Characteristics and subgroups of frequent emergency department users in an academic hospital in Japan

Health Statuses of People in Poverty Receiving Public Assistance in Japan: A Scoping Review

Background

Promoting health and well-being is essential to ensure dignified lives of the entire population, including those living in poverty. Guaranteeing the human right to health is a critical responsibility of social security policies. To address emerging issues associated with poverty, the Japanese government has implemented a welfare program known as public assistance-seikatsu-hogo. However, financial welfare programs may not fully mitigate health risks due to the complex impact of poverty on health. Although a global systematic review of the health status of public and social assistance recipients has been conducted, it did not include any studies from Japan. Furthermore, evidence for the development of health support strategies for Japanese recipients remains scarce. This scoping review aims to identify the current situation and potential issues concerning the health of recipients.

Methods

PubMed was searched for articles published before November 2023. Of the 357 articles identified, 56 were included. Among those included, 35 used the individual status of receiving public assistance as an exposure variable, 13 considered public assistance recipients as the study population, and 8 used the prefectural proportion of the population receiving public assistance as an environmental predictor.

Results

We found that public assistance recipients tend to have more disadvantageous health and well-being statuses than the general population, as reported in the global systematic review. Health inequalities were also observed among recipients based on their sociodemographic characteristics. In Japan, public assistance recipients face several health risks and are at a disadvantage compared with the general population.

Conclusions

The distribution of risks is heterogeneous among recipients, despite the minimum income protection and financial benefits in health and long-term care use. Further studies to identify the effects of public assistance policy on the health of the impoverished population, evidence-based discussions, and reform of social security policies are warranted.

Emergency Department Use among Patients with Mental Health Problems: Profiles, Correlates, and Outcomes

Patients with mental health (MH) problems are known to use emergency departments (EDs) frequently. This study identified profiles of ED users and associated these profiles with patient characteristics and outpatient service use, and with subsequent adverse outcomes. A 5-year cohort of 11,682 ED users was investigated (2012-2017), using Quebec (Canada) administrative databases. ED user profiles were identified through latent class analysis, and multinomial logistic regression used to associate patients' characteristics and their outpatient service use. Cox regressions were conducted to assess adverse outcomes 12 months after the last ED use. Four ED user profiles were identified: "Patients mostly using EDs for accessing MH services" (Profile 1, incident MDs); "Repeat ED users" (Profile 2); "High ED users" (Profile 3); "Very high and recurrent high ED users" (Profile 4). Profile 4 and 3 patients exhibited the highest ED use along with severe conditions yet received the most outpatient care. The risk of hospitalization and death was higher in these profiles. Their frequent ED use and adverse outcomes might stem from unmet needs and suboptimal care. Assertive community treatments and intensive case management could be recommended for Profiles 4 and 3, and more extensive team-based GP care for Profiles 2 and 1.

Transitions in health care settings for frequent and infrequent users of emergency departments: a population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Efforts to reduce emergency department (ED) volumes often target frequent users. We examined transitions in care across ED, hospital, and community settings, and in-hospital death, for high system users (HSUs) compared to controls.

METHODS

Population-based databases provided ED visits and hospitalizations in Alberta and Ontario, Canada. The retrospective cohort included the top 10% of all the ED users during 2015/2016 (termed HSUs) and a random sample of controls (4 per each HSU) from the bottom 90% per province. Rates of transitions among ED, hospitalization, community settings, and in-hospital mortality were adjusted for sociodemographic and ED variables in a multistate statistical model.

RESULTS

There were 2,684,924 patients and 579,230 (21.6%) were HSUs. Patient characteristics associated with shorter community to ED transition times for HSUs included Alberta residence (ratio of hazard ratio [RHR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11,1.12), living in areas in the lower income quintile (RHR = 1.06, 95%CI 1.06,1.06), and Ontario residents without a primary health care provider (RHR = 1.13, 95%CI 1.13,1.14). Once at the ED, characteristics associated with shorter ED to hospital transition times for HSUs included higher acuity (e.g., RHR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.61, 1.81 for emergent), and for many diagnoses including chest pain (RHR = 1.71, 95%CI 1.65,1.76) and gastrointestinal (RHR = 1.66, 95%CI 1.62,1.71). Once admitted to hospital, HSUs did not necessarily have longer stays except for conditions such as chest pain (RHR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.86, 0.95). HSUs had shorter times to death in the ED if they presented for cancer (RHR = 2.51), congestive heart failure (RHR = 1.93), myocardial infarction (RHR = 1.53), and stroke (RHR = 1.84), and shorter times to death in-hospital if they presented with cancer (RHR = 1.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between HSUs and controls in predictors of transitions among care settings were identified. Co-morbidities and limitations in access to primary care are associated with more rapid transitions from community to ED and hospital among HSUs. Interventions targeting these challenges may better serve patients across health systems..

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Clinical performance of early warning scoring systems for identifying sepsis among anti-hypertensive agent users

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the accuracy of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in identifying sepsis patients with a history of hypertension on anti-hypertensive agents, which affect vital signs as components of the scoring systems. We aimed to examine the ability of qSOFA and NEWS to predict sepsis among anti-hypertensive agent users by comparing them with non-users.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified adult patients (aged ≥18years) with suspected infection who presented to an emergency department (ED) of a large tertiary medical center in Japan between April 2018 and March 2020. Suspected infection was defined based on the chief complaint of fever, high body temperature, or the clinical context on arrival at the ED. We excluded patients who had trauma or cardiac arrest, those who were transported to other hospitals after arrival at the ED, and those whose vital signs data were mostly missing. The predictive performances of qSOFA and NEWS based on initial vital signs were examined separately for sepsis, ICU admission, and in-hospital mortality and compared between anti-hypertensive agent users and non-users.

RESULTS

Among 2900 patients with suspected infection presenting to the ED, 291 (10%) had sepsis, 1023 (35%) were admitted to the ICU, and 188 (6.5%) died. The prediction performances of qSOFA and NEWS for each outcome among anti-hypertensive agent users were lower than that among non-users (e.g., c-statistics of qSOFA for sepsis, 0.66 vs. 0.71, p = 0.07; and for ICU admission, 0.70 vs. 0.75, p = 0.01). For identifying sepsis, the sensitivity and specificity of qSOFA ≥2 were 0.43 and 0.77 in anti-hypertensive agent users and 0.51 and 0.82 in non-users. Similar associations were observed for identifying ICU admission and in-hospital mortality. Regardless of the use of anti-hypertensive agents, NEWS had better prediction abilities for each outcome than qSOFA.

CONCLUSION

The clinical performance of qSOFA and NEWS for identifying sepsis among anti-hypertensive agent users was likely lower than that among non-users.