A comparison of changes seen on radiographs of rheumatoid arthritis patients in Australia and in China

The epidemiology of hip osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis in the Orient

The prevalence of hip osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis has been found to be lower in Chinese, Japanese, and other Asian populations than in whites. The low prevalence of osteoarthritis hip in the Chinese and Japanese populations cannot be explained by the rarity of hip dysplasia, which is as prevalent in those two populations as in whites. As in other populations, rheumatoid arthritis in the Chinese is associated with the shared epitope of the third hypervariable region of the DR gene. However, the low prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the Chinese cannot be accounted for entirely by genetic factors.

Rheumatoid arthritis in the northeastern area of the People's Republic of China and western Japan

The clinical features of 134 consecutive hospitalized patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the northeastern area of the People's Republic of China and 251 consecutive hospitalized patients from western Japan were compared. A total of 91.8% of the Chinese patients were of Han nationality, while all of the patients from Japan were Japanese. The patients in the People's Republic of China showed more inflammatory articular disease and more frequent subcutaneous nodules than did the Japanese patients in the presence of a less elevated ESR value and less radiographic joint destruction. The clinical features of the patients of Han nationality and the Japanese did not change even after adjusting the patients' age and disease duration. The reasons for the contradictory features in the Chinese patients still remain to be clarified. This study is hopefully a first step in promoting more precise studies on rheumatoid arthritis in the People's Republic of China.

Rheumatoid arthritis "in the buff": erosive arthritis in defleshed bones

Examination of isolated bones from patients with unequivocal rheumatoid arthritis provides only a glimpse of the disease but has been the only "gold standard" for recognition of osseous lesions as compatible with the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Documentation of skeletal pathologic changes in confidently diagnosed individuals has been a major missing link in the transition from clinical to skeletal analysis. Availability of appropriate skeletal material from two patients with long-standing, well-documented rheumatoid arthritis provided the opportunity for acquiring such information. The osseous appearance, skeletal distribution, and distinguishing features of rheumatoid arthritis "in the buff" were delineated in two contemporary patients and in a skeletal population of 2,906 individuals. The preconceived notion of anticipated severity of disease has hereby been tested and found wanting. Severe lesions are not recognizable or distinguishable from artifact in relatively fragile rheumatoid arthritis-affected bones, whether freshly prepared or remotely sampled. Characterization of the nature and epidemiology of osseous alterations in two contemporary skeletal populations permitted the development of a standard for recognition of the disease in skeletal populations.