DBS of Thalamic Centromedian Nucleus for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (ESTEL Trial)

Add-On Deep Brain Stimulation versus Continued Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Childhood Epilepsy (ADVANCE): A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial

Outcomes following vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improve over years after implantation in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. The added value of deep brain stimulation (DBS) instead of continued VNS optimization is unknown. In a prospective, non-blinded, randomized patient preference trial of 18 children (aged 8-17 years) who did not respond to VNS after at least 1 year, add-on DBS resulted in greater seizure reduction compared with an additional year of VNS optimization (51.9% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.047). Add-on DBS also resulted in less bothersome seizures (p = 0.03), but no change in quality of life. DBS may be considered earlier for childhood epilepsy after non-response to VNS. ANN NEUROL 2024;96:405-411.

Uncovering spatiotemporal dynamics of the corticothalamic network at ictal onset

OBJECTIVE

Although the clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation targeting the anterior nucleus (AN) and centromedian nucleus (CM) of the thalamus has been actively investigated for the treatment of medication-resistant epilepsy, few studies have investigated dynamic ictal changes in corticothalamic connectivity in human electroencephalographic (EEG) recording. This study aims to establish the complex spatiotemporal dynamics of the ictal corticothalamic network associated with various seizure foci.

METHODS

We analyzed 10 patients (aged 2.7-28.1 years) with medication-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent stereotactic EEG evaluation with thalamic sampling. We examined both undirected and directed connectivity, incorporating coherence and spectral Granger causality analysis (GCA) between the diverse seizure foci and thalamic nuclei (AN and CM) at ictal onset.

RESULTS

In our analysis of 36 seizures, coherence between seizure onset and thalamic nuclei increased across all frequencies, especially in slower bands (delta, theta, alpha). GCA showed increased information flow from seizure onset to the thalamus across all frequency bands, but outflows from the thalamus were mainly in slower frequencies, particularly delta. In the subgroup analysis based on various seizure foci, the delta coherence showed a more pronounced increase at CM than at AN during frontal lobe seizures. Conversely, in limbic seizures, the delta coherence increase was greater at AN compared to CM.

SIGNIFICANCE

It appears that the delta frequency plays a pivotal role in modulating the corticothalamic network during seizures. Our results underscore the significance of comprehending the spatiotemporal dynamics of the corticothalamic network at ictal onset, and this knowledge could guide personalized responsive neuromodulation treatment strategies.

Identification and treatment of surgically-remediable causes of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a common developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with poor long-term outcomes. A substantial proportion of patients with IESS have a potentially surgically remediable etiology. Despite this, epilepsy surgery is underutilized in this patient group. Some surgically remediable etiologies, such as focal cortical dysplasia and malformation of cortical development with oligodendroglial hyperplasia in epilepsy (MOGHE), are under-diagnosed in infants and young children. Even when a surgically remediable etiology is recognised, for example, tuberous sclerosis or focal encephalomalacia, epilepsy surgery may be delayed or not considered due to diffuse EEG changes, unclear surgical boundaries, or concerns about operating in this age group.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors discuss the common surgically remediable etiologies of IESS, their clinical and EEG features, and the imaging techniques that can aid in their diagnosis. They then describe the surgical approaches used in this patient group, and the beneficial impact that early epilepsy surgery can have on developing brain networks.

EXPERT OPINION

Epilepsy surgery remains underutilized even when a potentially surgically remediable cause is recognized. Overcoming the barriers that result in under-recognition of surgical candidates and underutilization of epilepsy surgery in IESS will improve long-term seizure and developmental outcomes.

A pediatrician's guide to epilepsy surgery

Surgical intervention for epilepsy emerged in the second half of the 20th century as an important option for pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Both the number of patients undergoing epilepsy surgery and the available surgical procedures for epilepsy have expanded in the last 3 decades, and now range from surgical resection to neuromodulatory device placement1,2 Studies showing that many patients who would be excellent candidates for surgery are still not being offered appropriate interventions have prompted an interest in ensuring that all providers who see patients with epilepsy are aware of the options for epilepsy surgery to facilitate earlier referrals when medications have not been effective3 In this article, we will introduce the pediatrician to the process involved in determining epilepsy surgery candidacy and to surgical outcomes, with the goal of empowering pediatric providers to refer their medically refractory epilepsy patients to a pediatric epilepsy center.

The comparison of DBS and RNS for adult drug-resistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Neuromodulation has been proven to be a promising alternative treatment for adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) were approved by many countries for the treatment of DRE. However, there is a lack of systematic studies illustrating the differences between them. This meta-analysis is performed to assess the efficacy and clinical characteristics of DBS and RNS in adult patients with DRE.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were retrieved to obtain related studies including adult DRE patients who accepted DBS or RNS. The clinical characteristics of these patients were compiled for the following statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 55 studies (32 of DBS and 23 of RNS) involving 1,568 adult patients with DRE were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in seizure reduction and responder rate between DBS and RNS for DRE. The seizure reduction of DBS and RNS were 56% (95% CI 50-62%, p > 0.05) and 61% (95% CI 54-68%, p > 0.05). The responder rate of DBS and RNS were 67% (95% CI 58-76%, p > 0.05) and 71% (95% CI 64-78%, p > 0.05). Different targets of DBS did not show significant effect on seizure reduction (p > 0.05). Patients with DRE who accepted DBS were younger than those of RNS (32.9 years old vs. 37.8 years old, p < 0.01). The mean follow-up time was 47.3 months for DBS and 39.5 months for RNS (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both DBS and RNS are beneficial and alternative therapies for adult DRE patients who are not eligible to accept resection surgery. Further and larger studies are needed to clarify the characteristics of different targets and provide tailored treatment for patients with DRE.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for a patient with drug resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: 1 year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (DR-JME) remains a significant challenge in neurology. Traditional management strategies often fail to achieve satisfactory control, necessitating innovative treatments.

OBJECTIVE

This case report aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) in a patient with DR-JME.

METHODS

We describe the treatment of a patient with DR-JME using STN-DBS. The patient underwent implantation and received high-frequency stimulation (HFS) at the STN.

RESULTS

One year post-implantation, the patient demonstrated a substantial reduction in motor seizure frequency by 87.5%, with improvements in quality of life and seizure severity by 52.0% and 46.7%, respectively. No adverse events were reported during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

This case represents the first report of favorable outcomes with STN-DBS in a patient with DR-JME, suggesting that long-term HFS of the STN may be a promising treatment option for patients suffering from this condition.

Targeting thalamocortical circuits for closed-loop stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

This paper outlines the therapeutic rationale and neurosurgical targeting technique for bilateral, closed-loop, thalamocortical stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, a severe form of childhood-onset epilepsy. Thalamic stimulation can be an effective treatment for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, but complete seizure control is rarely achieved. Outcomes may be improved by stimulating areas beyond the thalamus, including cortex, but the optimal targets are unknown. We aimed to identify a cortical target by synthesizing prior neuroimaging studies, and to use this knowledge to advance a dual thalamic (centromedian) and cortical (frontal) approach for closed-loop stimulation. Multi-modal brain network maps from three group-level studies of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome were averaged to define the area of peak overlap: simultaneous EEG-functional MRI of generalized paroxysmal fast activity, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET of cortical hypometabolism and diffusion MRI structural connectivity associated with clinical efficacy in a previous trial of thalamic deep brain stimulation. The resulting 'hotspot' was used as a seed in a normative functional MRI connectivity analysis to identify connected networks. Intracranial electrophysiology was reviewed in the first two trial patients undergoing bilateral implantations guided by this hotspot. Simultaneous recordings from cortex and thalamus were analysed for presence and synchrony of epileptiform activity. The peak overlap was in bilateral premotor cortex/caudal middle frontal gyrus. Functional connectivity of this hotspot revealed a distributed network of frontoparietal cortex resembling the diffuse abnormalities seen on EEG-functional MRI and PET. Intracranial electrophysiology showed characteristic epileptiform activity of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in both the cortical hotspot and thalamus; most detected events occurred first in the cortex before appearing in the thalamus. Premotor frontal cortex shows peak involvement in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and functional connectivity of this region resembles the wider epileptic brain network. Thus, it may be an optimal target for a range of neuromodulation therapies, including thalamocortical stimulation and emerging non-invasive treatments like focused ultrasound or transcranial magnetic stimulation. Compared to thalamus-only approaches, the addition of this cortical target may allow more rapid detections of seizures, more diverse stimulation paradigms and broader modulation of the epileptic network. A prospective, multi-centre trial of closed-loop thalamocortical stimulation for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is currently underway.

Post-ictal Rhythmic Thalamic Activity of the Centromedian Nucleus

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CMN) to treat drug-resistant epilepsy has been of interest for decades. However, little is known about the electrophysiological activity of the CMN during seizures. We describe a novel CMN EEG finding associated with seizure: post-ictal rhythmic thalamic activity.

METHODS

Five patients with drug-resistant epilepsy of unknown etiology with focal onset seizures underwent stereoelectroencephalography monitoring as part of evaluation for potential resective surgery or neuromodulation. Two patients had previously undergone complete corpus callosotomy and vagus nerve stimulation. A standardized plan for implantation included targets in the bilateral CMN.

RESULTS

Each patient had frontal onset seizures, and two patients had additional insular, parietal, or mesial temporal onset seizures. Contacts of CMN were involved synchronously or rapidly after onset in most recorded seizures, particularly those with frontal onset. Focal onset hemiclonic and bilateral tonic-clonic seizures spread to involve cortical contacts with high-amplitude rhythmic spiking followed by abrupt offset with diffuse voltage attenuation. A post-ictal rhythmic 1.5 to 2.5 Hz delta frequency pattern, post-ictal rhythmic thalamic activity, emerged in CMN contacts amid the suppression of background activity in cortical contacts. In the two patients with corpus callosotomy, unilateral seizure spread and ipsilateral post-ictal rhythmic thalamic activity were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed post-ictal rhythmic thalamic activity in five patients with stereoelectroencephalography monitoring of the CMN with convulsive seizures. This rhythm appears late in ictal evolution and may signal an important role of the CMN in seizure termination. Furthermore, this rhythm may help identify CMN involvement in the epileptic network.

Deep Brain Stimulation of Bilateral Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei in Pediatric Patients with Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: An Institutional Experience

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of pediatric patients with nonlesional, drug-resistant epilepsy, including patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), remains a challenge given the lack of resective targets in most patients and shows seizure freedom rates <50% at 5 years. The efficacy of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is less certain in children than in adults. This study examined clinical and seizure outcomes for pediatric patients with LGS undergoing DBS targeting of the centromedian thalamic nuclei (CMTN).

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis was performed of patients aged ≤19 years with clinical diagnosis of LGS undergoing bilateral DBS placement to the CMTN from 2020 to 2021 by a single surgeon.

RESULTS

Four females and 2 males aged 6-19 years were identified. Before surgery, each child experienced at least 6 years of refractory seizures; 4 children had experienced seizures since infancy. All took antiseizure medications at the time of surgery. Five children had previous placement of a vagus nerve stimulator and 2 had a previous corpus callosotomy. The mean length of stay after DBS was 2 days. No children experienced adverse neurologic effects from implantation; the mean follow-up time was 16.3 months. Four patients had >60% reduction in seizure frequency after surgery, 1 patient experienced 10% reduction, and 1 patient showed no change. No children reported worsening seizure symptoms after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study contributes to the sparse literature describing CMTN DBS for children with drug-resistant epilepsy from LGS. Our results suggest that CMTN DBS is a safe and effective therapeutic modality that should be considered as an alternative or adjuvant therapy for this challenging patient population. Further studies with larger patient populations are warranted.

Pediatric neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: Survey of current practices, techniques, and outcomes across US epilepsy centers

Neuromodulation via Responsive Neurostimulation (RNS) or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an emerging treatment strategy for pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Knowledge gaps exist in patient selection, surgical technique, and perioperative care. Here, we use an expert survey to clarify practices. Thirty-two members of the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium were surveyed using REDCap. Respondents were from 17 pediatric epilepsy centers (missing data in one): Four centers implant RNS only while 13 implant both RNS and DBS. Thirteen RNS programs commenced in or before 2020, and 10 of 12 DBS programs began thereafter. The busiest six centers implant 6-10 new RNS devices per year; all DBS programs implant <5 annually. The youngest RNS patient was 3 years old. Most centers (11/12) utilize MP2RAGE and/or FGATIR sequences for planning. Centromedian thalamic nuclei were the unanimous target for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Surgeon exposure to neuromodulation occurred mostly in clinical practice (14/17). Clinically significant hemorrhage (n = 2) or infection (n = 3) were rare. Meaningful seizure reduction (>50%) was reported by 81% (13/16) of centers. RNS and DBS are rapidly evolving treatment modalities for safe and effective treatment of pediatric DRE. There is increasing interest in multicenter collaboration to gain knowledge and facilitate dialogue. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We surveyed 32 pediatric epilepsy centers in USA to highlight current practices of intracranial neuromodulation. Of the 17 that replied, we found that most centers are implanting thalamic targets in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy using the RNS device. DBS device is starting to be used in pediatric epilepsy, especially after 2020. Different strategies for target identification are enumerated. This study serves as a starting point for future collaborative research.

Neurostimulation treatments for epilepsy: Deep brain stimulation, responsive neurostimulation and vagus nerve stimulation

Epilepsy is a common and debilitating neurological disorder, and approximately one-third of affected individuals have ongoing seizures despite appropriate trials of two anti-seizure medications. This population with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) may benefit from neurostimulation approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). In some patient populations, these techniques are FDA-approved for treating DRE. VNS is used as adjuvant therapy for children and adults. Acting via the vagus afferent network, VNS modulates thalamocortical circuits, reducing seizures in approximately 50 ​% of patients. RNS uses an adaptive (closed-loop) system that records intracranial EEG patterns to activate the stimulation at the appropriate time, being particularly well-suited to treat seizures arising within eloquent cortex. For DBS, the most promising therapeutic targets are the anterior and centromedian nuclei of the thalamus, with anterior nucleus DBS being used for treating focal and secondarily generalized forms of DRE and centromedian nucleus DBS being applied for treating generalized epilepsies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Here, we discuss the indications, advantages and limitations of VNS, DBS and RNS in treating DRE and summarize the spatial distribution of neuroimaging observations related to epilepsy and stimulation using NeuroQuery and NeuroSynth.

The changing landscape of palliative epilepsy surgery for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome

Lennox Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy that typically leads to decreased quality of life and deleterious neurodevelopmental comorbidities from medically refractory seizures. In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the development and availability of novel treatment strategies for Lennox Gastaut Syndrome patient to improve seizure. Recent advances in neuromodulation and minimally invasive magnetic resonance guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) have paved the way for new treatments strategies including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and MRgLITT corpus callosum ablation. These new strategies offer hope for children with drug-resistant generalized epilepsies, but important questions remain about the safety and effectiveness of these new approaches. In this review, we describe the opportunities presented by these new strategies and how each treatment strategy is currently being employed. Next, we will critically assess available evidence for these new approaches compared to traditional palliative epilepsy surgery approaches, such as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and open microsurgical corpus callosotomy (CC). Finally, we will describe future directions that would help define which of the available strategies should be employed and when.

Predictors of therapeutic response following thalamic neuromodulation for drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

We sought to perform a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to identify predictors of treatment response following thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched, with no language or data restriction, to identify studies reporting seizure outcomes in pediatric populations following deep brain stimulation (DBS) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) implantation in thalamic nuclei. Studies featuring individual participant data of patients with primary or secondary generalized drug-resistant epilepsy were included. Response to therapy was defined as >50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Of 417 citations, 21 articles reporting on 88 participants were eligible. Mean age at implantation was 13.07 ± 3.49 years. Fifty (57%) patients underwent DBS, and 38 (43%) RNS. Sixty (68%) patients were implanted in centromedian nucleus and 23 (26%) in anterior thalamic nucleus, and five (6%) had both targets implanted. Seventy-four (84%) patients were implanted bilaterally. The median time to last follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range = 6.75-26.25). Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved response to treatment. Age, target, modality, and laterality had no significant association with response in univariate logistic regression. Until thalamic neuromodulation gains widespread approval for use in pediatric patients, data on efficacy will continue to be limited to small retrospective cohorts and case series. The inherent bias of these studies can be overcome by using individual participant data. Thalamic neuromodulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for epilepsy. Larger, prolonged prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of DBS over RNS in this patient population where resection for curative intent is not a safe option.

Increased electrode impedance as an indicator for early detection of deep brain stimulation (DBS) hardware Infection: Clinical experience and in vitro study

BACKGROUND

When deep brain stimulation (DBS) infections are identified, they are often too advanced to treat without complete hardware removal. New objective markers to promptly identify DBS infections are needed. We present a patient with GPi (globus pallidus interna) DBS for dystonia, where the electrode impedance unexpectedly increased 3-months post-operatively, followed by serologic and hematologic markers of inflammation at 6-months, prompting explantation surgery. We recreated these conditions in a laboratory environment to analyze the pattern of changing of electrical impedance across the contacts of a DBS lead following Staphylococcus biofilm formation.

METHODS

A stainless-steel culture chamber containing 1 % brain heart infusion agar was used. A DBS electrode was dipped in peptone water containing a strain of S. aureus and subsequently introduced into the chamber. The apparatus was incubated at 37 °C for 6 days. Impedance was measured at 24hr intervals. A control experiment without S. Aureus inoculation was used to determine changes in impedance over a period of 6-days.

RESULTS

The mean monopolar impedance on day-1 was 751.8 ± 23.8 Ω and on day-3 was 1004.8 ± 68.7 Ω, a 33.7 % rise (p = 0.007). A faint biofilm formation could be seen around the DBS lead by day-2 and florid growth by day-3. After addition of the linezolid solution, a 15.9 % decrease in monopolar impedance was observed from day 3-6 (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

This study gives insight into impedance trends following a hardware infection in DBS. Increased impedance outside expected norms may be valuable for early prediction of infection. Furthermore, timely management using antibiotics might reduce the frequency of infection-related explant surgeries.

Corticothalamic Responsive Neurostimulation for Focal Epilepsy: A Single-Center Experience

PURPOSE

Owing to its extensive, reciprocal connectivity with the cortex and other subcortical structures, the thalamus is considered an important target for neuromodulation in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Using corticothalamic stimulation, it is possible to modulate both the thalamus and the cortical seizure onset zone. Limited published clinical experience describes corticothalamic stimulation with depth leads targeting one of the anterior (ANT), centromedian (centromedian nucleus), or pulvinar (PUL) thalamic nuclei. However, it is not clear which of these nuclei is the "best" therapeutic target.

METHODS

This study comprised a single-center experience with corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation using the RNS System to target these three thalamic nuclei. Presented here are the methods for target selection and device programming as well as clinical outcomes and a comparison of ictal and nonictal electrophysiological features.

RESULTS

In this small retrospective study (N = 19), responsive corticothalamic neurostimulation was an effective therapy for 79% of patients (≥50% reduction in disabling seizure frequency), regardless of whether the thalamic lead was implanted in the ANT (N = 2), PUL (N = 6), or centromedian nucleus (N = 11). Twenty-six percent of patients reported a reduction in disabling seizure frequency ≥90%. Both high frequency (≥100 Hz) and low (≤20 Hz) frequency were used to stimulate the thalamus depending on the patient's response and ability to tolerate higher charge densities. In all patients, a longer burst duration (2000-5000 ms) was ultimately implemented on the thalamic leads. Across patients, peaks in the intracranial EEG were observed at theta, beta, gamma, and sleep spindle frequencies. Changes in frequency content and distribution were observed over time in all three nuclei.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that both high frequency and low frequency corticothalamic responsive neurostimulation can potentially be an effective adjunctive therapy in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. These data can also contribute to a broader understanding of thalamic electrophysiology in the context of focal epilepsy.

Neurostimulation for Generalized Epilepsy: Should Therapy be Syndrome-specific?

Current applications of neurostimulation for generalized epilepsy use a one-target-fits-all approach that is agnostic to the specific epilepsy syndrome and seizure type being treated. The authors describe similarities and differences between the 2 "archetypes" of generalized epilepsy-Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy-and review recent neuroimaging evidence for syndrome-specific brain networks underlying seizures. Implications for stimulation targeting and programming are discussed using 5 clinical questions: What epilepsy syndrome does the patient have? What brain networks are involved? What is the optimal stimulation target? What is the optimal stimulation paradigm? What is the plan for adjusting stimulation over time?

Deep Brain Stimulation for Children with Generalized Epilepsy

Intracranial neuromodulation is an evolving therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is now available as a therapy for patients with DRE and focal-onset seizures in select health care systems; however, there remains a substantial need of efficacy data before DBS can be more widely adopted into routine clinical practice. This review and commentary focuses on a particular shifting paradigm: DBS as a therapy for children with generalized-onset seizures.

Evolution of SEEG Strategy: Stanford Experience

Overall stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) has a favorable risk profile, patient tolerability, and superior investigative capability of individualized 3-dimensional seizure onset activity over subdural electrodes. Further, our recent surgical approach to safely enable multinuclear thalamic propagation mapping can only be performed with SEEG. For these reasons, SEEG has become the gold standard of phase II monitoring at our institution, and believe the ability to develop precision network-centric approaches to therapy will be critical to enhance our ability to care for medically refractory, and importantly, even complex multifocal, generalized, or surgically refractory epilepsy patients.

Stimulation to probe, excite, and inhibit the epileptic brain

Direct cortical stimulation has been applied in epilepsy for nearly a century and has experienced a renaissance, given unprecedented opportunities to probe, excite, and inhibit the human brain. Evidence suggests stimulation can increase diagnostic and therapeutic utility in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. However, choosing appropriate stimulation parameters is not a trivial issue, and is further complicated by epilepsy being characterized by complex brain state dynamics. In this article derived from discussions at the ICTALS 2022 Conference (International Conference on Technology and Analysis for Seizures), we succinctly review the literature on cortical stimulation applied acutely and chronically to the epileptic brain for localization, monitoring, and therapeutic purposes. In particular, we discuss how stimulation is used to probe brain excitability, discuss evidence on the usefulness of stimulation to trigger and stop seizures, review therapeutic applications of stimulation, and finally discuss how stimulation parameters are impacted by brain dynamics. Although research has advanced considerably over the past decade, there are still significant hurdles to optimizing use of this technique. For example, it remains unclear to what extent short timescale diagnostic biomarkers can predict long-term outcomes and to what extent these biomarkers add information to already existing biomarkers from passive electroencephalographic recordings. Further questions include the extent to which closed loop stimulation offers advantages over open loop stimulation, what the optimal closed loop timescales may be, and whether biomarker-informed stimulation can lead to seizure freedom. The ultimate goal of bioelectronic medicine remains not just to stop seizures but rather to cure epilepsy and its comorbidities.

Vagus nerve stimulation in refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy: An Irish retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE

Refractory idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; also known as genetic generalised epilepsy) is a clinical challenge due to limited available therapeutic options. While vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is approved as an adjunctive treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy, there is limited evidence supporting its efficacy for refractory IGE.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre retrospective analysis of adult IGE patients treated with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. We analysed the efficacy, safety, tolerability, stimulation parameters and potential clinical features of VNS response in this IGE cohort.

RESULTS

Twenty-three IGE patients were implanted with VNS between January 2003 and January 2022. Twenty-two patients (95.65%) were female. The median baseline seizure frequency was 30 per month (interquartile range [IQR]= 140), including generalised tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), absences, myoclonus, and eyelid myoclonia with/without absences. The median number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASM) was three (IQR= 2). Patients had previously failed a median of six ASM (IQR= 5). At the end of the study period, VNS therapy remained active in 17 patients (73.9%). amongst patients who continued VNS, thirteen (56.5% of the overall cohort) were considered responders (≥50% seizure frequency reduction). Amongst the clinical variables analysed, only psychiatric comorbidity correlated with poorer seizure outcomes, but was non-significant after applying the Bonferroni correction. Although 16 patients reported side-effects, none resulted in the discontinuation of VNS therapy.

SIGNIFICANCE

Over half of the patients with refractory IGE experienced a positive response to VNS therapy. VNS represents a viable treatment option for patients with refractory IGE, particularly for females, when other therapeutic options have been exhausted.

Sensing with deep brain stimulation device in epilepsy: Aperiodic changes in thalamic local field potential during seizures

OBJECTIVE

Thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapeutic option in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Recent DBS devices with sensing capabilities enable chronic, outpatient local field potential (LFP) recordings. Whereas beta oscillations have been demonstrated to be a useful biomarker in movement disorders, the clinical utility of DBS sensing in epilepsy remains unclear. Our aim was to determine LFP features that distinguish ictal from inter-ictal states, which may aid in tracking seizure outcomes with DBS.

METHODS

Electrophysiology data were obtained from DBS devices implanted in the anterior nucleus (N = 12) or centromedian nucleus (N = 2) of the thalamus. Power spectra recorded during patient/caregiver-marked seizure events were analyzed with a method that quantitatively separates the oscillatory and non-oscillatory/aperiodic components of the LFP using non-parametric statistics, without the need for pre-specification of the frequency bands of interest. Features of the LFP parameterized using this algorithm were compared with those from inter-ictal power spectra recorded in clinic.

RESULTS

Oscillatory activity in multiple canonical frequency bands was identified from the power spectra in 86.48% of patient-marked seizure events. Delta oscillations were present in all patients, followed by theta (N = 10) and beta (N = 9). Although there were no differences in oscillatory LFP features between the ictal and inter-ictal states, there was a steeper decline in the 1/f slope of the aperiodic component of the LFP during seizures.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our work highlights the potential and shortcomings of chronic LFP recordings in thalamic DBS for epilepsy. Findings suggest that no single frequency band in isolation clearly differentiates seizures, and that features of aperiodic LFP activity may be clinically-relevant biomarkers of seizures.

Structural connections of the centromedian nucleus of thalamus and their relevance for neuromodulation in generalized drug-resistant epilepsy: insight from a tractography study

Background

Epilepsy is a widespread neurologic disorder and almost one-third of patients suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Neuromodulation targeting the centromediannucleus of the thalamus (CM) has been showing promising results for patients with generalized DRE who are not surgical candidates. Recently, the effect of CM- deep brain stimulation (DBS) in DRE patients was investigated in the Electrical Stimulation of Thalamus for Epilepsy of Lennox-Gastaut phenotype (ESTEL) trial, a monocentric randomized-controlled study. The same authors described a 'cold-spot' and a 'sweet-spot', which are defined as the volume of stimulation in the thalamus yielding the least and the best clinical response, respectively. However, it remains unclear which structural connections may contribute to the anti-seizure effect of the stimulation.

Objective

We investigated the differences in structural connectivity among CM, the sweet-spot and the cold-spot. Furthermore, we tried to validate our results in a cohort of DRE patients who underwent CM-DBS or CM-RNS (responsive neurostimulation). We hypothesized that the sweet-spot would share similar structural connectivity with responder patients.

Methods

By using the software FMRIB Software Library (FSL), probabilistic tractography was performed on 100 subjects from the Human Connectome Project to calculate the probability of connectivity of the whole CM, the sweet-spot and the cold-spot to 45 cortical and subcortical areas. Results among the three seeds were compared with multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Similarly, the structural connectivity of volumes of tissue activated (VTAs) from eight DRE patients was investigated. Patients were divided into responders and non-responders based on the degree of reduction in seizure frequency, and the mean probabilities of connectivity were similarly compared between the two groups.

Results

The sweet-spot demonstrated a significantly higher probability of connectivity (p < 0.001) with the precentral gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, and the cerebellum than the whole CM and the cold-spot. Responder patients displayed a higher probability of connectivity with both ipsilateral (p = 0.011) and contralateral cerebellum (p = 0.04) than the non-responders.

Conclusion

Cerebellar connections seem to contribute to the beneficial effects of CM-neuromodulation in patients with drug-resistant generalized epilepsy.

Advancing the frontiers of thalamic neuromodulation: A review of emerging targets and paradigms

The thalamus is a key structure that plays a crucial role in initiating and propagating seizures. Recent advancements in neuroimaging and neurophysiology have identified the thalamus as a promising target for neuromodulation in drug-resistant epilepsies. This review article presents the latest innovations in thalamic targets and neuromodulation paradigms being explored in pilot or pivotal clinical trials. Multifocal temporal plus or posterior quadrant epilepsies are evaluated with pulvinar thalamus neuromodulation, while centromedian thalamus is explored in generalized epilepsies and Lennox Gastaut syndrome. Multinodal thalamocortical neuromodulation with novel stimulation paradigms such as long bursting or low-frequency stimulation is being investigated to quench the epileptic network excitability. Beyond seizure control, thalamic neuromodulation to restore consciousness is being studied. This review highlights the promising potential of thalamic neuromodulation in epilepsy treatment, offering hope to patients who have not responded to conventional medical therapies. However, it also emphasizes the need for larger randomized controlled trials and personalized stimulation paradigms to improve patient outcomes further.

Deep learning for automated detection of generalized paroxysmal fast activity in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

OBJECTIVES

Generalized paroxysmal fast activity (GPFA) is a key electroencephalographic (EEG) feature of Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS). Automated analysis of scalp EEG has been successful in detecting more typical abnormalities. Automatic detection of GPFA has been more challenging, due to its variability from patient to patient and similarity to normal brain rhythms. In this work, a deep learning model is investigated for detection of GPFA events and estimating their overall burden from scalp EEG.

METHODS

Data from 10 patients recorded during four ambulatory EEG monitoring sessions are used to generate and validate the model. All patients had confirmed LGS and were recruited into a trial for thalamic deep-brain stimulation therapy (ESTEL Trial).

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between manual and model estimates of event counts was r2 = 0.87, and for total burden was r2 = 0.91. The average GPFA detection sensitivity was 0.876, with an average false-positive rate of 3.35 per minute. There was no significant difference found between patients with early or delayed deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment, or those with active vagal nerve stimulation (VNS).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the deep learning model was able to accurately detect GPFA and provide accurate estimates of the overall GPFA burden and electrographic event counts, albeit with a high false-positive rate.

SIGNIFICANCE

Automated GPFA detection may enable automated calculation of EEG biomarkers of burden of disease in LGS.

Initial case series of a novel sensing deep brain stimulation device in drug-resistant epilepsy and consistent identification of alpha/beta oscillatory activity: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Here, we report a retrospective, single-center experience with a novel deep brain stimulation (DBS) device capable of chronic local field potential (LFP) recording in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and explore potential electrophysiological biomarkers that may aid DBS programming and outcome tracking.

METHODS

Five patients with DRE underwent thalamic DBS, targeting either the bilateral anterior (n = 3) or centromedian (n = 2) nuclei. Postoperative electrode lead localizations were visualized in Lead-DBS software. Local field potentials recorded over 12-18 months were tracked, and changes in power were associated with patient events, medication changes, and stimulation. We utilized a combination of lead localization, in-clinic broadband LFP recordings, real-time LFP response to stimulation, and chronic recordings to guide DBS programming.

RESULTS

Four patients (80%) experienced a >50% reduction in seizure frequency, whereas one patient had no significant reduction. Peaks in the alpha and/or beta frequency range were observed in the thalamic LFPs of each patient. Stimulation suppressed these LFP peaks in a dose-dependent manner. Chronic timeline data identified changes in LFP amplitude associated with stimulation, seizure occurrences, and medication changes. We also noticed a circadian pattern of LFP amplitudes in all patients. Button-presses during seizure events via a mobile application served as a digital seizure diary and were associated with elevations in LFP power.

SIGNIFICANCE

We describe an initial cohort of patients with DRE utilizing a novel sensing DBS device to characterize potential LFP biomarkers of epilepsy that may be associated with seizure control after DBS in DRE. We also present a new workflow utilizing the Percept device that may optimize DBS programming using real-time and chronic LFP recording.

Characteristics of ictal thalamic EEG in pediatric-onset neocortical focal epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To characterize ictal EEG change in the centromedian (CM) and anterior nucleus (AN) of the thalamus, using stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recordings.

METHODS

Forty habitual seizures were analyzed in nine patients with pediatric-onset neocortical drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent SEEG (age 2-25 y) with thalamic coverage. Both visual and quantitative analysis was used to evaluate ictal EEG signal in the cortex and thalamus. The amplitude and cortico-thalamic latencies of broadband frequencies at ictal onset were measured.

RESULTS

Visual analysis demonstrated consistent detection of ictal EEG changes in both the CM nucleus and AN nucleus with latency to thalamic ictal EEG changes of less than 400 ms in 95% of seizures, with low-voltage fast activity being the most common ictal pattern. Quantitative broadband amplitude analysis showed consistent power changes across the frequency bands, corresponding to ictal EEG onset, while while ictal EEG latency was variable from -18.0 seconds to 13.2 seconds. There was no significant difference between detection of CM and AN ictal activity on visual or amplitude analysis. Four patients with subsequent thalamic responsive neurostimulation (RNS) demonstrated ictal EEG changes consistent with SEEG findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Ictal EEG changes were consistently seen at the CM and AN of the thalamus during neocortical seizures.

SIGNIFICANCE

It may be feasible to use a closed-loop system in the thalamus to detect and modulate seizure activity for neocortical epilepsy.

Long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with pharmacologically intractable epilepsy: A case series of six patients

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy is one of the widespread neurological illnesses, and about 20%-40% of epilepsy patients are pharmacoresistant. We aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

We included pharmacologically intractable epilepsy patients who had STN-DBS at the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital between June 2016 and December 2018. We retrospectively evaluated pre- and postoperative clinical outcomes, including seizure frequency, seizure type, anti-seizure medication, cognitive function, anatomical target coordinates, stimulation parameters, and adverse events following the surgical procedure. Six patients with a mean follow-up of 49.3 ± 10.2 months, were included.

RESULTS

Seizure frequency decreased by an average of 64.0% after STN-DBS at last year follow-up (p = .046), and one patient (1/6) achieved seizure-free status. For seizure type, anti-seizure medication, and cognitive function, there were no significant differences between pre-and post-operation (p > .05). In terms of stimulation parameters, the pulse width, amplitude, and frequency were 58.3 ± 9.4 μs, 2.5 ± .7 V, and 122.5 ± 15.7 Hz, respectively. None of the patients showed normal electroencephalography during the electroencephalography reexamination. There were no surgery-related complications, and chronic STN stimulation was generally well tolerated in five patients. However, one patient (1/6) had a difficulty of dyskinesia in the right arm.

SIGNIFICANCE

In conclusion, neuromodulation of the STN by DBS is a promising option for patients with pharmacologically intractable epilepsy, especially for whose epileptic zone originates mainly from the frontoparietal region and who are unsuitable for resective surgery. Further prospective multicenter studies with a larger sample size are necessary for further exploration.

Uncovering Spatiotemporal Dynamics of the Corticothalamic Network during Seizures

Objective

Although the clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation targeting the anterior nucleus (AN) and centromedian nucleus (CM) of the thalamus has been actively investigated for the treatment of medication-resistant epilepsy, few studies have investigated dynamic ictal changes in corticothalamic connectivity in human EEG recording. This study aims to establish the complex spatiotemporal dynamics of the ictal corticothalamic network associated with various seizure foci.

Methods

We analyzed ten patients (aged 2.7-28.1) with medication-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent stereotactic EEG evaluation with thalamic coverage. We examined both undirected and directed connectivity, incorporating coherence and spectral Granger causality analysis (GCA) between the diverse seizure foci and thalamic nuclei (AN and CM).

Results

In our analysis of 36 seizures, coherence between seizure onset and thalamic nuclei increased across all frequencies, especially in slower bands (delta, theta, alpha). GCA showed increased information flow from seizure onset to the thalamus across all frequency bands, but outflows from the thalamus were mainly in slower frequencies, particularly delta. In the subgroup analysis based on various seizure foci, the delta coherence showed a more pronounced increase at CM than at AN during frontal lobe seizures. Conversely, in limbic seizures, the delta coherence increase was greater at AN compared to CM.

Interpretation

It appears that the delta frequency plays a pivotal role in modulating the corticothalamic network during seizures. Our results underscore the significance of comprehending the spatiotemporal dynamics of the corticothalamic network during seizures, and this knowledge could guide personalized neuromodulation treatment strategies.

Characteristics of ictal thalamic EEG in pediatric-onset neocortical focal epilepsy

Objective

To characterize ictal EEG change in the centromedian (CM) and anterior nucleus (AN) of the thalamus, using stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) recordings.

Methods

Forty habitual seizures were analyzed in nine patients with pediatric-onset neocortical drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent SEEG (age 2-25 y) with thalamic coverage. Both visual and quantitative analysis was used to evaluate ictal EEG signal in the cortex and thalamus. The amplitude and cortico-thalamic latencies of broadband frequencies at ictal onset were measured.

Results

Visual analysis demonstrated consistent detection of ictal EEG changes in both the CM nucleus and AN nucleus with latency to thalamic ictal EEG changes of less than 400ms in 95% of seizures, with low-voltage fast activity being the most common ictal pattern. Quantitative broadband amplitude analysis showed consistent power changes across the frequency bands, corresponding to ictal EEG onset, while while ictal EEG latency was variable from -18.0 seconds to 13.2 seconds. There was no significant difference between detection of CM and AN ictal activity on visual or amplitude analysis. Four patients with subsequent thalamic responsive neurostimulation (RNS) demonstrated ictal EEG changes consistent with SEEG findings.

Conclusions

Ictal EEG changes were consistently seen at the CM and AN of the thalamus during neocortical seizures.

Significance

It may be feasible to use a closed-loop system in the thalamus to detect and modulate seizure activity for neocortical epilepsy.

Alternative patterns of deep brain stimulation in neurologic and neuropsychiatric disorders

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a widely used clinical therapy that modulates neuronal firing in subcortical structures, eliciting downstream network effects. Its effectiveness is determined by electrode geometry and location as well as adjustable stimulation parameters including pulse width, interstimulus interval, frequency, and amplitude. These parameters are often determined empirically during clinical or intraoperative programming and can be altered to an almost unlimited number of combinations. Conventional high-frequency stimulation uses a continuous high-frequency square-wave pulse (typically 130-160 Hz), but other stimulation patterns may prove efficacious, such as continuous or bursting theta-frequencies, variable frequencies, and coordinated reset stimulation. Here we summarize the current landscape and potential clinical applications for novel stimulation patterns.

Thalamocortical circuits in generalized epilepsy: Pathophysiologic mechanisms and therapeutic targets

Generalized epilepsy affects 24 million people globally; at least 25% of cases remain medically refractory. The thalamus, with widespread connections throughout the brain, plays a critical role in generalized epilepsy. The intrinsic properties of thalamic neurons and the synaptic connections between populations of neurons in the nucleus reticularis thalami and thalamocortical relay nuclei help generate different firing patterns that influence brain states. In particular, transitions from tonic firing to highly synchronized burst firing mode in thalamic neurons can cause seizures that rapidly generalize and cause altered awareness and unconsciousness. Here, we review the most recent advances in our understanding of how thalamic activity is regulated and discuss the gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms of generalized epilepsy syndromes. Elucidating the role of the thalamus in generalized epilepsy syndromes may lead to new opportunities to better treat pharmaco-resistant generalized epilepsy by thalamic modulation and dietary therapy.

Ambulatory Local Field Potential Recordings from the Thalamus in Epilepsy: A Feasibility Study

INTRODUCTION

Stimulation of the thalamus is gaining favor in the treatment of medically refractory multifocal and generalized epilepsy. Implanted brain stimulators capable of recording ambulatory local field potentials (LFPs) have recently been introduced, but there is little information to guide their use in thalamic stimulation for epilepsy. This study sought to assess the feasibility of chronically recording ambulatory interictal LFP from the thalamus in patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

In this pilot study, ambulatory LFP was recorded from patients who underwent sensing-enabled deep brain stimulation (DBS, 2 participants) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS, 3 participants) targeting the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT, 2 electrodes), centromedian nucleus (CM, 7 electrodes), or medial pulvinar (PuM, 1 electrode) for multifocal or generalized epilepsy. Time-domain and frequency-domain LFP was investigated for epileptiform discharges, spectral peaks, circadian variation, and peri-ictal patterns.

RESULTS

Thalamic interictal discharges were visible on ambulatory recordings from both DBS and RNS. At-home interictal frequency-domain data could be extracted from both devices. Spectral peaks were noted at 10-15 Hz in CM, 6-11 Hz in ANT, and 19-24 Hz in PuM but varied in prominence and were not visible in all electrodes. In CM, 10-15 Hz power exhibited circadian variation and was attenuated by eye opening.

CONCLUSION

Chronic ambulatory recording of thalamic LFP is feasible. Common spectral peaks can be observed but vary between electrodes and across neural states. DBS and RNS devices provide a wealth of complementary data that have the potential to better inform thalamic stimulation for epilepsy.

Deep brain stimulation for patients with refractory epilepsy: nuclei selection and surgical outcome

Objective

By studying the surgical outcome of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different target nuclei for patients with refractory epilepsy, we aimed to explore a clinically feasible target nucleus selection strategy.

Methods

We selected patients with refractory epilepsy who were not eligible for resective surgery. For each patient, we performed DBS on a thalamic nucleus [anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT), subthalamic nucleus (STN), centromedian nucleus (CMN), or pulvinar nucleus (PN)] selected based on the location of the patient's epileptogenic zone (EZ) and the possible epileptic network involved. We monitored the clinical outcomes for at least 12 months and analyzed the clinical characteristics and seizure frequency changes to assess the postoperative efficacy of DBS on the different target nuclei.

Results

Out of the 65 included patients, 46 (70.8%) responded to DBS. Among the 65 patients, 45 underwent ANT-DBS, 29 (64.4%) responded to the treatment, and four (8.9%) of them reported being seizure-free for at least 1 year. Among the patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE, n = 36) and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (ETLE, n = 9), 22 (61.1%) and 7 (77.8%) responded to the treatment, respectively. Among the 45 patients who underwent ANT-DBS, 28 (62%) had focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS). Of these 28 patients, 18 (64%) responded to the treatment. Out of the 65 included patients, 16 had EZ related to the sensorimotor cortex and underwent STN-DBS. Among them, 13 (81.3%) responded to the treatment, and two (12.5%) were seizure-free for at least 6 months. Three patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS)-like epilepsy and underwent CMN-DBS; all of them responded to the treatment (seizure frequency reductions: 51.6%, 79.6%, and 79.5%). Finally, one patient with bilateral occipital lobe epilepsy underwent PN-DBS, reducing the seizure frequency by 69.7%.

Significance

ANT-DBS is effective for patients with TLE or ETLE. In addition, ANT-DBS is effective for patients with FBTCS. STN-DBS might be an optimal treatment for patients with motor seizures, especially when the EZ overlaps the sensorimotor cortex. CMN and PN may be considered modulating targets for patients with LGS-like epilepsy or occipital lobe epilepsy, respectively.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe childhood-onset epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by multiple seizure types, generalized slow spike-and-wave complexes in the EEG, and cognitive impairment. Seizures in LGS are typically resistant to treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs). Tonic/atonic ('drop') seizures are of particular concern, due to their liability to cause physical injury.

AREAS COVERED

We summarize evidence for current and emerging ASMs for the treatment of seizures in LGS. The review focuses on findings from randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RDBCTs). For ASMs for which no double-blind trials were identified, lower quality evidence was considered. Novel pharmacological agents currently undergoing investigation for the treatment of LGS are also briefly discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Evidence from RDBCTs supports the use of cannabidiol, clobazam, felbamate, fenfluramine, lamotrigine, rufinamide, and topiramate as adjunct treatments for drop seizures. Percentage decreases in drop seizure frequency ranged from 68.3% with high-dose clobazam to 14.8% with topiramate. Valproate continues to be considered the first-line treatment, despite the absence of RDBCTs specifically in LGS. Most individuals with LGS will require treatment with multiple ASMs. Treatment decisions should be individualized and take into account adverse effects, comorbidities, general quality of life, and drug interactions, as well as individual efficacy.

Deep brain stimulation of thalamus for epilepsy

Neuromodulation (neurostimulation) is a relatively new and rapidly growing treatment for refractory epilepsy. Three varieties are approved in the US: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). This article reviews thalamic DBS for epilepsy. Among many thalamic sub-nuclei, DBS for epilepsy has been targeted to the anterior nucleus (ANT), centromedian nucleus (CM), dorsomedial nucleus (DM) and pulvinar (PULV). Only ANT is FDA-approved, based upon a controlled clinical trial. Bilateral stimulation of ANT reduced seizures by 40.5% at three months in the controlled phase (p = .038) and 75% by 5 years in the uncontrolled phase. Side effects related to paresthesias, acute hemorrhage, infection, occasional increased seizures, and usually transient effects on mood and memory. Efficacy was best documented for focal onset seizures in temporal or frontal lobe. CM stimulation may be useful for generalized or multifocal seizures and PULV for posterior limbic seizures. Mechanisms of DBS for epilepsy are largely unknown, but animal work points to changes in receptors, channels, neurotransmitters, synapses, network connectivity and neurogenesis. Personalization of therapies, in terms of connectivity of the seizure onset zone to the thalamic sub- nucleus and individual characteristics of the seizures, might lead to improved efficacy. Many questions remain about DBS, including the best candidates for different types of neuromodulation, the best targets, the best stimulation parameters, how to minimize side effects and how to deliver current noninvasively. Despite the questions, neuromodulation provides useful new opportunities to treat people with refractory seizures not responding to medicines and not amenable to resective surgery.

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Centromedian Nucleus of the Thalamus for Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a severe childhood-onset pharmacoresistant epilepsy. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CMN) has been utilized.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) analysis to characterize outcomes of DBS of CMN in LGS.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Articles were screened by title/abstract then full text. Included articles were reviewed for bibliographic, demographic, and outcome data. IPD were extracted from studies providing IPD for all patients.

RESULTS

Of 72 resultant articles, 10 studies (114 patients) were included. Six of 7 studies reporting the outcome of ≥50% seizure reduction indicated that ≥50% of patients achieved this, with improved functional ability. Seizure freedom rate was generally <10%. Six studies with 47 patients provided IPD. The mean ages at epilepsy onset and CMN DBS were 3.9 ± 4.5 years and 17.4 ± 8.8 years, respectively. Nineteen of 41 (46.3%) patients had positive MRI findings. Seizure types included atypical absence in 39 (83.0%) patients, generalized tonic-clonic in 32 (68.1%), tonic in 22 (46.8%), and atonic in 20 (42.6%). Thirty-eight (80.9%) patients experienced ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, and only 3 (6.4%) experienced seizure freedom. The mean seizure reduction was 62.9% ± 31.2% overall. Quality of life improved in 30/34 (88.2%) and was unchanged in the remainder (11.8%). The complication rate was 2/41 (4.9%). The mean length of follow-up was 19.8 ± 26.1 months (IQR: 4-18 months).

CONCLUSION

Limited data indicate that DBS of the CMN may be effective and safe for people with LGS.

Emerging approaches in neurostimulation for epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neurostimulation is a quickly growing treatment approach for epilepsy patients. We summarize recent approaches to provide a perspective on the future of neurostimulation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Invasive stimulation for treatment of focal epilepsy includes vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation of the cortex and deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus. A wide range of other targets have been considered, including centromedian, central lateral and pulvinar thalamic nuclei; medial septum, nucleus accumbens, subthalamic nucleus, cerebellum, fornicodorsocommissure and piriform cortex. Stimulation for generalized onset seizures and mixed epilepsies as well as increased efforts focusing on paediatric populations have emerged. Hardware with more permanently implanted lead options and sensing capabilities is emerging. A wider variety of programming approaches than typically used may improve patient outcomes. Finally, noninvasive brain stimulation with its favourable risk profile offers the potential to treat increasingly diverse epilepsy patients.

SUMMARY

Neurostimulation for the treatment of epilepsy is surprisingly varied. Flexibility and reversibility of neurostimulation allows for rapid innovation. There remains a continued need for excitability biomarkers to guide treatment and innovation. Neurostimulation, a part of bioelectronic medicine, offers distinctive benefits as well as unique challenges.

Medial Pulvinar Stimulation in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Literature Review and a Hypothesis Based on Neuroanatomical Findings

While bilateral stimulation of the anterior thalamic nuclei remains the only approved deep brain stimulation (DBS) option for focal epilepsy, two additional thalamic targets have been proposed. Earlier work indicated the potential of centromedian thalamic nucleus stimulation with recent findings highlighting the medial pulvinar nucleus. The latter has been shown to exhibit electrophysiological and imaging alterations in patients with partial status epilepticus and temporal lobe epilepsy. On this basis, recent studies have begun assessing the feasibility and efficacy of pulvinar stimulation, with encouraging results on the reduction of seizure frequency and severity. Building on existing neuroanatomical knowledge, indicating that the medial pulvinar is connected to the temporal lobe via the temporopulvinar bundle of Arnold, we hypothesize that this is one of the routes through which medial pulvinar stimulation affects temporal lobe structures. We suggest that further anatomic, imaging, and electrophysiologic studies are warranted to deepen our understanding of the subject and guide future clinical applications.

Frontoparietal 18F-FDG-PET hypo-metabolism in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: further evidence highlighting the key network

INTRODUCTION

Lennox Gastaut syndrome (LGS) can be conceptualised as a "secondary network epilepsy", in which the shared electroclinical manifestations reflect epileptic recruitment of a common brain network, despite a range of underlying aetiologies. We aimed to identify the key networks recruited by the epileptic process of LGS using interictal 2-deoxy-2-(¹⁸F)fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET).

METHODS

Group analysis of cerebral ¹⁸F-FDG-PET, comparing 21 patients with LGS (mean age = 15 years) and 18 pseudo-controls (mean age = 19 years), studied at Austin Health Melbourne, between 2004 and 2015. To minimise the influence of individual patient lesions in the LGS group, we only studied brain hemispheres without structural MRI abnormalities. The pseudo-control group consisted of age- and sex-matched patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy, using only the hemispheres contralateral to the side of epilepsy. Voxel-wise permutation testing compared ¹⁸F-FDG-PET uptake between groups. Associations were explored between areas of altered metabolism and clinical variables (age of seizure onset, proportion of life with epilepsy, and verbal/nonverbal ability). Penetrance maps were calculated to explore spatial consistency of altered metabolic patterns across individual patients with LGS.

RESULTS

Although not always readily apparent on visual inspection of individual patient scans, group analysis revealed hypometabolism in a network of regions including prefrontal and premotor cortex, anterior and posterior cingulate, inferior parietal lobule, and precuneus (p < 0.05, corrected for family-wise error). These brain regions tended to show a greater reduction in metabolism in non-verbal compared to verbal LGS patients, although this difference was not statistically significant. No areas of hypermetabolism were detected on group analysis, although ∼25 % of individual patients showed increased metabolism (relative to pseudo-controls) in the brainstem, putamen, thalamus, cerebellum, and pericentral cortex.

DISCUSSION

Interictal hypometabolism in frontoparietal cortex in LGS is compatible with our previous EEG-fMRI and SPECT studies showing that interictal bursts of generalised paroxysmal fast activity and tonic seizures recruit similar cortical regions. This study provides further evidence that these regions are central to the electroclinical expression of LGS.

Neurostimulation in generalized epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

There are three neurostimulation devices available to treat generalized epilepsy: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS). However, the choice between them is unclear due to lack of head-to-head comparisons. A systematic comparison of neurostimulation outcomes in generalized epilepsy has not been performed previously. The goal of this meta-analysis was to determine whether one of these devices is better than the others to treat generalized epilepsy.

METHODS

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was performed for studies reporting seizure outcomes following VNS, RNS, and DBS implantation in generalized drug-resistant epilepsy between the first pivotal trial study for each modality through August 2022. Specific search criteria were used for VNS ("vagus", "vagal", or "VNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), DBS ("deep brain stimulation", "DBS", "anterior thalamic nucleus", "centromedian nucleus", or "thalamic stimulation" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"), and RNS ("responsive neurostimulation" or "RNS" in the title and "epilepsy" or "seizure"). From 4409 articles identified, 319 underwent full-text reviews, and 20 studies were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model using the meta package in R.

RESULTS

Sufficient data for meta-analysis were available from seven studies for VNS (n = 510) and nine studies for DBS (n = 87). Data from RNS (five studies, n = 18) were insufficient for meta-analysis. The mean (SD) follow-up durations were as follows: VNS, 39.1 (23.4) months; DBS, 23.1 (19.6) months; and RNS, 22.3 (10.6) months. Meta-analysis showed seizure reductions of 48.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 38.7%-57.9%) for VNS and 64.8% (95% CI = 54.4%-75.2%) for DBS (p = .02).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our meta-analysis indicates that the use of DBS may lead to greater seizure reduction than VNS in generalized epilepsy. Results from RNS use are promising, but further research is required.

Deep brain stimulation of thalamic nuclei for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: Are we confident with the precise surgical target?

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic nuclei for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) has been investigated for decades. In recent years, DBS targeting the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) was approved by CE and FDA for the treatment of focal-onset DRE in light of the results from the multicentric randomized controlled SANTE trial. However, stereotactic targeting of thalamic nuclei is not straightforward because of the low contrast definition among thalamic nuclei on the current MRI sequences. When the FGATIR sequence is added to the preoperative MRI protocol, the mammillothalamic tract can be identified and used as a visible landmark to directly target ANT. According to the current evidence, the trans-ventricular trajectory allows the placement of stimulating contact into the nucleus more frequently than the trans-cortical trajectory. Another thalamic nucleus whose stimulation for the treatment of generalized DRE is receiving increasing attention is the centromedian nucleus (CM). CM-DBS seems to be particularly efficacious in patients suffering from Lennox-Gastault syndrome (LGS) and the recent monocentric randomized controlled ESTEL trial also described a beneficial "sweet-spot". However, CM targeting is still based on indirect stereotactic coordinates, since acquisition times and post-processing techniques of the actual MRI sequences are not applicable in clinical practice. Moreover, the results of the ESTEL trial await confirmation from similar studies accounting for epileptic syndromes other than LGS. Therefore, novel neuroimaging approaches are advisable to improve the surgical targeting of CM and potentially tailor the stimulation based on the patient's specific epileptic phenotype.

Could We Generalize Surgical Candidacy Beyond Focal Epilepsy With Neurostimulation?

[Box: see text]

Using chronic recordings from a closed-loop neurostimulation system to capture seizures across multiple thalamic nuclei

We report the case of a patient with unilateral diffuse frontotemporal epilepsy in whom we implanted a responsive neurostimulation system with leads spanning the anterior and centromedian nucleus of the thalamus. During chronic recording, ictal activity in the centromedian nucleus consistently preceded the anterior nucleus, implying a temporally organized seizure network involving the thalamus. With stimulation, the patient had resolution of focal impaired awareness seizures and secondarily generalized seizures. This report describes chronic recordings of seizure activity from multiple thalamic nuclei within a hemisphere and demonstrates the potential efficacy of closed-loop neurostimulation of multiple thalamic nuclei to control seizures.

Invasive neuromodulation for epilepsy: Comparison of multiple approaches from a single center

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) patients not amenable to epilepsy surgery can benefit from neurostimulation. Few data compare different neuromodulation strategies.

OBJECTIVE

Compare five invasive neuromodulation strategies for the treatment of DRE: anterior thalamic nuclei deep brain stimulation (ANT-DBS), centromedian thalamic nuclei DBS (CM-DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS), and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).

METHODS

Single center retrospective review and phone survey for patients implanted with invasive neuromodulation for 2004-2021.

RESULTS

N = 159 (ANT-DBS = 38, CM-DBS = 19, RNS = 30, CSS = 32, VNS = 40). Total median seizure reduction (MSR) was 61 % for the entire cohort (IQR 5-90) and in descending order: CSS (85 %), CM-DBS (63 %), ANT-DBS (52 %), RNS (50 %), and VNS (50 %); p = 0.07. The responder rate was 60 % after a median follow-up time of 26 months. Seizure severity, life satisfaction, and quality of sleep were improved. Cortical stimulation (RNS and CSS) was associated with improved seizure reduction compared to subcortical stimulation (ANT-DBS, CM-DBS, and VNS) (67 % vs. 52 %). Effectiveness was similar for focal epilepsy vs. generalized epilepsy, closed-loop vs. open-loop stimulation, pediatric vs. adult cases, and high frequency (>100 Hz) vs. low frequency (<100 Hz) stimulation settings. Delivered charge per hour varied widely across approaches but was not correlated with improved seizure reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple invasive neuromodulation approaches are available to treat DRE, but little evidence compares the approaches. This study used a uniform approach for single-center results and represents an effort to compare neuromodulation approaches.

Paroxysmal fast activity is a biomarker of treatment response in deep brain stimulation for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Epilepsy treatment trials typically rely on seizure diaries to determine seizure frequency, but these are time-consuming and difficult to maintain accurately. Fast, reliable, and objective biomarkers of treatment response are needed, particularly in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), where high seizure frequency and comorbid cognitive and behavioral issues are additional obstacles to accurate diary-keeping. Here, we measured generalized paroxysmal fast activity (GPFA), a key interictal electrographic feature of LGS, and correlated GPFA burden with seizure diaries during a thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment trial (Electrical Stimulation of the Thalamus in Epilepsy of Lennox-Gastaut Phenotype [ESTEL]).

METHODS

GPFA and electrographic seizure counts from intermittent, 24-h electroencephalograms (EEGs) were compared to 3-month diary-recorded seizure counts in 17 young adults with LGS (mean age ± SD = 24.9 ± 6.6) in the ESTEL study, a randomized clinical trial of DBS lasting 12 months (comprising a 3-month baseline and 9 months of postimplantation follow-up).

RESULTS

Baseline median seizures measured by diaries numbered 2.6 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1.4-5) per day, compared to 284 (IQR = 120.5-360) electrographic seizures per day, confirming that diaries capture only a small fraction of seizure burden. Across all patient EEGs, the average number of GPFA discharges per hour of sleep was 138 (IQR =72-258). GPFA duration and frequency, quantified over 2-h windows of sleep EEG, were significantly associated with diary-recorded seizure counts over 3-month intervals (p < .001, η2 p  = .30-.48). For every GPFA discharge, there were 20-25 diary seizures witnessed over 3 months. There was high between-patient variability in the ratio between diary seizure burden and GPFA burden; however, within individual patients, the ratio was similar over time, such that the percentage change from pre-DBS baseline in seizure diaries strongly correlated with the percentage change in GPFA.

SIGNIFICANCE

When seeking to optimize treatment in patients with LGS, monitoring changes in GPFA may allow rapid titration of treatment parameters, rather than waiting for feedback from seizure diaries.

Acute Effects of High-Frequency Insular Stimulation on Interictal Epileptiform Discharge Rates in Patients with Refractory Epilepsy

Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of several sites, such as the thalamus, has been shown to reduce seizure frequency and interictal epileptiform activity in patients with refractory epilepsy. Recent findings have demonstrated that the insula is part of the ‘rich club’ of highly connected brain regions. This pilot study investigated short-term effects of high-frequency (HF) insular DBS on interictal epileptiform discharge (IED) rate in patients with refractory epilepsy. Methods: Six patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing an intracranial electroencephalographic study received two sets of 10 min continuous 150 Hz HF-DBS of the insula. For each patient, epileptiform activity was analyzed for a total of 80 min, starting 20 min prior to stimulation set 1 (S1), and ending 20 min after stimulation set 2 (S2). All IEDs were identified and classified according to their anatomic localization by a board-certified epileptologist. The IED rate during the 20 min preceding S1 served as a baseline for comparison with IED rate during S1, S2 and post-stimulation periods. Results: HF-DBS of the anterior insula (aINS) was performed in a patient with an aINS epileptic focus (patient 1). HF-DBS of the posterior insula (pINS) was performed in two patients with a pINS epileptic focus (patients 2 and 4), in one patient with an aINS focus (patient 3), and in two non-insular patients (patients 5 and 6). The total IED (irrespective of their location) rate significantly decreased (p < 0.01) in two patients (patients 1 and 2) during the stimulation period, whereas it significantly increased (p < 0.01) in one patient (patient 6); there was no change in the other three patients. Looking at subsets of spike localization, HF-DBS of the aINS significantly reduced aINS and orbitofrontal IEDs in patient 1 (p < 0.01), while HF-DBS of the pINS had an effect on pINS IEDs (p < 0.01) in both patients with a pINS focus; there was no significant effect of HF-DBS of the insula on IEDs in temporal or other frontal regions. Conclusion: Short-term HF-DBS of the insula had heterogeneous effects on the IED rate. Further work is required to examine factors underlying these heterogeneous effects, such as stimulation frequency, location of IEDs and subregions of the insula stimulated.

Towards network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy

Epilepsy is well-recognized as a disorder of brain networks. There is a growing body of research to identify critical nodes within dynamic epileptic networks with the aim to target therapies that halt the onset and propagation of seizures. In parallel, intracranial neuromodulation, including deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation, are well-established and expanding as therapies to reduce seizures in adults with focal-onset epilepsy; and there is emerging evidence for their efficacy in children and generalized-onset seizure disorders. The convergence of these advancing fields is driving an era of 'network-guided neuromodulation' for epilepsy. In this review, we distil the current literature on network mechanisms underlying neurostimulation for epilepsy. We discuss the modulation of key 'propagation points' in the epileptogenic network, focusing primarily on thalamic nuclei targeted in current clinical practice. These include (i) the anterior nucleus of thalamus, now a clinically approved and targeted site for open loop stimulation, and increasingly targeted for responsive neurostimulation; and (ii) the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus, a target for both deep brain stimulation and responsive neurostimulation in generalized-onset epilepsies. We discuss briefly the networks associated with other emerging neuromodulation targets, such as the pulvinar of the thalamus, piriform cortex, septal area, subthalamic nucleus, cerebellum and others. We report synergistic findings garnered from multiple modalities of investigation that have revealed structural and functional networks associated with these propagation points - including scalp and invasive EEG, and diffusion and functional MRI. We also report on intracranial recordings from implanted devices which provide us data on the dynamic networks we are aiming to modulate. Finally, we review the continuing evolution of network-guided neuromodulation for epilepsy to accelerate progress towards two translational goals: (i) to use pre-surgical network analyses to determine patient candidacy for neurostimulation for epilepsy by providing network biomarkers that predict efficacy; and (ii) to deliver precise, personalized and effective antiepileptic stimulation to prevent and arrest seizure propagation through mapping and modulation of each patients' individual epileptogenic networks.

Practical considerations in epilepsy neurostimulation

Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for clinicians managing patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple devices are available with long-term follow-up and real-world experience. The aim of this review is to give a practical summary of available neuromodulation techniques to guide the selection of modalities, focusing on patient selection for devices, common approaches and techniques for initiation of programming, and outpatient management issues. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (DBS-ANT), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are all supported by randomized controlled trials that show safety and a significant impact on seizure reduction, as well as a suggestion of reduction in the risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Significant seizure reductions are observed after 3 months for DBS, RNS, and VNS in randomized controlled trials, and efficacy appears to improve with time out to 7 to 10 years of follow-up for all modalities, albeit in uncontrolled follow-up or retrospective studies. A significant number of patients experience seizure-free intervals of 6 months or more with all three modalities. Number and location of epileptogenic foci are important factors affecting efficacy, and together with comorbidities such as severe mood or sleep disorders, may influence the choice of modality. Programming has evolved-DBS is typically initiated at lower current/voltage than used in the pivotal trial, whereas target charge density is lower with RNS, however generalizable optimal parameters are yet to be defined. Noninvasive brain stimulation is an emerging stimulation modality, although it is currently not used widely. In summary, clinical practice has evolved from those established in pivotal trials. Guidance is now available for clinicians who wish to expand their approach, and choice of neuromodulation technique may be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.