Trajectory of Approach of a Zinc-Hydrogen Bond to Transition Metals

The Continuum Between Hexagonal Planar and Trigonal Planar Geometries

New heterometallic hydride complexes that involve the addition of {Mg-H} and {Zn-H} bonds to group 10 transition metals (Pd, Pt) are reported. The side-on coordination of a single {Mg-H} to Pd forms a well-defined σ-complex. In contrast, addition of three {Mg-H} or {Zn-H} bonds to Pd or Pt results in the formation of planar complexes with subtly different geometries. We compare their structures through experiment (X-ray diffraction, neutron diffraction, multinuclear NMR), computational methods (DFT, QTAIM, NCIPlot), and theoretical analysis (MO diagram, Walsh diagram). These species can be described as snapshots along a continuum of bonding between ideal trigonal planar and hexagonal planar geometries.

Reversible Oxidative Addition of Zinc Hydride at a Gallium(I)-Centre: Labile Mono- and Bis(hydridogallyl)zinc Complexes

In the presence of TMEDA (N,N,N',N'-tetramethylethylenediamine), partially deaggregated zinc dihydride as hydrocarbon suspensions react with the gallium(I) compound [(BDI)Ga] (I, BDI={HC(C(CH3 )N(2,6-iPr2 -C6 H3 ))2 }- ) by formal oxidative addition of a Zn-H bond to the gallium(I) centre. Dissociation of the labile TMEDA ligand in the resulting complex [(BDI)Ga(H)-(H)Zn(tmeda)] (1) facilitates insertion of a second equiv. of I into the remaining Zn-H to form a thermally sensitive trinuclear species [{(BDI)Ga(H)}2 Zn] (2). Compound 1 exchanges with polymeric zinc dideuteride [ZnD2 ]n in the presence of TMEDA, and with compounds I and 2 via sequential and reversible ligand dissociation and gallium(I) insertion. Spectroscopic and computational studies demonstrate the reversibility of oxidative addition of each Zn-H bond to the gallium(I) centres.

Supported σ-Complexes of Li-C Bonds from Coordination of Monomeric Molecules of LiCH3, LiCH2CH3 and LiC6H5 to MoMo Bonds

LiCH₃ and LiCH₂CH₃ react with the complex [Mo₂(H)₂(μ‐Ad^Dipp2)₂(thf)₂] (1⋅thf) with coordination of two molecules of LiCH₂R (R=H, CH₃) and formation of complexes [Mo₂{μ‐HLi(thf)CH₂R}₂(Ad^Dipp2)₂], 5⋅LiCH₃ and 5⋅LiCH₂CH₃, respectively (Ad^Dipp2=HC(NDipp)₂; Dipp=2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃; thf=C₄H₈O). Due to steric hindrance, only one molecule of LiC₆H₅ adds to 1⋅thf generating the complex [Mo₂(H){μ‐HLi(thf)C₆H₅}(μ‐Ad^Dipp2)₂], (4⋅LiC₆H₅). Computational studies disclose the existence of five‐center six‐electron bonding within the H−Mo≣Mo−C−Li metallacycles, with a mostly covalent H−Mo≣Mo−C group and predominantly ionic Li−C and Li−H interactions. However, the latter bonds exhibit non‐negligible covalency, as indicated by X‐ray, computational data and the large one‐bond ^6,7Li,¹H and ^6,7Li,¹³C NMR coupling constants found for the three‐atom H−Li−C chains. By contrast, the phenyl group in 4⋅LiC₆H₅ coordinates in an η² fashion to the lithium atom through the ipso and one of the ortho carbon atoms.

Palladium-Catalysed C-H Bond Zincation of Arenes: Scope, Mechanism, and the Role of Heterometallic Intermediates

Catalytic methods that transform C-H bonds into C-X bonds are of paramount importance in synthesis. A particular focus has been the generation of organoboranes, organosilanes and organostannanes from simple hydrocarbons (X=B, Si, Sn). Despite the importance of organozinc compounds (X=Zn), their synthesis by the catalytic functionalisation of C-H bonds remains unknown. Herein, we show that a palladium catalyst and zinc hydride reagent can be used to transform C-H bonds into C-Zn bonds. The new catalytic C-H zincation protocol has been applied to a variety of arenes-including fluoroarenes, heteroarenes, and benzene-with high chemo- and regioselectivity. A mechanistic study shows that heterometallic Pd-Zn complexes play a key role in catalysis. The conclusions of this work are twofold; the first is that valuable organozinc compounds are finally accessible by catalytic C-H functionalisation, the second is that heterometallic complexes are intimately involved in bond-making and bond-breaking steps of C-H functionalisation.

Metal-only Lewis Pairs of Rhodium with s, p and d-Block Metals

Metal-only Lewis pairs (MOLPs) in which the two metal fragments are solely connected by a dative M→M bond represent privileged architectures to acquire fundamental understanding of bimetallic bonding. This has important implications in many catalytic processes or supramolecular systems that rely on synergistic effects between two metals. However, a systematic experimental/computational approach on a well-defined class of compounds is lacking. Here we report a family of MOLPs constructed around the RhI precursor [(η5 -C5 Me5 )Rh(PMe3 )2 ] (1) with a series of s, p and d-block metals, mostly from the main group elements, and investigate their bonding by computational means. Among the new MOLPs, we have structurally characterized those formed by dative bonding between 1 and MgMeBr, AlMe3 , GeCl2 , SnCl2 , ZnMe2 and Zn(C6 F5 )2, as well as spectroscopically identified the ones resulting from coordination to MBArF (M=Na, Li; BArF - =[B(C6 H2 -3,5-(CF3 )2 )4 ]- ) and CuCl. Some of these compounds represent unique examples of bimetallic structures, such as the first unambiguous cases of Rh→Mg dative bonding or base-free rhodium bound germylene and stannylene species. Multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, including 103 Rh NMR, is used to probe the formation of Rh→M bonds. A comprehensive theoretical analysis of those provides clear trends. As anticipated, greater bond covalency is found for the more electronegative acids, whereas ionic character dominates for the least electronegative nuclei, though some degree of electron sharing is identified in all cases.

Structural Snapshots of π-Arene Bonding in a Gold Germylene Cation

Heavier group 14 element cations exhibit a remarkable reactivity that has typically hampered their isolation. For the few available examples, the role of π‐arene interactions is crucial to provide kinetic stabilization, but dynamic and structural information on those contacts is yet limited. In this study we have accessed the metalogermylenium cation [(PMe₂Ar^Dipp2)AuGe(Ar^Dipp2)Cl]⁺ (4⁺) (Ar^Dipp2=C₆H₃‐2,6‐(C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂)₂) that has been structurally characterized with three different non‐coordinating counter anions. These studies provide for the first time dynamic information about the conformational rearrangement that characterizes π‐arene bonding thorough a series of X‐ray diffraction structural snapshots. Computational studies reveal the weak character of the π‐arene bonding (ca. 2 kcal mol⁻¹) that can be described as the donation from a π_C=C bond toward the empty p valence orbital of germanium.