Purely endoscopic endonasal surgery of the craniovertebral junction: A systematic review

Approaching Intradural Lesions of the Anterior Foramen Magnum and Craniocervical Junction: Anatomical Comparison of the Open Posterolateral and Anterior Extended Endonasal Endoscopic Approaches

BACKGROUND

Lesions of the foramen magnum (FM) and craniocervical junction area are traditionally managed surgically through anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral skull-base approaches. This anatomical study aimed to compare the usefulness of a modified extended endoscopic approach, the so-called far-medial endonasal approach (FMEA), versus the traditional posterolateral far-lateral approach (FLA).

METHODS

Ten fixed silicon-injected heads specimens were used in the Skull Base ENT-Neurosurgery Laboratory of the University Hospital of Strasbourg, France. A total of 20 FLAs and 10 FMEAs were realized. A high-resolution computed tomography scan was performed for quantitative analysis of the different approaches. The analysis aimed to estimate the extent of surgical exposure and freedom of movement (maneuverability) through the operating channel using a polygonal surface model to obtain a morphometric estimation of the area of interest (surface and volume) on postdissection computed tomography scans using Slicer 3D software.

RESULTS

FMEA allows for a more direct route to the anterior FM, with wider brainstem exposure compared with the FLA and an excellent visualization of all anterior midline structures. The limitations of the FMEA include the deep and narrow surgical corridor and difficulty in reaching lesions located laterally over the jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal.

CONCLUSIONS

The FMEA and FLA are both effective surgical routes to reach FM and craniocervical junction lesions. Modern skull base surgeons should have a good command of both because they appear complementary. This anatomical study provides the tools for comprehensive preoperative evaluations and selection of the most appropriate surgical approach.

Clinical considerations for open versus endoscopic approaches in skull base surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to distill the current body of evidence to consider when selecting an endoscopic versus open approach to address cranial base disease. We evaluate the evolution of modern surgical techniques and their respective limitations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Greater understanding of the role of tumor biology in relation to patient outcomes has led to increasingly sophisticated treatment algorithms. This combined with further development of advanced instrumentation and technique has led to the adoption of new surgical corridors previously unapproachable via traditional surgery.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic and open craniofacial approaches both remain important surgical techniques in the management of cranial base tumors. The modern skull base surgeon may employ a combination of approaches to optimize tumor extirpation while preserving functional outcomes. Patient history, anatomic tumor extent, histology, and functional goals should be considered thoroughly when planning any surgical intervention.

Endoscopic endonasal approach to the craniovertebral junction

The surgical approach to lesions of the ventral craniovertebral junction (CVJ) has evolved significantly in the last several years with the advent of endoscopic skull base surgery. Differing pathologies of the CVJ can result in irreducible compression of the cervicomedullary region. The endoscopic endonasal approach lends itself well to this region due to the ventral location, and while there is a steep learning curve, is a safe and effective way to perform decompression of the cervicomedullary region. Herein, we discuss the anatomy of the CVJ, preoperative evaluation and surgical considerations, our surgical approach, complications, and outcomes.

Endoscopic Endonasal Versus Transoral Odontoidectomy for Non-Neoplastic Craniovertebral Junction Disease: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Odontoidectomy is a challenging yet effective operation for decompression of non-neoplastic craniovertebral junction disease. Though both the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and the transoral approach (TOA) have been discussed in the literature, there remain few direct comparisons between the techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the perioperative outcomes of EEA vs TOA odontoidectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all cases undergoing odontoidectomy by either the EEA or TOA was performed. Attention was paid to the need for prolonged nutritional support, prolonged respiratory support, and hospitalization times.

RESULTS

During the study period between 2000 and 2018, 25 patients underwent odontoid process resection (18 TOA and 7 EEA). The most common indication for surgery was basilar invagination. Hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and intubation days were all significantly shorter in the EEA group compared to the TOA group (P < .01, P = .01, P < .01, respectively). Prolonged nutritional support in the form of a gastrostomy tube was required in 5 patients and tracheostomy was required in 4 patients; all of these underwent odontoidectomy by the TOA. There was no statistical difference in neurological outcomes between the EEA and TOA groups (P = .17).

CONCLUSION

Odontoidectomy can be performed safely through both the EEA and TOA. The results of this study suggest the EEA has shorter hospitalizations and a lower probability of requiring prolonged nutritional support. These advantages are likely the results of decreased oropharyngeal mucosa disruption as compared to the TOA.

Modern endoscopic skull base neurosurgery

INTRODUCTION

Since the early use of the endoscopic view for treating simple intrasellar pituitary adenomas, the skull base surgery has experienced an unprecedented revolution elevating the treatment of skull base lesions to the next level in proficiency and excellence of care.

METHODS

We have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of the endoscope in the treatment of skull base lesions. In this article, we aim to discuss and provide a wide view of the current indications and future perspectives of the endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) and of the endoscopic transcranial approaches.

RESULTS

As in the development of any other technique, EEA have gone through a transformation process from theoretical anatomic models to a pragmatic clinical use. Along the way, EEA have required several modifications, as well as pushbacks in the application of this technique in some indications. This process has resulted in the provision of an additional tool to the current surgical armamentarium that allows the skull base surgeon to face most challenging lesions along the skull base.

CONCLUSIONS

The judicious combination of transcranial and endoscopic-transnasal approaches warrants highest chances of achieving satisfactory tumors resection with a reduced risk of complications.

Retro-Odontoid Pseudotumor Formation in the Context of Various Acquired and Congenital Pathologies of the Craniovertebral Junction and Surgical Techniques

Retro-odontoid pseudotumor formation consists of an abnormal growth of granulation tissue typically posterior to the odontoid process, resulting as a manifestation of atlantoaxial instability. This instability can occur as a result of conditions ranging from severe mechanical trauma to metabolic disease or autoimmune conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. A pseudotumor may impinge on the spinal nerves or even the spinal cord and brainstem, manifesting symptoms from severe neck pain to cervicomedullary compression or myelopathy, and in some cases even sudden death. The objective of this review is to consolidate the findings in published case reports and relevant prior literature reviews regarding the formation of retro-odontoid pseudotumor. We address the pathophysiology involved in acquired and congenital pseudotumor formation, including those associated with rheumatoid arthritis (panni). Additionally, we discuss past and current operative techniques designed to curtail and ultimately regress a retro-odontoid pseudotumor and pannus. Surgical techniques that are addressed include ventral decompression (both transoral and transnasal), dorsal decompression, and indications for posterior instrumentation in pannus formation, particularly in cases that may be sufficiently treated in lieu of an anterior approach. Finally, we will examine the role of external orthoses as both a method of conservative treatment as well as a potential adjunct to the aforementioned surgical procedures.

Navigation-Guided Measurement of the Inferior Limit Through the Endonasal Route to the Craniovertebral Junction

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) has been accepted as an alternative option for diseases at the craniovertebral junction. However, the inferior destination through the endoscopic endonasal approach is anatomically higher than that of the transoral approach. Therefore, preoperative assessment of accessibility is mandatory for appropriate selection of indication. Using a navigation system, we examined the inferior limit through the endonasal route and evaluated the relationships between surrounding anatomicl structures and the lowest point.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for intrasellar lesions at our hospital (N = 23). At the start of surgery, the lowest point (target point [TP]) was marked with a straight probe under guidance of the navigation system. We measured 4 parameters on preoperative computed tomography: nasal length, hard palate length, anterior-posterior diameter of the nasopharynx, and nasopalatine angle. Patients were classified into groups depending on whether the TP was at or above (group A) or below (group B) the hard palatine line.

RESULTS

TPs were above the hard palatine line in 15 patients (group A) and below the hard palatine line in 8 patients (group B). No TPs reached the nasopalatine line. Nasal length (P = 0.03) and nasopalatine angle (P = 0.01) were larger in group B than in group A. There were no significant differences in anterior-posterior diameter of the nasopharynx or hard palate length.

CONCLUSIONS

The hard palatine line is a reliable parameter for assessing the inferior limit of the endoscopic endonasal approach. Nostril size affects accessibility with surgical instruments.

[Anatomy of anterior craniovertebral junction in endoscopic transnasal approach]

Modern achievements in endoscopic technologies ensure extending the indications for endoscopic transnasal approach in skull base surgery. Knowledge on topographic anatomy of craniovertebral junction is a prerequisite for surgical interventions in this area. Transnasal endoscopic surgery of craniovertebral junction is a relatively new field. Therefore, this manuscript and similar anatomical studies are extremely important for neurosurgeons.

Anatomical Aspects of the Transnasal Endoscopic Access to the Craniovertebral Junction

OBJECTIVE

Interest in endoscopic transnasal access has increased with continued technological advances in endoscopic technology. The goals of this study were to review the normal anatomy in transnasal endoscopic neurosurgery and outline the anatomical basis for an expanded surgical approach. Defining anatomical aspects of surgical endoscopy helps guide the surgeon by defining normal anatomy of the access vector.

METHODS

This anatomic study was conducted on 15 adult male cadaver specimens using various microsurgical tools and endoscopic instruments and 1 intraoperative case. The vasculature was injected with colored silicone to aid visualization. Different transnasal approach techniques were used, with angles of endoscope access at 0°, 30°, 45°, and 70° accordingly for extensive anatomical mapping.

RESULTS

The proximity of critical structures is different in each approach degree. A full understanding of the possible structures to be met during transnasal access is described. As a result of the study, anatomical aspects and important structures were outlined, and a surgical protocol was defined for minimal risk access in respect to normal anatomy of the area.

CONCLUSIONS

Thorough knowledge of topographic anatomy of the craniovertebral junction is required for performing minimal-risk surgical intervention in this region. It is important to know all anatomical aspects of the transnasal approach in order to reduce the risk of damage to vital structures. Transnasal endoscopic surgery of the craniovertebral junction is a relatively new direction in neurosurgery; therefore, anatomical studies such as the one described in this article are extremely important for the development of this access method.

A Dual Approach for the Management of Complex Craniovertebral Junction Abnormalities: Endoscopic Endonasal Odontoidectomy and Posterior Decompression with Fusion

BACKGROUND

Ventral brainstem compression secondary to complex craniovertebral junction abnormality is an infrequent cause of neurologic deterioration in pediatric patients. However, in cases of symptomatic, irreducible ventral compression, 360° decompression of the brainstem supported by posterior stabilization may provide the best opportunity for improvement in symptoms. More recently, the endoscopic endonasal corridor has been proposed as an alternative method of odontoidectomy associated with less morbidity. We report the largest single case series of pediatric patients using this dual-intervention surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of pediatric patients who underwent posterior occipitocervical decompression and instrumentation followed by endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy performed to relieve neurologic impingement involving the ventral brainstem and craniocervical junction.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and February 2017, 7 patients underwent posterior instrumented fusion followed by endonasal endoscopic odontoidectomy at our unit. Standardized clinical and radiological parameters were assessed before and after surgery. A univariate analysis was performed to assess clinical and radiologic improvement after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 14 operations were performed on 7 pediatric patients. One patient had Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, 1 patient had a Chiari 1 malformation, and the remaining 5 patients had Chiari 1.5 malformations. Average extubation day was postoperative day 0.9. Average day of initiation of postoperative feeds was postoperative day 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy and posterior decompression and fusion for complex craniovertebral compression is a safe and effective procedure that appears to be well tolerated in the pediatric population.

Endoscopic Endonasal Approaches for Treatment of Craniovertebral Junction Tumours

Tumours involving the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) are challenging because of their local invasiveness and high recurrence rates, as well as their proximity to critical neurovascular structures and the difficulty of reconstructing the resulting skull base defect at this site. Several surgical techniques are currently available to access these lesions, including the far lateral, extreme lateral, direct lateral, transcervical, transoral and transnasal approaches. In this paper, application of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the treatment of CVJ tumours is analysed. The indications, contraindications, preoperative workup, step-by-step surgical technique, skull base reconstruction options and postoperative management are described. The advantages and limitations of the EEA are also discussed. Finally, a systematic review of the literature is provided to elucidate the levels of evidence supporting the use of the EEA in this field. Employment of this approach to the CVJ has contributed to high success rates in achieving gross total resection of tumours and improvement in neurological symptoms. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates are acceptable, with cerebrospinal fluid leakage being the major concern (with a 17-25% incidence). Moreover, in comparison with traditional approaches to the CVJ, the EEA provides lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and respiratory complications. Use of the EEA for treatment of CVJ tumours appears to be a rational alternative to the conventional transoral, transcranial and transcervical approaches in selected cases. Multidisciplinary teamwork including different specialists-such as medical and radiation oncologists, radiologists, otorhinolaryngologists and neurosurgeons-is strongly recommended for the purpose of offering the best treatment strategy for the patient.

Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of the Odontoid Process in a Patient with Chronic Injury of the C1 Transverse Ligament

Atlas dislocation after transverse ligament injury is one of the most rare types of trauma to the upper cervical level. If magnetic resonance imaging of the craniovertebral junction reveals the Kassam line passing through the cervix of the odontoid process, a transnasal approach can be used for surgical treatment. Here, we present a case in which an endoscopic endonasal approach was used to treat chronic traumatic transligamentous atlas dislocation. A 26-year-old male underwent two-stage surgical treatment; during the first stage, posterior decompression and fixation were performed under halo immobilization. In the second stage, a transnasal endoscopic approach to the odontoid process was used. A transnasal approach permitted complete decompression of the medulla oblongata and facilitated early extubation of the patient without any postoperative complications such as respiratory or pharyngopalatine deficiency. The patient was discharged in good condition 9 days after the surgery.

Endoscopic Transseptal Approach with Posterior Nasal Spine Removal: A Wide Surgical Corridor to the Craniovertebral Junction and Odontoid: Technical Note and Case Series

BACKGROUND

The transnasal approach to lesions involving the craniovertebral junction represents a technical challenge because of limited inferior exposure. The endoscopic transseptal approach (EtsA) with posterior nasal spine (PNS) removal is described. This technique can create a wide exposure of the craniovertebral junction, thereby increasing the caudal exposure.

METHODS

On patients undergoing anterior craniovertebral junction decompression, we calculated the degree of exposure on the sagittal plan through a paraseptal route, an EtsA without and with PNS removal. The horizontal exposure and working area with the latter approach were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Five patients underwent the transnasal procedure. The age of patients ranged from 34-71 years. All patients harbored basilar impression. The mean postoperative Nurick grade (1, 8) was improved versus the average preoperative grade (3). The average follow-up duration was 16 months. All patients underwent occipitocervical fixation. The mean vertical distances, from the clinoid recess to the inferior most limit with the paraseptal approach, EtsA without and with PNS removal were 38.52, 44.12, and 51.16 mm, respectively. The difference between our approach and a standard paraseptal route was statistically significant (P = 0.041; P< 0.05). The mean horizontal distances were 31.68 mm (mononostril entry) and 35.37 mm (binostril entry). The mean working area was 1795.53 mm².

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic endonasal approaches to the craniovertebral junction are increasing, but the downward extension on the anterior cervical spine represents a limit. Therefore, many surgeons prefer transoral or transcervical approaches. The EtsA with PNS removal allows for a more caudal exposure than the standard paraseptal approach, with reduced nasal trauma.

The endoscopic endonasal approach to cranio-cervical junction: the complete panel

We aim to establish a complete summary on the Endoscopic Endonasal Approach (EEA) to Cranio Cervical Junction (CCJ): evolution since first description, criteria to predict the feasibility and limitations, anatomical landmarks, indications and biomechanical evaluation after performing the approach. A comprehensive literature search to identify all available literature published between March 2002 and June 2015, the articles were divided into four categories according to their main purpose: 1- surgical technique, 2- anatomical landmarks and limitations, 3- literature reviews to identify main indications, 4- biomechanical studies. Thereafter, we demonstrate the approach step-by-step, using 1 fresh and 3 silicon injected embalmed cadaveric specimen heads. 61 articles and one poster were identified. The approach was first described on cadaveric study in 2002, and firstly used to perform odontoidectomy in 2005. The main indication is odontoid rheumatoid pannus and basilar invagination. The nasopalatine line (NPL), the superior nostril-hard palate Line (SN-HP), the naso-axial line (NAxL), the rhinopalatine Line (RPL) and other methods were described to predict the anatomical feasibility of the approach. The craniocervical fusion is potentially unnecessary after removal of < 75% of one occipital condyle. A recent cadaveric study stated the possibility of C1-C2 fusion via EEA. This paper reviews all available clinical and anatomical studies on the EEA to CCJ. The approach marked a significant evolution since its first description in 2002. Because of its lesser complications compared to the transoral approach, the EEA became when feasible, the approach of choice to the ventral CCJ.

Endonasal Endoscopic Odontoidectomy in Ventral Diseases of the Craniocervical Junction: Results of a Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, supported by preliminary anatomic and clinical studies exploring its feasibility and safety, experience has increased of the use of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to ventral diseases at the craniocervical junction (CCJ).

METHODS

A multicenter study was carried out over a 4-year period of 14 patients managed by EEA odontoidectomy for CCJ diseases causing irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. The surgical setup included an IGS system based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance images fusion, and 0° and 30° angled endoscopes with dedicated endoscopic tools.

RESULTS

Nine men and 5 women, with a mean age of 60.7 years, were included. The mean follow-up was 28.5 months; 9 patients had basilar impression, whereas 5 had a degenerative pannus. The quality of anterior decompression was excellent in all cases; nonetheless, a posterior stabilization was deemed necessary in 13 patients, and no external orthosis was used during the postoperative course. No tracheostomy or gastrostomy was required after surgery; no deaths, no new neurologic deficits/complications, and no postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak were recorded. At follow-up, the neurologic status assessed with Frankel grade did not deteriorate in any of the patients but improved in 13 of them; and no new listhesis was shown on neuroradiologic follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show that EEA provides a direct surgical corridor to the CCJ, allowing an adequate decompression as with the more invasive transoral route. Morbidity is less than with a transoral approach, resulting in higher patient comfort and faster recovery.

Image-guided transoral approach in severe craniovertebral junction malformations at the golden age of endoscopy: Regarding 2 cases

INTRODUCTION

The image-guided transoral approach (IGTOA) provides a safe exposure to skull base midline lesions and the ventral aspect of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). The IGTOA has several advantages: the head being placed in the extended position, it decreases the brainstem angulation during surgery; the approach being done through the avascular median pharyngeal raphe, not only lowers the bleeding risk but also provides a direct access to the bony pathology and granulation tissue accessible only via the ventral route. Wide field exposure and maneuverability are necessary to deal with the entire ventral brainstem compression in case of severe CVJ malformation to safely perform partial clivectomy and odontoidectomy.

PRESENTATION OF TWO CASES

We illustrate the cases of two patients, 52-year-old and 42-year-old males, who presented with an impressive craniovertebral junction malformation, confirmed on CT and MRI images. They first underwent surgery by IGTOA, later completed by occipitocervical fixation. For the two patients, outcomes were assessed respectively at 4 and 5 years and showed satisfactory results both clinically and radiologically.

CONCLUSION

In patients with marked ventral compression, the IGTOA provides direct and guided access to the anterior aspect of the CVJ and effective means for odontoidectomy and clivectomy. This approach is more easily maneuverable compared to the endonasal endoscopic approach. The IGTOA approach is quite a complex technique, requiring multidisciplinary skills, but it should primarily be used in difficult situations. We suggest that endonasal endoscopy is over-utilized. We consider that endoscopy should not be routinely performed and kept only for well-selected cases.

Variations of mucosal-sparing septectomy for endonasal approach to the craniocervical junction

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Recent advances in surgical techniques have rendered the craniocervical junction (CCJ) accessible transnasally. Endoscopic endonasal transclival and transodontoid approaches are routinely performed in leading skull base centers. Usually, these approaches involve a posterior bony and mucosal septectomy, which may compromise the vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap (PNSF), a robust reconstructive option for repair of large skull base defects. With the possibility of an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak and the reported success of the PNSF for repair of these defects, preserving the integrity of the PNSF is beneficial during the endoscopic endonasal approach to the CCJ. We describe three new variations/refinements of the endoscopic endonasal approach to the CCJ that preserve the mucosal integrity of the posterior nasal septum and PNSF.

METHODS

Photo and video documentation of cadaveric dissections.

RESULTS

The steps required for the different variations in approaching the CCJ are demonstrated. These three options are: 1) nonopposing Killian incisions with submucosal elevation of PNSFs laterally under the inferior turbinates (the PNSFs are retracted laterally and left attached superiorly onto the nasal septum and laterally under the inferior turbinate); 2) bilateral non-opposing PNSFs tucked beneath their respective middle turbinate or into the sphenoid sinus; and 3) a hybrid approach combining option 1 performed on one side and option 2 on the contralateral side. All three options allowed for a mucosal-sparing septectomy to provide ample access to the CCJ.

CONCLUSION

These variations/refinements of the mucosal-sparing approach to the CCJ allowed adequate surgical access with sufficient maneuverability while preserving both PNSFs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA. Laryngoscope, 126:2220-2225, 2016.

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to the Odontoid Pathologies

BACKGROUND

Surgical anterior decompression represents the treatment of choice for symptomatic irreducible ventral craniovertebral junction (CVJ) compression. With the refinement of the endoscopic techniques, the endonasal route has been proposed as alternative to the classic transoral approach to CVJ. Some reports assess the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic endonasal approaches to CVJ pathologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2011 to February 2014, 12 patients with symptomatic nonreducible ventral spinal cord compression underwent purely 3-dimensional endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy in our department. The surgical technique is described.

RESULTS

A good brainstem-medullary decompression was achieved in all patients. In 10 of 12 patients the endotracheal tube was removed just after the procedure with good recovery of the respiratory function. We report no cases of velopharyngeal insufficiency. In 5 of 12 patients the preservation of C1 anterior was achieved, without the need for posterior cervical fixation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy has proven to be safe and effective in selected patients. Soft and hard palate preservation dramatically reduces the risk of postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency. Moreover, the endonasal endoscopic approach provides a direct access to the dens. Three-dimensional high-definition endoscope, laser, and ultrasound bony curettes revealed to be useful tools for this approach that, however, remains a demanding one.

Complications of transoral and transnasal odontoidectomy: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Odontoidectomy has been considered an effective way to treat anterior cervicomedullary compression in patients presenting with craniocervical joint anomalies. The transoral and transnasal routes have been described for anterior decompression surgery. However, to date, a comprehensive review of the complications from this procedure is lacking in the extant medical literature. Therefore, herein, we review this specific literature as a resource for surgeons.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature via online search engines was performed.

CONCLUSION

The most reported complications for odontoidectomy are CSF leakage, postoperative craniocervical instability, velopharyngeal insufficiency, wound dehiscence, pulmonary issues, meningitis, and death. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive review of complications of odontoidectomy. Increased awareness of the more common complications associated with this procedure may help in the care of patients in the future.