In Reply: Central compartment atopic disease: the missing link in the allergy and CRSwNP saga

Novel insights into central compartment atopic disease - a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Central compartment atopic disease (CCAD) is a newly recognized variant subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Although CCAD has been reported to be correlated with allergy, there is still a considerable gap in our knowledge regarding CCAD.

AREAS COVERED

We have conducted a thorough analysis of the literature on CCAD. This review provides current understanding and therapeutic strategies of CCAD. In this article, we will review the clinical presentations and parameters, allergy-related etiology, endotypes, and recommended management of CCAD.

EXPERT OPINION

CCAD is considered as an aeroallergen-driven type 2/eosinophilic inflammatory pattern. Although CCAD can be diagnosed by endoscopy and radiology, as well as allergen test, pathogenesis and management strategies leave much to be desired, and further studies are needed.

Clinical characteristics and cytokine profiles of central-compartment-type chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

The clinical characteristics of central-compartment-type chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in East Asian individuals are not clear. We sought to investigate the clinical features and the cytokine profiles of central-compartment-type CRS in our patient group.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with bilateral CRS were recruited, and patients who had previously undergone sinus surgery and pansinusitis (Lund-Mackay scores >23) were excluded. Central-compartment-type CRS was defined by both endoscopic and radiological features. The symptoms, inhalant allergen sensitization status, endoscopic findings, and radiological assessments were recorded and compared between patients with central-compartment-type CRS and other types of CRS. We also examined the extent of tissue eosinophilia and specific cytokine protein levels (eosinophil cationic protein [ECP], myeloperoxidase [MPO], immunoglobulin E [IgE], interleukin [IL]-4, IL-5, and IL-13) in the sinonasal tissues.

RESULTS

Central-compartment-type CRS was found in 16 (23.9%) patients, and non-central-compartment-type CRS was found in 51 (76.1%) patients. Hyposmia or anosmia as the major symptom was more common in the central-compartment-type CRS group. The numbers of eosinophils in tissue and serum were significantly higher in the central-compartment-type CRS patients. The presence of allergen sensitization was not significantly different between groups. The levels of IL-5 and IL-13 were increased in middle turbinate tissues of patients with central-compartment-type CRS.

CONCLUSION

Central-compartment-type CRS was associated with hyposmia or anosmia, eosinophilic subtypes, and elevated levels of IL-5 and IL-13 in middle turbinate tissues but not necessarily correlated with allergic disease in our patients.