Cyclooligomerization with Transition Metal Catalysts

An elusive thermal [2 + 2] cycloaddition driven by visible light photocatalysis: tapping into strain to access C2-symmetric tricyclic rings

A mild and operationally simple methodology is reported for the synthesis of cyclobutane rings imbedded within a C2-symmetric tricyclic framework. The method uses visible light and an iridium-based photocatalyst to drive the oft-stated "forbidden" thermal [2 + 2] cycloaddition of cycloheptenes and analogs. Importantly, it generates cyclobutane with four new stereocenters with excellent stereoselectivity, and perfect regioselectivity. The reaction is propelled forward when the photocatalyst absorbs a visible light photon, which transfers this energy to the cycloheptene. Key to success is, upon excitation to the triplet via sensitization from the photocatalyst, the double bond isomerizes to give the transient, highly strained, trans-cycloheptene. The trans-cycloheptene undergoes a strain relieving thermal, intermolecular [π2s + π2a] cycloaddition with another cis-cycloheptene. X-ray analysis reveals that the major product is the head-to-head, C2-symmetric all trans-cyclobutane. Additionally, a dramatic display structural complexity enhancement is observed with the use of chiral cycloheptenols possessing one stereocenter, which results in the formation of cyclobutanes with six contiguous stereocenters with good to excellent diastereocontrol, and can be used to isolate single stereoisomers of stereochemically complex cyclobutanes in good yield.

Catalytic Cyclooligomerization of Enones with Three Methylene Equivalents

Cyclic structures are highly represented in organic molecules, motivating a wealth of catalytic methods targeting their synthesis. Among the various ring-forming processes, cyclooligomerization reactions possess several attractive features but require addressing a unique challenge associated with controlling ring-size selectivity. Here we describe the catalytic reductive cocyclooligomerization of an enone and three carbene equivalents to generate a cyclopentane, a process that constitutes a formal [2 + 1 + 1 + 1]-cycloaddition. The reaction is promoted by a (quinox)Ni catalyst and uses CH₂Cl₂/Zn as the C₁ component. Mechanistic studies are consistent with a metallacycle-based pathway, featuring sequential migratory insertions of multiple carbene equivalents to yield cycloalkanes larger than cyclopropanes.

Mechanism, reactivity, and selectivity of nickel-catalyzed [4 + 4 + 2] cycloadditions of dienes and alkynes

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations with B3LYP and M06 functionals elucidated the reactivities of alkynes and Z/E selectivity of cyclodecatriene products in the Ni-catalyzed [4 + 4 + 2] cycloadditions of dienes and alkynes. The Ni-mediated oxidative cyclization of butadienes determines the Z/E selectivity. Only the oxidative cyclization of one s-cis to one s-trans butadiene is facile and exergonic, leading to the observed 1Z,4Z,8E-cyclodecatriene product. The same step with two s-cis or s-trans butadienes is either kinetically or thermodynamically unfavorable, and the 1Z,4E,8E- and 1Z,4Z,8Z-cyclodecatriene isomers are not observed in experiments. In addition, the competition between the desired cooligomerization and [2 + 2 + 2] cycloadditions of alkynes depends on the coordination of alkynes. With either electron-deficient alkynes or alkynes with free hydroxyl groups, the coordination of alkynes is stronger than that of dienes, and alkyne trimerization prevails. With alkyl-substituted alkynes, the generation of alkyne-coordinated nickel complex is much less favorable, and the [4 + 4 + 2] cycloaddition occurs.

An approach to mimicking the sesquiterpene cyclase phase by nickel-promoted diene/alkyne cooligomerization

Artificially mimicking the cyclase phase of terpene biosynthesis inspires the invention of new methodologies, since working with carbogenic frameworks containing minimal functionality limits the chemist's toolbox of synthetic strategies. For example, the construction of terpene skeletons from five-carbon building blocks would be an exciting pathway to mimic in the laboratory. Nature oligomerizes, cyclizes, and then oxidizes γ,γ-dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) and isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) to all of the known terpenes. Starting from isoprene, the goal of this work was to mimic Nature's approach for rapidly building molecular complexity. In principle, the controlled oligomerization of isoprene would drastically simplify the synthesis of terpenes used in the medicine, perfumery, flavor, and materials industries. This article delineates our extensive efforts to cooligomerize isoprene or butadiene with alkynes in a controlled fashion by zerovalent nickel catalysis building off the classic studies by Wilke and co-workers.

[Ni0]-Catalyzed Co-oligomerization of 1,3-Butadiene and Ethylene: A Theoretical Mechanistic Investigation of Competing Routes for Generation of Linear and Cyclic C10-Olefins

A detailed theoretical investigation of the mechanism for the [Ni(0)]-catalyzed co-oligomerization of 1,3-butadiene and ethylene to afford linear and cyclic C(10)-olefins is presented. Crucial elementary processes have been carefully explored for a tentative catalytic cycle, employing a gradient-corrected density functional theory (DFT) method. The favorable route for oxidative coupling starts from the prevalent [Ni(0)(eta(2)-butadiene)(2)(ethylene)] form of the active catalyst through oxidative coupling between the two eta(2)-butadienes. The initial eta(3),eta(1)(C(1))-octadienediyl-Ni(II) product is the active precursor for ethylene insertion, which preferably takes place into the syn-eta(3)-allyl-Ni(II) bond of the prevalent eta(3)-syn,eta(1)(C(1)),Delta-cis isomer. The insertion is driven by a strong thermodynamic force, giving rise entirely to eta(3),eta(1),Delta-trans-decatrienyl-Ni(II) forms, with the eta(3)-anti,eta(1),Delta-trans isomer almost exclusively generated. Occurrence of allyl,eta(1),Delta-cis isomers, however, is precluded on both kinetic and thermodynamic grounds, thereby rationalizing the observation that cis-DT and cis,cis-CDD are never formed. Linear and cyclic C(10)-olefins are generated in a highly stereoselective fashion, with trans-DT and cis,trans-CDD as the only isomers, along competing routes of stepwise transition-metal-assisted H-transfer (DT) and reductive CC elimination under ring closure (CDD), respectively, that start from the prevalent eta(3)-anti,eta(1),Delta-trans-decatrienyl-Ni(II) species. The role of allylic conversion in the octadienediyl-Ni(II) and decatrienyl-Ni(II) complexes has been analyzed. As a result of the detailed exploration of all important elementary steps, a theoretically verified, refined catalytic cycle is proposed and the regulation of the selectivity for formation of linear and cyclic C(10)-olefins is elucidated.

[Ni(0)L]-catalyzed cyclodimerization of 1,3-butadiene: a comprehensive density functional investigation based on the generic [(C(4)H(6))(2)Ni(0)PH(3)] catalyst

We present a comprehensive theoretical investigation of the mechanism for cyclodimerization of butadiene by the generic [bis(butadiene)Ni(0)PH(3)] catalyst employing a gradient-corrected DFT method. We have explored all critical elementary steps of the whole catalytic cycle, namely, oxidative coupling of two butadienes, reductive elimination under ring closure, and allylic isomerization. Oxidative coupling of two butadienes in the [bis(butadiene)Ni(0)L] complex and reductive elimination in the [(bis(eta(3))-octadienediyl)Ni(II)L] species take place under different stereocontrol, which makes isomerization indispensable. Commencing from a preestablished equilibrium between several configurations of the [(octadienediyl)Ni(II)L] complex, the major cyclodimer products, namely, VCH, cis-1,2-DVCB, and cis,cis-COD, are formed along competing reaction paths via reductive elimination, which is found to be the overall rate-determining step. Careful exploration of different possible conceivable routes revealed that bis(eta(1)) species are not involved as critical intermediates either in reductive elimination or in isomerization along the most feasible pathway. The regulation of the selectivity of the cyclodimer formation based on both thermodynamic and kinetic considerations is outlined.