Comparative analysis of various extraction processes based on economy, eco-friendly, purity and recovery of polyhydroxyalkanoate: A review.
Int J Biol Macromol 2021;
183:1881-1890. [PMID:
34090850 DOI:
10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.007]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Bioplastics have been an interesting area of research and development in the last few decades. Normal plastics are made out of petroleum products, which is a non-renewable resource. Apart from that, its non-biodegradable nature makes it a serious threat to the environment, and hence a better alternative is needed. Bioplastics are synthesized by microorganisms and are biodegradable; this property makes them a promising alternative to normal plastic. However, the major drawback related to bioplastic is the high cost of its production. Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) is a very popular biopolymer produced by different types of microbes. The review focuses on the different methods of extraction of PHA based on the percentage of purity, recovery, eco-friendly, and cost-effectiveness. There is a wide array of extraction methods reported to date, wherein there is the involvement of different types of solvents (like halogenated, non-halogenated, and green solvents) or mechanical or enzymatic methods. Each extraction process has its advantages and disadvantages. In this study, we have attempted to present a structured comparison of these different methods and highlight the factors that can be addressed for better extraction of PHA thereby making it a feasible alternative to commercial synthetic plastic.
Collapse