Aminobisphosphonate inhibition of interleukin-1-induced bone resorption in mouse calvariae

Bisphosphonates regulate cell growth and gene expression in the UMR 106-01 clonal rat osteosarcoma cell line

Local growth of osteosarcoma involves destruction of host bone by proteolytic mechanisms and/or host osteoclast activation. Osteoclast formation and activity are regulated by osteoblast-derived factors such as the osteoclast differentiating factor, receptor activator of NF-kappaB ligand (RANKL) and the inhibitor osteoprotegerin (OPG). We have investigated the in vitro effects of bisphosphonates on a clonal rat osteosarcoma cell line. The aminobisphosphonate pamidronate was added to UMR 106-01 cell cultures (10(-8)M to 10(-4)M up to 5 days). The non-aminobisphosphonate clodronate was administered for the same time periods (10(-6)M to 10(-2)M). Cell proliferation, apoptosis and mRNA expression was assessed. Both agents inhibited cell proliferation in a time- and dose-dependent manner. ELISA analysis demonstrated an increase in DNA fragmentation although there was no significant dose-related difference between the doses studied. Bisphosphonate-treated cultures had a greater subpopulation of cells exhibiting morphological changes of apoptosis. Expression of mRNA for osteopontin and RANKL was down-regulated by both agents, while the expression of mRNA for alkaline phosphatase, pro-alpha1(I) collagen and OPG was not altered. Out in vitro work suggests the bisphosphonates not only have direct effects on osteosarcoma cell growth and apoptosis, but also, by altering the relative expression of osteoclast-regulating factors, they may inhibit the activity of osteoclasts and their recruitment.

A risk-benefit assessment of slow-acting antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis

There is no ideal slow-acting antirheumatic drug. Therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is currently being modified, with strong recommendations to abandon the traditional pyramidal approach. The call is for a more aggressive, earlier approach to suppress inflammation. Combination therapy rather than the use of a single agent is advocated by some. Improved methods for assessing disease activity as well as measurement of outcome have been developed. Markers of poor prognosis have helped to define patients for earlier treatment. Comparison of toxicity among such a diverse group of drugs is probably best achieved with a toxicity index measuring the number of episodes expressed in terms of patient-years of exposure. Toxicity remains the commonest reason for discontinuing an agent, while remission beyond 36 months on therapy is uncommon, except with methotrexate. The profile of toxicity is clearly defined for individual agents, but combination therapy may reveal an entirely different set of toxic manifestations. There is an urgent need to develop a set of risk factors to predict toxicity in an individual patient. Juvenile chronic arthritis behaves differently from adult RA. Drug toxicity profiles are similar, but less common. Outcome is more difficult to measure, with the major impact of disease and therapy being on growth retardation.