Development and validation of a procedure-based organ failure assessment model for patients in the intensive care unit: an administrative database study

Analysis of the effectiveness of combination antimicrobial therapy for Legionnaires' disease: A nationwide inpatient database study

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of monotherapy and combination therapy with quinolones and macrolides for treating Legionnaires' disease remains uncertain; this study aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of three treatment approaches.

METHODS

Using a nationwide inpatient database, we analyzed 3560 eligible patients hospitalized for Legionnaires' disease between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2021; patients were divided into combination therapy, quinolone monotherapy, and macrolide monotherapy groups according to the antibiotics administered within 2 days of admission. We compared in-hospital mortality, total hospitalization costs, and length of stay across these groups using multiple propensity score analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Of the 3560 patients, there were 564 (15.8%), 2221 (62.4%), and 775 (21.8%) patients in the combination therapy, quinolone monotherapy, and macrolide monotherapy groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in in-hospital mortality between combination therapy and quinolone monotherapy groups, and between combination therapy and macrolide monotherapy groups. There were no significant differences in total hospitalization costs or length of stay among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that there may not be a significant advantage in using a combination of quinolones and macrolides over monotherapy for the treatment of Legionnaires' disease. Given the potential for increased side effects, careful consideration is advised when choosing this combination therapy.

Intensive care unit versus high dependency care unit admission after emergency surgery: a nationwide in-patient registry study

BACKGROUND

The appropriate level of postoperative critical care for patients undergoing emergency surgery is unknown. We aimed to assess the outcomes of postoperative patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) and high dependency care unit (HDU) after emergency surgery.

METHODS

Analysis of national in-patient registry data in Japan from July 2010 to March 2018, including patients undergoing one of 10 emergency surgeries on the day of hospital admission. The exposures were ICU or HDU admission on the day of surgery. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Results are presented as n (%) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

We included 158 149 patients from 646 hospitals. Crude in-hospital mortality for each procedure ranged from 168/8583 (2.0%) for cholecystectomy to 2842/12 958 (21.9%) for patients undergoing surgery for traumatic brain injury. Compared with HDU admission, ICU admission was associated with lower in-hospital mortality among the cohorts for medium-mortality risk procedures (procedure-specific mortality 5-15%) (ICU: 8834/73 616 [12.0%] vs HDU: 2586/25 262 [10.2%]; OR=0.90 [0.85-0.96]; P=0.001), and high-mortality risk procedures (procedures-specific mortality >15%) (ICU: 3445/16 334 [21.1%] vs HDU: 996/4613 [21.6%]; OR=0.86 [0.78-0.96]; P=0.005). There were no differences in mortality for low-mortality risk procedures with procedure-specific mortality <5%.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national registry study, postoperative critical care in ICU was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than in HDU for patients undergoing medium-risk and high-risk emergency surgery. Further research is needed to understand the role of critical care for surgical patients.