Recurrent anaphylaxis in the United States: time of onset and risk factors

Efficacy and Safety of Modified Yupingfeng Nasal Spray in Controlling the Recurrence of Persistent and Moderate-Severe Allergic Rhinitis: Study Protocol for a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, and Parallel-Arm Trial

Background. Recurrent episode of allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the leading illnesses that affects patients. However, there is little research evidence to support pharmacotherapy for AR recurrence. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in the control of the recurrence of AR. Methods. In this study, a multicenter, open-label, randomized, and parallel-arm trial will be conducted at three study centers. A total of 190 subjects aged 18–65 with persistent and moderate-severe AR (Qi deficiency and blood stasis syndrome) will be randomly assigned to receive the modified Yupingfeng nasal spray or mometasone furoate aqueous nasal spray. When subjects’ rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT) score is >21 for two weeks, they will stop taking the medication and enter the follow-up. Once a relapse occurs, the time point will be recorded, and the follow-up stops. The primary outcome is the six-month recurrence rate of AR after intervention withdrawal. The secondary outcomes are the one-month recurrence rate of AR, the RCAT score, the duration of follow-up, the duration of medication, the nasal endoscopic results, and questionnaires to evaluate symptoms, signs, and quality of life. The mechanism outcomes include some indicators that may be associated with AR recurrence. In addition, electrocardiograms and other safety indicators will be applied to evaluate the drug’s safety. Discussion. This is the first study to explore the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine nasal spray on AR from the perspective of controlling recurrence. The results of this trial may provide valuable clinical evidence for controlling the recurrence of this disease by pharmacotherapy. Trial Registration. This study was registered with registration number ChiCTR2100047053 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=127432 on June 7, 2021).

Self-injectable epinephrine: doctors' attitude and patients' adherence in real-life

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Epinephrine is the only life-saving treatment of anaphylaxis. Prescription and administration rates of self-injectable epinephrine are generally low. It is unclear whether this is because of availability, low prescription rates, fear of using epinephrine, or a combination of these issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review focuses on what self-injectable epinephrine devices (SIED), such as auto-injectors and prefilled syringes, are preferred by patients and healthcare professionals (HCP). Our findings suggest that a device's ease to use, proper and frequent training on its operability, and availability have an impact on preferences and adherence to treatment with SIEDs. After prescribing a patient with a SIED, clinicians should emphasize its use in anaphylaxis, educate patients/caregivers to identify anaphylaxis and on how to use the SIED, and encourage constant practicing with training devices.

SUMMARY

Epinephrine is the sole recommended anaphylaxis treatment and SIEDs are of critical usefulness in the community setting. Further studying of these devices is needed to optimize education for HCPs and patients and their accessibility to SIEDs.