Self-Reported Head Trauma Predicts Poor Dual Task Gait in Retired National Football League Players

NCAA football players are at higher risk of upper extremity injury after first-time concussion

BACKGROUND

Previous research has demonstrated that concussions increase the risk of subsequent lower extremity musculoskeletal injury in athletes. However, the risk of upper extremity injury in athletes' post-concussion is poorly understood.

METHODS

All concussed football players within a National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I conference athletic database were identified between 2017 and 2021. After exclusions, each athlete experiencing their first concussion was then retrospectively reviewed for upper extremity injuries in the year prior to their concussion and in the year beginning at 90 days after their concussion. All upper extremity injuries were identified and the odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and statistical significance between groups were calculated in Microsoft Excel.

RESULTS

160 de-identified football players from a single conference who were first diagnosed with concussions in the seasons from 2017 through 2021 met inclusion criteria. In these athletes the odds of upper extremity injury in year following first diagnosed concussion were 2.36 times higher than in the year prior (95% CI 1.13-4.95, p = 0.02). Shoulder was the most common site of injury with 57.7% of injuries compared to 19.2% in the hand, 15.4% in the elbow, 7.7% in the forearm, and 0% in the wrist.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that collegiate football players are at a 2.36 times greater risk of upper extremity injury in the year following their first diagnosed concussion compared to the year preceding it. The most common site of upper extremity injury after concussion was the shoulder.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effects of contact/collision sport history on gait in early- to mid-adulthood

BACKGROUND

To determine the effect of contact/collision sport participation on measures of single-task (ST) and dual-task (DT) gait among early- to middle-aged adults.

METHODS

The study recruited 113 adults (34.88 ± 11.80 years, (mean ± SD); 53.0% female) representing 4 groups. Groups included (a) former non-contact/collision athletes and non-athletes who are not physically active (n = 28); (b) former non-contact/collision athletes who are physically active (n = 29); (c) former contact/collision sport athletes who participated in high-risk sports and are physically active (n = 29); and (d) former rugby players with prolonged repetitive head impact exposure history who are physically active (n = 27). Gait parameters were collected using inertial measurement units during ST and DT gait. DT cost was calculated for all gait parameters (double support, gait speed, and stride length). Groups were compared first using one-way analysis of covariance. Then a multiple regression was performed for participants in the high-risk sport athletes and repetitive head impact exposure athletes groups only to predict gait outcomes from contact/collision sport career duration.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between groups on any ST, DT, or DT cost outcomes (p > 0.05). Contact/collision sport duration did not predict any ST, DT, or DT cost gait outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Years and history of contact/collision sport participation does not appear to negatively affect or predict neurobehavioral function in early- to mid-adulthood among physically active individuals.

Association Between Collision Sport Career Duration and Gait Performance in Male Collegiate Student-Athletes

BACKGROUND

Investigations of estimated age of first exposure to repetitive head impacts from collision and contact sports have shown no associations with neurocognitive or neurobehavioral function at the collegiate level, but the effect of career duration may be a more comprehensive factor. Understanding whether longer career duration influences gait performance would provide insights into potential neurological impairment.

PURPOSE

To examine the relationship between career duration of collision sports and single/dual-task gait performance in collegiate student-athletes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We recruited 168 male student-athletes from collision sports: football, lacrosse, ice hockey, and wrestling (mean ± SD age, 19.2 ± 1.3 years; height, 184.5 ± 7.2 cm; mass, 94.3 ± 15.9 kg; estimated age of first exposure, 8.6 ± 3.1 years; career duration, 10.6 ± 3.0 years). All participants completed a baseline single- and dual-task gait assessment before the start of their athletic season. Inertial measurement units were used to measure gait speed and stride length. During the dual task, participants were asked to perform working memory cognitive tasks while walking. The dependent variables were single/dual-task gait speed and stride length, cognitive accuracy, and dual-task cost. The relationship between career duration, analyzed as a continuous variable, and the dependent variables was analyzed using a linear regression.

RESULTS

There were no significant associations between career duration and single-task gait speed (1.16 ± 0.16 m/s; β = -0.004; P = .35; 95% CI = -0.012 to 0.004; η² = 0.005) or dual-task gait speed (1.02 ± 0.17 m/s; β = -0.003; P = .57; 95% CI = -0.011 to 0.006; η² = 0.002). There were also no significant associations between career duration and single/dual-task stride length, cognitive accuracy, or dual-task cost.

CONCLUSION

Career duration among collegiate collision sport athletes was not associated with single- or dual-task gait performance, suggesting that a greater exposure to repetitive head impacts is not detrimental to dynamic postural control at the college level. However, the effects of diminished gait performance over the lifetime remain to be elucidated.

Mobile Technology for Falls Prevention in Older Adults

Falls are the leading cause of accidental death in older adults that result from a complex interplay of risk factors. Recently, the need for person-centered approach utilizing personalization, prediction, prevention and participation, known as the P4 model, in fall prevention has been highlighted. Features of mobile technology make it a suitable technological infrastructure to employ such an approach. This narrative review aims to review the evidence for using mobile technology for personalized fall risk assessment and prevention since 2017 in older adults. We aim to identify lessons learned and future directions for using mobile technology as a fall risk assessment and prevention tool. Articles were searched in PubMed and Web of Science with search terms related to older adults, mobile technology, and falls prevention. A total of 23 articles were included. Articles were identified as those examining aspects of the P4 model including prediction (measurement of fall risk), personalization (usability), prevention, and participation. Mobile technology appears to be comparable to gold-standard technology in measuring well-known fall risk factors including static and dynamic balance. Seven applications were developed to measure different fall risk factors and tested for personalization, and/or participation aspects, and four were integrated into a falls prevention program. Mobile health technology offers an innovative solution to provide tailored fall risk screening, prediction, and participation. Future studies should incorporate multiple, objective fall risk measures and implement them in community settings to determine if mobile technology can offer tailored and scalable interventions.

Gait Performance in People with Symptomatic, Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

There is a dearth of knowledge about how symptom severity affects gait in the chronic (>3 months) mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) population despite up to 53% of people reporting persisting symptoms after mTBI. The aim of this investigation was to determine whether gait is affected in a symptomatic, chronic mTBI group and to assess the relationship between gait performance and symptom severity on the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI). Gait was assessed under single- and dual-task conditions using five inertial sensors in 57 control subjects and 65 persons with chronic mTBI (1.0 year from mTBI). The single- and dual-task gait domains of Pace, Rhythm, Variability, and Turning were calculated from individual gait characteristics. Dual-task cost (DTC) was calculated for each domain. The mTBI group walked (domain z-score mean difference, single-task = 0.70; dual-task = 0.71) and turned (z-score mean difference, single-task = 0.69; dual-task = 0.70) slower (p < 0.001) under both gait conditions, with less rhythm under dual-task gait (z-score difference = 0.21; p = 0.001). DTC was not different between groups. Higher NSI somatic subscore was related to higher single- and dual-task gait variability as well as slower dual-task pace and turning (p < 0.01). Persons with chronic mTBI and persistent symptoms exhibited altered gait, particularly under dual-task, and worse gait performance related to greater symptom severity. Future gait research in chronic mTBI should assess the possible underlying physiological mechanisms for persistent symptoms and gait deficits.

Sensory Reweighting for Upright Stance in Soccer Players: A Comparison of High and Low Exposure to Soccer Heading

The purpose of this study was to compare sensory reweighting for upright stance between soccer players who report higher soccer heading exposure to those who report lower soccer heading exposure. Thirty participants completed a self-reported questionnaire to estimate the number of soccer headers experienced over the previous year and were divided into "low exposure" and "high exposure" groups based on their responses. Sensory reweighting for upright stance was assessed by simultaneously perturbing visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive systems. The visual stimulus was a sinusoidal translation of the visual scene at 0.2 Hz, the vestibular stimulus was ±1mA binaural monopolar galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) at 0.36 Hz, and the proprioceptive stimulus was Achilles tendon vibration at 0.28 Hz. The visual stimulus was presented at two amplitudes (0.2 m, 0.8 m). Center of mass (COM) gain/phase to each modality, total power, 95% area and velocity were compared between low exposure (N = 15, six males, 21.5 ± 1.9 years, 27.7 ± 31.6 headers) and high exposure groups (N = 15, 10 males, 22.1 ± 3.5years, 734.9 ± 877.7 headers). Without vibration, COM 95% area (F = 5.861, p = 0.022*, partial η² = 0.173), velocity (F = 14.198, p = 0.001, partial η² = 0.336), and total power (F = 13.491, p = 0.001, partial η² = 0.325) for the "high exposure" group were higher than for the "low exposure" group, and postural sway lagged the vestibular stimulus in the "high exposure" group rather than leading it as in the "low exposure" group (F = 4.765, p = 0.038, partial η² = 0.145). There were no differences in sensory reweighting and no differences in COM gain/phase between groups. These findings lend empirical evidence to a detrimental effect of soccer heading exposure on balance control during upright stance.

Measurement of Step Angle for Quantifying the Gait Impairment of Parkinson's Disease by Wearable Sensors: Controlled Study

Background

Gait impairments including shuffling gait and hesitation are common in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD), and have been linked to increased fall risk and freezing of gait. Nowadays the gait metrics mostly focus on the spatiotemporal characteristics of gait, but less is known of the angular characteristics of the gait, which may provide helpful information pertaining to the functional status and effects of the treatment in PD.

Objective

This study aimed to quantify the angles of steps during walking, and explore if this novel step angle metric is associated with the severity of PD and the effects of the treatment including the acute levodopa challenge test (ALCT) and deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Methods

A total of 18 participants with PD completed the walking test before and after the ALCT, and 25 participants with PD completed the test with the DBS on and off. The walking test was implemented under two conditions: walking normally at a preferred speed (single task) and walking while performing a cognitive serial subtraction task (dual task). A total of 17 age-matched participants without PD also completed this walking test. The angular velocity was measured using wearable sensors on each ankle, and three gait angular metrics were obtained, that is mean step angle, initial step angle, and last step angle. The conventional gait metrics (ie, step time and step number) were also calculated.

Results

The results showed that compared to the control, the following three step angle metrics were significantly smaller in those with PD: mean step angle (F_1,48=69.75, P<.001, partial eta-square=0.59), initial step angle (F_1,48=15.56, P<.001, partial eta-square=0.25), and last step angle (F_1,48=61.99, P<.001, partial eta-square=0.56). Within the PD cohort, both the ALCT and DBS induced greater mean step angles (ACLT: F_1,38=5.77, P=.02, partial eta-square=0.13; DBS: F_1,52=8.53, P=.005, partial eta-square=0.14) and last step angles (ACLT: F_1,38=10, P=.003, partial eta-square=0.21; DBS: F_1,52=4.96, P=.003, partial eta-square=0.09), but no significant changes were observed in step time and number after the treatments. Additionally, these step angles were correlated with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part III score: mean step angle (single task: r=–0.60, P<.001; dual task: r=–0.52, P<.001), initial step angle (single task: r=–0.35, P=.006; dual task: r=–0.35, P=.01), and last step angle (single task: r=–0.43, P=.001; dual task: r=–0.41, P=.002).

Conclusions

This pilot study demonstrated that the gait angular characteristics, as quantified by the step angles, were sensitive to the disease severity of PD and, more importantly, can capture the effects of treatments on the gait, while the traditional metrics cannot. This indicates that these metrics may serve as novel markers to help the assessment of gait in those with PD as well as the rehabilitation of this vulnerable cohort.