Chronic arthritis in the United States Health Examination Survey

US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Arthritis Initiatives, Methodologies and Data

The US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) has collected population-based, nationally representative examination, laboratory, and radiographic data for arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases for more than 50 years. The resulting body of data and publications are substantial, yet much data remain unpublished. This review provides a basic understanding of the design and capabilities of the NHANES survey, reviewing the major accomplishments in the area of arthritis and musculoskeletal diseases. Currently available US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey arthritis-related datasets are identified. Guidelines for using these data, and opportunities for data analysis and designing future studies are presented.

A community model for arthritis rehabilitation

Arthritis is a widespread chronic disease which can result in severe disability. Arthritis is best managed by a triad of treatment, education, and research. A community model for arthritis rehabilitation, with emphasis on the team approach, is described and illustrated. Central to the design of the model is an arthritis centre which demonstrates exemplary treatment and has a commitment to develop education and research programs. Primary arthritis care is the responsibility of the health professionals in each community, and the arthritis centre provides the support and resources for their programs. The model is suggested as a prototype for the management of other major chronic diseases.

Etiological, social and therapeutical aspects of osteoarthrosis and soft-tissue rheumatism in a Finnish health centre material

A study of 690 osteoarthrosis (OA) patients with corresponding controls, and 475 soft-tissue rheumatism (STR) patients with the same number of controls was made in Finnish health centres. The aim of the study was to clarify certain etiological, social and therapeutical aspects. No clear differences were found in the working conditions of patients with OA, STR, or their controls, or in their occupational classes. OA patients were less satisfied with their working conditions than were the other. OA and STR patients had been more actively engaged in sports earlier in life, but during the study there were no differences; nor did the localisation of OA differ. The weight index qas slightly higher in OA, particularly when knee and ankle were affected, but not with arthrosis of the hip. There were no clear associations with other diseases. The maximum duration of a treatment period in this study was 1 month. The average sick leave in OA was 17.8 days, in STR 13.4 and in controls 15.4 days. After treatment, 31% of OA patients, and 56% of STR were recommended to resume work; 4% were recommended to change their occupation; 21% of OA and 7% of STR patients were recommended to retire on pension. Sulindac, indomethacin and many other drug combinations were used for medication. Certain side effects were found in about 5% of sulindac- and in 8-10% of indomethacin-treated patients. In 17% of OA and in 12% of STR patients, it was found necessary to consult a specialist for diagnosis or treatment.