Investigation and treatment of pulmonary embolism as a potential etiology may be important to improve post-resuscitation prognosis in non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest: report on an analysis of the SOS-KANTO 2012 study

Long-Term Impact of the Kumamoto Earthquake on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Origins - An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

BACKGROUND

Possible etiologies of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), including aortic dissection, ruptured aortic aneurysms, and pulmonary embolism, may be classified as non-cardiac causes. We investigated whether cardiac and non-cardiac OHCAs increased following the Kumamoto earthquake and whether the impact on OHCAs extended to regions far from the epicenter.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively analyzed a nationwide registry of patients who experienced OHCAs between January 2013 and December 2019. Data from cases registered in 7 prefectures, including Kumamoto (Kyushu region; n=82,060), in the All-Japan Utstein Registry were analyzed for OHCAs of cardiac and non-cardiac origin. The numbers of OHCAs before and after the Kumamoto earthquake were compared using an interrupted time series analysis. The incidence of both cardiac (rate ratio [RR] 1.22) and non-cardiac (RR 1.27) OHCAs in Kumamoto Prefecture increased after the earthquake. The difference disappeared when the analysis was limited to patients with non-cardiac OHCAs with a clear cause of cardiac arrest. The number of cardiac and non-cardiac OHCAs did not increase in other prefectures within the Kyushu region.

CONCLUSIONS

The Kumamoto earthquake led to an increase in the incidence of cardiac and non-cardiac OHCAs. However, this was attenuated by increasing distance from the epicenter. Except for cardiac causes, cases complicated by earthquake-related events may include non-cardiac OHCAs due to vascular diseases that might be overlooked.

An epidemiological assessment of choking-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A post hoc analysis of the SOS-KANTO 2012 study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to reveal the neurological outcomes of choking-induced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and evaluate the presence of witnesses, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by a witness (bystander-witnessed CPR), and the proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes by the time from CPR by emergency medical services (EMS) to the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (CPR-ROSC time).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the SOS-KANTO 2012 database, which included data of 16,452 OHCAs in Japan. We selected choking-induced OHCA patients aged ≥ 20 years. We evaluated the neurological outcomes at 1 month with the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC). We defined favourable neurological outcomes (CPCs: 1-2) and present the outcomes with descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 1,045 choking-induced OHCA patients, 18 (1.7%) had a favourable neurological outcome. Of 1,045 OHCAs, 757 (72.6%) were witnessed, and 375 (36.0%) underwent bystander-witnessed CPR. Of the 18 OHCAs with favourable outcomes, 17 (94.4%) were witnessed, and 11 (61.1%) underwent bystander-witnessed CPR. With a CPR-ROSC time of 0-5 minutes, the proportion of patients with favourable neurological outcomes was 29.7%, ranging from 0% to 6% in the following time groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The neurological outcome of choking-induced OHCA was poor. The neurological outcomes deteriorated rapidly from 5 minutes after the initiation of CPR by EMS. The presence of witnesses and bystander-witnessed CPR may be factors that contribute to improved outcomes, but the effects were not remarkable. As another approach to reduce deaths due to choking, citizen education for the prevention of choking may be effective.

Incidence of acute aortic dissections in patients with out of hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVES

Acute Aortic dissection (AAD) may present as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the incidence of this presentation is not well known. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all observational studies reporting on the incidence of AAD in patients with OHCA.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycInfo, Web of Science Core Collection and OpenGrey databases from inception to March-2021, for observational studies reporting on the incidence of AAD in patients with OHCA. Data was pooled using a random-effects model of proportions. The primary outcome was the incidence of AAD in OHCA patients. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of type A aortic dissections (TAAD) and type B aortic dissections (TBAD) in OHCA patients, overall mortality following AAD-OHCA and risk of death in AAD-OHCA patients compared to risk of death of non-AAD-OHCA patients.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included. The pooled calculated incidence of OHCA due to AAD was 4.39% (95 %CI: 2.55; 6.8). Incidence of OHCA due to TAAD was 7.18% (95 %CI: 5.61; 8.93) and incidence of OHCA due to TBAD was 0.47% (95 %CI: 0.18; 0.85). Overall mortality following OHCA due to AAD was 100% (95 %CI: 97.62; 100). The risk of death in AAD-OHCA patients compared with non-AAD-OHCA patients was 1.10 (95 %CI: 0.94; 1.30).

CONCLUSION

AAD as a cause of OHCA is more frequent than previously thought. Prognosis is dire, as it is invariably lethal. These findings should lead to a higher awareness of AAD when approaching a patient with OHCA and to future studies on this matter.

Cardiac arrest in special circumstances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation prioritize treatments like chest compression and defibrillation, known to be highly effective for cardiac arrest from cardiac origin. This review highlights the need to modify this approach in special circumstances.

RECENT FINDINGS

Potentially reversible causes of cardiac arrest are clustered into four Hs and four Ts (Hypoxia, Hypovolaemia, Hyperkalaemia/other electrolyte disorders, Hypothermia, Thrombosis, Tamponade, Tension pneumothorax, Toxic agents). Point-of-care ultrasound has its role in identification of the cause and targeting treatment. Time-critical interventions may even prevent cardiac arrest if applied early. The extracorporeal CPR (eCPR) or mechanical CPR should be considered for bridging the period needed to reverse the precipitating cause(s). There is low quality of evidence available to guide the treatment in the majority of situations. Some topics (pulmonary embolism, eCPR, drowning, pregnancy and opioid toxicity) were included in recent ILCOR reviews and evidence updates but majority of recommendations is based on individual systematic reviews, scoping reviews, evidence updates and expert consensus.

SUMMARY

Cardiac arrests from reversible causes happen with lower incidence. Return of spontaneous circulation and neurologically intact survival can hardly be achieved without a modified approach focusing on immediate treatment of the underlying cause(s) of cardiac arrest.

[Cardiac arrest under special circumstances]

These guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Cardiac Arrest under Special Circumstances are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the modifications required for basic and advanced life support for the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrest under special circumstances; in particular, specific causes (hypoxia, trauma, anaphylaxis, sepsis, hypo-/hyperkalaemia and other electrolyte disorders, hypothermia, avalanche, hyperthermia and malignant hyperthermia, pulmonary embolism, coronary thrombosis, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, toxic agents), specific settings (operating room, cardiac surgery, cardiac catheterization laboratory, dialysis unit, dental clinics, transportation [in-flight, cruise ships], sport, drowning, mass casualty incidents), and specific patient groups (asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neurological disease, morbid obesity, pregnancy).

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances

These European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Cardiac Arrest in Special Circumstances guidelines are based on the 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Science with Treatment Recommendations. This section provides guidelines on the modifications required to basic and advanced life support for the prevention and treatment of cardiac arrest in special circumstances; specifically special causes (hypoxia, trauma, anaphylaxis, sepsis, hypo/hyperkalaemia and other electrolyte disorders, hypothermia, avalanche, hyperthermia and malignant hyperthermia, pulmonary embolism, coronary thrombosis, cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, toxic agents), special settings (operating room, cardiac surgery, catheter laboratory, dialysis unit, dental clinics, transportation (in-flight, cruise ships), sport, drowning, mass casualty incidents), and special patient groups (asthma and COPD, neurological disease, obesity, pregnancy).

Association Between Therapeutic Hypothermia and Outcomes in Patients with Non-shockable Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Developed After Emergency Medical Service Arrival (SOS-KANTO 2012 Analysis Report)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The outcomes of patients with non-shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (non-shockable OHCA) are poorer than those of patients with shockable out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (shockable OHCA). In this retrospective study, we selected patients from the SOS-KANTO 2012 study with non-shockable OHCA that developed after emergency medical service (EMS) arrival and analyzed the effect of therapeutic hypothermia (TH) on non-shockable OHCA patients.

METHODS

Of 16,452 patients who have definitive data on the 3-month outcome in the SOS-KANTO 2012 study, we selected 241 patients who met the following criteria: age ≥ 18 years, normal spontaneous respiration or palpable pulse upon emergency medical services arrival, no ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia before hospital arrival, and achievement of spontaneous circulation without cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of TH and were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 241 patients, 49 underwent TH. Univariate analysis showed that the 1-/3-month survival rates and favorable 3-month cerebral function outcome rates in the TH group were significantly better than the non-TH group (46% vs 19%, respectively, P < 0.001, 35% vs 12%, respectively, P < 0.001, 20% vs 7%, respectively, P = 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that TH was a significant, independent prognostic factor for cerebral function outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, TH was an independent prognostic factor for the 3-month cerebral function outcome. Even in patients with non-shockable OHCA, TH may improve outcome if the interval from the onset of cardiopulmonary arrest is relatively short, and adequate cardiopulmonary resuscitation is initiated immediately after onset.