Ethmoid-to-maxillary opacification ratio: a predictor of postoperative olfaction and outcomes in nasal polyposis?

Development of a novel self-assessment tool following endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVE

To propose a novel quality metric tool for retrospectively examining ESS performed on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients, ultimately to facilitate clinician self-assessment and optimize care provision within this population.

DESIGN

Quality improvement study.

SETTING

Multi-center.

PARTICIPANTS

Observational, prospective research database of adult patients with medically recalcitrant CRS, presenting to seven North-American academic rhinology centers, who underwent ESS between 2011 and 2021. Participant characteristics, comorbidities, and preoperative study measures were collected.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A simple ratio of preoperative Lund-Mackay (LM) score to the number of sinus regions operated on during the course of ESS was determined for each participant and dichotomized into ratios of >1.0 or <1.0.

RESULTS

828 study participants with medically recalcitrant CRS met final study inclusion, of which 47.8 % were male with an average age of 49.0 years. Approximately 50.9 % of participants had a history of previous ESS. Overall mean ratio between preoperative LM scores and numbers of surgically addressed sinuses for all patients with CRS (n = 828) was 1.61 (range: 0.00-6.00), with a minority of subjects (n = 108; 13.0 %) found to have ratios below 1.00. Mean ratios between patients who underwent primary ESS versus revision ESS were not statistically different (2.00 [±0.83] vs 1.98 [±0.88]; 0.02 %, 95 % CI -0.10, 0.14; P = 0.76), whereas differences in mean ratios between CRSsNP patients (without nasal polyposis) and CRSwNP patients (with nasal polyposis) were statistically significant (1.78 [±0.93] vs 2.26 [±0.67]; 0.48 %, 95 % CI 0.37, 0.59; P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This quality metric ratio represents a simple operational means for clinicians to integrate qualitative methodology into self-reflection when evaluating the extent of ESS performed on CRS patients. Its use as a clinical tool for retrospective self-reflection enables the surgeon to identify areas for improvement, assess situational specifics, and hone their craft.

Factors Contributing to the Recurrence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Systematic Review

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) occurs due to the inflammation of sinonasal tissue. Cases of CRSwNP more commonly demand revision endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) as compared to patients without polyposis. The recurrence rate varies widely depending on various factors, such as the extent of surgery, patient compliance with postoperative care, and the severity of the underlying disease. Studies conducted on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients showing recurrence or relapse of nasal polyps post endoscopic sinus surgery were included. We used the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for cross-sectional studies and cohort studies. Only 15 articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria after the full-text screening. The studies enrolled participants between 2009 and 2022, including 2,515 ESS patients. The mean age of the included subjects ranged between 37.1 and 57.57 years. In conclusion, CRSwNP is a chronic inflammatory disease that can impose a significant burden on patients, healthcare systems, and society. Asthma, aspirin intolerance, peripheral eosinophilia, interleukin-5 (IL-5) expression, T2 profile, and intense sinus opacification have been noted to be independent predictors of the condition in different studies. Recurrent polyposis in CRS signals a more aggressive disease course, requiring close follow-up and revision surgeries in the long run.

Prognostic factors for post-operative outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a high recurrence rate after surgery despite the availability of medical treatments. Multiple clinical and biological factors have been associated with poor post-operative outcomes in patients with CRSwNP. However, these factors and their prognostic values have not yet been extensively summarized.

AREAS COVERED

This systematic review included 49 cohort studies exploring the prognostic factors for post-operative outcomes in CRSwNP. A total of 7802 subjects and 174 factors were included. All investigated factors were classified into three categories according to their predictive value and evidence quality, of which 26 factors were considered plausible for post-operative outcome prediction. Previous nasal surgery, ethmoid-to-maxillary (E/M) ratio, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, tissue eosinophil count or percentage, tissue neutrophil count, tissue IL-5, tissue eosinophil cationic protein, and CLC or IgE in nasal secretion provided more reliable information for prognosis in at least two studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Exploring predictors through noninvasive or minimally invasive methods for specimen collection is recommended for future work. Models combining multiple factors must be established, as no single factor is effective for the whole population.

Minimal Radiographic Mucosal Thickness or Opacification Criterion for Sinus-Specific Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVE

Primary chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is typically a diffuse process and the extent of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) performed for medically recalcitrant CRS is impacted by many factors. However, some third-party payors have implemented policies to authorize coverage for ESS in a sinus-by-sinus manner based on a minimal measurement of millimeters of mucosal thickening or sinus opacification in the corresponding sinus that is being surgically addressed. Our objective was to determine whether such policies are based on scientific evidence that in patients with medically recalcitrant CRS, a minimum measurement of mucosal thickening or sinus opacification is a predictor of CRS in that sinus or improved outcomes after ESS on a sinus-by-sinus basis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, from inception through May 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review was performed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

We identified 6070 abstracts which were screened and from which 112 studies ultimately underwent a full-text review. From these studies, we found that none investigated (or provided evidence of) whether any minimal degree of radiographic mucosal thickening or sinus opacification predicted CRS or better outcomes after ESS in a sinus-specific manner.

CONCLUSION

We were unable to find evidence supporting a minimum millimeter measurement of mucosal thickening or sinus opacification as predictors of CRS or better post-ESS outcomes in a sinus-specific manner in patients with medically recalcitrant CRS. The extent of ESS for CRS should be determined through personalized medical decision-making that considers all patient-specific factors.

Correlation of polyp grading scales with patient symptom scores and olfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various nasal polyp (NP) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature. However, no single system has been identified as superior. Correlations between NP scoring systems and patient symptoms, quality of life (QOL) or olfaction vary widely.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline. Any study examining endoscopy scores and symptom, QOL or olfaction measures in cross sectional manner or after therapeutic intervention were included.

RESULTS

This review identified 55 studies for a pooled meta-analysis of Lund-Kennedy (LK-NP) polyp scores (N = 6), Meltzer scores (N = 6), Nasal polyp scores (NPS; N = 19), Total polyp score (TPS; N=8) Lilholdt scores (N = 8), Olfactory cleft endoscopy score (OCES; N =4), Discharge, inflammation, polyp/edema score (DIP; N = 2), and Perioperative sinus endoscopy score (POSE; N = 2). Meta-regression assessed correlations between NP grading systems and SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), and Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT40). None of the NP grading systems correlated significantly with any symptom, QOL or olfactory metric. In intervention studies of surgery or monoclonal antibody treatment, changes in NPS scores did not correlate with any patient reported outcome measure (PROM) or olfactory outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Current NP endoscopic scoring systems are not associated with PROMs such as SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, and TNSS as well as objective measures of olfaction. NP grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.