Thermal degradation and aging behavior of polytriazole polyethylene oxide‐tetrahydrofuran elastomer based on click‐chemistry

Preparation and Performances of Polyether Polytriazole Elastomers Based on Click Chemistry

Since the polyurethane elastomer synthesis process is susceptible to moisture, polytriazole polyethylene oxide-tetrahydrofuran (PTPET) elastomer was used as a replacement owing to its mild production environment. In contrast to the conventional flask-synthesis method, the twin-screw reactor instrument could provide more meaningful data in the synthesis. In this study, PTPET elastomer was prepared by the MiniLab twin-screw reactor method for the first time, and the activation energy of the PTPET elastomer was calculated using the torque variation obtained from the MiniLab twin-screw reactor during the synthesis process at two different temperatures. The addition of flame retardants could endow the composites with more useful properties. The PTPET composites poly (phenylsilsesquioxane) (PTPET-PPSQ), octaphenyl polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (PTPET-OPS) and PTPET-PhVPOSS (phenyl/vinyl polysilsesquioxane) were synthesized by using the MiniLab twin-screw reactor. The prepared PTPET elastomer and composites were fully characterized by FT-IR, TG, DSC, swelling test, mechanical test, SEM and combustion test. The characterization results show that the addition of the flame retardants has little influence on the original structure and properties of PTPET elastomer. The flame retardancy was characterized by the combustion test showing that all PTPET composites form a certain thickness of char layer during the burning process. These results indicate that the addition of flame retardants maintains the outstanding properties of PTPET elastomer and also endows the materials with a certain extent of flame retardancy; thus, it is believed to be a good engineering material that could be applied in many realms.

Curing Behaviors of Alkynyl-Terminated Copolyether with Glycidyl Azide Polymer in Energetic Plasticizers

Alkynyl-terminated polyethylene oxide−tetrahydrofuran (ATPET) and glycidyl azide polymer (GAP) could be linked through click-chemistry between the alkynyl and azide, and the product may serve a binder for solid propellants. The effects of the energetic plasticizers A3 [1:1 mixture of bis-(2,2-dinitropropy) acetal (BDNPA) and bis-(2,2-dinitropropyl) formal(BDNPN)] and Bu-NENA [N-butyl-N-(2nitroxyethyl) nitramine] on the curing reaction between ATPET and GAP have been studied. A diffusion-ordered nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (DOSY-NMR) approach has been used to monitor the change in the diffusion coefficient of cross-linked polytriazole polyethylene oxide−tetrahydrofuran (PTPET). The change in the diffusion coefficient of PTPET with A3 plasticizer is significantly higher than that of PTPET with Bu-NENA. Viscosity analysis further highlighted the difference between A3 and Bu-NENA in the curing process—the curing curve of PTPET (A3) with time can be divided into two stages, with an inflection point being observed on the fourth day. For PTPET (Bu-NENA), in contrast, only one stage is seen. The above methods, together with gel permeation chromatography (GPC) analysis, revealed distinct effects of A3 and Bu-NENA on the curing process of PTPET. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) analysis showed that Bu-NENA has little effect on the valence oxidation of copper in the catalyst. Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis indicated that Bu-NENA helps to improve the thermal stability of the catalyst. After analysis of several possible factors by means of XPS, modeling with Material Studio and TG, the formation of molecular cages between Bu-NENA and copper is considered to be the reason for the above differences. In this article, GAP (Mn = 4000 g/mol) was used to replace GAP (Mn = 427 g/mol) to successfully synthesize the PTPET elastomer with Bu-NENA plasticizer. Mechanical data measured for the PTPET (Bu-NENA) sample included ε = 34.26 ± 2.98%, and σ = 0.198 ± 0.015 MPa.