Limited effects of intravenous IgG in treating systemic lupus erythematosus--associated thrombocytopenia

Intravenous Immunoglobulins as Immunomodulators in Autoimmune Diseases and Reproductive Medicine

Intravenous administration of immunoglobulins has been routinely used for more than 60 years in clinical practice, developed initially as replacement therapy in immunodeficiency disorders. Today, the use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) is embedded in the modern algorithms for the management of a few diseases, while in most cases, their application is off-label and thus different from their registered therapeutic indications according to the summary of product characteristics. In this review, we present the state-of-the-art use of IVIGs in various autoimmune conditions and immune-mediated disorders associated with reproductive failure, as approved therapy, based on indications or off-label. IVIGs are often an alternative to other treatments, and the administration of IVIGs continues to expand as data accumulate. Additionally, new insights into the pathophysiology of immune-mediated disorders have been gained. Therefore, the need for immunomodulation has increased, where IVIG therapy represents an option for stimulating, inhibiting and regulating various immune processes.

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in vasculitis and connective tissue disorders

Vasculitis syndromes and connective tissue disorders are heterogeneous and mostly rare multisystem disorders with various autoimmune mechanisms driving tissue inflammation and remodeling, ischemic and hemorrhagic tissue damage. While the nervous system can be affected by most of these diseases, the pathogenesis for neural involvement is often ambiguous and elusive for the clinician. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) have been used for the treatment of most of these disorders. However, a thorough review of the literature indicates that the role for IVIG has to be discussed for individual entities, has often only anecdotal evidence, and is particularly hard to define with respect to neurological manifestations. This review gathers the available evidence on the efficacy of IVIG in neurologically relevant rheumatic diseases, leading to recommendations for their clinical use.

High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins: an option in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

Despite encouraging reports on the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the clinical value of this treatment is not well established, and most of the data are based on case reports and small series of patients. IVIG has been used successfully to treat SLE patients with a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, such as refractory thrombocytopenia, pancytopenia, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, secondary antiphospholipid syndrome, and lupus nephritis. The beneficial effects of IVIG on overall disease activity are usually prompt, with marked improvement within a few days, but they are often of limited duration. Improvement lasts for several weeks after the last infusion, although clinical response could be maintained by continuous monthly IVIG infusions. IVIG therapy immunomodulates autoimmune diseases by interacting with various Fcgamma receptors in such a way that it downregulates activating FcRIIA and FcRIIC and/or upregulates inhibitory FcRIIB. However, in SLE, additional mechanisms include inhibition of complement-mediated damage, modulation of production of cytokines and cytokine antagonists, modulation of T- and B-lymphocyte function, induction of apoptosis in lymphocytes and monocytes, downregulation of autoantibody production, manipulation of the idiotypic network, and neutralization of pathogenic autoantibodies. At present, IVIG in SLE is indicated either in severe cases that are nonresponsive to other therapeutic modalities, or when SLE can be controlled only with high-dose steroids; in such patients, IVIG thus becomes a useful steroid-sparing agent. However, this needs to be confirmed in double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Immunoglobulin for rheumatic diseases in the twenty-first century: take it or leave it?

There is no simple answer to the question: intravenous immunoglobulin-take it or leave it? A thorough review of the current data on mechanisms of action, efficacy, and safety of intravenous immunoglobulins in rheumatic diseases demonstrates that the answer depends on the disease and the patients involved.

Treatment of lupus nephritis

Renal involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a serious complication of the disease. However, the prognosis of patients with lupus nephritis is continually improving with 10-year survival rates now greater than 75%. This improvement reflects earlier diagnosis due to more sensitive and specific diagnostic tests, better clinical appreciation of the natural history, and improved treatment of SLE and its manifestations. This review of the treatment of lupus nephritis has graded the level of evidence of specific treatment using the guidelines of the US Preventive Service Task Force. Although many new treatments have been advocated, the best evidence for treating proliferative lupus nephritis relies on a strategy combining specific treatment of the SLE as well as generalised treatment of the associated comorbidities. This strategy involves a combination of corticosteroids and cytotoxic agents plus or minus the adjunctive use of antimalarials, coordinated aggressive management of hypertension, proteinuria, infections, dyslipidaemia, thrombotic coagulopathy and potential renal replacement therapies.

Treatment of rheumatic diseases in children: special considerations

The goals of treatment of rheumatic diseases in children are to control the disease process while ensuring normal nutrition, growth, and development. The choice of antirheumatic drugs is similar in children and adults, but the doses, treatment schedules, and susceptibility to toxicity can differ considerably. In addition to differences between adult and pediatric diseases themselves, it is important for the rheumatologist who treats children to be cognizant of the impact of nutritional, developmental, and growth issues and differential susceptibility to toxicity of various treatments.