Recurrence patterns among patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma: A multi-institutional study

Survival Outcomes in Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background/Objectives: Sinonasal mucosal melanomas (SNMMs) are rare and aggressive malignancies with poor survival outcomes. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate overall survival (OS) rates in patients with SNMM; Methods: We conducted a systematic search, following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), and citation searching for studies reporting survival and prognosis outcomes for SNMMs. Inclusion criteria included studies with 5-year OS rates. Studies were excluded if they included tumor sites other than the paranasal sinuses or nasal cavity, were published in languages other than English and Spanish, or had a sample size of fewer than 15 patients. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist. Analyses of survival probabilities were conducted. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. PROSPERO ID CRD42024565137; Results: A total of 515 articles were identified after removing duplicates, and 99 reports were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 35 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 2383 SNMM patients, of whom 1192 (50%) were female, with a weighted mean age of 65.4 years (SD = 5.4). Fifteen studies were from Europe (42.9%), six (17.1%) were from America, eleven (31.4%) were from Asia, two (5.7%) were from Australia, and one (2.9%) combined European, United Kingdom, and American populations. The 5-year OS was 34.8 [95% CI = 30.6-39.5], with the highest OS in America at 40.5 [95% CI = 34.1-48.1], followed by Europe at 36.6 [95% CI = 30.6-43.7], Australia at 32.3 [95% CI = 12.5-83.8], and Asia at 28.1 [95% CI = 19.5-40.7]. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) for SNMM ranges was between 0.07 and 0.14 per 100,000 persons/year, with a slightly higher incidence in women than in men; Conclusions: This meta-analysis, one of the largest to date on SNMM, confirms the aggressive nature of this melanoma subtype with poor survival outcomes. Despite geographic differences in survival rates, the overall 5-year survival remains low, highlighting the urgent need for improved treatment strategies and more research to improve patient outcomes.

Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma Patients With Recurrent and Metastatic Disease

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare malignancy with poor prognosis and high recurrence rate. In those with recurrence, survival is dismal. Immunotherapy is an emerging area of investigation; however, there is a scarcity of data on immunotherapy outcomes in SNMM patients with recurrence. We report outcomes of immunotherapy in recurrent SNMM patients with distant versus nondistant recurrence. Fifty-four patients with recurrent SNMM were identified, and 31 (57.4%) had distant recurrence. One-year overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 47.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34.0%-60.9%), with a median survival of 2.8 years (95% CI: 2.0-5.3). In those with distant recurrence, receipt of immunotherapy was associated with better OS compared to those without immunotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29 [95% CI: 0.12-0.68], P = .004). While patients with nondistant recurrence (n = 23), who received immunotherapy (n = 6) had worse OS compared to those who did not receive immunotherapy (HR = 4.76 [95% CI: 1.36, 15.89], P = .02). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Immunotherapy in the Management of Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to comprehensively review and synthesize the literature related to sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) treatment with immunotherapy, including potentially targetable genetic mutations, survival outcomes, and adverse events.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

The study protocol was designed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement. Databases were searched from inception through May 23, 2023.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-four of the included studies reported genetic mutations for a combined 787 patients with SNMM. 8.1% (95% confidence interval, CI: 7.6-8.6), 18.9% (95% CI: 18.1-19.8), and 8.5% (95% CI: 8.1-9.0) of reported patients were positive for BRAF, NRAS, and KIT mutations, respectively. The presence of brisk tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was associated with improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival (OS). Six studies reported a combined 5-year OS after adjuvant immunotherapy treatment of 42.6% (95% CI: 39.4-45.8). Thirteen studies encompassing 117 patients reported adjuvant or salvage immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) immunotherapy response rates: 40.2% (95% CI: 36.8-43.6) had a positive response (tumor volume reduction or resolution). Eleven studies reported direct comparisons between SNMM patients treated with or without immunotherapy; the majority (7/11) reported survival benefit for their entire cohort or select subgroups of SNMM patients. With the transition to modern ICIs, there is a stronger trend toward survival improvement with adjuvant ICI. Tumors with Ki67 <40% may respond better to ICI's.

CONCLUSION

ICI therapy can be an effective in select SNMM patients, especially those with advanced/metastatic disease.

Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma: Where Are We Now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent and relevant treatment considerations while managing mucosal melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence is building to support the use of targeted therapy and immunotherapy while managing mucosal melanoma. Surgical resection with postoperative radiotherapy plays a major role in managing resectable disease. Recent studies evaluate the addition of targeted, and immunotherapies with an attempt to determine the most efficacious sequence of treatment.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.