasis provide the surgical field needed to avoid complications. Postoperative patient counseling, along with close and detailed nasal postoperative care are significant factors for an optimal outcome.

SUMMARY

Monitoring of complications after endoscopic skull base surgery is necessary in order to standardize protocols of management and improve our surgical techniques. The presence of late onset complications underlines the need of a special focus in postoperative care and follow-up.

Utility of early postoperative imaging after combined endoscopic and open ventral skull base surgery

PURPOSE

Immediate postoperative imaging is frequently obtained after combined skull base surgery (SBS) with endoscopic endonasal and open transcranial approaches. The importance of early postoperative imaging for detecting complications in these patients is still debatable. In this study, we investigated the clinical utility of early postoperative imaging after combined SBS for determination of postoperative complications.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis of 21 cases of combined SBS between 2009 and 2015 was performed. Data on postoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the hospital course were collected. We separated interpretations of postoperative imaging into two groups: (1) when using the radiologist's interpretation alone, and (2) when using the surgeon's knowledge of the case in conjunction with imaging.

RESULTS

Forty-two postoperative scans were obtained (21 CT, 21 MRI) within 48 hours of surgery. There was a significant statistical difference between imaging interpretation by surgeons and radiologists for CT interpretation only. For CT interpretation the true positive (TP), false positive (FP), true negative (TN), and false negative (FN) rates for radiologists (TP, 0/21; FP, 6/21; TN, 11/21; FN, 4/21) slightly deviated from surgeons' interpretation (TP, 1/21 [p = 0.9999]; FP, 0/21 [p = 0.0207]; TN, 17/21 [p = 0.1000]; FN, 3/21 [p = 1.000]). Rates for MRI interpretation by both groups were nearly identical, with no significant difference found. Overall, four patients experienced seven postoperative complications, which led to a complication rate of 19.0% (4/21). The patients exhibited clinical symptoms in all instances of postoperative complications that required further intervention.

CONCLUSION

The benefit of early postoperative imaging to detect complications after combined SBS was limited. In this cohort of patients, positive imaging findings' effects on patient management were dictated by the presence of supporting clinical symptoms.

Management of Skull Base Defects After Surgical Resection of Sinonasal and Ventral Skull Base Malignancies

Over the past 2 decades, there has been a significant increase in the resection of larger and more complex ventral skull base malignancies. The resection of these lesions has resulted in the creation of larger and more difficult to repair skull base defects. There are many available options for ventral skull base reconstruction. Despite the variety of reconstructive options, the key objective is to eliminate any communication between the intracranial space and the sinonasal cavity. This article discusses some of the more common techniques currently used for repair of these skull base defects.

Combined Endoscopic and Open Approaches in the Management of Sinonasal and Ventral Skull Base Malignancies

Combined transcranial and endoscopic endonasal approaches remain useful in the treatment of ventral skull base malignancies. The extended bifrontal transbasal approach provides wide access to the anterior ventral skull base and paranasal sinuses without transfacial incisions. In more extensive lesions, the bifrontal transbasal approach can then be combined with an endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) from below. This article reviews the indications, surgical technique, and operative nuances of combined transbasal and EEA (cranionasal) approaches for the surgical management of ventral skull base malignancies.

Endoscopic Resection of Sinonasal and Ventral Skull Base Malignancies

The transnasal endoscopic resection of ventral skull base lesions represents a safe and effective method for the surgical management of sinonasal and ventral skull base malignancies in carefully selected cases. The goal of surgery is complete removal of all tumor with negative resection margins while maintaining the key oncological principles. Careful selection of cases along with the presence of an experienced surgeon and a fully involved multidisciplinary skull base team trained in the management of ventral skull base neoplasm are essential for excellent outcomes.

Development of minimally invasive surgery for sinonasal malignancy

Sinonasal malignancies are rare and histologically heterogeneous. Treatment is complicated by tumor aggressiveness and location near critical anatomic structures (orbita, skull base, etc.). This low incidence and histologic diversity make prospective studies unfeasible, and thus therapeutic guidelines difficult to establish. The gold standard for surgery is a transfacial approach, with craniofacial resection in case of skull-base involvement. However, these techniques are associated with non-negligible perioperative morbidity. In the past two decades, endoscopic surgery has made major progress, extending its indications: initially developed for functional sinus surgery, it is now applied in benign skull-base pathologies (CSF leakage, meningocele, etc.) and, more recently, in sinonasal malignancy. Literature analysis shows a significant decrease in morbidity and improved quality of life associated with endoscopic endonasal surgery, with oncologic safety and efficacy in well-selected cases, although dependent on operator experience. Additional studies with longer follow-up and comparison between histologic subtypes will be needed.

An Algorithm for Surgical Approach to the Anterior Skull Base

OBJECTIVE

To characterize our experience with the surgical management of anterior skull base malignancy, and to propose an algorithm for surgical approach to anterior skull base malignancies.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic cranial base center.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-seven patients who underwent resection of paranasal sinus or anterior skull base malignancy with an endoscopic, cranioendoscopic, or traditional anterior craniofacial approach.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Complications, recurrence, and survival.

RESULTS

There were 48 males and 19 females, ranging from 6 to 88 years old. There were three groups: endonasal endoscopic resection (n = 10), cranioendoscopic resection (n = 12), and traditional craniofacial resection (n = 45). The most common tumor pathologies included esthesioneuroblastoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. Patients with T3/T4 disease were less likely to undergo endoscopic resection (p = 0.007). The 5-year disease-free survival was 82.1% overall, with no statistically significant differences among approaches. There were no differences in orbital complications, meningitis, or cerebrospinal fluid leak. Use of a transfacial incisions predisposed patients to surgical site infection and sinocutaneous fistulae. An algorithm for surgical approach was developed based on these results.

CONCLUSION

Sinonasal and skull base malignancies can be safely surgically addressed via several approaches. Surgical approach should be selected algorithmically based on preoperative clinical assessment of the tumor and known postoperative complication rates.

Endoscopic Endonasal Anterior Skull Base Surgery: A Systematic Review of Complications During the Past 65 Years

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic skull base surgery is becoming more popular as an approach to the anterior skull base for tumors and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) fistulae. It offers the advantages of better cosmesis and improved quality of life after surgery. We reviewed the complication rates reported in the literature.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in the electronic database Ovid MEDLINE (1950 to August 25, 2015) with the search item "([Anterior] AND Skull base surgery) AND endoscopic."

RESULTS

We identified 82 relevant studies that included 7460 cases. An average overall complication rate of 17.1% (range 0%-68.0%) and a mortality rate of 0.4% (0%-10.0%) were demonstrated in a total of 82 studies that included 7460 cases. The average CSF leak rate for all studies was 8.9% (0%-40.0%) with meningiomas and clival lesions having the greatest CSF leak rates. The most frequent benign pathology encountered was pituitary adenomas (n = 3720, 49.8% of all cases) and the most frequent malignant tumor was esthesioneuroblastoma (n = 120, 1.6% of all cases). Studies that included only CSF fistula repairs had a lower average total complication rate (12.9%) but a greater rate of meningitis compared with studies that reported mixed pathology (2.4% vs. 1.3%). A trend towards a lower total complication rate with increasing study size was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic approach is an increasingly accepted technique for anterior skull base tumor surgery and is associated with acceptable complication rates. Increasing experience with this technique can decrease rates of complications.

Sinonasal malignancies: A population-based analysis of site-specific incidence and survival

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Sinonasal malignancies vary in behavior according to histology and anatomical location. Incidence, survival, and optimal treatment for these lesions are thus uncertain in various cases. Our objective was to utilize a national population-based registry to identify the most common sinonasal histopathologies by anatomical site, and subsequently analyze the data by incidence trends, survival rates, patient demographics, and treatment modalities.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of the United States National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry.

METHODS

The SEER database was examined for patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignancies between 1973 and 2011. Data were stratified according to anatomical site, incidence, survival, histology, staging, and patient demographics. Therapy-based outcomes were analyzed for cases from 1983 to 2011.

RESULTS

A total of 13,295 patients were identified, with an incidence of 0.83 per 100,000 people. Males comprised 58.6% of cases. Whites represented 81.5% of cases, while blacks comprised 8.7%. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common histology (41.9%) across all sites of the sinonasal tract. The most common anatomical site of malignancy was the nasal cavity (45.7%), and least common was the frontal sinus (1.2%). For single sites, 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was highest for nasal cavity tumors (67.1%) and lowest for overlapping sinus malignancies (37.6%). The overall 5-year DSS for all sinonasal malignancies was 53.7%.

CONCLUSION

Sinonasal malignancies are rare entities with poor overall prognosis. By anatomical site, prognosis is best for nasal cavity cancers and worst for overlapping lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Immediate and Delayed Complications Following Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Objectives To characterize the temporal distribution and resolution rate of postoperative complications from endoscopic skull base surgery. Design Retrospective review of patients undergoing endoscopic resection of paranasal sinus or skull base neoplasm from 2007 to 2013. Setting Massachusetts General Hospital/Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary Cranial Base Center. Participants Fifty-eight consecutive patients. Main Outcome Measures Postoperative complications were categorized as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, pituitary, orbital, intracranial, or sinonasal. Complications were temporally categorized as "perioperative" (within 1 week), "early" (after 1 week and within 6 months), or "delayed" (after 6 months). Results The most common perioperative complications were diabetes insipidus (19.0%), CSF leak (5.2%), and meningitis (5.2%), with resolution rates of 75%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Overall, CSF leak occurred in 13.8% of patients and resolved in all cases. A total of 53.8% of all complications were evident within 1 week of surgery. Chronic rhinosinusitis was the most common delayed complication (3.4%). Hypopituitarism and delayed complications were less likely to resolve (p = 0.014 and p = 0.080, respectively). Conclusions Monitoring of complications after endoscopic skull base surgery should focus on neurologic complications and CSF leak in the early postoperative period and development of chronic rhinosinusitis in the long term. Late-onset complications and hypopituitarism are less likely to resolve.

Modified subtotal-Lothrop procedure for extended frontal sinus and anterior skull-base access: a case series

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) is well established for resistant frontal sinus disease and anterior skull base (ASB) exposure. However, this technique may be unnecessarily aggressive by removing avoidable sinonasal structures in select cases. Previously, in a cadaveric study, we proposed a modification of the EMLP, termed the modified subtotal-Lothrop procedure (MSLP), to access the ASB and to address complex frontal sinus disease, for which access to the bilateral frontal sinus posterior table is required. This study provides a step-by-step description of this technique, and presents our experience in 5 patients who underwent this approach.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at a tertiary referral center on all patients undergoing endoscopic ASB resection and complex frontal sinus surgeries between May 2011 and May 2013. Of 8 patients identified who underwent an MSLP, 5 had at least 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients underwent successful ASB exposure via the MSLP without complications and preservation of one frontal sinus recess. Adequate access to the bilateral posterior frontal sinus table was achieved in all cases. A patent frontal sinus drainage pathway could be assessed endoscopically after a mean follow-up of 18.6 (range, 12-27) months.

CONCLUSION

The MSLP is a feasible approach for exposure of the ASB and accessing complex frontal sinus pathology. This modification provides adequate ASB exposure and surgical maneuverability similar to the EMLP, while preserving one frontal sinus recess. This modification was successful in providing adequate exposure and maneuverability as well as maintaining frontal sinus patency in this small cohort.

Endoscopic nonembolized resection of an extensive sinonasal cavernous hemangioma: A case report and literature review

Sinonasal hemangiomas, although rare, must be considered in the evaluation of intranasal masses with profuse epistaxis. Although the availability of literature discussing cavernous hemangiomas in this location is limited, there have been no case reports of exclusively soft tissue sinonasal cavernous hemangiomas extending to the anterior skull base (ASB) that were resected purely endoscopically. Here, we describe the successful endoscopic resection of an extensive right sinonasal cavernous hemangioma extending to but not invading the ASB. Although highly vascular, in select cases, these tumors can be successfully resected endoscopically without embolization by experienced endoscopic sinus and skull base surgeons.

Porcine small intestine submucosal grafts for post-tumor resection orbital reconstruction

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Removal of the medial orbital wall for sinonasal tumor involvement is required to obtain complete oncologic resection. However, orbital fat herniation can produce significant morbidity, including enophthalmos and diplopia. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate outcomes following use of porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) grafts for orbital reconstruction following extirpation of sinonasal malignancies.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series in a tertiary hospital setting.

METHODS

Review of prospectively collected data regarding orbital reconstruction using SIS was performed. Demographics, tumor histology, size of orbital defect, adjuvant treatment, clinical status, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (average age, 58 years; range, 27-82 years) had SIS grafting of the medial orbital wall over a 5-year period at our tertiary academic institution. The average orbital wall defect size was 4.6 cm(2) (range, 1 cm(2)-24 cm(2)). Tumor histopathology included esthesioneuroblastoma (n = 5), squamous cell carcinoma (n = 4), adenocarcinoma (n = 2), sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (n = 2), melanoma (n = 3), and neuroendocrine carcinoma (n = 1). Surgical goals were curative intent in all patients. Ten patients had postoperative radiation therapy, whereas five individuals had surgical extirpation following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation. All patients had complete locoregional control at last clinical follow-up (average, 16 months; range, 2-54 months), although three patients developed distant metastases. The only orbital complications noted were enophthalmos (n = 1), periorbital cellulitis (n = 1), and orbital wall crusting (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

SIS reconstruction of orbital wall defects was effective in the current series of patients, with only one patient developing noticeable enophthalmos and a low incidence of surgical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Early harvesting of the vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap during endoscopic skull base surgery

PURPOSE

The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) represents a successful option for reconstruction of large skull base defects after expanded endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA). This vascularized flap can be harvested early or late in the operation depending on the anticipation of high-flow CSF leaks. Each harvesting technique (early vs. late) is associated with different advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we evaluate our experience with early harvesting of the PNSF for repair of large skull base defects after EEA.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at a tertiary care medical center on patients who underwent early PNSF harvesting during reconstruction of intraoperative high-flow CSF leaks after EEA between December 2008 and March 2012. Demographic data, repair materials, surgical approach, and incidence of PNSF usage were collected.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. In 86 procedures (98.9%), the PNSF harvested at the beginning of the operation was used. In 1 case (1.1%), the PNSF was not used because a high-flow intraoperative CSF leak was not encountered. This patient had recurrence of intradural disease 8months later, and the previously elevated PNSF was subsequent used after tumor resection.

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, a high-flow CSF leak and need for a PNSF can be accurately anticipated in patients undergoing EEA for skull base lesions. Because of the advantages of early harvesting of the PNSF and the high preoperative predictive value of CSF leak anticipations, this technique represents a feasible harvesting practice for EEA surgeries.

Challenges and surgical nuances in reconstruction of large planum sphenoidale tuberculum sellae defects after endoscopic endonasal resection of parasellar skull base tumors

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Endoscopic endonasal transplanum transtuberculum (EETT) resection of parasellar skull base (SB) tumors often results in large SB defects with intraoperative high-flow cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks. Reconstruction of these defects can be challenging because of the large defects size, communication with the suprasellar cistern, and close proximity to the optic nerves and chiasm. Recent studies have postulated that transplanum defects may be associated with increased postoperative CSF leakage. We review our experience with reconstruction of transplanum defects after EETT resection of parasellar SB tumors. Challenges encountered during these repairs and our operative nuances for successful reconstruction are discussed.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed between March 2010 and February 2012 on patients undergoing reconstruction of transplanum defects after EETT resection of parasellar SB tumors. Repair materials, defect sizes, postoperative CSF leakage, postoperative CSF diversion, and demographic data were collected.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients who underwent 22 repairs with a pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF) were identified. The mean age was 47.6 years (range, 12-68 years). Average defect size was 5.6 cm(2) (range, 2.2-10.4 cm(2)). Three failed repairs necessitated a revision procedure. All three revisions were successfully reconstructed with the previously used PNSF. The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months (range, 1-26 months). The overall success rate was 86.4% for transplanum defects alone, as compared to 97.0% for our comprehensive PNSF experience in 99 repairs.

CONCLUSION

Repair of large transplanum defects after EETT resection of parasellar SB tumors presents a unique challenge. Using a PNSF along with meticulous multilayer closure may help decrease postoperative CSF leaks.

Celebrating the golden anniversary of anterior skull base surgery: reflections on the past 50 years and its historical evolution

With its inception nearly half a century ago through the pioneering work of Dandy, McLean, and Smith, anterior skull base (ASB) surgery is a relatively young discipline. It became a distinct entity in 1963 when Ketcham popularized the combined transcranial transfacial approach for en bloc resection of tumors of the paranasal sinuses extending into the anterior cranial fossa. However, because these procedures resulted in major morbidities and mortalities, alternative modes of treatment were sought. Since the 1970s, the introduction and promotion of the surgical endoscope by Messerklinger, Stammberger, and Kennedy, commenced the era of endoscopic sinus surgery. Thaler and colleagues described the utility of the endoscope for ASB surgery at the turn of the century. This allowed direct visualization and safer, more accurate removal of tumors. In 2001, Casiano reported the first purely endoscopic endonasal ASB resection, a novel technique that has been adopted by major skull base centers. The success of ASB surgery can be attributed to both the development of the skull base team as well as improvements in surgical techniques, instrumentation, and visualization technology. In this article, we review the historical evolution of ASB surgery as we approach the 50th anniversary since its recognition as a distinct entity.