Hidden Noninnocence: Theoretical and Experimental Evidence for Redox Activity of a β-Diketiminate(1−) Ligand

Electrocatalytic Proton Reduction by a Cobalt Complex Containing a Proton-Responsive Bis(alkylimdazole)methane Ligand: Involvement of a C-H Bond in H2 Formation

Homogeneous electrocatalytic proton reduction is reported using cobalt complex [1](BF₄)₂. This complex comprises two bis(1‐methyl‐4,5‐diphenyl‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)methane (HBMIMPh2 ) ligands that contain an acidic methylene moiety in their backbone. Upon reduction of [1](BF₄)₂ by either electrochemical or chemical means, one of its HBMIMPh2 ligands undergoes deprotonation under the formation of dihydrogen. Addition of a mild proton source (acetic acid) to deprotonated complex [2](BF₄) regenerates protonated complex [1](BF₄)₂. In presence of acetic acid in acetonitrile solvent [1](BF₄)₂ shows electrocatalytic proton reduction with a k_obs of ≈200 s⁻¹ at an overpotential of 590 mV. Mechanistic investigations supported by DFT (BP86) suggest that dihydrogen formation takes place in an intramolecular fashion through the participation of a methylene C−H bond of the HBMIMPh2 ligand and a Co^II−H bond through formal heterolytic splitting of the latter. These findings are of interest to the development of responsive ligands for molecular (base)metal (electro)catalysis.

Evidence for Non-Innocence of a β-Diketonate Ligand

β-Diketonates, such as acetylacetonate, are amongst the most common bidentate ligands towards elements across the entire periodic table and are considered wholly redox-inactive in their complexes. Herein we show that complexation of 1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoroacetylacetonate (hfac^- ) to Cr^II spontaneously affords Cr^III and a reduced β-diketonate radical ligand scaffold, as evidenced by crystallographic analysis, magnetic measurements, optical spectroscopy, reactivity studies, and DFT calculations. The possibility of harnessing β-diketonates as electron reservoirs opens up possibilities for new metal-ligand concerted reactivity in the ubiquitous β-diketonate coordination chemistry.

Radical-Type Reactivity and Catalysis by Single-Electron Transfer to or from Redox-Active Ligands

Controlled ligand-based redox-activity and chemical non-innocence are rapidly gaining importance for selective (catalytic) processes. This Concept aims to provide an overview of the progress regarding ligand-to-substrate single-electron transfer as a relatively new mode of operation to exploit ligand-centered reactivity and catalysis based thereon.

Isolation of a TMTAA-Based Radical in Uranium bis-TMTAA Complexes

We report the synthesis, characterization, and electronic structure studies of a series of thorium(IV) and uranium(IV) bis-tetramethyltetraazaannulene complexes. These sandwich complexes show remarkable stability towards air and moisture, even at elevated temperatures. Electrochemical studies show the uranium complex to be stable in three different oxidation states; isolation of the oxidized species reveals a rare case of a non-innocent tetramethyltetraazaannulene (TMTAA) ligand.

Reversible Ligand-Centered Reduction in Low-Coordinate Iron Formazanate Complexes

Coordination of redox-active ligands to metals is a compelling strategy for making reduced complexes more accessible. In this work, we explore the use of redox-active formazanate ligands in low-coordinate iron chemistry. Reduction of an iron(II) precursor occurs at milder potentials than analogous non-redox-active β-diketiminate complexes, and the reduced three-coordinate formazanate-iron compound is characterized in detail. Structural, spectroscopic, and computational analysis show that the formazanate ligand undergoes reversible ligand-centered reduction to form a formazanate radical dianion in the reduced species. The less negative reduction potential of the reduced low-coordinate iron formazanate complex leads to distinctive reactivity with formation of a new N-I bond that is not seen with the β-diketiminate analogue. Thus, the storage of an electron on the supporting ligand changes the redox potential and enhances certain reactivity.

Discovering more non-innocence: triazenido versus triazenyl radical ligand function, and a comment on [NO2]n as a "suspect" ligand

The unusual suspects: Depending on co-ligands L(n) and the effects of substituents (R), the well-known triazenides [N(NR)2](-) may act as EPR detectable coordinated triazenyl ligands, [N(NR)2](·). They are thus new non-innocent ligands and are related to the hitherto unused non-innocent nitrogen dioxide ligand, [NO2](·).

Experimental and DFT evidence for the fractional non-innocence of a β-diketonate ligand

New compounds [Ru(pap)(2)(L)](ClO(4)), [Ru(pap)(L)(2)], and [Ru(acac)(2)(L)] (pap = 2-phenylazopyridine, L(-) = 9-oxidophenalenone, acac(-) = 2,4-pentanedionate) have been prepared and studied regarding their electron-transfer behavior, both experimentally and by using DFT calculations. [Ru(pap)(2)(L)](ClO(4)) and [Ru(acac)(2)(L)] were characterized by crystal-structure analysis. Spectroelectrochemistry (EPR, UV/Vis/NIR), in conjunction with cyclic voltammetry, showed a wide range of about 2 V for the potential of the Ru(III/II) couple, which was in agreement with the very different characteristics of the strongly π-accepting pap ligand and the σ-donating acac(-) ligand. At the rather high potential of +1.35 V versus SCE, the oxidation of L(-) into L(⋅) could be deduced from the near-IR absorption of [Ru(III)(pap)(L(⋅))(L(-))](2+). Other intense long-wavelength transitions, including LMCT (L(-) → Ru(III)) and LL/CT (pap(⋅-) → L(-)) processes, were confirmed by TD-DFT results. DFT calculations and EPR data for the paramagnetic intermediates allowed us to assess the spin densities, which revealed two cases with considerable contributions from L-radical-involving forms, that is, [Ru(III)(pap(0))(2)(L(-))](2+) ↔ [Ru(II)(pap(0))(2)(L(⋅))](2+) and [Ru(III)(pap(0))(L(-))(2)](+) ↔ [Ru(II)(pap(0))(L(⋅))(L(-))](+). Calculations of electrogenerated complex [Ru(II)(pap(⋅-))(pap(0))(L(-))] displayed considerable negative spin density (-0.188) at the bridging metal.

Manifestations of noninnocent ligand behavior

The potential of redox-active ligands to behave "noninnocently" in transition-metal coordination compounds is reflected with respect to various aspects and situations. These include the question of establishing "correct" oxidation states, the identification and characterization of differently charged radical ligands, the listing of structural and other consequences of ligand redox reactions, and the distinction between barrierless delocalized "resonance" cases M(n)/L(n) ↔ M(n+1)L(n-1) versus separated valence tautomer equilibrium situations M(n)/L(n) ⇌ M(n+1)L(n-1). Further ambivalence arises for dinuclear systems with radical bridge M(n)(μ-L(•))M(n) versus mixed-valent alternatives M(n+1)(μ-L(-))M(n), for noninnocent ligand-bridged coordination compounds of higher nuclearity such as (μ(3)-L)M(3), (μ(4)-L)M(4), (μ-L)(4)M(4), or coordination polymers. Conversely, the presence of more than one noninnocently behaving ligand at a single transition-metal site in situations such as L(n)-M-L(n-1) or L(•)-M-L(•) may give rise to corresponding ligand-to-ligand interaction phenomena (charge transfer, electron hopping, and spin-spin coupling) and to redox-induced electron transfer with counterintuitive oxidation-state changes. The relationships of noninnocent ligand behavior with excited-state descriptions and perspectives regarding material properties and single-electron or multielectron reactivity are also illustrated briefly.