1
|
Rabinovici GD, Selkoe DJ, Schindler SE, Aisen P, Apostolova LG, Atri A, Greenberg SM, Hendrix SB, Petersen RC, Weiner M, Salloway S, Cummings J. Donanemab: Appropriate use recommendations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2025:100150. [PMID: 40155270 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2025] [Revised: 03/16/2025] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
Donanemab (Kisunla®), an IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting N-terminal pyroglutamate-modified forms of amyloid-β, is approved in the United States for treatment of early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (AD). Appropriate Use Recommendations (AUR) were developed to guide the implementation of donanemab in real-world practice, prioritizing safety considerations and opportunity for effectiveness. The AUR were developed by the AD and Related Disorders Therapeutic Workgroup by consensus, integrating available data and expert opinion. Appropriate candidates for donanemab treatment include persons with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to AD (Clinical Stages 3-4, MMSE 20-30) who have biomarker confirmation of AD pathology by PET or CSF. Tau PET is not required for eligibility. Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotyping should be performed prior to treatment to inform an individual's risk of developing Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA). Pre-treatment MRI should be obtained no more than 12 months prior to treatment. Patients with findings of >4 cerebral microbleeds, cortical superficial siderosis or a major vascular contribution to cognitive impairment should be excluded from treatment. The decision to initiate therapy should be grounded in a shared decision-making process that emphasizes the patient's values and goals of care. Donanemab is administered as a monthly intravenous infusion. Surveillance MRIs to evaluate for ARIA should be performed prior to the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 7th infusions, prior to the 12th dose in higher risk individuals, and at any time ARIA is suspected clinically. Clinicians may consider discontinuing treatment if amyloid clearance is demonstrated by amyloid PET, typically obtained 12-18 months after initiating treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G D Rabinovici
- Memory & Aging Center, Departments of Neurology, Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - D J Selkoe
- Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S E Schindler
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - P Aisen
- Alzheimer's Treatment Research Institute, University of Southern California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - L G Apostolova
- Departments of Neurology, Radiology, Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - A Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Banner Health, Sun City, AZ, USA; Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S M Greenberg
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - R C Petersen
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - M Weiner
- Departments of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Medicine, Psychiatry and Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Salloway
- Butler Hospital and Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence RI, USA
| | - J Cummings
- Chambers-Grundy Center for Transformative Neuroscience, Department of Brain Health, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Brien K, Largent EA, Karlawish J. Applying recommendations for diagnostic disclosure of mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Practical guidance for clinicians. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21:e14200. [PMID: 39740343 PMCID: PMC11772705 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/02/2025]
Abstract
A comprehensive evaluation for cognitive impairment should culminate with the communication of the diagnosis to patients and their care partners. This diagnostic disclosure sets the stage for subsequent care. Diagnostic disclosure for individuals with cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or AD-related dementias (ADRD) is particularly nuanced and requires a conscientious approach. Clinicians must assess patients' understanding and appreciation of symptoms, goals for the evaluation, and desire for information. Because AD/ADRD can impact patients' perceptions of their symptoms, it is recommended to include an informant or care partner for this assessment and for future care. Here, we provide guidance for addressing the complexities of AD/ADRD diagnostic disclosure to build clinicians' confidence in communicating diagnostic findings and a plan of care. HIGHLIGHTS: Diagnostic disclosure is a key part of the evaluation of cognitive impairment. The disclosure process begins at the moment a cognitive evaluation is initiated. Care partners must be included in the cognitive evaluation and diagnostic disclosure. Clinicians should use patient-centered communication for evaluation and disclosure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyra O'Brien
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Emily A. Largent
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health PolicyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health PolicyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of MedicinePhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dickerson BC, Atri A, Clevenger C, Karlawish J, Knopman D, Lin P, Norman M, Onyike C, Sano M, Scanland S, Carrillo M. The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for specialty care. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21:e14337. [PMID: 39713957 PMCID: PMC11772716 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or a related dementia (ADRD) are two decades old. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. An expert workgroup conducted a review of 7374 publications (133 met inclusion criteria) and developed recommendations as steps in an evaluation process. This summary briefly reviews core recommendations and details specialist recommendations of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes primary care recommendations. If clinicians use the recommendations in this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings. HIGHLIGHTS: US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all-including primary care-clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. This summary focuses on recommendations appropriate for specialty practice settings, forming key elements of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes primary care recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford C. Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit, Department of NeurologyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute and Banner Alzheimer's InstituteSun CityArizonaUSA
- Department of NeurologyCenter for Brain/Mind MedicineBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Carolyn Clevenger
- Department of Neurology, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of NursingEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Memory CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - David Knopman
- Department of NeurologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Pei‐Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in HealthInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Mary Norman
- Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterCulver CityCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chiadi Onyike
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and NeuropsychiatryThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Mary Sano
- James J. Peters VAMCBronxNew YorkUSA
- Department of PsychiatryAlzheimer's Disease Research CenterIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Maria Carrillo
- Medical & Scientific Relations DivisionAlzheimer's AssociationChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Atri A, Dickerson BC, Clevenger C, Karlawish J, Knopman D, Lin P, Norman M, Onyike C, Sano M, Scanland S, Carrillo M. The Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the diagnostic evaluation, testing, counseling, and disclosure of suspected Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Validated clinical assessment instruments. Alzheimers Dement 2025; 21:e14335. [PMID: 39713939 PMCID: PMC11772712 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) or AD and related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all-including primary care-clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. As part of the modified Delphi approach and guideline development process (7374 publications were reviewed; 133 met inclusion criteria) an expert workgroup developed recommendations as steps in a patient-centered evaluation process. The workgroup provided a summary of validated instruments to measure symptoms in daily life (including cognition, mood and behavior, and daily function) and to test for signs of cognitive impairment in the office. This article distills this information to provide a resource to support clinicians in the implementation of this approach in clinical practice. The companion articles provide context for primary care and specialty clinicians with regard to how to fit these instruments into the workflow and actions to take when integration of performance on these instruments with clinical profile and clinician judgment support potential cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute and Banner Alzheimer's InstituteSun CityArizonaUSA
- Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Department of NeurologyBrigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Bradford C. Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of NeurologyMassachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Carolyn Clevenger
- Department of NeurologyNell Hodgson Woodruff School of NursingEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Departments of MedicineMedical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Memory CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - David Knopman
- Department of NeurologyMayo ClinicRochesterMinnesotaUSA
| | - Pei‐Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in HealthInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy StudiesTufts Medical CenterBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Mary Norman
- Cedars‐Sinai Medical CenterCulver CityCaliforniaUSA
| | - Chiadi Onyike
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and NeuropsychiatryThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Mary Sano
- James J. Peters VAMCBronxNew YorkUSA
- Department of PsychiatryAlzheimer's Disease Research CenterIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | | | - Maria Carrillo
- Medical & Scientific Relations DivisionAlzheimer's AssociationChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Atri A, Dickerson BC, Clevenger C, Karlawish J, Knopman D, Lin PJ, Norman M, Onyike C, Sano M, Scanland S, Carrillo M. Alzheimer's Association clinical practice guideline for the Diagnostic Evaluation, Testing, Counseling, and Disclosure of Suspected Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (DETeCD-ADRD): Executive summary of recommendations for primary care. Alzheimers Dement 2024. [PMID: 39713942 DOI: 10.1002/alz.14333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or AD and related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all-including primary care-clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. Through a modified-Delphi approach and guideline-development process (7374 publications were reviewed; 133 met inclusion criteria) an expert workgroup developed recommendations as steps in a patient-centered evaluation process. This summary focuses on recommendations, appropriate for any practice setting, forming core elements of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes specialist recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings. Highlights US clinical practice guidelines for the diagnostic evaluation of cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease (AD) or AD and related dementias (ADRD) are decades old and aimed at specialists. This evidence-based guideline was developed to empower all-including primary care-clinicians to implement a structured approach for evaluating a patient with symptoms that may represent clinical AD/ADRD. This summary focuses on recommendations, appropriate for any practice setting, forming core elements of a high-quality, evidence-supported evaluation process aimed at characterizing, diagnosing, and disclosing the patient's cognitive functional status, cognitive-behavioral syndrome, and likely underlying brain disease so that optimal care plans to maximize patient/care partner dyad quality of life can be developed; a companion article summarizes specialist recommendations. If clinicians use this guideline and health-care systems provide adequate resources, outcomes should improve in most patients in most practice settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alireza Atri
- Banner Sun Health Research Institute and Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Sun City, Arizona, USA
- Center for Brain/Mind Medicine, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bradford C Dickerson
- Frontotemporal Disorders Unit and Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carolyn Clevenger
- Department of Neurology, Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jason Karlawish
- Departments of Medicine, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, and Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, Penn Memory Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Knopman
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Pei-Jung Lin
- Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary Norman
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Culver City, California, USA
| | - Chiadi Onyike
- Division of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neuropsychiatry, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Mary Sano
- James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx, New York, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Maria Carrillo
- Medical & Scientific Relations Division, Alzheimer's Association, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|